• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.399-415
• /
• 2024

Purpose - This study aims to explore trading behaviors of individual investors in the KOSDAQ market, thereby explaining the low profitability of individual investors relative to institutional or foreign investors and comparing features specific to the KOSDAQ market with those of the KOSPI market. Design/methodology/approach - KOSDAQ market data, ranging from 2018-01-03 to 2023-12-28, is obtained from the KRX market data system on a daily basis. 12 sub-periods are generated by dividing the entire dataset into 6-month intervals, and within each sub-period, 25 stock-groups are established by the amount of individual investors' net purchases at 4% intervals. The analysis is conducted by comparing major information on trading behaviors across the sub-periods and across the stock-groups. Findings - First, the ratio of individual investors' net purchases shows a negative correlation with the ratio of net purchases of institutional and foreign investors with a strong statistical significance for all sub-periods, and it exhibits negative correlations with the periodic cumulative returns for the most sub-periods. It is also revealed that the low profitability of individual investors might result from the failure of choosing stocks, unlike the case of the KOSPI market where individual investors' low performance is related to the choice of the timing of transactions, rather than the choice of stocks. Research implications or Originality - The empirical results indicate that individual investors in the KOSDAQ market need to be more prudent in choosing stocks than in the KOSPI market, and imply that rediscovering the benefit of the diversification, especially for the KOSDAQ market, might be substantially meaningful.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.111-136
• /
• 2000

본고는 기업 내부의 경영자와 일단 투자자들 사이에 정보 비대칭이 존재하는 기업 공개 시장에서 신주의 저평가 현상을 완화하는 제3자의 보증 역할에 관한 연구이다. 일찍이 Megginson and Weiss(1991), Hamao, Packer and Ritter(1998) 등의 연구에 의하면 미국, 일본 등의 경우 벤처 캐피탈의 지원을 받는 벤처 기업이 그렇지 않은 경우에 비해 신주 저평가 현상이 비교적 적게 나타나 벤처 캐피탈이 일정한 명성 효과를 발휘하는 것으로 보고되고 있다. 그러나 남명수(1993), 이기환, 임병균, 최해술(1998) 등의 실증 분석에 의하면 국내 벤처 기업의 경우에는 그렇지 않은 것으로 보고되고 있어 벤처 캐피탈의 보증 역할이 미미한 것으로 나타난 바 있으나 이들의 연구는 KSE 시장의 신규 벤처 기업들을 대상으로 하였기 때문에 최근 KOSDAQ 시장에서의 벤처 기업의 신규 등록이 활발해지면서 벤처 캐피탈의 보증 역할에 관한 연구는 재검토를 요구하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구는 96년 7월 이후 KOSDAQ 시장에 등록되어 있는 기업 중 벤처 캐피탈의 지원을 받은 34개의 벤처 기업과 그렇지 않은 34개의 벤처 기업을 대응 추출하여 구성한 표본에 대해 신주의 등록 초기의 시장초과 수익률을 분석하여 신주 저평가 현상을 살펴보고 각 기업의 수익률과 공모 잔량에 대한 회귀분석을 통하여 벤처 캐피탈의 보증역할을 규명하였다. 본 연구 결과는 현재 KOSDAQ 시장에서 벤처 캐피탈의 보증 역할은 거의 나타나지 않았으며 상장 직전의 세후이익과 전체적인 시장 상황만이 수익률과 공모 잔량에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과는 기존의 KSE 시장에서의 벤처 캐피탈의 보증 역할에 대한 연구 결과와 유사한 것으로 미국 등 선진 시장의 연구 결과와는 달리 국내 벤처 캐피탈의 KOSDAQ 시장에서의 미미한 역할을 입증하는 실증 결과라고 할 수 있다.

• Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2003

This study Investigates the short and long-run dynamic relationships between the domestic and U.S. stock markets for the period of declining stock prices. It Is well known that the domestic stock market variations are largely caused by the U.S. stock market movements. Multivariate causal tty test Is utilized to examine the lead-lag relationships among four stock prices of KOSPI and KOSDAQ In the domestic part and DOWJONES and NASDAQ In the U.S. part. When the stock prices tend to decrease In the long run, It Is found that both KOSPI and KOSDAQ have closer relations with NASDAQ than DOWJONES. When both of domestic stock markets are severely fluctuate, bidirectional causal relationships appear to exist between NASDAQ and each of KOSPI and KOSDAQ. On the other hand. when the domestic stock markets are relatively stable, unidirectional causality Is found to exist between NASDAQ and each of KOSPI and KOSDAQ. which is explicitly validated by the analysis of variance decomposition.

• Journal of Information Technology Services
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.67-81
• /
• 2009

This study aims to test the valur relevance of development cost particularly focusing on IT firms of KOSDAQ. Test period is from 2005 to 2007 and the samples are 2,271 year-firms including 1,692 firms that reported development cost in financial statements. The basic test model is a modified Ohlson(1995)'s linear model. The empirical results show that there is the negative relation between stock price and development cost reported as asset. It means that development costs reported as asset is considered as expense in the market. It implies that development activities of KOSDAQ IT firms is not related to market-leading technologies or goods. Otherwise it might reflect the conservative valuation of market on the unstability of KOSDAQ market itself.

• Knowledge Management Research
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.39-56
• /
• 2004

Mergers and Acquisitions(M&A) have long played an important role in the growth of firm. M&A has been considered a effective strategy for Korean government to restructure industry. Previous studies provided mixed results on the synergy effect of M&A This study provides investigation on 39 mergers occurred over the sample period from 2000 to 2001. In this study, event study methodology arc used to calculate abnormal return(AR) and cumulative abnormal return(CAR) based on mean-adjusted model. The testing period of this study from date -30 through date +30, where date zero is the date of the first public announcement of the merger. The empirical results in this study can be summarized as follows. First, the return rates of KOSDAQ registered firms with M&A appears higher than that of KSE listed firms. This means that public announcement of M&A is more influential on stock price for KOSDAQ registered firms than KSE listed firms. Second, The difference between actual merging price and fair value is significant in KSE listed firms and KOSDAQ registered firms. This means that the investors take M&A of KOSDAQ registered firms as a good news. Third, the impact on the market prices of merging firms take place after the first public announcement of the merger in KSE registered firms. But the impact on the market prices take place not only merging firms but also merged firms in KOSDAQ registered firms. This result shows that the investors recognize a M&A is a strategy of technology transfer in small & venture business.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2010

This study examines the impacts of outside directors' characteristics and compensation on stock performances of KOSDAQ and NASDAQ IPO firms. The results of this study indicated the following interesting results. First, there is no significant relation between outside directors' age and CARs on KOSDAQ firms. while significant positive relation between outside directors' age and CARs on NASDAQ firms. And the elder age group shows a more positive impact on performances compared with the younger age group. Second, there is no relation between outside directors' academic background and CARs for KOSDAQ firms. But We find a significantly positive one for NASDAQ firms. Third, In Relation to outside directors' careers, their professional or CEO careers group have more positive impact on stock performances than gray directors' careers group. Lastly, there is an insignificant negative relation between the outside directors' compensation and CARs for KOSDAQ firms. while there is a positive relative for NASDAQ firms. In particular, there is a significant positive relative between value of stock options and CARs for NASDAQ firms. from the result, I could find out the stock option for outside' directors have a positive influence on firm value.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.2096-2109
• /
• 2012

