• 제목/요약/키워드: Korea-Japan Comparative Study

검색결과 657건 처리시간 0.032초

남한과 일본의 임연군란 비교 연구 (A Comparative Study on Mantle Communities in South Korea and Japan)

  • 정용규;김종원
    • The Korean Journal of Ecology
    • /
    • 제21권1호
    • /
    • pp.81-88
    • /
    • 1998
  • A comparative analysis on mantle communities in South Korea and Japan was carried out. The study was accomplished by using syntaxa and hierarchical system of mantle communities in South Korea and Japan through Zurich-Montpellier School's method, and also achieved comparison on syntaxonomy, synecology, syndynamics and syngeography between two countries. Mantle communities in South Korea and Japan were defined to the Rosetea multilorae representing mantle vegetation in Northeast Asia. Mantle communities in Japan showed much diverse than those in South Korea. Mantle communities in South Korea and Japan considerably corresponded between the two. Results of the current study will make possible to accumulate qualitative $\bullet$quantitative informations on mantle communities in Northeast Asia. And the subsidiary knowledge from this study will provide practical data on comparative analysis about whole mantle communities in Northeast Asia.

  • PDF

한ㆍ일 수산물 수출입 경쟁구조 분석 (An Analysis on the Competitive Structure of Fishery Products Export & Import between Korea and Japan)

  • 최정윤;김정봉
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.141-164
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study analysis the market status and competitive structure of Korean fishery in Japan import market, and derive policy implications for seeking main causes. Specifically', trade state between Korea and Japan is discovered and theoretical model is also used to analysis competitiveness between two countries. And then real measuring methods of competitive index is Introduced, the status of Korean fishery products in Japan import market is analysed totally through the study of comparative predominance and export competition. The analysis is based on the statistical methods such as RCA, RMI, and CMS. In summary, first, Korean fishery products have the comparative predominance in Japan, China and Thailand, but they have the comparative inferiority in USA, considering research results. Second, competitiveness of fishery products between Korea and in Japan import market extreme, relatively, competitiveness of Korean fishery products for Thailand's fishery products is lowest. Third, Korean fishery products maintain unconstant pattern, but competitive inputs result in increasing export to Japan generally.

  • PDF

Comparative Analysis of Competitiveness in the Steel Distribution Industry between Korea and Japan

  • Lee, Jae-Sung
    • 유통과학연구
    • /
    • 제12권3호
    • /
    • pp.25-32
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose - This study reviews changes in the steel export-import structure between Korea and Japan using a trade related index; it focuses on analyzing comparative advantage based on time-series analysis statistics data using the trade intensity index (TII), revealed comparative advantage index (RCA), and trade specialization index (TSI). Research design, data, and methodology - In terms of their economic phase, Korea and Japan have a mutually complementary character. Therefore, this study aims to understand each country's trade structure to strengthen Korea-Japan economic cooperation, examine trade drawbacks, analyze factors that affect trade, and identify ways to improve and expand trade. Results - The results indicate immense potential for mutual cooperation and complementariness, which will yield guaranteed adequate profits comparable to those of any regional economic integrated community. Conclusion - From our viewpoint, Northeast economic cooperation can facilitate industry technological cooperation with Japanese partners in the prevailing environment that is characterized by increasing competition among industries and the need to secure stable resource supplies as well as the expansion of the export market and diversification, which can have significant positive implications.

한일 패키징 콘테스트 수상작에 관한 비교 분석 (Comparative Study on the Packaging Contest Winners' Work of Korea and Japan)

  • 노경수;유왕진
    • 한국포장학회지
    • /
    • 제14권2호
    • /
    • pp.73-79
    • /
    • 2008
  • Compared to the 2007 packaging contest winners' work of Korea and Japan, their packaging trends have been studied in this study. Environmental-friendly packaging have been turned out the main trend at the same time in both Korea and Japan markets in this comparative research. In applied technology aspects, there was a remarkable distinction compared to packaging technology of both countries; Korea's technology was evaluated out to be lagged behind Japan by three or four years in this study. The road map for future packaging development plan shall be suggested by following comparative studies from the annual packaging contests which are supposed to be held in many developed countries.

