• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제50권1호
• /
• pp.395-416
• /
• 2016

이 연구는 조선시대 황해도 지방의 사찰에서 개판(開板)된 불서를 대상으로 시기별 간행 현상과 불서의 성격 등에 대해서 서지학적으로 분석한 글이다. 황해도에서 간행된 불서는 모두 85종으로 파악되었으며, 그 중 "용감수감(龍龕手鑑)" 등 5종은 황해도 사찰에서만 유일하게 개판되었던 것으로 보인다. 이들 불서는 조선전기에 64종이 간행되어 전체 75%를 차지하고 있으며, 특히 이 중에서도 명종 대에 문정왕후 등 왕실의 후원으로 집중적으로 개판되었던 현상을 보이고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 그러나 임란 이후 조선후기에는 급격하게 쇠퇴하는 경향을 보이고 있는 바, 이는 임진과 병자의 양난을 거치면서 황해도 지방의 민생이 파탄에 이른 역사적 사실과도 일치하는 것으로 이해하였다. 또한 이들 불서를 대상으로 주제별로 분류하여 성격을 분석해 본 결과 대체로 경전류와 종의류 불서가 80% 이상을 차지하고 있는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 실제적으로 사찰에서 개판불사에는 각수의 소임이 매우 중요한데, 대부분의 각수(刻手)는 황해도 지방의 사찰에서 활동하면서 2-3종의 불서를 판각하는데 그치고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 하지만 각수 중에 도성(道成)과 수연(守衍)은 황해도는 물론 다른 지방으로 이동하면서 불서를 판각하였던 것으로 나타나고 있어 주목되는 각승(刻僧)으로 보인다. 이 연구는 향후 북한지역 내 다른 지방의 개판 불서 연구에 비교 대상 논문으로써 의미를 지닐 것으로 기대한다.

• 대한건축학회연합논문집
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.131-137
• /
• 2018

The two recent excavations at the site of Beopsusa Temple in Seongju revealed that it contained eight building remains, three pedestrian facilities, four drainage facilities, two walls, three embankments, and an estimated pagoda remain. Even though this investigation was restricted to some sections of the site, it confirmed remains of architectural significance and thus attracted the attention of concerned researchers. This study thus set out to make an architectural survey of the site based on the excavation results and examine the characteristics and nature of remains of Buildings No.2 and 3 at the site. The planar analysis results show that Building No.2 (Remains 2-2) at the site of Beopsusa Temple was a gable-roofed building with a single story including 6 kan(間) in the front and 4 kan(間) in the flank and that Building No.3 (Remains 3-3) was a single-story building with a hipped-and-gable roof including 5 kan(間) in the front and 3 kan(間) in the flank. The most noteworthy remain of this excavation was the north-south square platform discovered at the Building No.2 at the site. It is estimated as a high chair platform used for Buddhist sermons. It was confirmed only at the lecture hall remains of Hwangnyongsa Temple and Anyangsa Temple in the nation and had never been found at remains related to Chinese and Japanese Buddhist Temples, being regarded as a very important and unique artifact. Since it was found at the remains of Building No.2, they was estimated as the lecture hall remain at the site. Found at the remains of Building No.3 at the site, the oblong altar remains were also very unique and rare and never found at other Buddhist temple sites. The inside of oblong altar was evenly covered with roof tiles instead of rubble, and there were small crushed stones for internal division, which is an altar construction method distinctly different from its counterparts at other Buddhist temple sites. Those findings raise the possibility high that a wooden facility was put up at the top of oblong remains.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.33-40
• /
• 2015

