• 한국정보과학회논문지:컴퓨팅의 실제 및 레터
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.606-610
• /
• 2010

본 논문에서는 학습 패러다임의 변화에 따른 효과적인 학습을 제공하기 위해 Learning Design (LD) 기반 학습관리시스템에서 전단부 엔진인 LD Publication 엔진을 설계하고 구현하였다. LD Publication 엔진은 LD 기반으로 작성된 학습 콘텐츠 패키지를 분석하고 학습활동을 기술한 정보파일의 구문과 의미를 분석하여 모델화한다. 모델화된 데이터는 학습관리시스템에서 효과적으로 접근 가능한 형태로 단편화하여 데이터베이스에 영속한다. LD 기반 학습관리시스템은 학습 효과와 학습자 편리성을 제공하여 높은 학습 성과를 가져올 수 있도록 도와준다. 그리고 학습 콘텐츠의 재생산, 재사용, 공유를 통한 콘텐츠 개발의 활성화를 도모하고 인프라 확대에 기여할 것이다. 또한, 학습자의 역량, 성향 그리고 학습이력 등을 연계가 가능하도록 설계되어 시스템의 확장이 용이하다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.407-432
• /
• 2012

이 연구는 조선후기 전남 지역의 출판문화를 파악하기 위해 수행되었다. 현전본과 문헌을 통해 서목을 작성하여 시기별, 지역별, 주제별 분석을 시도하였다. 조선후기 전남지역에서는 보성의 죽천서당에서 서적간행을 시작하였다. 또한 시기를 막론하고 문집은 비중있게 간행되었음을 알 수 있고, 17세기와 18세기 전반까지 나주가 출판의 중심지였다가 19세기 후반에는 장흥이 출판의 중심지가 되었다. 후대로 올수록 보계류, 전기류, 별집류, 지리류 등의 서적을 집중적으로 간행하였다. 19세기부터는 목활자를 이용하여 간행한 서적이 대부분임을 확인할 수 있다. 이와 같이 목활자를 이용한 빈도가 높은 것은 전적의 내용과도 깊은 관련성이 있다. 출판활동이 가장 활발했던 시기는 19세기 후반이고, 조선전기에 비해 유가류, 총집류, 의가류, 사서류 등은 비중이 줄어들었다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.311-317
• /
• 2019

Background Since the initial Research and Reconstruction Forum (R&R Forum) in 2011, the R&R Forum, Korean Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (KSAPS), and Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (KSPRS) have held annual meetings. This study was conducted to provide updated information on the publication rate of presentations at those meetings. Methods Plastic surgery-related abstracts presented at the R&R Forum, KSAPS, and KSPRS between 2011 and 2015 were collected. The sessions were divided into free papers, posters, and e-presentations (or e-posters) for each annual meeting. Abstract publication status was confirmed through PubMed, Google Scholar, the KCI-Korean Journal Database, and the KM-base database. Results In total, 2,335 abstracts were presented in the free paper, poster, and e-presentation sessions. Of these, 622 (26.6%) were published. The overall publication rates were 240 of 684 abstracts (35.1%) presented at the R&R Forum, 56 of 216 abstracts (25.9%) presented at the KSAPS meetings, and 326 of 1,435 abstracts (22.7%) presented at the KSPRS meetings. In terms of specific annual meetings, the 2014 R&R Forum had the highest publication rate (39.9%), followed by the 2015 KSAPS (31.0%) and the 2015 KSPRS (28.8%). Conclusions Scientific researchers present diverse results at these professional meetings, with a focus on innovative surgical techniques and improved surgical outcomes. This is our second study on this topic. Despite its limitations, this study indirectly shows that the recognition of Korean plastic surgeons and the quality of the annual meetings of Korean societies of plastic surgery have risen to the global level.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.209-218
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 특정 기관에 소속된 저자들의 저작경향을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 H 의과대학 부속병원 소속저자들을 대상으로 이들이 게재한 2000년부터 2008년까지의 SCI 논문을 추출하여 저자별로 색인화하였다. 소속 저자들의 저작경향을 일시성과 지속성 측면에서 분석하였다. 분석결과, 소속저자들은 일시적인 저작경향보다는 비교적 지속적인 저작경향을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 신규저자들에 의한 출판비율은 평균 39.17%로 높지만 재투입 저자들의 출판비율(16.83%)과 연속저자의 출판비율(44%)로 구성된 기존저자들에 의한 출판비율이 평균 60.83%로 상대적으로 높게 나타났다. 또한 저자들의 일시성을 판단하는 신규소멸저자비율은 평균 28.2%로 비교적 낮았으며 특정연도의 저자들의 고정적 출판확률은 평균 76%로 매우 높게 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 기관 소속저자들의 저작경향은 기관의 연구성과 관리를 위한 기초 데이터로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.66-76
• /
• 2015

