• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.103-113
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength of composite resin inlays according to the their internal surface treatment and types of luting cement and compared them with the conventional direct resin filling thchnique. Class II cavities were prepared in 50 extracted human molar teeth, and then equally divided into five groups. Group 1 : Cavities of control group were directly filled with P-50. Group 2 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with resin cement. Group 3 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with luting G-I cement. Group 4 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with resin cement after sandblasting. Group 5 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with luting G-I cement after sandblasting. All specimens were polished with same method and stored in normal saline for 24 hours before testing. An Universal Testing machine(Model No. AGS-100A, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to apply tensile loads in the vertical direction, and the force required for separation was recorded with a cross-head speed of 5mm/min and 100kg in full scale. The results were as follows : 1. The mean tensile bond strength was lowest in group luted with luting G-I cement, with measurements of $14.45{\pm}0.78(kg/cm^2)$ and highest in group luted with resin cement after sandblasting, with measurements of $49.6{\pm}2.74(kg/cm^2)$. 2. The tensile bond strength was greater in resin inlay groups luted with resin cement than in control group and resin inlay groups luted with luting G-I cement(P<0.05). 3. The tensile bond strength was lower in resin inlay groups luted with luting G-I cement than in control group(P<0.05). 4. The tensile bond strength was greater in resin inlay groups luted with resin cement or luting G-I cement after sandblasting than without that(P<0.05).

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.178-186
• /
• 2015

Dental polymer-based luting materials are classified into esthetic resin cement, adhesive resin cement and self-adhesive resin cement. Due to the different component of each type of resin cement, the preconditioning method of tooth surface and the steps are different from each type of resin cement. The pre-treatment of adherend (ceramic, resin and metal) surface also varies with the type of resin cement and the manufacturer. In this study, the characteristics of each type of resin cement, mechanical properties, indication and advantages were investigated. Through these, clinical tips on using resin cements were suggested.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.491-497
• /
• 2006

소아치과 임상에 있어서 교정용 밴드는 매우 다양한 용도로 일상적으로 사용되고 있다. 그러나 교정용 밴드와 치아 사이에 시멘트가 불균일하게 분포되어 치아 법랑질 탈회나 치은염이 유발됨을 간혹 보게 된다. 본 연구는 이러한 문제를 근원적으로 차단할 수 있는 균일한 시멘트 층을 유지 한 밴드 장착방법을 모색할 목적으로 시도되었다. 발치된 상하 제 1 대구치를 복제한 치아모형에 이에 적합한 교정용 밴드를 선택하여 접착용 시멘트로 세 가지 방법으로 접착시켰다. 방법 1에서는 접착용 시멘트를 밴드 내면에만 도포하였고, 방법 2에서는 접착용 시멘트를 밴드 내면과 치아의 축면에 도포, 방법 3에서는 접착용 테이프를 밴드의 상연에 부착한 상태에서 밴드 내면에 접착용 시멘트를 도포하였다. 접착용 시멘트가 경화된 후 밴드를 치아에서 벗겨내고 내면의 시멘트 분포상태를 관찰하였다. 실험 결과, 밴드 내면에만 시멘트를 도포한 방법 1의 경우보다는 방법 2와 3의 경우에 시멘트가 더 균일하게 도포된 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 교정용 밴드를 장착하는 과정에서는 접착용 시멘트를 밴드 내면에만 도포하는 방법보다는, 치면에도 시멘트를 가하거나 잉여 시멘트의 교합면측 탈출구를 봉쇄하는 등의 방법이 균일하게 도포된 시멘트 접착을 달성하는 좋은 대안이 될 것으로 판단되었다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.314-323
• /
• 2018

