• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.53-74
• /
• 2012

This study aims to overview and review the infiltration of Japanese Buddhism and it's influences on the construction and architectural characteristics of Japanese Buddhist temple from the opening of ports to Independence Day of Korea. Infiltration of Japanese Buddhism had been sustained during 70 years from the foundation of Higashi Hongan-ji Temple(東本願寺) in Pusan, by Shinshu Otani School(眞宗 大谷派) which was one of Japanese Buddhism, to Independence Day of Korea. This study is to be promoted on the following subjects ; 1) the circumstance around the infiltration of Japanese Buddhism 2) Buddhism policy of Japanese Governor and infiltration on Korean Buddhism 3) increasing trend, distribution and construction of Japanese Buddhist temples near downtown areas 4) for the conclusion, case research on Bondang, Gori, and open space and analysis on the architecture style of Japanese Buddhist temples. Accordingly, Korean Buddhism had been subordinated to Japanese Buddhism, and the management system and memorial service of Korean Buddhism had to be affected by Japanese Buddhism. This study is considered meaningful for the elementary research to examine the aspects of Japanese style on Korean Buddhist architecture at that time.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.7-26
• /
• 2003

This article works on the development process of the Buddhist Temple with two pagodas in the Eastern Asia. in 7-8th centuries. This study was motivated from the observation that why there are many the Buddhist Temple having two pagodas only around the late 7th century, roughly around 670 A.D.. This period corresponds to the Silla Dynasty(in Korean History) and Hakuho Period(in Japan History) among the Eastern Asia while the composition of the temple being changed as Buddhism spreads out from China. The results of this study are the followings. The appearance of the Buddhist Temple having two pagodas was resulted from the representation of the Ideology in Botabpum(dogma of pagoda security) of the Saddharmapundarika Sutra, that is to say, two Buddhas sit side by side and iconography of Esoteric Buddhism dogma supports the spirit for defending one's country. Buddhist Temple having two pagodas in China had separate tab-won(areas with pagodas outer temple building block). Buddhist Temple having two pagodas in Korea had begun with sacheunwangsa temple in Unified-Silla. But it had two pagodas with inner temple area instead of outer. This was different from the composition of China. It can be related to the layout of the temple haying two pagodas in East-Jin(in China History) and the sculpture of two pagodas in Ungang-stonecave(in China). Thus the layout of the Buddhist Temple having two pagodas in Silla had been originated from that of China, but was developed to the main temple layout on her own accord. As Japanese Temple having two pagodas had been influenced diplomatically, it had two pagodas inner area as like the layout in Shilla. But later under the influence of Tang it was modified to the layout having them in separate area. And this influence can be seen for example Tangchojaesa temple. For the more, We call see that the diplomatic trends according to the policies in East asia affected to Buddhism and then naturally also to the layout of the Buddhist Temple.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.45-60
• /
• 2001

The Tongdo temple have been transformed continuously since its first establishment about 1300 years ago. Nevertheless three critical elements specified by 'Jajangyulsa', founder of the temple have not varied over the times but rather strengthened and strongly combined. All elements and doctrines of the religion coexist and form a harmony within the whole of the temple. This researcher examined what changes, or combinations, in spatial formation were sought for such unique structures of the Tongue temple by focusing mainly on the Sangrojun area of the temple to obtain the following findings. First. unlike a work by a Japanese researcher 'Sekino Tadashi', the east yard of the main building was found located on the section line which corresponded to the separation line of Yungkuncheokdo(營建尺度=measure running) from the edge of the Keumkangkyedan(金剛戒壇 =Buddhist platform) embankment to the corner column of the Kamrodang. This was confirmed as a result of the review of photos shown in [Chosun Kojukdobo]. Second, the number of stairs used for the Keumkangkyedan was thought to become three when the temple was firstly restored in 1379 as a result that this researcher reviewed Chinese literature 'DoSun' and [Kyedandokyung(戒壇圖經)], records by 'Lee saek' and 'Jung Shihan', studies of Yungkun measure and actual changes in the temple. Then the temple was forth restored in 1705 when the second of the stairs was changed in area and height and at the same time grounded hard for a space for a Buddhist service. Third, the roof of the main building was probably changed in shape during the Koryo period when the plane structure, furnish arrangement, emphasized front, stone lanterns of the building and political factors of that time were all considered. Fourth, the main building was Initially designed to provide a Buddhist sermon service which was assumedly followed by a similar service at a Keumkangkyedan. Thus the main building had a small window on the northern side which might be opened up to look out or otherwise go outside like a door. However, the window was probably locked up like a surrounding wall since the main building was entirely repaired after the end of Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592.

