DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear Bonding Strength of Three Cements Luted on Pediatric Zirconia Crowns and Dentin of Primary Teeth

3종 시멘트로 접착한 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관과 유치 상아질의 전단결합강도

  • Lee, Jeongeun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Howon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Lee, Juhyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Seo, Hyunwoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 이정은 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박호원 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 이주현 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 서현우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2017.09.07
  • Accepted : 2017.11.24
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three luting cements and to identify the effect of thermocycling. Zirconia discs were made similar to the inner surface of a preformed pediatric zirconia crown ($NuSmile^{(R)}$ ZR crown: ZRCr). The similarity between the zirconia discs and the inner surface of a ZRCr was confirmed by scanning electron microscope. Three luting cements were $Ketac^{TM}$ Cem Permanent Glass Ionomer Luting Cement (KGI), $RelyX^{TM}$ Luting Plus Cement (RLP), $RelyX^{TM}$ Unicem Self-Adhesive Universal Resin Cement (RUR). Three luting cements were bonded according to the manufacturer's instructions for 60 zirconia discs and 60 dentin of primary teeth. Total of 120 specimens were divided into two subgroups: One was not aged, and the other was tested with 5500 thermocycling. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and the fracture patterns were observed with SEM. On the zirconia discs and the dentin of primary teeth, shear bond strength of RUR was higher than that of KGI and RLP, and there were statistically significant differences by cement type. The shear bond strength differences for RUR were not statistically significant depending on thermocycling.

이 연구의 목적은 3종 시멘트의 전단결합강도를 평가하고 열순환 시행이 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 소아치과에서 사용되는 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관($NuSmile^{(R)}$ ZR crown)의 내면과 유사한 디스크 형태의 지르코니아 시편(Zirconia discs)을 제작하였다. 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관의 내면과 지르코니아 시편의 표면이 동일하도록 같은 몰드를 이용하여 제작하였으며 주사전자현미경을 통해 유사함을 확인하였다. 60개의 지르코니아 시편과 60개의 유구치 상아질 시편을 3종의 시멘트 $Ketac^{TM}$ Cem Permanent Glass Ionomer Luting Cement(KGI), $RelyX^{TM}$ Luting Plus Cement(RLP), $RelyX^{TM}$ Unicem Self-Adhesive Universal Resin Cement(RUR)에 따라 20개씩 나누고, 열순환 시행 유무에 따라 다시 10개씩 2개의 하위그룹으로 나누었다. 하위그룹 A는 열순환을 시행하지 않았고 하위그룹 B는 5500회의 열순환을 시행하였다. 만능 재료 시험기를 이용하여 전단결합강도를 측정한 후 파절 양상을 주사전사현미경으로 관찰하였다. 지르코니아 시편 및 유구치 상아질 시편에 접착한 시멘트의 전단결합강도는 RUR이 KGI와 RLP보다 높았으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다(p < 0.05). RUR의 전단결합강도는 열순환 시행하지 않은 군과 열순환 시행한 군 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A : Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int, 38:745-753, 2007.
  2. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK : Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater, 19:725-731, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  3. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A : An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent, 101:29-38, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60286-3
  4. Anusavice KJ : Recent developments in restorative dental ceramics. J Am Dent Assoc, 124:72-74, 76-78, 80-74, 1993.
  5. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD : Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent, 75:18-32, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8
  6. Waggoner WF : Restoring primary anterior teeth : updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent, 37:163-170, 2015.
  7. Passos SP, May LG, Valandro LF, et al. : Adhesive quality of self-adhesive and conventional adhesive resin cement to YTZP ceramic before and after aging conditions. Oper Dent, 35:689-696, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-157-L
  8. Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K : Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater, 21:1158-1162, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.005
  9. Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ : Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent, 96:104-114, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.001
  10. Bae YE, Kim Shin, Jeong TS, Kim JY : Effect of artificial saliva contamination on the bond strength of three dentin adhesive to dentin of primary teeth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 44:72-81, 2017.
  11. Luthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH : Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater, 22:195-200, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.016
  12. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R : Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?. Dent Mater, 27:71-82, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022
  13. Aboushelib MN, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z, Ounsi H : Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials: part I. Dent Mater, 24:1268-1272, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.010
  14. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, et al. : Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 85:1-9, 2008.
  15. Marchan S, Coldero L, Whiting R, Barclay S : In vitro evaluation of the retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts luted with glass ionomer and resin cements. Braz Dent J, 16:213-217, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402005000300008
  16. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B : Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res, 88:817-822, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509340881
  17. Chang JC, Powers JM, Hart D : Bond strength of composite to alloy treated with bonding systems. J Prosthodont, 2:110-114, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00391.x
  18. Gale MS, Darvell BW : Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent, 27:89-99, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
  19. Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH : Effects of storage media on mechanical properties of adhesive systems. Am J Dent, 17:104-108, 2004.
  20. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, et al. : Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig, 9:161-167, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5
  21. Holderegger C, Sailer I, Fischer J, et al. : Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater, 24:944-950, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.021
  22. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Wei SH, et al. : Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. singlestep self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent, 5:27-40, 2003.
  23. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF : Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J, 27:99-104, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.99
  24. Kim AJ, Yu SH, Oh SH, Bae JM : Effect of self-adhesive resin cements on the shear bond strengths between bovine teeth and composite resin block. J Korean Soc Dent Mater, 40:367-372, 2013.
  25. Nakanuma K, Hayakawa T, Tornita T, Yamazaki M : Effect of the application of dentin primers and a dentin bonding agent on the adhesion between the resin-modified glassionomer cement and dentin. Dent Mater, 14:281-286, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00040-2
  26. Ozcan M, Kerkdijk S, Valandro LF : Comparison of resin cement adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic following manufacturers' instructions of the cements only. Clin Oral Investig, 12:279-282, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0151-y
  27. Olsson KG, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE : A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont, 16:150-156, 2003.
  28. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Kern M, et al. : Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater, 24:508-513, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.013
  29. Lee JM, Lee HS, Choi SH, et al. : Three dimensional analysis of primary maxillary central and lateral anterior zirconia crown. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 43:176-186, 2016.
  30. Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG, Belser UC : Fracture resistance of human enamel and three all-ceramic crown systems on extracted teeth. Int J Prosthodont, 9:580-585, 1996.
  31. Bindl A, Richter B, Mormann WH : Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont, 18:219-224, 2005.
  32. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L : An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent, 35:819-826, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  33. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ : Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res, 70:880-882, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050301
  34. Crim GA : Assessment of microleakage of 12 restorative systems. Quintessence Int, 18:419-421, 1987.
  35. Technical Guide Instructions for Use and General Information. Available from URL : https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/174266O/relyxtm-unicem-self-adhesive-resincement.pdf (Accessed on July 3, 2007).