The present study is aimed to reconsider the time of installation and the purpose of the square footstone located at the center of the wooden pagoda in Hwangnyongsa Temple, based on related precedent studies. Precedent studies are divided into two streams of assertions: one is that the square footstone was to support the major pillars at the time of building and the other is that it was installed to store Buddhist reliquaries inside the central foundation stone after the wood pagoda burnt down in the Invasion of Mongol. Summarizing the grounds with which the precedent studies support their assertions, they are the relation with Gaseopbul Yeonjwaseok, the emerging time of the square footstone, repairing work at the level of reconstruction, additional enshrinement of general Buddhist reliquaries and so on. The present study reviewed the key grounds suggested in the previous studies regarding the square footstone. First, it was determined that the square footstone has nothing to do with Gaseopbul Yeonjwaseok, after looking into the timings of appearance, condition and shape in literatures. Rather, it was assumed that Gaseopbul Yeonjwaseok resembles a stone column. Next, the square footstone is assumed to be installed after the 4th year of King Kwangjong's rule because the wood pagoda was lost in fire in the 4th year of Kwangjong's rule and it had been left alone for 68 years until the repair work finished in the 13th year of King Hyunjong. It is assumed that repair works at the level of reconstruction had been twice in total, say, once during King Kyungmun and Hyunjong, respectively. Next, looking into the establishment of the general Buddhist reliquaries and the repair work during King Kyungmun, it was not common then to enshrine additional Buddhist reliquaries when repair work progressed and so there was not an additional enshrinement of Buddhist reliquaries after King Kyungmun. However, it is hard to decide that there was no repair work at the level of reconstruction at that time. Last, we can find a similar case to the square footstone of the wood pagoda in Hwangnyongsa Temple in the copper pagoda in Japanese Yaksasa Temple. In conclusion, it is assumed that the wooden pagoda in Hwangnyongsa Temple was lost to the fire in the 4th year of King Kwangjong's rule and thus the square footstone had been used as Jinho stone to protect Buddhist reliquaries and used as a propping stone for the major pillars after King Hyungjong.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.38-49
• /
• 2021

정림사지 정비사업은 사찰을 구성하는 건물의 원형복원을 목표로 하였으나 점차 사역의 경관을 조성하는 조경 정비로 이행되었다. 본 연구는 이러한 사실에 주목하여 다음과 같은 정림사지 문화재 조경의 특성을 정리하였다. 첫째, 문화재 조경은 문화재보호법상 지정된 문화재와 주변에 지정된 문화재 보호구역을 공간적 범위로 하여 경관을 조성, 유지, 관리하는 조경 행위로서 유구 보호 및 정비, 기능별 공간 배치와 동선계획, 문화재 보호를 위한 구조물 설치, 방문자 편의를 위한 시설물 도입, 식생경관 조성을 포함하는 작업이다. 둘째, 정림사지 문화재 경관은 일제의 문화재 지정과 발굴조사로 사찰명이 밝혀진 '고적조사사업', 광복 이후 '백제탑공원 조성', 사적으로 지정된 '백제문화권 개발사업', 고증의 어려움으로 전각의 복원 대신 공원과 박물관 건립으로 이행된 '백제문화권 특정지역 종합개발사업', 백제 창건 당시 가람 배치를 회복하고 세계유산으로 지정된 '정림사지 복원사업'으로 전개되었다. 셋째, 부여신궁(扶餘神宮) 외원(外苑)과 연계된 기념공원 조성, 일제강점기의 시가지계획 실현, 발굴 유구와 사역의 보호환경 조성, 가람 배치의 원형복원, 문화재의 진정성 회복과 활용이라는 정림사지 경관 변화의 배경을 확인하였다. 넷째, 정림사지 경관은 문화재 지정대상과 범위, 토지이용, 동선·포장, 유구정비 수법, 구조물, 시설물, 식생으로 결정되는데 이들의 정비 양상을 고찰한 결과, 문화재 영역의 시각적 차별화로 위계성 부여, 문화재 지정 범위 확장을 고려한 과정적 경관 조성, 가역성을 고려한 유구 정비로 진정성 확보, 역사문화경관에 어울리는 식생경관 조성, 오픈스페이스 제공으로 문화유산 향유가치 증진이라는 정림사지 문화재 조경의 특성을 도출하였다.