This research uses a new approach to analyze the extent of influence journal papers have on the progress of varied research fields by estimation of subject-based influence on research other than impact factor that relies on citation index. It is initiated with the hypothesis that earlier established citation relations between journal and citing paper, which reveals the research field that contains the highest citation index and hence has received the greatest contribution from a particular journal, would have inconsistent contribution to the research field over the year of journal publication. The target research is primarily 128 journal papers and 4,123 citing papers from Information Systems Research published in the years 2001, 2004, 2007, and 2010. The characteristics of citation history and hallmarks of research field of citing papers were studied and analysis on significant distinction between citing fields based on the year of publication was performed. The analysis results show the order of citation rate to be highest from Computer Science (2,221 cases), Business & Economics (2,191 cases), and Information Science & Library Science (1,901 cases). The citation history of the journal, nonetheless, indicates increase in citation during 2-3 years after the earliest publication till it achieves constant citation. The statistical analysis shows significant variation in citing fields in accordance with the publication year; especially in 2010, journal contribution has increased in the fields of Business & Economics, Operations Research & Management Science, and Health Care Sciences & Services but, however, is reduced in Education & Educational Research and Social Sciences - Other Topics.

• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제47권5호
• /
• pp.791-808
• /
• 2012

이 연구는 우리나라 대표적 현대 지리지인 "한국지지"와 "한국지리지"의 사업성과를 평가한 것이다. 1980년대와 2000년대에 수행된 지리지 발간사업에 대하여 지리학 전문가를 대상으로 지리지 편찬체계와 참여인력, 지리지의 내용과 구성, 시각자료 활용 등에 대해 델파이 조사를 실시하였다. 지리학 전문가들은 "한국지지"와 "한국지리지"의 의의를 높게 평가하였고, 동시에 문제점을 지적하였다. 편찬주기, 소요기간, 분량, 집필진 선정방식, 주제구분과 권역구분 등에 대해서는 현행방식에 만족하였다. 편찬방식에 있어 집필진 외에 상위책임자를 추가할 것, 난이도에 있어 보편적 독자를 더욱 염두에 둘 것, 시각자료 활용에 있어 도안과 표현의 다양화 등을 주문하였다. 이러한 응답성향은 응답자의 직업, 지리지 편찬 참여경력에 따라 다소 차이를 보였다. 전문가를 대상으로 수행한 지리지 사업성과 평가는 추후 지리지가 나아가야 할 방향을 고려하는 과정에서 주요 고려사항이 될 것으로 판단된다.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.701-707
• /
• 2010

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the attributing factors influencing major research areas of the papers published in the journal of Ergonomics Society of Korea (JESK). Background: Ergonomics has a wide range of research areas. Diversity of research topic is one of the major strong points of this discipline especially in the era of fusion. Dominant areas among the diversity changed from time to time. It is interesting to know the attributing factors of the dominant areas. Method: During the past three decades JESK has published 649 articles. As an editor of the JESK, I reviewed these papers and sorted them into the detailed research fields of ergonomics; (1) technical group (TG) s of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES), (2) editing groups of the journal of Ergonomics Abstracts and (3) TGs of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (ESK). I also listed major events which might affect the publication trend. Results: Anthropometry was the most dominant area all the time. Health and safety area has been steadily increasing publication amount. Conclusion: Government research funding was the main attributing factor determining the publication trend of the JESK. Application: The results of the publishing trend analysis might help to determine the editing policy of the JESK.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.5-9
• /
• 2015