• 한일민족문제연구
• /
• 제21호
• /
• pp.1-43
• /
• 2011

This article introduces Abe Mituie's activities related to Korean and Japanese Buddhism and two newly discovered materials. He worked as a brain of Japanese cultural rule over Joseon Korea while holding various positions such as the president of KyeongSung Il Bo, the vice president of Kokmin Newspaper and the director of Central Joseon Association. Abe was responsible for Enkak Temple, the head temple of Japanese Rinzai section, and was one of the layman followers of Syak Soen who worked for the spread of modern Japanese Buddhism to Europe and America. He was a respectful Buddhist layman so as to teach Zen Buddhism for young Buddhist monks in Japan. After he started to assume charge in the Kyeong Sung Il Bo, he was also very active in movements in relation to Joseon Buddhism to the extent that he was found to be deeply involved in Joseon Buddhism sections. On the other hand, he concluded Joseon culture to be 'devastated.' He asserted that it was necessary to develop spiritual culture and revive Buddhism in order to resolve the devastation in the Joseon. In addition, he thought that Joseon Buddhism was ruined due to the misgovernment of the Joseon Dynasty, but had its own as great tradition as Japanese Buddhism. Therefore, in his opinion, there was a need to do research on Joseon Buddhism and find some way out of the contemporary difficulties. In order to save the situation, he made efforts to protect and revive Joseon Buddhism while paying continuous visits to Joseon Buddhist temples, supporting the publication of Buddhist canons and proposing to have a regular meeting of 'The Invitation of 30 Head Temples.' From his visit to Youngju Temple and his consistent relationship with Kang Daeryeon, it can be assumed that he was involved in reorganizing power structure in Joseon Buddhism and establishing various institutions. He emphasized the strict adherence of individuals and communities to rules in his lecture for students at Jung Ang Hak Rim. It was a way to revive Joseon Buddhism by creating a new social image of Joseon Buddhism. He continued to work for the restoration of Joseon Buddhism even after he retired from Kyeong Sung Il Bo and returned to Japan. He introduced the originality of Joseon Buddhism history to Japan and sent Japanese monks to Korea in order to do research and contribute to exchange between Korean and Japanese Buddhism. All things taken together, it is evident that Abe Mitzihe regarded Joseon as backward or stagnant from a perspective of evolutionist or orientalist, and was a Japanese elite to believe that it was just for Japan to control Korea. However, he was different from other Japanese elites in that he did not considered Joseon Buddhism merely as the object of propagation. He thought that Joseon Buddhism possessed its own great tradition and culture, but was ruined because of the misadministration of the Joseon Royal House. Therefore, in his opinion, Joseon Buddhism should be recovered by means of some supports, and its revival would lead to the restoration of Joseon culture as a whole, which would be realized by Japanese rule over Korea and Japanese elites' generous assistance.

