• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.169-196
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study was to improve academic achievement and mathematics learning attitudes in the formative assessment using descriptive problems as an effective teaching method. In this paper we set the following research questions. First, how would you improve students' academic achievement utilizing descriptive evaluation? Second, how would improve students' mathematics learning attitudes utilizing descriptive evaluation? Third, what was the reaction utilizing the descriptive method to evaluate? The result of this study could be seen as follows. The experimental group than the control group on academic achievement shows a significant improvement. Second, the experimental group compared to the control group in mathematics learning attitude changes could be helpful and appreciated. Third, experimental group than in the control group indicates significance could be seen in the reaction.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.79-98
• /
• 2010

To analyze the relationships between self-control, thinking quality and mathematical academic achievement, 197 senior school students were asked to complete questionnaires called "self-control ability on mathematics for middle school students" and "thinking quality for senior school students." The results were as follows: (1) There was strongly positive relevance between self-control ability, thinking quality and mathematical academic achievement. (2) A model was presented in which self-control ability had a direct impact on mathematical academic achievement, meanwhile had indirectly influenced mathematical academic achievement by thinking quality which acted as the intermediate variable. Thinking quality had a direct impact on mathematical academic achievement, too. (3) There's no significant difference between the two groups of boys and girls on the structural weights.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제61권1호
• /
• pp.127-156
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 한국교육종단연구2013의 초등학교 6학년부터 중학교 3학년까지의 학생 데이터들을 활용하여 수학 학업성취도의 종단적인 변화양상에 따른 학업적 자아개념 및 교사와 부모의 학업적 지원이 수학 학업성취도에 미치는 직·간접적인 영향력을 종단적으로 살펴보았다. 분석결과, 그룹별 학업적 자아개념은 수학 학업성취도에 긍정적인 영향력을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 교사와 부모의 학업적 지원은 학업적 자아개념을 매개로 하여 수학 학업성취도에 긍정적인 영향력을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 학업적 자아개념과 수학 수직척도점수에 미치는 직·간접적인 영향력은 부모의 학업적 지원 보다 교사의 학업적 지원이 더 많은 영향력을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 점에 따른 교육적인 함의점을 논의하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.525-544
• /
• 2020

학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 다양하며, 요인들이 미치는 영향 또한 복합적으로 일어난다. 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인들은 끊임없이 변화하기 때문에 성장을 예측·분석하는 종단연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 서울교육종단 연구의 2014년도(중학교 2학년)부터 2017년(고등학교 2학년)까지의 종단자료를 활용하여 수학 학업성취도의 종단적인 변화양상이 유사한 그룹으로 나누고 그룹별 수학수업 태도, 분위기, 만족도의 변화양상과 영향을 살펴보았다. 연구결과, 1그룹(1456명, 68.3%)과 2그룹(677명, 31.7%) 학생들의 수학 학업성취도는 수학수업 태도가 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 수학수업 분위기와 만족도는 직접적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 수학수업 태도가 수학 학업성취도에 미치는 영향력은 그룹에 따라서도 다르게 나타났으며, 수학 학업성취도가 높은 2그룹의 학생들은 1그룹의 학생들보다 수학수업 태도, 분위기, 만족도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 수학수업 태도와 분위기, 만족도는 중학교 2학년부터 고등학교 2학년기간 동안 지속적으로 변화하는 것으로 나타났으며, 그 변화의 폭은 적은 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 1999

This study aims at identifying the effect of problem posing on the academic achievement in high school mathematics. As subjects of the study, two classes of first grade in high school were selected. One of them was treated with problem posing learning, the other was treated with learning-in-a-body. Each has 40 students and was also divided into two groups(high- level and low-level) according to their learning-level. Two instruments were used for this study. One was the teaching-learning method developed by the researcher. The other was TTCT(Torrance Test of Creative Thinking). The 't-test' was used for this study and the significant level of test was within 5 percent. The results of this study are as follows: 1. The group with problem posing learning showed significantly higher academic achievement(learning-ability) than the one with learning-in-a-body. 2. There was no significant difference in the academic achievement(creativity) between the two groups. But there was significant difference in the creative factors. 3. There was no significant differences in the academic achievement between high-level-groups in each group. 4. There was significant difference in the academic achievement (learning-ability) between low-level groups in each group. And there was significant difference in the creative factors. On the basis of the results above, the following conclusions could be made. The problem posing learning method was more effective in the academic achievement in highschool mathematics than learning-in-a-body. Especially low-level group was more effective than high-level group. These facts implies that it is more effective for a teacher to adopt the problem posing learning considering the students' learning-levels.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.39-53
• /
• 2018