Purpose -The purpose of this study was to review and analyze the four major journals of KODISA and all of their published articles of 2014 and to revise and update the existing publication standards and practices in order to improve the overall quality and reputation of these journals. Research design, data, and methodology - This study applied an analytical approach, a case study method, to analyze and examine the published articles and the publication standards and practices of four KODISA journals, JDS (1999), IJIDB (2010), EAJBM (2011), and JAFEB (2014), from their first publication. Results - In 2014, KODISA journals published a total of 171 papers - JDS (122), IJIDB and EAJBM (16 each), and JAFEB (17): 94 articles in general business and 77 articles in economics. Conclusions - KODISA journals continuously revised and updated their publication standards and practices and adopted technological support systems to enable its journals to remain independent and open access in order to ultimately become one of the world's reputable journals.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.49-52
• /
• 2017

Purpose - To improve and strengthen existing publication and research ethics, KODISA has identified and presented various cases which have violated publication and research ethics and principles in recent years. The editorial office of KODISA has been providing and continues to provide advice and feedback on publication ethics to researchers during peer review and editorial decision making process. Providing advice and feedback on publication ethics will ensure researchers to have an opportunity to correct their mistakes or make appropriate decisions and avoid any violations in research ethics. The purpose of this paper is to identify different cases of ethical violation in research and inform and educate researchers to avoid any violations in publication and research ethics. Furthermore, this article will demonstrate how KODISA journals identify and penalize ethical violations and strengthens its publication ethics and practices. Research design, data and methodology - This paper examines different types of ethical violation in publication and research ethics. The paper identifies and analyzes all ethical violations in research and combines them into five general categories. Those five general types of ethical violations are thoroughly examined and discussed. Results - Ethical violations of research occur in various forms at regular intervals; in other words, unethical researchers tend to commit different types of ethical violations repeatedly at same time. The five categories of ethical violation in research are as follows: (1) Arbitrary changes or additions in author(s) happen frequently in thesis/dissertation related publications. (2) Self plagiarism, submitting same work or mixture of previous works with or without using proper citations, also occurs frequently, but the most common type of plagiarism is changing the statistical results and using them to present as the results of the empirical analysis; (3) Translation plagiarism, another ethical violation in publication, is difficult to detect but occurs frequently; (4) Fabrication of data or statistical analysis also occurs frequently. KODISA requires authors to submit the results of the empirical analysis of the paper (the output of the statistical program) to prevent this type of ethical violation; (5) Mashup or aggregator plagiarism, submitting a mix of several different works with or without proper citations without alterations, is very difficult to detect, and KODISA journals consider this type of plagiarism as the worst ethical violation. Conclusions - There are some individual cases of ethical violation in research and publication that could not be included in the five categories presented throughout the paper. KODISA and its editorial office should continue to develop, revise, and strengthen their publication ethics, to learn and share different ways to detect any ethical violations in research and publication, to train and educate its editorial members and researchers, and to analyze and share different cases of ethical violations with the scholarly community.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.137-156
• /
• 1999

본 연구에서는 SCI 학술지에 1990년에서 1995년 사이에 발표된 한국 의학논문의 수를 DIALOG의 SCISearch 데이터베이스를 온라인 검색하여 연도별. 주제분야별, 문헌유형별로 측정하고, SCI 한국 의학논문의 수와 증가추세, 그리고 SCI 기여도와 논문생산성을 분석하였다. 국내 의학논문의 국제화, 세계화 추세를 가늠하여 보기 위하여, 1990년대 전반부의 SCI 한국 의학논문의 발표실적 및 기여도를 1980년대의 데이터에 비교하였다. 또한. 1980년대에 SCI 논문 발표실적 및 SCI 논문들에 의한 인용정도가 의학에 비하여 현저하게 높았던 화학에 비교하여 봄으로써, 1990년대에 들어오면서 의학분야가 상대적으로 많은 발전을 하였는지 검증하여 보았다.