이 연구의 목적은 3종 시멘트의 전단결합강도를 평가하고 열순환 시행이 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 소아치과에서 사용되는 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관($NuSmile^{(R)}$ ZR crown)의 내면과 유사한 디스크 형태의 지르코니아 시편(Zirconia discs)을 제작하였다. 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관의 내면과 지르코니아 시편의 표면이 동일하도록 같은 몰드를 이용하여 제작하였으며 주사전자현미경을 통해 유사함을 확인하였다. 60개의 지르코니아 시편과 60개의 유구치 상아질 시편을 3종의 시멘트 $Ketac^{TM}$ Cem Permanent Glass Ionomer Luting Cement(KGI), $RelyX^{TM}$ Luting Plus Cement(RLP), $RelyX^{TM}$ Unicem Self-Adhesive Universal Resin Cement(RUR)에 따라 20개씩 나누고, 열순환 시행 유무에 따라 다시 10개씩 2개의 하위그룹으로 나누었다. 하위그룹 A는 열순환을 시행하지 않았고 하위그룹 B는 5500회의 열순환을 시행하였다. 만능 재료 시험기를 이용하여 전단결합강도를 측정한 후 파절 양상을 주사전사현미경으로 관찰하였다. 지르코니아 시편 및 유구치 상아질 시편에 접착한 시멘트의 전단결합강도는 RUR이 KGI와 RLP보다 높았으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다(p < 0.05). RUR의 전단결합강도는 열순환 시행하지 않은 군과 열순환 시행한 군 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.75-82
• /
• 2020

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant retained restorations on to titanium specimens after different surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty disc shaped specimens were used. They were divided into three groups considering the surface treatments (no treatment, sandblasting, and oxygen plasma treatment). Water contact angle of specimens were determined. The specimens were further divided into four subgroups (n=10) according to applied cement types: polycarboxylate cement (Adhesor Carbofine-AC), temporary zinc oxide free cement (Temporary CementZOC), non eugenol provisional cement for implant retained prosthesis (Premier Implant Cement-PI), and non eugenol acrylic-urethane polymer based provisional cement for implant luting (Cem Implant Cement-CI). Shear bond strength values were evaluated. Two-way ANOVA test and Regression analysis were used to statistical analyze the results. RESULTS. Overall shear bond strength values of luting cements defined in sandblasting groups were considerably higher than other surfaces (P<.05). The cements can be ranked as AC > CI > PI > ZOC according to shear bond strength values for all surface treatment groups (P<.05). Water contact angles of surface treatments (control, sandblasting, and plasma treatment group) were 76.17° ± 3.99, 110.45° ± 1.41, and 73.80° ± 4.79, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that correlation between the contact angle of different surfaces and shear bond strength was not strong (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The retentive strength findings of all luting cements were higher in sandblasting and oxygen plasma groups than in control groups. Oxygen plasma treatment can improve the adhesion ability of titanium surfaces without any mechanical damage to titanium structure.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2017

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive luting on the fracture resistance of zirconia compared to that of a composite resin and a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Materials and Methods: The specimens (dimension: $2mm{\times}2mm{\times}25mm$) of the composite resin, lithium disilicate glass ceramic, and yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) were prepared. These were then divided into nine groups: three non-luting groups, three non-adhesive luting groups, and three adhesive luting groups, for each restorative material. In the non-luting groups, specimens were placed on the bovine tooth without any luting agents. In the non-adhesive luting groups, only zinc phosphate cement was used for luting the specimen to the bovine tooth. In the adhesive luting groups, specimens were pretreated, and the adhesive luting procedure was performed using a self-adhesive resin cement. For all the groups, a flexural test was performed using universal testing machine, in which the fracture resistance was measured by recording the force at which the specimen was fractured. Results: The fracture resistance after adhesive luting increased by approximately 29% in the case of the composite resin, 26% in the case of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic, and only 2% in the case of Y-TZP as compared to non-adhesive luting. Conclusions: The fracture resistance of Y-TZP did not increased significantly after adhesive luting as compared to that of the composite resin and the lithium disilicate glass ceramic.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.93-101
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of core materials and luting agents on the retention of full veneer gold crown. The core materials used in this study was dental amalgam, and composite resin, and the luting agents were zinc phosphate cement, polycarboxylate cement, and glass ionomer cement. The obtained results were as follows. 1. In full veneer gold crown supported by composite resin core, the crown retention with zinc phosphate cement was the highest of all. 2. In full veneer gold crown supported by amalgam core, the crown retention was shown no statistical difference by luting agent. 3. There was no statistical difference in the crown retention between the full veneer gold crown supported by composite resin core and dental amalgam core.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.19.1-19.10
• /
• 2018