• 미술자료
• /
• 제101권
• /
• pp.48-65
• /
• 2022

경상북도 김천 대휴사(大休寺)의 일본 불교 존상은 일제강점기가 시작되는 1910년경에 일본 신의진언종지산파(新義眞言宗智山派)가 대구에 설치한 별원(別院), 즉 대구 편조원(遍照院) 본당에 봉안하기 위해 조성되었다. 이들 존상 중 목조홍법대사좌상(木造弘法大師坐像)은 일본 진언종을 개창한 고보다이시 쿠카이(弘法大師 空海, 774-835)의 모습이며, 목조대일여래좌상(木造大日如來坐像)과 목조부동명왕좌상(木造不動明王坐像)은 진언종의 불교 사상과 신앙을 대표하는 존상이다. 지금까지 알려진 일제강점기에 조성된 대일여래상, 홍법대사상, 부동명왕상은 대부분 마애상이나 석조상으로, 대휴사의 존상들은 당시 일본 사찰에 봉안된 나무로 만든 일본 불교 존상이라는 점에서 매우 주목된다. 이들 불교 존상은 조형적으로는 근대적인 미감을 갖추고 있지만, 그 도상적인 연원은 헤이안(平安)시대(794-1185)까지 거슬러 올라간다. 즉 대일여래상은 신의진언종을 개창한 고교다이시 가쿠반(興敎大師 覺鑁, 1095-1143)이 만든 대일여래상의 신앙적인 전통을 계승하고 있으며, 홍법대사상은 고보다이시 쿠카이의 제자였던 신뇨신노(眞如親王)가 그린 신뇨신노 스타일[樣]을 따르고 있고, 부동명왕상은 겐죠(玄祖) 스타일의 십구관(十九觀) 부동명왕상을 답습하고 있다. 일제강점기 대구 편조원에 봉안되었던 당시의 모습은 구체적으로 알 수가 없지만, 이들 존상은 신의진언종의 삼륜신상(三輪身像)으로 조성되었을 가능성이 매우 높다. 즉 대일여래상, 홍법대사상, 부동명왕상이 각각 자성륜신(自性輪身), 정법륜신(正法輪身), 교령륜신(敎令輪身)의 성격을 지녔을 것으로 추정된다. 한편 1950년대 전반의 실달사(悉達寺)(대구 편조원의 후신)의 상황이긴 하지만, 그 전신인 일제강점기의 대구 편조원에서 고보다이시 신앙의 전통이 계승되고 있었음을 추측하게 하는 본당 내부의 모습도 확인할 수 있다. 즉 실달사 본당에 놓여 있던 유골들은 11세기 이후 고보다이시 신앙과 함께 유행했던 고야산(高野山)의 납골(納骨) 신앙의 전통을 보여 준다.

• 박물관과 연구
• /
• 제1권
• /
• pp.278-305
• /
• 2024

국립중앙박물관이 소장한 일제강점기의 유리건판 사진과 조선총독부박물관 공문서는 1950년 한국전쟁으로 북한 지역 소재 문화유산이 큰 피해를 입기 전의 모습을 알려주는 자료로서 가치가 있다. 이에 최근 유리건판과 총독부박물관 문서를 활용한 북한 지역 불교조각 연구가 증가하고 있으며, 본고에서는 황해도의 대표적 사찰 중 하나인 황주 성불사의 불교조각에 대해 기존 성과를 바탕으로 몇 가지 새로운 의견을 개진하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 문헌기록을 토대로 성불사의 연혁을 정리하고 현황을 짚어본 후, 유리건판 속 존상별 제작시기와 조성배경 등을 자세히 살펴봄으로써 성불사 불교조각을 종합적으로 이해하고자 했다. 1945년 해방 이전 성불사의 불교조각은 보살상 2건, 여래상 4건, 삼존상 1건의 총 7건이 확인된다. 제작시기에서는 고려 전기 2건, 고려 후기 1건, 조선 전기 3건, 조선 후기 1건의 분포를 보인다. 이 가운데 오늘날 실물이 남아있는 2건이 주목된다. 먼저 성불사 응진전에서 촬영되었다는 고려 전기 석조약사여래좌상이다. 이 상의 당시 대좌 실측도를 면밀히 검토한 결과, 현재 정방산 내금강 골짜기의 옛 상원암 터에 전하는 머리없는 석조약사여래좌상 및 대좌 부재와 일치함을 알 수 있었다. 이 판단이 맞다면 북한 지역에 전하는 고려 전기 불교조각의 작례를 새롭게 확보하는 것으로서 의의가 크다. 다른 하나는 성불사 극락전에서 발견된 조선 1454년(단종2) 작 금동아미타여래삼존좌상이다. 이 상은 현재 사리원력사박물관에 보관 중이며 조선 전기 이북 지역에서 확인되는 소형 금동불의 기년작으로서 중요하다. 본고는 성불사라는 단일 사찰에 초점을 맞추어 북한 지역 불교조각을 고찰한 사례 연구이다. 앞으로 국립중앙박물관 유리건판 자료가 더욱 다양한 방식으로 활용된다면 우리나라 불교조각사의 연구에 적지 않은 기여를 할 것으로 기대된다.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.62-79
• /
• 2020

