• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.549-556
• /
• 2020

Real estate markets play an essential role in the economic development of both developed and developing countries. Investment decisions in private real estate demand the consideration of several qualitative and quantitative criteria. Especially in Vietnam, demand for housing, apartments are rising which has resulted because of the migration from rural to urban areas. This study aims to determine the influencing factors of the real estate purchasing behavior and then recommend a grey Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) support model to evaluate real estate alternatives based on a numerical example in Vietnam. A set of essential criteria are identified based on experts' opinion, and the proposed determinants are initial investment, maintenance cost, prestige location, distance to interesting places, parking lot, public transportation, property condition, total area size, number of rooms, and neighbors. The subjective weights were obtained by using the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) model, and the Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) technique is employed to prioritize and rank real estate alternatives. The results reveal that this approach can be useful to make purchasing decisions for many kinds of real estate property under uncertain business environments. These findings indicate that the presented hybrid model has advantages in granting flexibility to the preferences of decision makers.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.121-135
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스 투자 및 경제적 효과에 관련된 기술의 연구현황 및 사례들을 바탕으로 경제성 분석 모형을 제공한다. 플라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스가 기업에 가져올 수 있는 비용절감 만을 편익으로 계상함으로써 투자안들의 편익 및 비용을 보수적이며 효율적으로 파악할 수 있다. 기존 정보시스템을 대체할 논클라우드, 클라우드 방식의 투자안을 정태적인 NPV 분석방식 그리고 불확실성 및 전략적 옵션을 반영한 동태적인 실물옵션 분석 방식을 활용하여 비교하였다. 정태적인 NPV방식의 경제성 분석은 기업이 가진 전략적인 옵션의 가치를 제대로 평가하지 못하는 단점을 지적하고 있으며 실물옵션에 기반한 경제성 분석은 시장변수들과 기업이 전략적인 옵션이 클라우드 투자안들의 경제성에 미치는 영향을 함께 분석할 수 있다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.1259-1265
• /
• 2007

한국 영화산업의 발전을 가속화시키기 위해서는 한국 영화제작사의 가치를 정당하게 평가하여 이것을 통해 투자를 활성화시키는 것이 필요하다. 그러나 아직까지 영화제작사의 가치평가에 대한 연구가 미미하며 영화제작사의 가치평가를 위한 여러 모형 중 적당한 모형이 제시되어 있지 않다. 그러므로 우리나라 영화제작사(S 기업)의 가치평가를 실시하여 투자 또는 매수 시에 합리적인 의사결정을 할 수 있는 기반을 제공하고자 한다. 또 DCF, FCF, ROV 등 세 가지 가치평가모형으로 도출한 결과를 비교하여 우리나라 영화제작사의 가치평가에 적절한 모형을 제시하는 것이 본 논문의 목적이다. 본연구의 결과는 ROV모형이 다른 평가모형에 비하여 보다 효율적인 모형으로 나타났다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.73-89
• /
• 2013

This paper develops an investment algorithm based on Markowitz's Portfolio Selection Theory, using historical stock return data, and empirically evaluates the performance of the proposed algorithm in the U.S. and the Hong Kong stock markets. The proposed investment algorithm is empirically tested with the 30 constituents of Dow Jones Industrial Average in the U.S. stock market, and the 30 constituents of Hang Seng Index in the Hong Kong stock market. During the 6-year investment period, starting on the first trading day of 2006 and ending on the last trading day of 2011, growth rates of 12.63% and 23.25% were observed for Dow Jones Industrial Average and Hang Seng Index, respectively, while the proposed investment algorithm achieved substantially higher cumulative returns of 35.7% in the U.S. stock market, and 150.62% in the Hong Kong stock market. When compared in terms of Sharpe ratio, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Hang Seng Index achieved 0.075 and 0.155 each, while the proposed investment algorithm showed superior performance, achieving 0.363 and 1.074 in the U.S. and Hong Kong stock markets, respectively. Further, performance in the U.S. stock market is shown to be less sensitive to an investor's risk preference, while aggressive performance goals are shown to achieve relatively higher performance in the Hong Kong stock market. In conclusion, this paper empirically demonstrates that an investment based on a mathematical model using objective historical stock return data for constructing optimal portfolios achieves outstanding performance, in terms of both cumulative returns and Sharpe ratios.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.144-156
• /
• 2012