  • PDF

일본과 중국의 유통선박산업의 경쟁력비교분석 (A Comparative Analysis of the Competitiveness of the Distribution Ship Industries of Japan and China)

  • 이재승
    • 유통과학연구
    • /
    • 제11권8호
    • /
    • pp.31-37
    • /
    • 2013
  • Purpose - This study aims to strengthen the economic cooperation between Korea and Japan by studying the pattern of trade between them and identifying drawbacks. Thus, it aims to enable trade expansion by analyzing the factors that affect trade and identifying ways to improve them. If economic cooperation is improved, transport and communication costs, as well as the transaction cost of economic exchanges, can be minimized. Research design, data, methodology - The trade intensity index developed by the Japanese economist Yamazawa under his trade intensity theory was used to analyze the trade decision factor of Korea and Japan. Trade structure and decision factors were analyzed for the target period of 2000 to 2012, and the period ranging from 2000 to 2005 was compared with the period ranging from 2005 to 2012. This paper is an analysis of the resultant time series. The data were collected from Korea Traders Association, Korea Customs Office, and UN Comtrade (2000, 2005, 2012) and whole table indexes were calculated by the author. Trade related index was used to analyze the comparative advantage based on time-series analysis statistics data (2000. 2005, 2012) through an analysis of the trade intensity index (TII), revealed comparative advantage index (RCA), and trade specialization index (TSI). Results - The trade intensity index of the industries of Japan and Korea is 1.814 in 2000. The export ratio of Japan against China was slightly higher at 2.128. TII is indicated to be 1.600 in both 2005 and 2012, which means export ratio of Japan against China is considerably maintained in 2005; however, export ratio of Japan against China is diminishing gradually as its index is 1.600 in 2012. Second, as per the trade specialization index of the ship industry in Japan and China, TSI is indicated to be -0.818 in 2000, -0.308 in 2005, and -0.847 in 2012. Generally, it is still closer to -1 and especially, we can see it is more closer to -1 in 2012. Third, as per the revealed comparative advantage index of the ship industry in Japan and China, the RCA index in 2012 is 0.007, which is quite far from 1 as compared to the value in 2000 and 2005. Hence, the Japanese ship industry has a significant comparative disadvantage against the Chinese ship industry. Conclusions - Both countries invest most of their capital in the shipping industry. It is the shipping industry that receives the most capital investment in the two countries is invested and governmental policy funds are needed. As both countries have large shipping industries, this research project is very valuable. Japan and China are compared because they are Korea's neighbors. Also, Korea is strategically located in Northeast Asia and has a history of foreign intrusion from several countries. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is to understand the trade structures of both countries and intensify the economic cooperation between Japan and China.

동아시아 국가 간 부품무역 비교우위와 자유무역협정 (The Comparative Advantage of Intermediate Goods Trade in East Asia and Free Trade Agreement)

  • 권택호;주경원
    • 무역학회지
    • /
    • 제41권1호
    • /
    • pp.159-186
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구는 1991-2012년간 동아시아 국가 간 산업별 부품무역의 비교우위를 분석하여, 동아시아 FTA 체결 시 예상되는 무역과 생산분할 구조를 분석한다. 분석기간 중 동아시아 내 부품무역의 상호의존도는 지속적으로 증가하여 왔으며, 동아시아 FAT 체결 시 구조적 변화가 없다면 한국과 일본이 동아시아 내 전기 및 전자기기, 수송기기 부품수출을 더 강화하고, 중국과 ASEAN이 최종재를 수출하는 구조는 유지될 것으로 예상된다.

