• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.126-130
• /
• 2007

Sedation is often indicated for the relief of anxiety for outpatient oral surgery. In combination with local anesthesia, it is safe and effective method of treatment. However, it is not always effective in allowing the physician to complete the planned oral surgery procedure. On occasion, a procedure is left unfinished due to patient combativeness and discomfort and hypertension in spite of increase in sedative doses. Episodic increases in blood pressure were most commonly caused by light anesthesia or sedation and by the patient's experience of pain during treatment. Female patient was 42 years old. blood pressure is 150/90 mmHg. Extraction and implant surgery was done under IV sedation. During seadtion, her blood pressure was increased (200/100 mmHg). Surgery was stopped. She was done monitoring blood pressure. The blood pressure was decreased to 130/90 mmHg. Sedation was failed due to significant hypertension. Blood pressure is seldom increased during sedation but we should evaluate the patient's medical history and know guideline for hypertension crisis.

• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.114-119
• /
• 2007

Background: Dental disabilities mean the poor cooperation for dental treatment because of patient's inherent disability, severe fear and anxiety, and communication problem. Sedation and general anesthesia are usually used for behavioral control in dentally disabled patients. In particular, sedation (conscious and deep) can help them to tolerate the proper dental treatment effectively and safely. Methods: From March 2002 to September 2007, total 35 sedation were carried out in 33 patients (male : female = 20 : 13) with dental disabilities at Seoul National University Dental Hospital and Hanyang University Medical Center. Patients' dental charts and sedation records were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Tooth extraction (19 cases) was the most common dental treatment performed under intravenous sedation (30 cases). Occasionally, inhalation sedation using Sevoflurane 1-2% was adapted (5 cases). Deep sedation (28 cases) was carried out using midazolam 2-3 mg bolus injection and propofol infusion via TCI (4.2 ${\pm}$ 0.9 mg/kg/h), and conscious sedation (7 cases) was carried out using midazolam bolus onlywithout severe complications. The duration of dental treatment was 25.5 ${\pm}$ 12.3 min and that of sedation was 43.2 ${\pm}$ 9.7 min. Conclusion: Sedation for dentally disabledpatients should be selected for effective behavioral control in conjunction with general anesthesia, considering the duration and pain-evoking potentials of dental treatment, the type and severity of patients' disabilities, and the experience of dental anesthesiologists altogether.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.97-103
• /
• 2018

Background: Respiration monitoring is necessary during sedation for dental treatment. Recently, acoustic respiration rate ($RRa^{TM}$), an acoustics-based respiration monitoring method, has been used in addition to auscultation or capnography. The accuracy of this method may be compromised in an environment with excessive noise. This study evaluated whether noise from the ultrasonic scaler affects the performance of RRa in respiratory rate measurement. Methods: We analyzed data from 49 volunteers who underwent scaling under intravenous sedation. Clinical tests were divided into preparation, sedation, and scaling periods; respiratory rate was measured at 2-s intervals for 3 min in each period. Missing values ratios of the RRa during each period were measuerd; correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were performed on respiratory rates measured by RRa and capnogram. Results: Respective missing values ratio from RRa were 5.62%, 8.03%, and 23.95% in the preparation, sedation, and scaling periods, indicating an increased missing values ratio in the scaling period (P < 0.001). Correlation coefficients of the respiratory rate, measured with two different methods, were 0.692, 0.677, and 0.562 in each respective period. Mean capnography-RRa biases in Bland-Altman analyses were -0.03, -0.27, and -0.61 in each respective period (P < 0.001); limits of agreement were -4.84-4.45, -4.89-4.15, and -6.18-4.95 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The probability of missing respiratory rate values was higher during scaling when RRa was used for measurement. Therefore, the use of RRa alone for respiration monitoring during ultrasonic scaling may not be safe.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.75-80
• /
• 2024

Dental sedation plays a pivotal role in alleviating patient anxiety during various procedures. Remimazolam, a benzodiazepine derivative, stands out for its distinctive attributes, particularly its rapid onset of sedation coupled with a brief duration, making it an invaluable option for dental applications. The patient was admitted for the extraction of impacted third molars via patient-controlled sedation and not only demonstrated stable vital signs but also expressed a high level of satisfaction with the procedure. An in-depth analysis of plasma remimazolam concentrations and changes in the Patient State Index revealed negative correlation patterns, highlighting the inherent potential of remimazolam in achieving effective sedation. This expanded research scope aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of the pharmacological responses to remimazolam in dental sedation scenarios. This case report offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of dental sedation methodologies and paves the way for a more informed and evidence-based approach to the use of remimazolam in patient-controlled sedation.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative analgesic effect according to intravenous doses of ketorolac. The ninety-eight adult patients, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive saline or one of the five doses of ketorolac (10, 15, 30, 45, 60mg). After recoverg from anesthesia, saline or ketorolac was injected intravenously, and the visual analogue score, sedation secore, mean blood pressure, heart rate, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting were measured 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours the injection. Saline or 10 mg of ketorolac had no postanalgesic effect. Above 15 mg of ketorolac had analgesic effect, but this analgesic effect was not increased with increasing doses of ketorolac (30, 45, 60 mg). Any side effects (nausea, vomiting, excessive sedation, cardiopulmonary depression, and renal and hematologic adverse events) was not observed associated with ketorolac administration. These results suggested that 15 mg of ketorolac is the most reliable dose for postoperative anlgesia in intravenous administration.

• 대한치과마취과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.09b
• /
• pp.60-64
• /
• 2005

• 대한치주과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.113-113
• /
• 2004

• 대한치과마취과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.42-42
• /
• 2004

• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.4 no.1 s.6
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2004

• 대한치과마취과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.37-39
• /
• 2004