In recent years, advanced countries in energy sector are emphasizing the importance of the development and deployment of renewable energy to cope with the global environmental crisis such as depletion of fossil energy, climate convention to control emissions of greenhouse gases. In this paper, we evaluate the economic value of the investment in new and renewable energy R&D in Korea and optimal deployment timing of new and renewable energy by using the real option approach. The real option model adopted in this paper assumes that a decision maker has a compound option to abandon, deployment, or continue the R&D. As a result by using empirical data of Korea, it is found that there exists a considerable amount of positive real option value (ROV) in the investment of new and renewable energy R&D while its net present value (NPV) calculated by traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) model shows negative value.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.197-211
• /
• 2003

Intensified competition, splintered mass market, shortened product life cycles, and advanced technology and automation let companies to crease the IT investment to meet the changes, Although IT investment increased, IS didn't show the visible outcome. One of the major interest of IS managers is how to demonstrate the business value of the firm's investment in information technology. This paper proposes the revised model of Nelson & Cooprider(1990) regarding shared knowledge between IS and line groups. Knowledge can be shared through mutual trust, mutual influence and communication between these two groups. The revised model including communication is tested empirically using LISREL. The results show that shared knowledge mediated the relationship between IS performance and mutual trust, mutual influence and communication. And shared knowledge between IS and line groups increase IS performance. IS managers should develop mutual trust, mutual influence and communication between these groups to achieve more shared knowledge and higher IS performance.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제22권51호
• /
• pp.151-161
• /
• 1999

For many decades, Deterministic DCF approach has been widely used to evaluate investment opportunities. Under new manufacturing conditions involving uncertainty and risk, the DCF approach is not appropriate. In DCF, Risk is incorporated in two ways: certainty equivalent method, risk adjusted discount rate. This paper proposes a determination method of the Risk Adjusted Discount Rate for economically decision making advanced manufacturing technologies. Conventional DCF techniques typically use discount rate which do not consider the difference in risk of differential investment options and periods. Due to their relative efficiency, advanced manufacturing technologies have different degree of risk. The risk differential of investments is included using $\beta$ coefficient of capital asset pricing model. The comparison between existing and proposed method investigated. The DCF model using proposed risk adjusted discount rate enable more reasonable evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies.

• 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한설비공학회 2008년도 하계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.249-255
• /
• 2008

This paper developed the computerizing assessment system modeling of the natural gas and district heating DSM programs. It constructed as each project in accordance with the business investment plans & assessment DB, related M&V data DB and cost-effectiveness analysis data DB. It is composed of total 58 tables which are 22 tables which are used in the plan and the assessment, 16 tables which are used in the cost-effectiveness analysis, 18 tables which are used in the M&V, table which is used in qualitative evaluation, as by each programs. This computer programs can contributed to DSM business investment system construction as implementing for algorithm development and an estimation by each programs.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.86-97
• /
• 2006

90년대 중반에 이르러 정보화 사업의 규모가 커지면서 실패사례가 빈번히 발생함에 따라 정보화 성과평가에 대한 관심이 대두되고 있다. 또한 최고경영자들이 관심을 가지고 있는 정보시스템에 대한 투자비용과 정보시스템의 성과와의 관계에 대한 연구가 매우 미흡하여 이 분야에 대한 연구의 필요성이 고조 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 DeLone & McLean의 정보시스템 성공모델과 이국희의 기업정보시스템 평가모델 및 Kaplan & Norton의 균형성과지표(BSC)를 바탕으로, 정보시스템의 비용대비 투자효과를 측정하였다. 모형 내 변수들 간의 관계성을 연구하기 위하여 경로분석을 실시한 결과, 투자비용은 시스템의 질 및 정보의 질에, 시스템의 질과 정보의 질은 사용자 만족도에, 사용자 만족도는 재무적성과, 고객만족도, 내부업무 프로세스에 대해 유의적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 정보시스템에 대한 적절한 투자가 사용자의 만족도를 높여 궁극적으로 조직 성과로 귀결된다는 것이 증명되었다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.65-81
• /
• 2007

Recently, the affiliates of the Ministry of Information and Communication have been conducting a performance evaluation study on IT policy projects, based on the performance evaluation model of the U.S. Office of Management and Budgets, with regard to investment in computerization. The performance evaluation model for the policy project could provide the objective information required for the planning, development, and operation of the policy project. However, the performance of the most policy project is likely to be evaluated using the subjective evaluation criteria of evaluators. Therefore, this case study evaluates the relative efficiency using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) in order to improve the performance evaluation method of the digital pioneer' project implemented by the Korea IT Industry Promotion Agency. The improvement value of inefficient Decision Making Units (DMUs) was measured by a static efficiency analysis. The measured value will suggest a objective viewpoint of the performance between DMUs to evaluators. In doing so, it will show an appropriate direction for the policy project to be evaluated successfully.