• 제목/요약/키워드: Law Enforcement

검색결과 558건 처리시간 0.026초

신원확인 유전자정보은행 설립을 둘러싼 쟁점 연구 (Social Issues Arising from the Establishment of a National DNA Database)

  • 김병수
    • 과학기술학연구
    • /
    • 제3권2호
    • /
    • pp.83-104
    • /
    • 2003
  • 최근 질병관련 영역 못지않게 유전정보 이용이 눈에 띄게 증가하고 있는 분야가 개인식별 영역이다. 일부 국가에서는 범죄자유전자은행이 구축되어 운영되고 있으며, 군대, 이민국 등에서도 유전정보를 이용하고 있다. 국내에서도 이미 90년대 중반부터 친자확인, 사체확인, 범죄수사에 활용되고 있고 수사기관들은 신원확인을 위한 유전자정보은행을 준비하고 있다. 그런데 질병과 관련된 유전자 검사에 대한 높은 관심과는 달리 유전정보를 개인식별에 이용하는 것에 대해서는 사회적 관심이 별로 높지 않고 법적 윤리적 논의 또한 부족한 상황이다. 그러나 유전정보를 신원확인에 이용하는 과정에서도 개인의 프라이버시 침해, 유전정보의 오남용, 국가의 시민 감시체계확장 등 다양한 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 특히 유전자 감식을 개별적으로 사용하는데 그치지 않고 이를 데이터베이스로 구축할 경우 더욱 다양한 문제들이 발생할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 그 동안 사회적으로 잘 알려지지 않았던 신원확인 유전자정보은행(DNA databank)의 추진 현황과 사회적 쟁점을 국내 논의 중심으로 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 유전정보의 특징과 수사기관이 추진하고 신원확인 유전자정보은행에 대해서 살펴본다. 이어서 유전자정보은행 구축으로 인해 발생할 수 있는 사회적 문제를 검토해 본 후 논쟁이 건설적으로 이루어지기 위한 방안을 모색한다.

  • PDF

"공익사업을 위한 토지 등의 취득 및 보상에 관한 법률"에 의한 어업보상 적용사례와 문제점 및 개선방안에 대한 연구 : 항만 개발사업을 중심으로 (A Study on the Reform Measures for the Act on the Acqusition of Land for the Public Undertakings and Compensation : Focused on the Case of Harbor Construction)

  • 문정갑;강용주
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제37권3호
    • /
    • pp.85-108
    • /
    • 2006
  • The government enforced 'Act on the acquisition of land for the public undertakings and compensation' commenced on the 1st of January 2003 to faithfully protect the property right of people and to scheme the effiecient drive of public works by systematizing the procedures and the standards of compensation and reforming irrational systems. The previous act regulated to compensate a rightful person of fishery right, who is in a nearby area of public works enforcement zone for actual loss according to the level of damage. On the contrary, as for the fishery damage happened at the outside of public works enforcement zone, the act regulates to compensate for a loss when it is actullay occurred and affirmed. So, the related act was amended as, so called, Post Factum Compensation. With regard to the Post Factum Compensation regulation for the fishery damage occurred at the outside of this public works enforcement zone, many objections and problems are raised as it is not clearly understood of the nature of the fishery compensation. However, this paper is not intended to mention the right or wrong of the current law, but to discuss the problems or remedies of 'Act on the acquisition of land for the public undertakings and compensation' after examining cases of public works which was enforced for the fishery compensation within the current law.

  • PDF

국제중재판정의 집행을 거부하기 위한 사유로서의 공서 (On Public Policy As bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards.)

  • 박영길
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제12권1호
    • /
    • pp.3-54
    • /
    • 2002
  • When the ruling of Foreign Arbitral Awards contradicts the public policy of the enforcement state, it can be a ground for a refusal to enforce the ruling. New York Convention V section 2, UNCITRAL section 36, and Korean arbitration law section 36 confirm this principle. The final ruling of international arbitral awards should be respected according to the international convention or the principle of reciprocity, which cancel out the above principle: when the ruling contradicts the country's public policy, it can be refused to enforcement. Since the Helsinki General Convention, ILA have studied upon it and presented the final report and recommendation during the 2002 New Delhi General Convention. In it, firstly, the finality of awards rendered in the context of international commercial arbitration should be respected save in exceptional circumstances. Secondly, every state is recommended the “international public policy”, on which it can refuse to follow the ruling of international arbitral awards, and advised to respect it as far as possible.

  • PDF

The French approach to enforcement of arbitral awards, international public policy and corruption

  • Samantha Nataf
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제33권3호
    • /
    • pp.31-68
    • /
    • 2023
  • In recent years, French courts have decided to adopt an uncompromising stance in the fight against corruption in international arbitration. While French enforcement/annulment courts were originally conducting a limited review of arbitral awards dealing with corruption allegations on international public policy grounds, they now carry a full re-examination of such awards accepting that a corruption plea be raised for the first time before them and admitting new evidence. What is at stake, in terms of international public policy, is to define the happy medium between, on the one hand, the necessity to preserve the enforceability of international arbitral awards, and, the necessity to fight corruption. This paper presents the evolution of French case law in the past years and makes a critical assessment of the French approach by comparison with other jurisdictions.

