• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.285-294
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to find the way of treatment and prevention the stroke by Sasang constitutional medical therapy. I came to get some conclusions after considering literatures of ${\ll}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\gg}$ and the conclusion as follows. 1. In ${\ll}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\gg}$ the stroke of Soumin is caused by 'Interior cold disease'. When 'Interior Yin' can not descend, the disease arise. In this case Lee Je-ma used 'Sohabhyang-won(蘇合香元)', 'Chulaek-su(鐵液水)'. 2. The stroke of Soyangin is caused by 'Interior heat disease'. When the hot Qi of stomach and spleen is blocked, the disease arise. In this case Lee Je-ma used 'Dokhwal-jihwang-tang(獨活地黃湯)', 'Jihwang-baekho-tang(地黃白虎湯)'. 3. The stroke of Taeumin is caused by 'Dry and heat disease'. When the heat of liver and the dryness of lung is excessive, the disease arise. In this case Lee Je-ma treated with 'Woohwang-chungsim-hwan(牛黃淸心丸)', 'Wonji-sukchangpo-tang(遠志石菖蒲湯)', and 'Kwache-san(瓜帶散)' etc. Above results indicate that not only taking medicine but also filling up the Healthy energy(保命之主) is important to treat stroke.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2020

Objective The purpose of this study was to understand the conclusion of 「Gwangjeseol」 in 『Dongeuisusebowon』 in a more accurate sense. Method We examined the basic viewpoint of Lee je-ma in 「Seongmyeonglon」 in 『Dongeuisusebowon』. Based on the interpretation of the 「Seongmyeonglon」, the viewpoints described in the pathology theory of 『Dongeuisusebowon』 were examined. In addition to 『Dongeuisusebowon』, we looked for contents related to "TuHyeonJilNeung" and "HoHyeonNagSeon" in Lee je-ma's book 『Gyukchigo』 and 『Dongmuyugo』. Result We have found that the meanings of the words "TuHyeonJilNeung" and "HoHyeonNagSeon" in the last article of 「Gwangjeseol」 are not limited to just the 「Gwangjeseol」, but contain the meaning of a topic that runs through the entire book. According to the 『Gyukchigo』 and 『Dongmuyugo』, the meaning of "TuHyeonJilNeung" is related to the "Sa-Bang-Il-Yog", and the "Sa-Bang-Il-Yog" is the "ilsimjiyog" that prevents the practice of "Ji-Haeng". This concept is the same as the concept of "Ji-Haeng" in 「Seongmyeonglon」, the first unit of 『Dongeuisusebowon』. Conclusion It is considered that Lee je-ma wanted to emphasize the reason and mindset to do "Ji-Haeng" by writing the end of the 「Gwangjeseol」, which is the last part of 『Dongeuisusebowon』.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.28-36
• /
• 2022

Objectives The purpose of this study was to enhance the understanding of Yin and Yang poison by examining and comparing the views of Je-ma Lee and the medicine scholars before Je-ma Lee, including Zhang Zhongjing. Methods We examined and compared the contents related to Yin and Yang poison in 『Essential Prescriptions from the Golden Cabinet (金匱要略)』, 『Donguibogam (東醫寶鑑)』, and 『Donguisusebowon (東醫壽世保元)』. Results and Conclusion In 『Essential Prescriptions from the Golden Cabinet』, Zhang Zhongjing described the symptoms of Yin and Yang poison respectively, but could not suggested each prescription. In 『Donguibogam』, there were several prescriptions for Yin and Yang poison, respectively. In 『Donguisusebowon』, Yang poison belonged to the Soyangin and Taeeumin disease, Yin poison belonged to the Soeumin disease. Je-ma Lee emphasized that interior heat, which has grown suddenly should be controlled quickly for treatment of Yang poison in Soyangin and Taeeumin. And, in order to treat Yin poison caused by chronic course in Soeumin, Ginseng should be used a lot to help the Yang energy. Also, it is a better treatment to take the medicine ahead of time before the disease develops into Yin poison.