• 대한금속재료학회지
• /
• 제50권11호
• /
• pp.829-838
• /
• 2012

The microstructure, chemical composition, and lead isotope ratio of the Buddhist bell of Yongmoon Mountain Sangwonsa temple, which was selected as one of the three great bells of Korea by Japanese historians, were analyzed in order to estimate the origin of the material and the time of casting. The microstructure of the temple bell was composed of a copper matrix phase with ${\alpha}$, a face centered cubit lattice structure, a ${\delta}$ phase with $Cu_{41}$ $(Sn,Ag,Sb)_{11}$ as the chemical structural formula, dispersed lead and $Cu_2S$ particles, and locally agglomerated fine particles. Through analysis of the chemical composition of the bell, a criterion (Pb: 0-3.0 wt%, Sn: 10-15 wt%) for distinguishing the bells of the Shilla dynasty from the bells of the Koryo Chosun dynasty is proposed. Examining the lead isotope ratio of $^{207}Pb/^{206}Pb$ and $^{208}Pb/^{206}Pb$ of the Buddhist bell of Sangwonsa temple proved that the bell was fabricated using raw materials in South Korea, which led to the conclusion that the bell was cast in Korea and the top board of the bell has been damaged by an unknown individual. The criteria of distinguishing the bells from the Shilla dynasty from the bells of the Koryo Chosun dynasty presented for the first time in this research is expected to aid in identifying and estimating the previously unclear production years of other bells.

• 미술자료
• /
• 제104권
• /
• pp.102-142
• /
• 2023

보신각종은 호불군주 세조가 즉위 10년을 맞이하여 한양 도성 한복판에 원각사를 건립하면서 그곳에 봉안하고자 1468년에 조성한 범종(梵鐘)이었다. 현재 보신각종은 타종할 수 없을 정도로 많이 손상되었는데, 그것은 원각사종에서 보신각종으로의 역사적 변천을 잘 보여준다. 필자는 본고에서 보신각종에 가해진 인위적 훼손에 주목하여, 누가, 언제, 왜 훼손하였으며, 그 역사적 의미는 무엇인가를 살펴보았다. 먼저 제1장에서는 관련되는 선행 연구성과를 검토하여 필자의 문제의식과 연구 관점 및 방법론을 제시하였다. 특히 가장 주된 논점인 보신각종과 원각사종의 관계에 초점을 맞추어 학설사를 검토하여, '보신각종=원각사종'의 관점에서 필자가 논의를 전개함을 밝혔다. 이어서 제2장에서는 세조가 원각사종을 조성하게 된 배경을 검토하였다. 구체적으로 조선 초에 왕명으로 조성한 종들을 조종(朝鍾)과 범종(梵鐘)으로 나눈 다음, 조종 4구-태조의 종루종, 태종의 돈화문종, 세종의 광화문종, 세조의 사정전종-와, 범종 3구-세조의 용문사종, 흥천사종(또는 정릉사종) 및 원각사종-를 만든 시기순으로 정리하였다. 요컨대, 세조는 만년에 원각사종을 조성하면서, 거기에 한 마음으로 임금과 부처가 소리로써 백성을 교화하겠다는 의미를 부여하였던 것이다. 그리고 제3장에서는 보신각종에 보이는 인위적 훼손의 흔적을 면밀하게 고찰하였다. 먼저 보신 각종의 현상을 관찰한 다음, 이를 보신각종을 전후하여 조성한 흥천사종(1462) 및 봉선사종(1469)과 비교하여, 범종의 구성 요소 가운데 무엇이 얼마나 훼손되었는가를 추적하였다. 훼손된 구성 요소는 다시 불교적 요소-견대(肩帶)의 복련(伏蓮), 보살입상 4구, 최항(崔恒)이 지은 종명(鐘銘)-와, 비(非)불교적 요소-주종 관계자 가운데 도제조(都提調) 명단-로 나누어진다. 전자는 원각사종에서 불교 문자와 상징이 지워졌다는 점에 착안하여 이를 '불교지우기'라 명명하고 그 이념적 요인으로 동시대 유자(儒者)들의 맹렬한 벽불론(闢佛論)을 주목하였으며, 후자는 정치적 요인으로 연산군의 갑자사화를 지목하였다. 그리고 보신각종의 인위적 훼손에는 이념적 요인과 정치적 요인이 동시에 작용하였다는 점에서, 그 시기를 갑자사화(1504년)부터 연산군 퇴위까지로 추정하였다. 마지막으로 제4장에서는 범종으로서의 원각사종이 조종으로서의 보신각종으로 바뀌는 과정을 추적하고, 그 변신의 의미를 종소리의 상징성에 초점을 맞추어 음미하였다. 1468년 최종적으로 완성된 원각사종은 1504년까지 36년이라는 짧은 시간 동안만 예불(禮佛)을 위한 범종으로서 본연의 역할을 수행하였으며, 1504년 원각사가 폐사되면서 그 역할도 끝났다. 1536년에는 원각사지에서 남대문으로 옮겨졌으며, 1594년 11월 다시 타종할 때까지 전후 90년 동안 침묵 속에 방치되었다. 그런데 임진왜란 때의 병화로 종루종이 파괴되면서 원각사종은 조종으로 재탄생하였으며, 명동 고개를 거쳐 1619년 종루로 이전되었다. 이때부터 명실상부한 종루종[보신각종]으로서 1908년 일제가 타종을 중단시킬 때까지 300년 가까이 매일 새벽[파루(罷漏)]과 저녁[인정(人定)]마다 규칙적으로 타종되었다. 원각사종[범종]에서 보신각종[조종]으로의 변신은, 종소리가 상징하는 바가 부처의 소리에서 임금의 소리로 바뀌었음을 의미한다. 원각사종이 보신각종으로 바뀌는 과정에서 단적으로 드러난 '불교지우기'는, 조선 전시기에 걸쳐 불교의 거의 모든 분야에서 광범위하게 일어났다. 요컨대, 보신각종에서 확인되는 불교지우기야말로 조선시대 한국 사회의 탈불교화를 역설한다 하겠다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.41-58
• /
• 2005