  • PDF

독일, 영국과 한국, 일본 등 아시아 국가 간의 위험성평가 제도 비교연구 (Comparative Study on the Institutional Framework of Risk Assessment between German, UK and Korea, Japan in Asian Countries)

  • 신인재
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제28권1호
    • /
    • pp.151-157
    • /
    • 2013
  • This paper is a comparative study on risk assessment policy between Asian countries such as Japan, Korea, Singapore and EU countries, German, UK. Risk assessment is a tool adopted currently in many countries in order to reduce occupational risk in workplace because it help employers to identify their hazard arousing in their working conditions then to settle the issues. This paper compares institutional framework posed in EU and Asian countries. As a result of comparative study, EU countries have more concrete legal system for risk assessment than Asian countries. But Asian countries are now interested in risk assessment such as Japan, Korea and Singapore. The author also suggests successful ways to settle down the risk assessment policy in a country. These findings help to understand occupational health and safety policy on risk assessment in Asian countries.

한국과 일본의 제도적 문화재보호에 대한 비교연구 (A Comparison Study on the System of the cultural properties law for Fire Protection in Korea and Japan)

  • 윤유혁;김동은;서동구;이재영;권영진
    • 한국화재소방학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국화재소방학회 2008년도 춘계학술논문발표회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.57-60
    • /
    • 2008
  • A comparative study on the prevention regulation of historical heritage between Korea and Japan. Every years fire accident to historical building is increasing such as Daewoongjun, Naksansa, Namdaemun and so on. The aim of this comparative study is to investigate and compare the prevention regulation in the side of fire safety of historical building between Korea and Japan. This study focus on the background of development and exchange of Fire safety law in Japan because of same condition, building material and prevention regulation.

  • PDF

한.일 중재법상 중재판정의 비교법적 고찰 (A Comparative Study Arbitral A ward under the Arbitral Laws between Korea and Japan)

  • 최석범;정재우;김태환
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제16권1호
    • /
    • pp.81-119
    • /
    • 2006
  • The parties in the trade can have full autonomy and can resolve disputes independently, impartially and without delay by selecting arbitration by agreement. Korea and Japan had revised their Arbitration Laws to incorporate as many provisions of the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law as possible. Japan had amended its century-old arbitration law, becoming the 45th country to adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on International commercial arbitration. New Arbitration Law was enacted as Law No.138 of 2003 and effective on March 1, 2004, is applicable to both national and international arbitration. Korea had amended its arbitration law on December 31, 1999 and its New Arbitration Law incorporates the most of the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law as Japan. Arbitration must be popular in resolving international commercial disputes in Northeast Asian bloc in order to increase the volume of intra-trade in the Northeast Asian bloc. But in order for the parties to make use of arbitration in the bloc, the arbitration laws of nations in the bloc must have similarity and unification. As Korea and Japan playes important roles in the bloc, both nations's arbitration laws must be studied in view of similarity and difference to unify both nations' arbitration laws by way of showing an example. Therefore, this paper deals with both nations' arbitration laws in view of comparative law to unify their arbitration laws and Northeast Asian Nations' arbitration laws.

  • PDF

The Automobile Distribution Industry's Trade Structure Analysis and Comparison between Japan and USA

  • Lee, Jae-Sung
    • 유통과학연구
    • /
    • 제12권7호
    • /
    • pp.37-44
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose - This study reviews changes in the automobile export-import structure between Japan and USA through a trade related index, and focuses on analyzing comparative advantage based on time-series analysis of statistical data (2000, 2005, and 2012) by using the trade intensity index (TII), revealed comparative advantage index (RCA), and trade specialization index (TSI). Research design, data, and methodology - Japan and USA have mutually complementary economic phase characteristics. Therefore, this study aimed to understand each country's trade structure, to strengthen Japan-USA economic cooperation and aimed to examine trade drawbacks to analyze causes affecting trade and ways to improve it to facilitate its expansion. Results - These two economies have immense complementary potential and, further, significantly greater profits are assured from trade between them, as compared to any other integrated regional economic community. Conclusion - Economic cooperation between these two powers can provide opportunities for industry technology cooperation through partnerships against the backdrop of accelerating competition among industries, by identifying opportunities to secure stable resource suppliers and enlarge the export market.