• 한국재료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국재료학회 2005년도 춘계학술발표대회 및 제8회 신소재 심포지엄 논문개요집
• /
• pp.150-150
• /
• 2005

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2010

1. Background: GalgeunNabokja-Tang(葛根蘿葍子湯) is suggested as treatment and prescription of Exterior Heat syndrome Diarrhea(表熱證泄瀉) in Donguisusebowon Tae-eumin Interior febrile disease induced form the liver affected by heat("東醫壽世保元" "太陰人肝受熱裏熱病論"), but is not recorded the treatment contents in Sinjungbang("新定太陰人病應用要藥二十四方"). 2. Methods: Accordingly, the writer surveyed, compared, and arranged the relevant contents by collecting books of doctors of Four-Constitutional Medicine(四象醫) since Lee Je-ma including Lee Je-ma's books. 3. Results: and Conclusions: 1) The treatment contents in GalgeunNabokja-Tang are thought to be valid to have the criterion as the contents of appearing in SanggyohyuntoDonguisusebowon Boyubang("詳校懸吐東醫壽世保元" "補遺方"). 2) The origin in GalgeunNabokja-Tang is GalgeunNabokja-Tang in Bimang-lok("備忘錄"). And the period of having made treatment for the first time may be estimated to be the one between Donguisuse- bowonSasangchobonguan("東醫壽世保元四象草本卷") and HamsansachonDonguisusebowonGabogubon ("咸山沙村東醫壽世保元甲午舊本"). 3) GalgeunNabokja-Tang is thought to be probably what Han Du-jeong recorded in Boyubang by searching for what Lee Je-ma modified some of GalgeunNabokja-Tang in Bimang-lok while writing Pathological Syndromes("病證論") in Donguisusebowon("東醫壽世保元").

• 동의신경정신과학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2023

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of mind-body medicine revealed in the Sa-sang constitutional medicin. Methods: This study examined the psychosomatic aspects of "DongUiSuSeBoWon" that Lee Je-ma wrote about the Sa-sang constitutional medicine, comparing them to Neo-Confucianism and Oriental medicine. Results: Sa-sang constitutions contain much content that can be applied to mind-body medicine. Conclusions: First, the principle of disease caused by mental and physical connections was clearly suggested, as it was considered that when emotions of joy, sorrow, and pleasure reach their peak, they cause fatal damage to the body. Second, it was encouraged to prevent diseases by giving specific examples to prevent the prejudice of the methodology of looking back when it hasn't happened yet and the feeling of anger and joy before the emotions of joy and sorrow are revealed. Third, it suggested the treatment of mental and physical diseases using drugs for diseases that have already occurred and psychiatric methods.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.19-37
• /
• 1997

심경부주(心經附註)의 고찰(考察)과 심경부주(心經附註)에서 나타나고 있는 사상(思想)과 이제마(李濟馬)의 사상(思想)과의 비교에서 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 모든 사람의 마음에는 두 가지의 마음이 존재한다. 이는 심경(心經)에서는 인심(人心)과 도심(道心)으로, 이제마(李濟馬)는 군자지심(君子之心)과 소인지심(小人之心)으로 표현하였다. 2. 심경부주(心經附註)에서는 인심(人心)과 도심(道心)은 성인(聖人)과 중인(衆人)을 구별시키는 중요한 요점이 되는데 성인(聖人)의 경우는 이 두 마음을 잘 분별하여 도심(道心)으로 인심(人心)이 인욕(人欲)에 빠지는 것을 경계하는 사람이라 하였다. 이제마(李濟馬)의 경우에서는 군자지심(君子之心)은 역지(易知)이고 소인지심(小人之心)은 난지(難知)라 하고 군자지심(君子之心)이 많은 사람은 군자(君子)이고 소인지심(小人之心)이 많은 사람은 소인(小人)이 된다고 하였다. 3. 이러한 군자(君子)의 경지에 오르기 위해 심경(心經)과 이제마(李濟馬)는 여러 가지 수행 방법을 제시하는데 공통적으로 계신공구(戒愼恐懼)를 말하고 심경(心經)에서는 이러한 계신공구(戒愼恐懼)를 위해서는 경(敬)이 가장 우선이 된다고 하고, 이제마(李濟馬)는 여인상접지성(與人相接之性)과 자기독득지성(自己獨得之性)을 들어서 절불절(節不節), 중불중(中不中)과 지인(知人), 지천(知天)을 말하고 있다. 4. 계신공구(戒愼恐懼)를 통하여 성의(誠意)를 이루고 이것으로 정심(正心)을 하는 것을 심경(心經)은 말하는데 이제마(李濟馬)는 지인(知人)을 통한 치심정기(治心正己)를 말하고 있다. 5. 맹자(孟子)의 사단(四端)은 성(性)을 이루는 중요한 마음의 단초가 되니 확충(擴充)을 해나가야 하는 것이 된다. 이제마(李濟馬)는 격치고(格致藁)에서 이러한 사단(四端)의 사심신물(事心身物)로 분화된 모습을 말하고 이를 동의수세보원(東醫壽世保元)에서는 천인성명(天人性命)으로 표현을 하면서 각각의 심욕(心欲)과 각각의 선(善)한 부분을 말하고 있다.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.28-48
• /
• 2001