지금까지의 수학 교구에 대한 연구의 대부분은 연구에서 제시한 교구의 활용을 통하여 나타난 학업성취도의 변화나 수학에 대한 자신감과 태도 등에서 긍정적인 변화에 대한 연구였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 수학 교구 활용에 대한 변화 내용 보다는, 교육과정에서 제시한 성취기준 중에서 교구의 활용에 적합한 성취기준을 조사하여, 그 성취기준에 알맞은 교구의 제시하고, 현재 초등학교 1-2학년군 수학교과서에 제시된 교구를 조사하고 비교하여 앞으로 교구의 활용에 도움이 되도록 하였다. 성취기준에 알맞은 교구는 한국과학창의재단(2017)에서 수학 수업용 교구 표준안에 제시한 교구를 기준으로 앞으로 수학 수업에서 교구의 효과적인 활용에 도움을 주고자 하였다.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.215-240
• /
• 2022

In this study, we proposed a learning-centered DIY mathematics instruction for students to actively design instructions and developed important competencies. The research problems of this study were as follows. First, how did learning-centered DIY mathematics instruction affect math academic achievement? Second, how did learning-centered DIY mathematics instruction affect the affective domain? Third, what was the reaction of students to the implementation of the learning-centered DIY mathematics instruction? For this purpose, this study was conducted with 58 students in 2 classes of 2nd grade of 00 High School located in 00 Metropolitan City. As a result of the study, first, it could be seen that the study group that taught the learning-centered DIY mathematics instruction was very helpful in the change of mathematics academic achievement compared to the comparative group who taught the explanatory instruction based on traditional textbooks. Second, the research group showed a significant improvement in the affective domain compared to the comparison group. Third, the responses of the students in the research group through the learning-centered DIY mathematics instruction improved in a positive direction, and there were some negative responses.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.87-112
• /
• 2013

현재 우리나라에는 영재교육을 받기 위하여 사교육과 선행학습을 받고 있는 기형적인 현상이 나타나고 있다. 이에 영재교육원 입학 이전의 수학 선행학습이 입학 이후의 영재교육원 학업성취도에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 검토할 필요가 있다. 본 논문은 대학부설 과학영재교육원에서 수업을 받고 있는 학생들을 대상으로 수학 선행학습이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향에 대하여 연구하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 첫째, 영재교육원 학생들의 수학 선행학습 기간이 학업성취도와 자기효능감에 영향을 주지 못하였다. 둘째, 영재교육원 학생들의 수학 선행학습 기간은 성취동기에 유의미한 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 선행학습기간과 학업성취도, 선행학습기간과 성취동기, 성취동기와 학업성취도 사이에는 유의미한 결과가 거의 없었으나 성취동기와 자기효능감 사이에는 강한 양의 상관관계가 나타났다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to examine how academic achievement in college math courses differ depending on when the course takes place. As a result, based on years of data analyses on students' academic achievement, it was affirmed that achievement levels differ due to environmental factors despite the diverse efforts of instructors and students. By further analyzing the causes of these differences, this study suggests solutions for improving the different academic achievement levels.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.153-163
• /
• 2007

Utilizing the quantitative analysis methodology of questionnaire, the study explores the differences in the factors of achievement motivation, learning mathematics attitude and learning mathematics self-confidence and also the relationship between mathematics academic achievement and these factors in three areas in China. The following conclusions are drawn: 1. The subjects from different development level areas have significant differences in motivation, attitude and self-confidence in mathematics; 2. The subjects from different areas who possess the same ethnic group have significant differences. But the subjects from same area who possess different nationalities have little difference. It can be concluded that that the differences in these factors can be contributed to regional differences, rather than to ethnic differences; 3. The subjects from undeveloped areas have significant gender differences, and the levels of males are higher than those of female.