This study was started under the judgement that reviewing $\ulcorner$A Survey Report of Korean Architecture$\lrcorner$, which contains photographs and drawings by Sekino Tadashi and which was also made under the order of the Japanese government(1902), would make it possible to consider in detail the status of Korean buildings in the period of the Korean Empire. The focus of the study. was put on three main parts of the temple, especially the central parts. The photographs and drawings as mentioned above showed that changes in the layout of buildings in the central part of the temple were made between the period of the Korean Empire and that of Japanese occupation. Thus the purpose of the study is to investigate when changes in building layout in the central part of the temple were made and what made such changes to be caused, obtaining information necessary for future changes in the precincts of the temple. Results of the study can be summarized as follows. First, 'Seonchal Daebonsan Beomeosa feonkeongdo' and 'Gyeongsangnamdo Dongraegun Beomeosa Geonmul Jeondo' were made in a same period. While, 'Chosun Gojeok Dobo', published by the government-general of Chosun, was a collection of photographs taken by Sekino Tadashi for about 30 years from 1902 to 1933 under the order of the Japanese government. But there were few changes in the building layout of the temple shown in the three materials. Second, one of the photographs and drawings made since 1933, not contained in 'Chosun Gojeok Dobo', and discovered by this researcher was 'Seonchal Daebonsan Beomeosa Annae' which was published by the temple itself after national independence from the period of Japanese occupation, indicating the main reason of changes in building layout as mentioned above. In conclusion, the layout of buildings of the temple began to be changed on a large scale, with so-called 'Cheyongseol' ignored, when Buddhist monk Cha Woon Ho established a 7-storied sarira tower to the left of the main building in the center of the upper part in 1936. In addition, the axis line connecting between Hwaeomjong and Seonjong was also changed at that time.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.137-155
• /
• 2005