1. Background and Purpose Since ${\ulcorner}$Dongri Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ was published in 1929, it had great effects on the publications related to Sasang Constitutional Medicine. However there had been no practical research or its applications about ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ at all in spite of its importance. So through the study on the ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ we highly intend to utilize the book. 2. Methods In this dissertation, you'll find our research of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ regarding the author, the people who were involved in the publishing, the formations and the contents, our another research of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun Chebang${\lrcorner}$(東醫四象新編劑方) to make its medical characteristics and meaning clear. 3. Results and Conclusion 1) Won Chi Sang was Chang Bong Young's granduncle's son-in-law. Nam Dae-hee is suspected of Nam Tae-hee who lived in YeoJu Bam Gol at that time though, it's not certain. 2) ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ is consisted of two pans. ${\ulcorner}$The Internal part${\lrcorner}$ is the basic explanation and ${\ulcorner}$The External part${\lrcorner}$, is the prescriptions depending on the symptoms. ${\ulcorner}$Sasang Byunron${\lrcorner}$,(四象辯論) is mostly that's for the explanations about analysis of Sasang Constitution. ${\ulcorner}$Sasang Kyunghum${\lrcorner}$(四象經驗) is mainly it's for the prescriptions depends on Sasangin's symptoms. ${\ulcorner}$Sasang Kukyul${\lrcorner}$(四象口訣), ${\ulcorner}$Tong Sasang Changbu Sochaedo${\lrcorner}$(通四象臟腑所在圖), ${\ulcorner}$Tong Sasang Chunche Sosokdo${\lrcorner}$(通四象全體所屬圖) are about the analysis of Sasangin's characteristics from metaphysical concepts to Changbustic concepts. In ${\ulcorner}$Sasangin oyak${\lrcorner}$(四象人要藥), among them, 10 types of medicines were categorized separately by constitutional difference in ${\ulcorner}$Dongui Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ and ${\ulcorner}$Dongmu Youg${\lrcorner}$(東武遺槁). The unique style of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Yongyak Huebun${\lrcorner}$(東醫四象用藥索分) is originated from ${\ulcorner}$Bangyak Happyun${\lrcorner}$ ${\ulcorner}$Euibang Whaltu${\lrcorner}$(${\ulcorner}$方藥合編${\lrcorner}$${\ulcorner}$醫方活套${\lrcorner}$), ${\ulcorner}$Whaltu Chimsun${\lrcorner}$,(${\ulcorner}$方藥合編${\lrcorner}$ ${\ulcorner}$活套鎭線${\lrcorner}$). 3) There are 293 prescriptions in ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun Chebang${\lrcorner}$. 36 out of 44 prescriptions in ${\ulcorner}$Gapont${\lrcorner}$(甲午本) are quoted in ${\ulcorner}$kyunghumbang${\lrcorner}$. Therefore it could be very possible that those unknown prescriptions in ${\ulcorner}$Kyunghumbang${\lrcorner}$ can be from lee Je Ma. 4) We are assumed that ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ was made by some other doctors not from one single person, based on Lee Je Ma's prescriptions, after Lee Je Ma died. ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Sasang Shinpyun${\lrcorner}$ is very different from ${\ulcorner}$Dongeyi Suse Bowon${\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}$Dongmu Yougo${\lrcorner}$(東武遺稿). ${\ulcorner}$Chobonkwun${\lrcorner}$(草本卷) by lee Je Ma since it was published for utilizing Sasang Constitutional Medicine and medical practice not for the basic principles of Sasang Constitution by Lee Je Ma. Therefore it could be highly possible to look over the spirit of Sasang Constitution by lee Je-ma.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.95-116
• /
• 1996

