• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2012년 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.453-460
• /
• 2012

To maximize the operational efficiency of production and operations systems, Six Sigma and Lean Production System have been widely used. The main focus of Six Sigma is reducing variations, whereas that of Lean Production System is eliminating losses. To take advantage of the two approaches Six Sigma and Lean Production System was integrated into Lean Six Sigma, and the integrated approach has been used in recent years. In the implementation of Lean Six Sigma, the problems under consideration have often physical or technical contradictions which are difficult to be solved by conventional methods. To solve such contradictions TRIZ is useful in many cases. In this thesis, it is considered that how TRIZ can be applied to Lean Six Sigma. An integrated road-map of Lean Six Sigma and TRIZ is suggested and some cases are reviewed.

• 전자통신동향분석
• /
• 제22권2호통권104호
• /
• pp.92-101
• /
• 2007

Lean six sigma는 six sigma에 lean 개념을 접목시켜, 부가가치를 창출하지 못하는 프로세스 단계를 먼저 제거하여 프로세스 속도나 사이클 타임을 향상시키는 프로세스개선 방법론을 의미한다. Six sigma의 최우선 목표가 품질 개선이라면 lean은 생산 공정의 낭비제거에 초점이 맞춰져 있다. 그러나 quality와 함께 speed, cost를 고려하지 않는다면 프로세스의 속도나 투자자본의 감소를 개선하기 어려울 것이다. Lean six sigma는 lean의 속도와 six sigma의 무결점, 이 두 가지에 집중하여 원치 않는 복잡성을 제거하고 고객에게 집중하고 무결점 서비스를 제공하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 우편물류에 lean six sigma를 적용한 프로세스 개선 방법론을 제시한다.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제16권spc호
• /
• pp.60-64
• /
• 2003

This study proposes a method of implementing Six Sigma linking Lean approach and/or TOC(Theory of Constraints). A case study carried out in a PCB production line is examined to compare Lean Six Sigma and TOC Six Sigma. Implementing guidelines are given to achieve the whole company's optimum.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.298-313
• /
• 2006

Six sigma is focused on quality improvement through variation reduction, while lean is on process flow improvement and lead time reduction by waste elimination. However, lean cannot bring a process under statistical control and six sigma alone cannot dramatically improve process speed. Lean six sigma was developed to achieve faster rate of improvement in customer satisfaction, cost, quality, process speed, and invested capital. In this paper we present the importance of using value stream mapping and suggest a guideline on how to integrate lean and six sigma by is proposed.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.239-247
• /
• 2006

This paper is to propose new features and models for process innovation after classifying in three categories ; conventional six sigma, lean six sigma and 3rd generation six sigma. First considering two project types which are bottom-up and tod-down, DMAIC process is linked up with QC story 15 steps. Secondly, I present Koreanized lean six sigma model using Japanese production technology and principles. Lastly, this paper also depicts a new 3rd generation six sigma model utilizing MBNQA management quality system.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2007

The Six Sigma and Lean Production methodologies suggest that creating value for customers is the objective of a production process or an organisation. In the production context, "added value" dominates the discussion about the creation of value to customers. However, "added value" is often only defined conceptually or discussed at a strategic level, and the link between added value and customer value has not yet been well conceptualised. Therefore, the purpose of the paper is to develop a methodology to measure added value in order to complement the existing performance measures in Six Sigma and Lean Production by conceptualising the link between customer value and added value. The conceptual link "confirms" that quality, time, and costs are the elements of added value, which are transformed into a metric to express customer value. The implementation of the metric recommends the adoption of Lean (Six) Sigma and Lean Accounting (Activity Based Costing), which thus implies that "leanness" is an important "feature" of added value.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.63-71
• /
• 2015

린 6시그마 또한 6시그마처럼 도입하고자 하는 조직의 특성에 맞게 불합리한 사항과 미비사항을 사전의 파악하여 보완하지 않고, 조직의 특성과 기본 여건을 고려하지 않은 상태에서 추진되어진다면 아마도 추진 사무국 및 전담자의 과중한 업무가 하나 더 늘어나는 결과를 초래할 수 있으므로 린 6시그마 문헌연구와 적용구축 사례 분석과 현재까지 지속적으로 6시그마 활동을 10년 이상 추진 중인 15개 업체에 소속된 벨트(MBB, BB) 96명으로부터 접수된 설문지 내용을 조사하여 얻어진 자료를 통계분석 프로그램인 SPSS 16.0을 사용하여 설문자료의 신뢰성과 타당성을 분석하였고, 6시그마 추진 시행성과, 6시그마 프로젝트 개선안 실행력 제고방안, 6시그마 추진 시 발생하는 당면한 문제점과 개선 및 보완사항을 파악하여 기존 6시그마에 린 생산방식을 합리적으로 통합시켜 린 6시그마 도입 시 경영혁신을 위한 린 6시그마 활동의 효과적인 전개 방법을 제안하였다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2008년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.551-556
• /
• 2008

식스시그마는 처음소개 된 이래로 20련 동안 전략적인 측면과 방법론적인 측면 모두에서 식스시그마는 끊임없는 변화를 거듭하고 있다. 식스시그마와 다른 비즈니스 전략과의 접목을 통해 보다 높은 시너지효과를 창출할 수 있는 경영혁신전략의 개발에 대한 관심은 대단히 높다. 린 생산방식 등과의 접목에 대해 많은 연구와 실행이 추진되고 있으며 특히, 린과 식스시그마가 접목된 린 식스시그마는 식스시그마를 통해 성과를 올린 여러 기업들이 보다 발전된 형태의 혁신전략으로서 도입을 추진하고 있다. 하지만 현재 린과 식스시그마를 접목한 린식스시그마에 대한 연구나 여러 기업들의 적용이 이루어지고 있지만 건설분야에서는 연구나 실제 적용사례들이 부족한 상태이다. 이러한 문제점을 해결하고자 6시그마를 이용하여 시행된 프로젝트를 통하여 건설분야에서의 식스시그마의 방법론인 DMAIC의 프로세스를 구체화시키고 선행연구된 린식스시그마 연구를 통하여 DMAIC 프로세스를 발전시키고 건설분야에 식스시그마 DMAIC 프로세스를 재구성하여 제시하고자 한다.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.121-131
• /
• 2005

Six Sigma uses DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology as the process of a solving problem. Enterprises already propelling Six Sigma successfully, such as Motorola, GE and consulting companies, also traditionally propose DMAIC methodology. But, from activating Six Sigma, enterprises and Six Sigma-consulting companies propose Six Sigma methodology matching indirection part of office and R&D part. As an example, DFSS (Design For Six Sigma) is part of R&D application in GE. This study investigates Six Sigma methodology corresponding to the Right Process of the kernel factor. Especially for the optimum design of R&D, the study revises the definition of DFSS and the general organization through Lean DFSS methodology research and analysis.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.87-105
• /
• 2001

More than a decade after their development and first wave of deployment, Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing have recently returned on the corporate agendas of a larger number of corporations across industries and supply chains. In the wake of their re-surge, this commentary addresses the evolution, context, content and deployment patterns of the two distinct management concepts. It also analyses claims in the business press that a merger is taking place between Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing. Here, it is found that there is not enough evidence to broadly support such claims, and it is only concluded that there is some evidence of an early tend towards a merger and that a possible merger would have many synergies and advantages. Finally, an example from a Scandinavian manufacturing company is provided that explains how Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing can be used in a beneficial way for companies to reach world-class performance.