Browse > Article

Study on Preventing Retaliation against Crime Victims  

Choi, KeeNam (세명대학교 경찰행정학과)
Publication Information
Convergence Security Journal / v.16, no.7, 2016 , pp. 129-137 More about this Journal
Abstract
The guarantee of citizens' safety from crime is the reason for a nation's existence according to the social contract, and it is also a salient task in securing the citizens' right to the pursuit of happiness, which is a constitutional right expressing the nation's duty to its citizens. First, a procedure must be made mandatory that corresponds to the Miranda rule applied during the arrest of criminal suspect, which verifies whether there exists a risk of retaliatory crime to the victim of crime, crime reporter, or witness following their report of a crime or testimony. A measure to punish those who violate this should be devised. The second is the improvement of related laws and systems, such as expanding the scope of persons subject to protection from retaliatory crimes under the current law and strengthening information protection. Third, a retaliatory crime risk evaluation index must be developed, and the evaluation results must be quantified to clearly state measures and responsibilities, in detail, for personal safety at each level of intensity. The fourth is the expanded implementation of proactive personal safety measures for victims of crime and witnesses, as well as the development and application of advanced techniques. The last is a change in the perception s of those working for the judicial body. From the initial investigation stage of the crime to the diagnosis regarding the possibility of retaliation perpetrated on an ex-convict through psychological tests, systems of general cooperation, and mutual assistance must be established.
Keywords
victims of crime; witnesses; retaliatory crimes; retaliatory crime risk evaluation index; personal safety measures;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 조선일보, "미 범죄수사 보복범죄로 지방검사 피격" 2013.04.02.자, 사회면.
2 뉴스1, 법조인 테러"사법 신뢰 회복 필요", 2015.6.10.자 보도.
3 서울신문, "보복 무섭고 신고해도 안오고..눈감은 목격자들", 2011.9.30. 사회면.
4 NEWSIS, "검, 보복범죄자 '구속 격리'....범죄피해자는 '밀착보호', 2013. 7.28.자.
5 연합뉴스, "경찰, 보복범죄 우려 범죄피해자 '가명조서' 확대", 2014.02.11. 보도입력.
6 대검찰청, 보도자료 2012.4.16.배포.
7 Harvey, Wallace & Roberson, 'Victimology -Legal, Psychological and Social Perspectives', Printice Hall, p. 47, 2011.
8 강맹진. 김진철, '현대사회와 범죄', 서울: 대왕사, pp. 81-88, 2007.
9 김근태, "보복범죄의 피해자 등 보호제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 고려대학교 법학연구원, 고려법학 제77호, p. 123, 2015.
10 Sellin, Thorsten, "Enrico Ferr," Pioneers in Criminolgy, Montclair New Jersey: Patterson Smith, p. 366, 1973.
11 전대양, '범죄대책론', 강원: 청송출판사, p. 13, 2010.
12 김용우∙ 최재천, '범죄피해자학', 서울: 박영사, p. 3, 2006.
13 G.Kaiser, 'Krimnologie', 3Aufl. S.57, p 57, 1976.
14 김용세, '피해자학', 서울: 형설출판사, pp. 26-29. 95-96. 70-73, 90, 93-96, 111-120, 2010.
15 이윤호, '범죄학', 서울: 박영사, p. 479, 2007.
16 김재민, '피해자학 -범죄피해의 예방과 회복-', 서울: 청목출판사, pp. 27-41. 8, 321, 321-324, 2012.
17 김재민, '범죄피해자대책론', 서울: 진리탐구, pp. 17-23, 53-63, 2006.
18 이성호∙김상균∙신석환, '범죄피해자학', 서울: 21세기사, p. 35, 2005.
19 허경미, '피해자학', 서울: 박영사, pp,7-8, 2011.
20 충청매일, "법원'보복살인 못 막은 경찰징계 정당", 2014.2.8.자, 사회면.
21 특정범죄신고자 등 보호법 제2조 5항[법률 제11305호, 2012.2.10. 일부개정].
22 김지선∙안성훈∙장다혜추∙지현, "보복범죄의 원인 및 분석을 통한 피해자 신변보호강화 방안 연구", 대검찰청 연구과제 보고서, 한국형사정책연구원, p. 4, 2014.
23 조선일보, "날 고소해? 가만 안둔다" 보복범죄 기승, 2015.3.21.자, 사회면.