• 대한한방내과학회지
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.597-611
• /
• 2019

Objective: The goals of this study were to analyze each of the reasons adopted by the Constitutional Court or the Courts for Decisions determined to permit the use of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors and to look at the medical devices from a Korean medical perspective. Materials and Methods: For this study, several judicial precedent databases were used for searching judicial precedents that handle the usage of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors. Prior studies on similar issues were considered. The Korean medicine textbooks and related research studies were also used in this study. Results: From 2000 to 2018, a large number of lawsuits were filed regarding the legality of Korean medicine doctors using medical devices; approximately 20 final judgments or decisions were made. Among them, only two cases determined that Korean medicine doctors could legally use medical devices. Conclusion: The decisions in both cases could be interpreted as the judgments that Korean medicine doctors were allowed to use a medical device whose use or operating principles were commonly incorporated with Korean medical principles. That was provided that training was sufficient in the use of the medical device, to the extent that it could be used and that such use of the medical device was not feared to pose a health hazard.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.71-79
• /
• 2012

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to set the explanatory duty on traditional Korean medical(TKM) treatment by analyzing the judicial precedents. Methods : The study was performed by analyzing nine cases of lawsuits related to Korean medicine doctor and explanatory duty among the medical dispute cases in Korea from 1968 through 2012. Results : Nine closed claims occurred regarding the violation of explanatory duties in the field of TKM practice. Two claims were decided by supreme court, three were decided by high court, and four were decided by district court. The causes of lawsuits were categorized as follows : bee venom pharmacopuncture, herb treatment, and an explanation for safety. Conclusions : To perform an explanatory duty has important legal implications for the protection of patients' rights and Korean Medicine doctors' autonomy on TKM treatment.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.649-664
• /
• 2021

There have been numerous efforts to provide legal information to the general public easily. Most of the existing legal information services are based on keyword-oriented legal ontology. However, this keyword-oriented ontology construction has a sense of disparity from the relationship between the laws used together in actual cases. To solve this problem, it is necessary to study which laws are actually used together in various judicial precedents. However, this is difficult to implement with the existing methods used in computer science or law. In our study, we analyzed this by using topological data analysis, which has recently attracted attention very promisingly in the field of data analysis. In this paper, we applied the the Mapper algorithm, which is one of the topological data analysis techniques, to visualize the relationships that laws form organically in actual precedents.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.161-171
• /
• 2023

The traditional safety management method starts with the misconception that similar accidents will recur if the inappropriate behavior of the person who caused the accident is investigated and punishment is not judged. However, in modern safety management, incidents or situations occur when negative conditions latent in the system are mutually influenced and triggered. The precedent for revoking the disposition of suspension of first officer A of Eastar Jet, which won a legal lawsuit against the administrative regulatory authority, is a representative example that will serve as an opportunity for the administrative regulatory authority to break away from the punishment-oriented safety management method of the past. On the other hand, airmans and air carriers also need to have a clear understanding of flight regulations, and when judicial judgment is required, predictable and effective legal effects can be obtained by preparing clear standards for flight regulations. In addition, administrative regulatory authorities expect a change from the punishment-oriented safety management policy of the past to a systematic safety management policy.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제58권1호
• /
• pp.395-423
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 1987년 헌법재판소 출범이후 청구된 사회복지법 관련 헌법판례를 분석함으로써, 사회복지제도의 실시와 관련되어 어떠한 법생활적 갈등이 제기되고 있으며, 판결결과에서 나타난 헌법의 적용과 해석이 어떠하였는지를 고찰하고자 하였다. 분석에 활용된 헌법판례는 총 62건이었으며, 이 중 요건미충족 등으로 각하된 40건을 제외한 22건의 판례에 대해 내용분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 22건의 헌법재판 판례는 국민건강보험법 9건, 산업재해보상보험법 6건, 국민연금법 4건, 국민기초생활보장법 2건, 사외복지사업법 1건이었다. 판례의 주된 내용으로, 내용적 측면에서는 제도의 운영원리와 적용대상, 급여의 수준 및 급여수급 제한조건 사외복지서비스조직과 재정에 관련된 법률 규정들이 재산권과 평등권, 행복추구권 인간다운 생활 보장권 등의 기본권 침해와 관련된 판례가 주를 이루었다. 또한 절차적 측면에서는 권리구제절차 등이 재판청구권, 위임입법의 한계 등을 위배했는지의 여부를 심사하는 판례였다. 한편, 판결결과를 통해서 사외복지법과 관련된 우리나라의 헌법은 사회연대를 통한 복지국가주의와, 사회적 시장경제주의를 기본원리로 하여 사외복지제도의 시행을 제도보장으로 하고 있는 한편, 구체적인 제도시행의 내용에 있어서는 입법부와 행정부의 광범위한 재량을 인정하는 경향을 발견할 수 있었다.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.133-142
• /
• 2003