This study was started with its consideration as materials showing original shapes of temple buildings in the late period of Chosun the photographs and drawings which contained in $\ulcorner$A Survey Report of Korean Architecture$\lrcorner$ made by Sekino Tadashi through his survey for 62 days(July 5${sim}$Sep. 4, 1902). Results of the study can be summarized as follows. During the period of Japanese occupation, Beomesa temple experienced frequent changes in building layout including the transfer and removal of buildings. Such frequent change began in spring, 1936 when a Buddhist monk of Beomeosa temple, Cha Woon Ho moved Gwaneumjeon, originally located to the light of the main building, to the left of the building and, on its original site, built up a 7-storied sarira tower. Though it is difficult to say that the study provides everything about Beomeosa temple, the researcher expects that the study would be the very basis on which changes in the building layout of the temple since the late period of Chosun can be researched. In conclusion, the researcher hopes that the above mentioned restoration plan would help originally restore or enlarge temples, further transmitting such restored or enlarged establishments as valuable cultural remains from generation to generation. In this respect, the researcher expects such restoration plan to be made in continuous and more detailed ways.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.47-60
• /
• 2023

Due to a mistranslation of Sanskrit to Chinese, East Asian Buddhist community misunderstands the original meaning of the fundamental word, 'sachal(寺刹)'. Sanskrit chattra, a parasol on top of a venerated Indian stupa buried with Buddha's sarira, became the symbol of majesty. The Indian stupa was transformed into a pagoda in China, and the highlighted parasol on the summit was transliterated into chaldara(刹多羅), an abbreviation for chal (刹), and finally designated the whole pagoda(塔). Sachal consists with lying low monastery and high-rise pagoda. Tapsa(塔寺), an archaic word of temple, is exactly the same as sachal, because chal means tap, pagoda. However, during the 7th century a Buddhist monk erroneously double-transliterated the Sanskrit 'kshetra,' meaning of land, into the same word as chal, even despite phonetic disaccord. Thereafter, sutra translators followed and copied the error for long centuries. It was the Japanese pioneer scholars that worsen the situation 100 years ago, to publish Sanskrit dictionaries with the errors insisting on phonetic transliteration, though pronunciation of 'kshe-' which is quite different from 'cha-.' Thereafter, upcoming scholars followed their fallacy without any verification. Fallacy of chal, meaning of land, dominates Buddhist community broadly, falling into conviction of collective fixed dogma in East Asia up to now. In the Buddhist community, it is the most important matter to recognize that the same language has become to refer completely different objects due to translation errors. As a research method, searching for corresponding Sanskrit words in translated sutras and dictionaries of Buddhism is predominant. Then, after analyzing the authenticity, the fallacy toward the truth will be corrected.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.43-52
• /
• 1996

[Goshogi] which is held from 9th to 16th January, every year is the Buddhist service of praying for the soul of Shinran's $(l173{\sim}1262)$ after death. It is the most majestic high-filling style and also unparalled in the annals of Japanese history in sacrificial offering. Shinran was horned in the Fujiwara's family. And not only he believed Prince Shodoku's belife but also retired to the mountain to enter the priesthood by it. Prince Shodoku built Horyu temple which is the typical temple of Nara ages. Buddism was transmitted from Korean peninsula, three countries of Silla, Bekje and Kokuryo effected on many field of Japnese culture during that ages. At the same time, Kasugadaisha and Danjanjinja of Shinto religion was built by Fujiwara Family. Both of them was Buddhist temple before. Throughout like these historical background, the facts what the religious services and the sacrificial offerings for Prince Shodoku, Wakamiyasai of Kasugas' and Kakitsusai of Danjanjinja must be influenced from Korean Peningula. So the dietary culture of the religious rites and traditional customs between two countries could be thought the relation with a narrow stream strait. But among them, in the size, color and shape, the cooking method and technique in the usage of rice powder and sugar, it is tops in value. The noteworthy points of the thought were as follows: 1. high-filling style of the sacrificial offerings what is mixed and harmonized with Buddhism, Confucious, Sharmanism, Toaism and Korean traditioal customs. 2. eating together of god and human. 3. the fusion of gods and Buddha.