지방자치단체 미술장식품 설치의 개선방안 (A Study on Reforming the Adornment of Buildings in the Provinces)

  • 조정송;이유직
    • 한국조경학회지
    • /
    • 제31권2호
    • /
    • pp.36-47
    • /
    • 2003
  • The purpose of this study is to examine the present problems relating to the legislation and execution of adornment of buildings in the provinces, and to explore ways to improve the role and function of adornment of buildings in terms of public art. In order to do that, the related national law and enforcement decree and the local regulations and rules were analysed. In addition the catalogues on the adornments of buildings that are managed by 31 cities and counties of Gyeonggi-Province were also compared and analysed. As a result of our survey, it has been determined that the reform of the adornments of buildings must be executed on the national and local levels. On the local level, the revision of regulations must occur simultaneously with the changes of national law and enforcement decrees. In many local self-governing bodies, there are quite a lot of discrepancies between their regulations and the upper law. Therefore, people can be confused regarding the sensitive problems such as the types of buildings that are required to display adornments and the proportion of the cost to the construction cost. In addition the effects of the improvements to national laws are often delayed. For example, the updated national law requires committee members to be appointed on the basis of merit, the announcement of the deliberation results, and the establishment of provisions regarding the management of existing structures. Unfortunately, improvements to the national law are not followed through on a local level. Concerning national legislation, the following improvements are necessary to minimize these problems. First, the western concept of‘public art’must be imported to Korea and applied to future legislation regarding adornment of buildings. Second, the perception of the purpose of adornment of buildings must be changed from‘art promotion’to‘improvement of the urban environment’Third, it is impractical to require private citizens to fund public worts of In. Korea requires an organized federal funding system for the commission of public art, which is to be controlled by committee. Finally, the definition of public artwork must be enlarged to include a more broad range of art, such as landscape architecture. In addition, continuing care of existing public worts of art must be managed systematically and strengthened.

해상에서 국제법 위반행위에 대한 법 집행권의 범위와 한계 (The Scope and Limits of Law Enforcement at Sea on International Law Violations)

  • 김석균
    • Strategy21
    • /
    • 통권45호
    • /
    • pp.60-90
    • /
    • 2019
  • 공해의 이용은 '항해의 자유'와 '기국주의'라는 관습법으로 형성되어온 원칙이 유엔해양법협약에서 명문화되어 공해 이용에 관한 두 개의 큰 축을 이루고 있다. 연안국의 해양에 대한 통제권이 확대되고 새로운 안보위협에 대처하기 위한 레짐이 생성되면서 공해의 자유에 관한 두 가지 기제를 축소하려는 유인과 시도가 있었다. '항해의 자유'와 '기국주의'는 인류가 바다에 진출한 이래 수 천 년에 걸쳐 형성된 관습법이고 오늘날 인류 공동의 유산인 바다를 평화롭고 질서 있게 이용하기 위한 법, 제도적 근간이 되고 있다. 따라서 공해상 타국 선박에 법 집행의 절차적 편리성과 집행국의 이익을 위해 이러한 원칙으로부터 예외를 만들거나 후퇴하기 시작하면 해양이용의 기본 틀 자체가 위협받을 수 있고 결국에는 해양질서는 강대국의 힘의 논리와 이익에 좌우 될 수 있다. 이러한 이유로 대북해상 제재와 같은 새로운 해양법 집행 레짐이나 조치는 무해통항제도, 공해이용의 자유와 같은 원칙을 존중하고 국제법의 틀 안에서 이루어져야 한다.

Study on Drafting Appropriate Dispute Resolution Clause in International Contract

  • Lee, Se-In
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제29권3호
    • /
    • pp.39-52
    • /
    • 2019
  • There are various factors to consider when parties to an international agreement draft a dispute resolution clause in their written contract. These factors can be classified into two categories. The first category is about the parties and the nature of the contract, such as the parties' places of business and whether the contract contains a simple transaction or has a complicated nature. The second category is about the applicable rules of the parties' places of business or performance such as the private international law, service of process rules, and enforcement of court judgment and arbitration award rules. When parties to an international contract agree to a litigation, they normally choose a forum court and a governing law. In selecting a forum court and a governing law, the parties must consider private international law, service of process rules, and enforcement of judgement rules of candidate forums. In case the parties agree to an arbitration, they have to choose between institutional arbitration and ad hoc arbitration. For ad hoc arbitration, parties still need to further agree on which arbitration rules to use, and in which place the arbitration shall take place. Mediation involves a similar kind of decision as with arbitration. Traditionally, national courts of the parties' places of business have been used as litigation forums in dispute resolution clauses but, recently, arbitration is being increasingly employed as an alternative dispute resolution method in international contracts. Moreover, there have been international efforts to utilize mediation as a dispute resolution method in international commercial issues. Rather than simply taking a dispute resolution clause provided in a sample written contract, parties to an international contract must carefully consider various relevant factors in order to insert a dispute resolution clause which will work well for a particular contract.