This study investigates empirical issues that have received little attention in the previous research in the Korean capital market. It is to find any financial determinants on the capital structure for the firms listed in the KOSDAQ(Korea Securities Dealers Automated Quotation). Another test is performed to find any possible discriminating factors by utilizing a robust methodology, which may distinguish between the firms belonging the 'prime section' and the 'venture section' in terms of their financial aspects. Moreover, the null hypothesis that the changing trend or movement of a firm's capital structure with respect to its industry mean (or median) may be random, is also tested. For the book-value based debt ratios, size(INSIZE), growth(GROWTH), Market to book value of equity(MVBV), volatility(VOLATILITY), market value of equity (MVE) and section dummy (SECTION) showed their statistically significant effects on the book-value based leverage ratios, respectively, while size(INSIZE), growth(GROWTH), market value of equity(MVE), beta(BETA) and section dummy (SECTION) showed their statistically significant effects on the market-value based leverage ratios. This study also found an interesting result that a firm belonging to each corresponding industry has a tendency for reversion toward its mean and median leverage ratios over the five-year tested period.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.9 no.11
• /
• pp.353-361
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze how Corporate Real Estate Ratio affects Firm's Value for KOSPI Companies and KOSDAQ Companies. The period of analysis is the period of the Financial Crisis (2007-2008), the period immediately after the Financial Crisis (2009-2011), and the period following the introduction of IFRS (2012-2016). The samples of 2761 KOSPI Companies years and 3719 KOSDAQ Companies years are used in this study. The result of Regression Analysis shows that the higher Corporate Real Estate Ratio is, the more negative Firm's Value is. In the comparison of markets, both KOSPI Companies and KOSDAQ Companies had no statistically significant effects during the Financial Crisis. Although KOSDAQ Companies had a greater negative effect on the Firm's Value than KOSPI Companies right after the Financial Crisis, KOSPI Companies have had a greater negative influence on the Firm's Value than KOSDAQ Companies since the introduction of IFRS. Therefore, each corporation should pay more attention to identifying the appropriate amount of their Corporate Real Estate Ratio and should continue to analyze and make decisions on the most efficient use of real estate which is owned by each company. This study shows speciality in dividing into three period, such as the period of the Financial Crisis, the period immediately after the Financial Crisis, and the period following the introduction of IFRS and comparing the degree of influence on the KOSPI Companies and KOSDAQ Companies for the each period. I hope to study the factors that affect the company's real estate policy.

• Korean small business review
• /
• v.42 no.3
• /
• pp.173-193
• /
• 2020

This study analyzes the effects of KOSDAQ-listed firms' convertible bonds, which have recently increased rapidly in number and size. Although KOSDAQ companies are called mid-size companies, KOSDAQ companies belong to SMEs. Furthermore, convertible bonds have traditionally been a critical capital raising tool for SMEs in the US and Europe. In Korea, KOSDAQ companies actively employ convertible bonds. Convertible bonds provide investment incentives for hesitant investors, allowing companies to raise capital at low interest rates. This study analyzes whether capital raising through issuance of convertible bonds by KOSDAQ companies affects their financial constraints. Financial constraints result from incomplete capital markets, which are embedded in most companies and countries.. In particular, financial constraints have a significant impact on the growth and survival of SMEs. The seminal study FHP(1988) is the most important and effective study of firm's financial constraints. We find that FHP's financial constraint measures show that convertible bond issuance would mitigate the financial constraints of KOSDAQ companies. However, the significance of the evidence is not strong.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.15 no.11
• /
• pp.113-120
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the relative proportion of retention between real estate for business and investment real estate among the real estate held by corporations has been changed after and before the Financial Crisis as well as whether there has been any difference between KOSPI and KOSDAQ listed companies in terms of their share of the real estate. The increasing pattern of real estate owned by KOSDAQ were similar to the KOSPI companies except for investment properties during the Financial Crisis. The proportion of real estate owned by KOSPI had been lower than that of KOSDAQ companies in both investment and business real estate before the Financial Crisis. However, during the period of the Financial Crisis, the proportion of real estate for business held by KOSPI firms was higher than that of KOSDAQ firms. Furthermore, the portion of investment of real estate owned by KOSPI has remained higher than that of KOSDAQ after the Financial Crisis period and the recent period. Based on the results of this analysis, how the relevance of the change of portion between real estate for business and investment real estate affects management performance will be figured out in the future studies.