• Title/Summary/Keyword: Leading Universities Selection Criteria

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

The University Entrance System in the UK: Focused on the Interview Method of four Leading Universities (영국 명문대학의 입학전형 제도 - 면접고사를 중심으로 -)

  • Yoo, Jae-Bong
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.22 no.4
    • /
    • pp.125-147
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to explore university entrance system with particular regard to the interview system of some leading universities. In order to accomplish this end, I sketched university entrance system as a whole, applying procedures and entrance requirements, selecting criteria, and explore interview systems of leading universities, including Oxford, Cambridge, UCL and Imperial College. The university entrance system in the UK is closely related to the educational achievements at secondary schools and sixth form colleges. Admissions tutors look at applicant's academic ability and potential through various entrance requirements. Leading universities such as Oxbridge stress performance at interview with excellent examination grades, due to competition for places is strong. Admissions tutors are looking for the students who are best suited to the unique university education in general and the course applied for. The university entrance system in the UK would be shed light on Korea university entrance system in terms of basic principles and interviews as a whole and of addressing the academic ability and potential to flourish at the university.

A Study on Selection of the SCI in Domestic Journals (국내 학술지의 SCI 선정 방안 연구: "원자력학회지"를 중심으로)

  • 유재복
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.18 no.3
    • /
    • pp.7-28
    • /
    • 2001
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate the selection mechanism of the Science Citation Index(SCI) in domestic journals. Analysis has been carried out specially on the \"Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society\", which is a leading journal in the nuclear field in Korea. It is published in English and meets the basic standards of technical journal, however, does not meet the SCI selection criteria in many aspects. Major problems are; 1) Small number of research institutes and universities submit articles to the journal. 2) The impact factor is 0.097, far less than 0.764, the average value of SCI, and the rate of self-citation approaches only to 50%. 3) The journal is not distributed to the libraries in universities and research institutes that have nuclear engineering programs in foreign countries. 4) It does not have editor from international communities, only domestic editors serve for the journal. The study made recommendations for ways to be selected by SCI and utilization of this study for selection criteria of SCI.

  • PDF

A Study on the Verification of Significance of Assessment Items for Selecting Start-ups: Focusing on Project Fostering Start-ups through Leading Universities (창업기업 선정평가지표 유의성 검증에 관한 연구: 창업선도대학육성사업을 중심으로)

  • Jung, Kyung Hee;Sung, Chang So
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
    • /
    • v.13 no.4
    • /
    • pp.13-22
    • /
    • 2018
  • In this study, we examined the accuracy of the assessment items for selecting start-ups used in the project to support start-ups and verified their validity in determining whether they are appropriate assessment items based on selection criteria. The results of 973 start-ups that applied for the project fostering startup leading universities were collected and logistic regression was performed using SPSS 18.0. The study results are summarized as follows. First, the differences in characteristics of start-ups were identified in terms of selection. Second, the impact of selection by assessment items was gender in 2015, capability of the founder, business establishment in 2016, performance and potential in the global market, and business startup in 2017. Third, the overall selection accuracy analysis for the last three years confirmed that the accuracy of the selection is lower each year and that the accuracy of the selection is lower than the accuracy of the non-selection. This means that the current assessment items for selecting start-ups are inaccurate for selection, and that changes in the items due to changes in the start-up environment each year have led to lower accuracy of selection. It is meaningful that this study raised the importance of assessment items and the need for improvement of assessment items for the screening functions of good start-ups to enhance efficiency of the policies for startup support.