융과 동무(東武) 이제마(李濟馬)의 지인론(知人論)과 인간의 유형 연구의 비교를 통해 다음과 같은 결론을 얻을 수 있었다. 1. 융의 인간의 마음의 구조를 탐구한 작업이나 이제마(李濟馬)의 지인론(知人論)은 각각의 유형론(類型論)의 기본개념 설정에 중요 한 의미가 있다. 이들은 인간의 심성의 분석을 통하여 자신만의 독특한 유형론(類型論)을 개발해내었다. 2. 인식의 체계로서는 융은 의식, 개인적 무의식, 집단적 무의식, 자기의 사상론적(四象論的) 구조(構造)로, 이제마(李齊馬)는 사심신물(事心身物)의 사상론적(四象論的) 구조(構造)로서 인간을 설명하려 하였다. 그리고 유형론으로는 융은 사고형 감정형 감각형 직관형의 4개로, 이제마는 태양인(太陽人) 소양인(少陽人) 태음인(太陰人) 소음인(少陰人)의 4개로 나누었다. 공통적으로 사상론적(四象論的) 구조(構造)라는 점에 양자간의 유사성이 있다. 3. 융은 의식과 무의식을 탐구하였고 이제마(李濟馬)는 인의예지(仁義禮智)인 성(性)과 비박탐뢰(鄙薄貪賴)의 심욕(心慾)을 탐구하였는데 양자간에는 밀접한 관련이 있다고 사료된다. 또, 의식, 무의식과 군자의필(君子之心), 소인지필(小人之必)의 관련도 적용시킬 수 있다고 사료된다. 4. 이제마(李濟馬)의 대동(大同), 각립(各立), 행기지(行其知), 행기행(行其行)과 호선(好善), 악악(惡惡), 사심(邪心), 태행(怠行) 그리고 장부(臟腑)의 대소관계(大小關係)등은 융이 말한 제1기능(우월기능), 제2기능, 제3기능, 제4기능(열등기능)의 구분과 연관지어 생각해 볼 수 있다고 사료된다. 5. 융의 사고형 감정형 감각형 직관형의 4분류와 이제마(李濟馬)의 태양인(太陽人) 소양인(少陽人) 태음인(太陰人) 소음인(少陰人)과의 관계는 앞으로 많은 연구가 필요한 부분이라 생각된다.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2005

1. Objectives This study classifies xylographica of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\lrcorner}$ written by Lee, Je-Ma from 1901 to 1945. 2. Methods Through researching the phrases, I collected and analyzed data from rare book lists for this study 3. Results and Conclusions 1) The first edition of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\lrcorner}$ was issued in 1901, and the second, the third, the forth, the fifth, the sixth, the seventh, in 1911, 1913, 1914, 1921, 1936, 1941 respectively. 2) The popularized printed editions of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\lrcorner}$ are not the forth and the seventh, but the fifth and the seventh. 3) The xylographica of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\lrcorner}$ was mainly issued in Seoul and Hahmhung 4) No further data except the first to seventh editions were found in Korea, although some appear to be in error.