• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.241-256
• /
• 2015

기업의 정보 보안을 보장하기 위해, 많은 정부가 다양한 보안 관련 대책을 의무화해오고 있다. 하지만 이러한 보안 대책의 실행에 앞서, 이의 잠재적 효과성을 분석하는 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구는 안전벨트의 착용 법제화가 자동차 사고 사망자 감소에 미치는 효과에 대한 연구를 응용하여, 정부의 다양한 보안 대책의 사전 효과성 평가가 가능한 모형을 개발하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 또한, 인터넷 진흥원의 정보보호실태조사(기업편) 데이터를 개발된 모형에 적용하여 어떠한 보안대책의 법제화가 사회 및 산업 전반의 보안위험을 줄이는데 효과적인지 사전평가를 시행하였다. 그 결과 보안교육의 법제화가 다른 보안대책에 비해 효과적임을 확인하였다.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.124-130
• /
• 2015

Infinite competition on ICT industries is starting again. The basis of competence over global dominance will be human resource, a global ecosystem for products and national agenda for science and technology, etc.. This paper presents the six solution for the Global Competitiveness and Coexistence of Korean ICT Industries. Korea should nurture the brand of "World Best Korean ICT Forever" to secure technical competency of ICT related fields in global market. All ICT technologies should be aligned to global standard and market demand from beginning and the ecosystem around product needs to be established. System framework for utilizing the resource of core SW experts must be established. Through global partnership with China as manufacturing base for Korea-developed products, technical competency can be maintained including product planning. Security measure for technical assets is mandatory. Finally, core technology that will drive the future of ICT industries in Korea should be regarded as core subjects.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제16권7호
• /
• pp.129-137
• /
• 2016

범죄로부터 국민에 대한 안전의 보장은 사회계약에 의한 국가의 존재이유이며, 국민에 대한 국가의무로서, 헌법적 권리인 국민행복추구권의 보장에 핵심적인 과제이다. 보복범죄 근절을 위한 논의의 결론은 첫째 형사사법절차에서 범죄피의자 체포 시 적용되는 미란다원칙에 상응하는 범죄피해자, 범죄신고자, 증인 등에게 범죄신고나 증언 후 보복범죄에 대한 위험 유무를 확인하는 절차를 의무화하고, 이를 어길 경우 처벌하는 방안을 강구해야 한다. 둘째는 보복범죄에 대한 현행법의 보호대상을 확대 적용하고 정보보호를 강화하는 등 관련법과 제도의 개선이다. 셋째 보복범죄위험평가지표를 개발하고, 평가결과를 계량화하여 심화단계 별 신변안전에 대한 구체적인 조치방법과 책임을 명시하여야 한다. 넷째 범죄피해자 및 증인에 대한 적극적인 신변안전조치 제도의 확대 시행과 선진기법의 개발과 적용이다. 마지막으로 사법기관 근무자들의 인식전환이다. 범죄의 초동수사 단계에서부터 출소자 심리검사를 통한 보복의 가능성 진단과 조치에 이르기까지 형사사법기관의 총체적 협조와 공조체계가 구축되어야 하며, 보복범죄발생의 원인규명과 관련자의 직무상 문제점 발생 시 책임을 규정해야 한다. 등이다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권39호
• /
• pp.5-46
• /
• 2016

North Korea's 4th nuclear test on Jan. 6 and following developments once again awakened the world into seriousness of the nuclear matters on the Korean peninsula. On March 2, UNSC adopted Resolution 2270 which is complemented by Seoul government's measures such as withdrawal from the Gaesung Industrial Complex (Feb. 9) and announcement of unilateral sanction (March 8). Seoul government also strongly urged the international community to strangle North Korea's 'financial resources.' The U.S., Japan, China, and other countries have issued unilateral sanctions to complement the UNSC measure. South Korea and the U.S. conducted their annual joint military drill (Resolve-Foal Eagle) in the largest-ever scale. North Korea, however, responded with demonstration of its nuclear capabilities and announcement of de facto 'nuclear-first' politics. North Korea test-fired a variety of delivery vehicles, threatened nuclear strikes against South Korea and the U.S., and declared itself as an 'invincible nuclear power armed with hydrogen bombs' at the 7th Workers 'Party Congress held in May, 2016. Considering the circumstantial evidences, the North's 4th nuclear test may have been a successful boosted fission bomb test. North Korea, and, if allowed to go on with its nuclear programs, will become a nuclear power armed with more than 50 nuclear weapons including hydrogen bombs. The North is already conducting nuclear blackmail strategy towards South Korea, and must be developing 'nuclear use' strategies. Accordingly, the most pressing challenge for the international community is to bring the North to 'real dialogue for denuclearization through powerful and consistent sanctions. Of course, China's cooperation is the key to success. In this situation, South Korea has urgent challenges on diplomacy and security fronts. A diplomatic challenge is how to lead China, which had shown dual attitudes between 'pressure and connivance' towards the North's nuclear matters pursuant to its military relations with the U.S, to participate in the sanctions consistently. A military one is how to offset the 'nuclear shadow effects' engendered by the North's nuclear blackmail and prevent its purposeful and non-purposeful use of nuclear weapons. Though South Korea's Ministry of Defense is currently spending a large portion of defense finance on preemption (kill-chain) and missile defense, they pose 'high cost and low efficiency' problems. For a 'low cost and high efficiency' of deterrence, South Korea needs to switch to a 'retaliation-centered' deterrence strategy. Though South Korea's response to the North's nuclear threat can theoretically be boiled down into dialogue, sanction and deterrence, now is the time to concentrate on strong sanction and determined deterrence since they are an inevitable mandatory course to destroy the North' nuclear-first delusion and bring it to a 'real denuclearization dialogue.'