Objectives: This study investigated the effect of continuous application of 10-methacryloyloxydecyldihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing primer and luting resin cement on bond strength to tribochemical silica-coated yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP). Materials and Methods: Forty bovine teeth and Y-TZP specimens were prepared. The dentin specimens were embedded in molds, with one side of the dentin exposed for cementation with the zirconia specimen. The Y-TZP specimen was prepared in the form of a cylinder with a diameter of 3 mm and a height of 10 mm. The bonding surface of the Y-TZP specimen was sandblasted with silica-coated aluminium oxide particles. The forty tribochemical silica-coated Y-TZP specimens were cemented to the bovine dentin (4 groups; n = 10) with either an MDP-free primer or an MDP-containing primer and either an MDP-free resin cement or an MDP-containing resin cement. After a shear bond strength (SBS) test, the data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: The group with MDP-free primer and resin cement showed significantly lower SBS values than the MDP-containing groups (p < 0.05). Among the MDP-containing groups, the group with MDP-containing primer and resin cement showed significantly higher SBS values than the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The combination of MDP-containing primer and luting cement following tribochemical silica coating to Y-TZP was the best choice among the alternatives tested in this study.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2009

이 논문의 목적은 시멘트 층 내의 응력분포에 대해 금관의 물성과 시멘트의 물성 및 교합력의 방향이 미치는 영향을 이차원 유한요소분석으로 조사하는 것이다. Chamfer 변연을 가지는 23개의 하악 제1대구치 모델을 상정하였다. 금관의 재질은 제 3형 금합금, Ni-Cr 합금, 세라믹, 복합레진 등 4가지이며, 시멘트의 재질은 인산 아연 시멘트와 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트 등 2가지이다. 치축과 평행하게 또는 경사지게 하여 1N 단위로 금관에 하중을 가했다. 시멘트층의 응력은 금관 변연이 다른 곳보다 더 높았다. 치축에 평행한 하중이 치축에 경사진 하중보다 더 높은 응력을 발생시켰다. 경도가 더 큰 금관은 시멘트 층 내에서 더 높은 응력을 나타냈으며, 더 높은 응력은 더 큰 Young's modulus을 나타냈다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.296-305
• /
• 2002

The main disadvantage of cement-retained implant restorations is their difficulty in retrievability. Advocates of cemented implant restorations frequently state that retrievability of the restoration can be maintained if a provisional cement is used. The purpose of this study was to find the optimal properties of provisional luting cements and the surface treatment of abutments in single implant abutment system. 30 prefabricated implant abutments, height 8mm, diameter 6mm, 3-degree taper per side, with light chamfer margins were obtained. Three commercially available provisional luting agents which were all zinc oxide eugenol type ; Cavitec, TempBond and TempBond NE were evaluated. No cement served as the control. TempBond along with vaseline, a kind of petrolatum (2:1 ratio) was also evaluated. Ten out of thirty abutments were randomly selected and abutment surfaces were sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. Another ten abutments were sandblasted with $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. A vertical groove, 1 mm deep and 5mm long was cut in each twenty abutments. Ten of them were sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. The full coverage casting crowns were cemented to the abutments with the designated provisional luting agent. Specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. Each specimen was attached to a universal testing machine. A crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min was used to apply a tensile force to each specimen. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. Tensile bond strength of provisional luting cements in no surface treatment decreased with the sequence of TempBond NE, TempBond, Cavitec, TempBond with vaseline, no cement. 2. Tensile bond strength more increased by surface treatment. Sandblasting with $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide exhibited the highest tensile bond strength in the abutment cemented with TempBond NE and sandblasting with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide exhibited the highest tensile bond strength in cemented with TempBond. 3. In the aspect of a groove formation, tensile bond strength significantly increased in TempBond with vaseline only and the others had no significant effect on tensile bond strength.