강화 보문사 마애관음보살좌상은 일제강점기였던 1928년에 조성된 거대한 규모의 마애불상으로 한국 근대 불교 조각사에서 중요한 위치를 차지하는 기년명 불상임에도 불구하고 그동안 근대 불교 조각에 대한 연구 부진으로 심도 있는 논의가 이루어지지 못하였다. 본고에서는 보문사 마애관음보살좌상이 근대기 불상으로서 갖는 의미를 다양한 측면에서 살펴보기 위해 마애불 주변에 있는 명문을 판독하여 조성 연대와 제작자 및 후원자를 확인하였으며, 바위의 형태와 지형이 불상의 조형성에 어떤 영향을 끼쳤는지 알아보기 위해 제작자와 참배객의 시점(視點)을 비교 분석하였다. 또한 제작자 후손들과의 인터뷰를 통하여 불상 조성 당시의 구체적 정황을 파악해 보았다. 보문사 마애관음보살좌상의 제작에는 금강산 승려 이화응(李華應)이 화주(化主)겸 화사(畫師)를 맡았고, 불상 조성이 시작되는 1928년에는 100여 명이 넘는 시주자가 공동으로 후원하였으며, 1937년 참배공간을 확장할 때는 간송 전형필(澗松 全鎣弼)이 단독 후원하였다. 이 마애불 조성을 계기로 강화 보문사는 양양 낙산사, 남해 보리암과 더불어 우리 나라 3대 관음 도량으로 손꼽히게 되었다. 불상의 제작 기간은 약 3개월이 소요되었으며 초(草)는 화주를 맡았던 이화응이 그리고 조각은 운송학(雲松學) 등 다섯 명의 강화 지역 석수가 참여하였는데, 화승이 그린 초를 바탕으로 조각이 이루어졌기 때문에 마애불 곳곳에서 선묘적 기법이 발견된다. 화사로서 이화응의 면모가 밝혀짐에 따라 석옹철유(石翁喆有)-화응형진(華應亨眞)-일옹혜각(一翁慧覺)으로 이어지는 화맥의 단초를 확인할 수 있게 되었다. 보문사 마애관음보살좌상은 보관을 쓰고 정병을 든 전형적인 관음보살로 방형의 큰 얼굴에 목이 짧고 전체적으로 투박하여 경직된 인상을 준다. 제작자는 높이 10m에 40°가량 기울어져 있는 바위에 마애불을 왜곡 없이 보이기 위해 최대한 동작을 절제하고 대칭성을 강조하여 세부 표현을 생략하였고, 머리와 신체 비례는 1:1에 가깝게 조정하여 시각적 왜곡 문제를 해결하였다. 특히, 본고에서는 보문사 마애관음보살좌상처럼 별도의 불단을 만들지 않는 '불상과 불단의 일체화'된 형식을 근대기 불교 조각의 특징으로 상정하였다. 그 외에 광배에 새겨진 6글자의 범자(梵字)를 그동안 육자대명왕진언(六字大明王眞言)으로 해석했으나, 정법계진언(淨法界眞言)과 사방진언(四方眞言)이 조합된 것임을 새롭게 밝혔다. 아울러 처마 바위에 박혀 있는 3개의 쇠고리는 제작 과정에서 다림추를 달아 초를 그릴 때 기준점으로 활용하였고, 이후에는 고리에 풍탁을 달아 보살상을 장엄하는 용도로 사용한 것을 확인하였다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.7-22
• /
• 2013

