Journal of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회지:중재연구)

The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The French approach to enforcement of arbitral awards, international public policy and corruption

  • Received : 2023.08.11
  • Accepted : 2023.09.01
  • Published : 2023.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recent years, French courts have decided to adopt an uncompromising stance in the fight against corruption in international arbitration. While French enforcement/annulment courts were originally conducting a limited review of arbitral awards dealing with corruption allegations on international public policy grounds, they now carry a full re-examination of such awards accepting that a corruption plea be raised for the first time before them and admitting new evidence. What is at stake, in terms of international public policy, is to define the happy medium between, on the one hand, the necessity to preserve the enforceability of international arbitral awards, and, the necessity to fight corruption. This paper presents the evolution of French case law in the past years and makes a critical assessment of the French approach by comparison with other jurisdictions.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Arvmyren and C. Heydarian, "Chapter 14: Corruption and Arbitration: Swedish Perspectives Against a French Backdrop", in A. Calissendorff and P. Scholdstrom (eds), Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook 2022, Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook Series, Volume 4, pp. 231-256
  2. L. d'Avout and S. Bollee, ≪ Droit du commerce international aout 2016-juill. 2017 ≫, Recueil Dalloz 2017, p. 2054
  3. S. Besson, ≪ Le controle des sentences arbitrales par le juge suisse : apercu de quelques traits caracteristiques et confrontation avec le droit francais ≫, Revue de l'Arbitrage, Volume 2022, Issue 3, pp. 867-898
  4. S. Bollee, note sous Paris, 16 janv. 2018, JDI 2018. 12
  5. V. Chantebout, ≪ Etendue du controle du juge sur les violations de l'ordre public par l'arbitre : enfin le revirement espere ≫, Dalloz Actualite, 10 May 2022
  6. T. Clay, ≪ Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de reglement des litiges ≫, Recueil Dalloz 2014, p. 2541
  7. W. J.L. de Clerck, "Dutch Supreme Court Finds for the First Time on Corruption and Arbitration in Context of Annulment Proceedings", in M. Scherer (ed), Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2022, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp. 881-904 https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2022037
  8. L.-C. Delanoy, ≪ L'arret M. Schneider du 12 fevrier 2014 : feu rouge pour la ≪ revision ≫, feu vert pour la corruption ? ≫, Cahiers de l'arbitrage 2014 n°3, p. 585.
  9. I. Fadlallah, ≪ L'ordre public dans les sentences arbitrales ≫, Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International law, 1994, Volume 249, pp. 369-430
  10. I. Fadlallah, ≪ La corruption corrompt l'arbitrage, note sous Paris, 5 avril 2022 ≫, Revue de l'arbitrage, Volume 2022, Issue 2, pp. 640-646
  11. I. Fadlallah, ≪ Note under Cour d'appel de Versailles, 14 March 2023, Societe Alstom Transport et autre c/ societe Alexander Brothers Ltd ≫., Revue de l'arbirage, Volume 2023, Issue 2, pp. 416-422
  12. "Fighting International Corruption in Domestic Courts - Alstom, Sorelec and the Review of Arbitral Awards", in J. Risse, G. Pickrahn, et al. (eds), SchiedsVZ | German Arbitration Journal, Kluwer Law International 2023, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp. 91-98
  13. E. Gaillard and P. de Lapasse, ≪ Le nouveau droit francais de l'arbitrage interne et international ≫, Recueil Dalloz, 20 January 2011
  14. E. Gaillard, ≪ L'apport de la pensee juridique francaise a l'arbitrage internationale ≫, JDI n°2, April 2017
  15. E. Gaillard, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 13 Sept. 2017, JDI 2017. 20
  16. E. Gaillard, note sous Paris, 16 janv. 2018, JDI 2018.13
  17. C. Greenberg, ≪ Le controle de la conformite de la sentence a l'ordre public international : les questions en suspens ≫, Revue de l'Arbitrage, Volume 2022, Issue 1, pp. 227-250
  18. A.-C. Hahn, "Judicial Scrutiny of Corruption-Tainted Arbitral Awards at the Setting Aside and Enforcement Stage", in A.Meier and C. Oetiker (eds), Arbitration and Corruption, ASA Special Series, Volume 47, pp. 71-80
  19. R. Hansen, "Bariven S.A. v. Wells Ultimate Service LLC, Court of Appeal of The Hague, 200.244.714/01, 22 October 2019", A contribution by the ITA Board of Reporters, Kluwer Law International
  20. C. Jarrosson, ≪ La jurisprudence Belokon-Sorelec, ou l'avenement d'un controle illimite des sentences ≫, Revue de l'Arbitrage, Volume 2022, Issue 4, pp. 1251-1286
  21. J. Jourdan-Marques, ≪ Chronique d'arbitrage : la Cour de cassation creve l'abces sur l'ordre public international ≫, Dalloz Actualite, 20 May 2022
  22. A-M. Lacoste, "Corruption as a Bar to Award Enforcement in France", in M. Scherer (ed), ASA Bulletin, Kluwer Law International 2018, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp. 31-52 https://doi.org/10.54648/ASAB2018004
  23. P. Mayer, ≪ Corruption : nouvelles orientations dans le controle de la conformite de la sentence a l'ordre public international, note sous Paris, 27 octobre 2020, Paris, 17 novembre 2020, Paris, 25 mai 2021 ≫, Revue de l'Arbitrage, Volume 2021, Issue 3, pp. 788-799
  24. J.B. Racine, ≪ Le controle de la conformite de la sentence a l'ordre public international un etat des lieux ≫, Revue de l'arbitrage 2022, Issue 1, pp. 179-226
  25. C. Seraglini, ≪ Le controle par le juge de l'absence de contrariete de la sentence a l'ordre public international : le passe, le present, le futur ≫, Revue de l'arbitrage, Volume 2020, Issue 2, pp. 347-376
  26. United Nations, "Global Cost of Corruption at Least 5 Pert Cent of World Gross Domestic Product, Secretary-General Tells in Security Council, Citing World Economic Forum Data", SC.13493, 10 September 2018
  27. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022