조선시대 주요 의료 관련 쟁점과 관심사 - 시행법령을 중심으로 (Major Medical Issues and Interests in the Joseon Dynasty - Focusing on Enforcement Laws)

  • 박훈평
    • 한국의사학회지
    • /
    • 제36권1호
    • /
    • pp.31-50
    • /
    • 2023
  • Through this paper, all the provisions of the enforcement statutes stipulated in the Joseon's law code were investigated and major medical issues and interests in the Joseon Dynasty were analyzed. The characteristics of each period reviewed in the text are as follows. The early Joseon Dynasty is divided into three periods. First of all, Joseon filled the gap in the law with the active acceptance of the Ming Dynasty's law code, Daemyeongrul, which conformed to Confucian virtue. Next, the completion of Gyeonggukdaejeon was an opportunity to prepare the basis for Joseon's medical laws. Lastly, from the late 15th century to the 16th century, the existing medicine promotion measures and emphasis on hyangyak(domestic herb) continued. it can be said that Joseon's politicians needed a medical policy based on Confucian virtues and maintained state-led promotion policies, but on the other hand, there was no other alternative to try newly by reflecting the limitations and failures of the policy. The late Joseon Dynasty is also divided into three periods. First of all, the period from the late 16th century to the early 18th century was marked by the growth of families in technical positions. The era of King Yeongjo can be said to be the period of reorganization of medical related laws. Finally, the period after the late 18th century is a period of passive regulation and supplementation. Lastly, the revision of the actual medical law was not made or reflected in era of King Jeongjo. In the case of the early Joseon Dynasty, the policy shifted from state-led to families in technical positions. However, in the 19th century, the weakening of the royal authority led to the weakening of the overall administrative system of the country, and the pharmaceutical policy had to be limited.

한일 아동복지법의 내용에 관한 비교연구 (A Comparative Study on the Korean Child Welfare Law and the Japanese Child Welfare Law)

  • 이혜원
    • 한국사회복지학
    • /
    • 제58권2호
    • /
    • pp.167-195
    • /
    • 2006
  • 이 연구는 한일 아동복지법에 규정된 내용을 분석틀에 근거하여 비교하고, 그 결과를 토대로 향후 한국 아동복지법의 개정 방안을 제시하였다. 연구 결과, 양자에 있어서 아동의 참여권 규정은 2개 조항으로 나타났다. 일본의 보호급여는 일원화된 창구인 아동상담소를 중심으로 일시보호 기간 2개월 이내라는 신속성, 담당 아동복지사의 조사권한, 친권개입 등 공공성, 그리고 일선 가정아동지원센터와의 연계성을 확보하고 있다. 또한 4촌 이내가 아닌 아동의 일시보호 신고의무와 빠른 신고기간(영아는 1개월 이내)으로 법 규정의 실효성을 제고하고 있다. 이에 반해 한국의 일시보호는 대리보호 전 단계 조치의 기능을 하고 있다. 한편 일본의 장애아동 관련 조항이 전체 조항의 21.2%를 차지하고 있으나, 한국의 아동복지법에는 전혀 규정되어 있지 않다. 그리고 일본의 아동복지법은 대리보호의 최저기준 준수의무와 아동복지에 관한 국가의 재정부담 강제규정, 그리고 국가의 책임성 규정을 명시하고 있으나, 한국의 아동복지법은 이들을 명시하고 있지 않다.

  • PDF

식품과 축산물 HACCP의 차이점 분석 및 일원화 방안 도출 (Proposal of unification plan based on differences between food and livestock product HACCP)

  • 조아현;강주영;박은지;이한철;이철수;김중범
    • 식품과학과 산업
    • /
    • 제53권1호
    • /
    • pp.101-115
    • /
    • 2020
  • Korea has been managed HACCP with food and livestock products separately, but it was incorporated into food and livestock product safety management certification standard in 2015. Currently, the notification is unified, but food sanitation act and the livestock products sanitary control act are not unified. These differences are leading to complaints from food and livestock corporation. In this review, the food sanitation act, enforcement regulations of the food sanitation act, the livestock products sanitary control act and enforcement regulations of the livestock products sanitary control act were compared and analyzed to identify the part which requires unification. As a result of the survey, the thirteen clauses were proposed to unify in the food sanitation act and the livestock products sanitary control act. The nineteen clauses were proposed to unify in enforcement regulations of the food sanitation act and enforcement regulations of the livestock products sanitary control act.