Gimlyong-sa temple has played an important role of Buddhist culture in Gyeongsangdo Provinces(嶺南地域) in the late Joseon Dynasty as the 31st head temple(本山) in the Japanese occupation. There are lots of architectural documentary records remained nevertheless, most of cultural heritages are destroyed by fire in 1997. There were 85 articles in five kinds of books which contained historical achievements of Gimlyong-sa temple and hermitages(Daeseongam(大成庵), Hwajangam(華藏庵), Yangjinam(養眞庵), Geum seondae(金仙臺), Dosoram(兜率庵), Myeongjeogam(明寂庵)). It is possible to understand the five situational peculiarities in the 17~19th century. At the first, they were compiled in 1914 to around 1930 by Kwon Sangro(權相老) to clarify the historical facts. Second, confirmed the formation process of the foundation narrative. Third, the meaning of Seolseondang(設禪堂), Manseru(萬歲樓) and Hyangnojeon(香爐殿) were recorded, it is possible to look at the concept of people at that time. Fourth, the great masters portraits were enshrined in hermitages, not in Gimlyong-sa temple. It means that a hermitage is not for only self-discipline or living but assembly of religious orders(門派). Fifth, Chimgye(枕溪), the great Buddhist clergy and carpenter of Gimlyong-sa, was nationwide active worker in 19th century because he was also in a charge of investment manager for construction.

• 한국농촌건축학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.45-54
• /
• 2011

The results of examining the architectural features and changes of the main building of Dogapsa temple which is multi roofs wooden structure are as follows. The passage comparing 'Dogapsa' of <>, account of Lee Ha Gon's trip as the literature showing the appearance of Dogapsa temple in the early 18th century to Borimsa through verse of 'Dutacho' was noticeable. Dogapsa temple at Yeongam was distant over 100 ri from Borimsa temple at Jangheung and it was considered that there were many temples at Mt. Wolchul, Yeongam and there were also many temples to be comparable with it. But, Dogapsa temple was compared to Borimsa temple because verses 'many-storied building is high and immense' of 'Dogapsa' at <> and 'Dogapsa is lower than Borimsa at Jangheung' at 'Dutacho' of <> were interpreted as the existence of multi roofs Buddhist temple which had something in common with Dogapsa and Borimsa and was comparable to them. According to existing materials, it was assumed that the main building of Dogapsa was burnt through the Japanese invasion of Korea in the 52nd year of the sexagenary cycle (Eulmyooebyeon, 1555) and Jungyujaeran (1597), but record of major history of the main buildings of Dogapsa and Borimsa indicated that multi roofs wooden structure of the two temples were built at the same period. Since multi roofs wooden structure of main building of Borimsa was rebuilt in 1692, these buildings existed from the early 18th century to middle 18th century.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.151-163
• /
• 1998

This Study is concerned with the color design of Korean and Japanese wooden architecture. The main subject of the study is to investigate the commonness and difference of color decoration between Korean and Japanese Buddhist 'Danchung' in the modern ages. In carrying this study into execution, I examined the architectural and historical backgrounds, and analysed the elements, techniques and principles of color design. The result of this study is as follows ; 1. 'Danchung' was originated from the practical functions in Chinese wooden architecture, and developed to embody sensuous beauty in Buddhist temple. The techniques and principles of color design and color tone of Korean and japanese Danchung had been similar in the ancient ages. But little by little they have differed in its function and color tone. So they are very different in modern times. 2. The dominant colors of Korean Danchung are red and green as 'Sang-nok Ha-dan(上綠下丹)', but Japanese's is only red as 'Bak-gan Juk-sun(白間赤線)' 3. Korean Danchung expresses and accentuates the important structural elements in three dimensions, on the other hand japanese Danchung takes two dimensional decoration on the unstructural elements 4. When seen in general, in Korean Danchung colors and their light and shade are simple and patternized. In the meantime, Japanese Danchung has many configurational expressions in general and is closed to paintings or picture.