• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.349-361
• /
• 2009

In this paper, we derive the approximate maximum likelihood estimators of the shape parameter and the scale parameter in a Weibull distribution under multiply Type-II censoring by the approximate maximum likelihood estimation method. We develop three modified empirical distribution function type tests for the Weibull distribution based on multiply Type-II censored samples. We also propose modified normalized sample Lorenz curve plot and new test statistic.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.1335-1344
• /
• 2008

The maximum likelihood method does not admit explicit solutions when the sample is multiply censored and progressive censored. So we shall propose some approximate maximum likelihood estimators (AMLEs) of the scale parameter for the power function distribution based on multiply Type-II censored samples and progressive Type-II censored samples when shape parameter is known. We compare the proposed estimators in the sense of the mean squared error (MSE) through Monte Carlo simulation for various censoring schemes.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.793-801
• /
• 2007

For multiply Type-II censored samples from a half-triangle distribution, the maximum likelihood method does not admit explicit solutions. In this case, we propose some explicit estimators of the location parameter in the half-triangle distribution by the approximate maximum likelihood methods. We compare the proposed estimators in the sense of the mean squared error for various censored samples.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.109-118
• /
• 2013

We propose a method for estimating coefficients of AR (autoregressive) model which named MLPAR (Maximum Likelihood of Pearson system for Auto-Regressive model). In the present method for estimating coefficients of AR model, there is an assumption that residual or error term of the model follows the normal distribution. In common cases, we can observe that the error of AR model does not follow the normal distribution. So the normal assumption will cause decreasing prediction accuracy of AR model. In the paper, we propose the MLPAR which does not assume the normal distribution of error term. The MLPAR estimates coefficients of auto-regressive model and distribution moments of residual by using pearson distribution system and maximum likelihood estimation. Comparing proposed method to auto-regressive model, results are shown to verify improved performance of the MLPAR in terms of prediction accuracy.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.345-354
• /
• 2010

The Gamma Distribution is widely used in Engineering and Industrial applications. Estimation of parameters is revisited in the two-parameter Gamma distribution. The parameters are estimated by minimizing the likelihood ratios. A comparative study between the method of moments, the maximum likelihood method, the method of product spacings, and minimization of three different likelihood ratios is performed using simulation. For the scale parameter, the maximum likelihood estimate performs better and for the shape parameter, the product spacings estimate performs better. Among the three likelihood ratio statistics considered, the Anderson-Darling statistic has inferior performance compared to the Cramer-von-Misses statistic and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic.

• 한국전자파학회논문지
• /
• 제30권5호
• /
• pp.365-372
• /
• 2019

본 논문에서는 일반화우도비검정(generalized likelihood ratio test: GLRT)에 있는 모르는 파라미터(표적의 크기, 클러터의 파라미터)를 최대우도추정(maximum likelihood estimation: MLE) 방법 또는 Newton-Raphson method를 통해 추정하는 방법에 대해서 제안하였다. 클러터 환경에서 표적을 탐지할 경우, 실제 환경과 유사하게 클러터의 수식적인 모델을 세우는 것이 중요하다. 이러한 서로 상관된 클러터 모델은 SIRV(Spherically Invariant Random Vector)를 이용하여 생성할 수 있다. 생성된 클러터 모델에 대한 일반화우도비검정 식을 세우고, 추정된 파라미터에 대한 일반화우도비검정의 탐지확률을 모의실험을 통해 확인하였다.

• 한국데이터정보과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국데이터정보과학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2004

We consider the problem of estimating the scale parameter of the Weibull distribution based on multiply Type-II censord samples. We propose some estimators by using the approximate maximum likelihood estimation method. The proposed estimators are compared in the sense of the mean squared error.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.29-39
• /
• 2013

This paper derives maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) and some approximate MLEs (AMLEs) of unknown parameters of the generalized exponential distribution when data are lower record values. We derive approximate Bayes estimators through importance sampling and obtain corresponding Bayes predictive intervals for unknown parameters for lower record values from the generalized exponential distribution. For illustrative purposes, we examine the validity of the proposed estimation method by using real and simulated data.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.593-603
• /
• 2004

We consider the problem of estimating the scale parameter of the Weibull distribution based on multiply Type-II censored samples. We propose two estimators by using the approximate maximum likelihood estimation method for Weibull and extreme value distributions. The proposed estimators are compared in the sense of the mean squared error.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2009

Negative binomial yield model for semiconductor manufacturing consists of two parameters which are the average number of defects per die and the clustering parameter. Estimating the clustering parameter is quite complex because the parameter has not clear closed form. In this paper, a Bayesian approach using Markov Chain Monte Carlo is proposed to estimate the clustering parameter. To find an appropriate estimation method for the clustering parameter, two typical estimators, the method of moments estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator, and the proposed Bayesian estimator are compared with respect to the mean absolute deviation between the real yield and the estimated yield. Experimental results show that both the proposed Bayesian estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator have excellent performance and the choice of method depends on the purpose of use.