본 연구에서는 패러디, 패러디 광고에 대한 개념 규정은 물론 패러디 광고의 저작권 침해에 대한 미국과 한국의 법리 해의 문제 등을 알아보고자 한다. 또한, 패러디 광고의 무분별한 제작이 가져올 문제점과 이에 대한 바람직한 대응 방안도 모색하고자 하였다. 미국의 패러디 인정의 경우와는 달리 우리 나라에서는 법적으로 공정 사용 원칙이 매우 제한적으로 적용되고 있었다. 이러한 패러디 저작권에 대한 문제점 해결을 위해서 다음과 같은 몇 가지 대안이 모색되어야 한다고 본다. 첫째, 표절, 모방, 패러디에 대한 명확한 심의기준 확립이다. 둘째, 심의기구의 확충과 명백한 심의 기준의 적용이다. 셋째, 광고업계의 자체정화 노력이다. 넷째, 소비자 모니터링의 활성화이다. 다섯째, 법원의 판례에 대한 평가와 함께 '광고계의 의견'을 개진할 필요가 있다.

• 한방안이비인후피부과학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.78-87
• /
• 2012

Objective : The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of medical malpractice related to pediatric ophthalmology and to identify the causes and potential preventability of medical litigation in Korean medicine. Methods : A study was performed by analysing 8 cases of lawsuit in the year between 1968 and 2011, which were selected among the medical dispute cases involving pediatric ophthalmology. Results : The eight closed claims occurring in the field of pediatric ophthalmology were founded in the data for medical malpractice. One claim was supreme court decision, two claims were high court decisions and five claims were district court decisions. Conclusions : While malpractice claims occurring in the field of pediatric ophthalmology were uncommon, they resulted in a high rate and amount of indemnity payments. For reduction of medical disputes, improvement of clinical trials and clinical medical cares is emphasized, and informed consent is also important.

• 한국한의학연구원논문집
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 2009

Objectives : The lawsuits associated with medical practice in Korean medicine are increasing gradually. However, the clear definition for medical practice in Korean medicine has not been existed in Korean law. Only we may understand the concept regulated by judicial precedents of the court of justice or the authoritative interpretation by the government. Methods : For study, a database was established for medical lawsuits involving Korean medicine(1968~2009, n=130). Results : According to court rulings, the medical practice in Korean medicine is an act to diagnose a person's illness, prescribe and treat to cure based on traditional Korean medicine, to be understood as a medical care, to have some factor to create or increase danger for the preservation of health or hygiene, and to be practiced by medical specialists based on their professional knowledge. Conclusions : But, such definition is not proper and exceedingly vague. Besides medical circumstances Koreans Medicine are changing, and new precedent to the definition of the practice of medicine is establishing. Therefore the meaning and scope of the medical practice in Korean medicine should be modified and amended, reflecting these conditions.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.279-301
• /
• 2020

In the absence of any guidance under statutory law, such as the Rules for Construction of Policy, MIA 1906, judges should follow the general principles of interpretation that apply to all contracts. In simple terms, Contra Proferentem Rule means that if the contents of the terms and conditions are ambiguous, they are interpreted against the writer of the terms and conditions. In the Anglo-American Contract Law, the 'default rule' is an important judicial tool that can supplement defects in contract norms and reinforce the principle of private autonomy through gap-filling techniques related to the interpretation of contracts. In Korea, it is sometimes mentioned in case of precedent, and it has been established as a clear rule. This study analyzes the interpretation of terms and conditions is not in the form that the interpretation of other general contracts and other interpretation principles are valid, but contracts based on terms and conditions are also contracts, and as a general rule, the interpretation of terms and conditions is explained like the general contract interpretation.

• 한국소프트웨어감정평가학회 논문지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 감정사례 및 판례를 분석하여, 기존 소프트웨어 완성도 감정으로 분류되어 수행된 완성도감정, 기성고감정, 하자감정 및 비용감정의 문제점을 적시하고, 그 해결 방안을 제시한다. 판례와 법률적 관점에서 완성도와 기성고율은 큰 차이를 가지고 있다. 완성도는 개발프로세스가 종료된 소프트웨어를 대상으로 전제하는 반면, 기성고율 감정은 미완성된 소프트웨어의 개발진척도를 평가하기 때문이다. 종종 소프트웨어 기성고와 관련된 판례에서는 소프트웨어 공학 개발 절차에 따른 단계별 가중치를 인정하여 전체 기성고 또는 완성도를 산정하는 것을 볼 수 있는데, 감정에서는 대부분 기능의 구현-작동여부 만을 완성도 비율 산정의 척도로 삼고 있는 문제도 존재한다. 또한 기존 소프트웨어 완성도 감정사례에서 다루지 않았던 문제 중 하나는 소프트웨어 하자에 대한 책임 소재 분석 및 감정이 언급되지 않고 있는데 반하여, 판례에서는 분쟁이 발생한 원인을 찾아 책임소재를 다투고 있다. 본 논문에서는 위 제기된 문제를 체계적으로 분류하여 소프트웨어 완성도감정과 소프트웨어 기성고감정을 분리할 것을 제안하고 감정 방안을 제시한다.