• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.51-54
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and intermaxillary fixation (IMF) of mandibular fractures. Methods: A total of one hundred twenty-seven patients who were treated for mandibular fractures at Chosun University Dental Hospital, from January 2008 to December 2010, and analyzed their prognoses based on the use of IMF at the time of fracture reduction. The patients were divided into two groups; the manual reduction group without IMF and IMF group. Results: After reduction of the mandibular fracture, good results were obtained with majority patients. Nonetheless, seven patients (13.0%) in manual reduction method without arch bars or IMF, developed complications after surgery. Three patients underwent IMF due to occlusal instability after surgery, while one patient underwent re-operation. Thus, a significant difference was not observed between the IMF and manual reduction groups. Conclusion: Manual reduction and IMF at mandibular simple fracture could produce good results. In case of mandibular simple fracture, it was recommended with only manual reduction without IMF or IMF during a short period.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.477-482
• /
• 2006

The new type of orthodontic mini-implant named C-implant can be an effective alternative to conventional one-component mini-implant in the intermaxillary fixation (IMF) cases because of its particular design. The small size, two-part design, efficiency, and low cost of the C-implant make it applicable to various types of IMF cases easily such as fracture reduction and orthognathic surgery. The two part design resists highly to the fracture or deformation during implantation and removal. The long span head allows the patient to easily attach intermaxillary elastics, so that the patient can apply intermaxillary elastics for traction easily. Through this article, we tried to show the possibility of this appliance as a good adjunct for the IMF screw.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제29권6호
• /
• pp.513-519
• /
• 2007

Typical surgical methods for the treatment of mandibular fractures include intermaxillary-fixation (IMF) for obtaining temporary intraoperative occlusion. Traditionally IMF has been achieved with arch-bars or interdental eyelet wiring. However, these techniques are time-consuming procedures, can produce periodontal damage, and are not well tolerated by the patient even under local anesthesia. Moreover, daily maintenance of oral hygiene is difficult for patients with an arch bar. Recently, intermaxillary fixation using intraoral skeletal anchorage screws (SAS) has been introduced for the treatment of mandibular fractures. This method solves the problems above, but they have the potential for tooth damage, screw fractures and intraoperative occlusal instability. In this study, patients with mandiblular fractures were divided into three groups. Group 1 was treated by IMF using archbars(both maxilla and mandible), Group 2 was treated with SAS(maxilla) and arch-bar (mandible), Group 3 was treated with SAS(both maxilla and mandible). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the different IMF methods on periodontal tissue health and intraoperative occlusal rehabilitation about each groups, and to discuss the most favorable IMF method.

• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.24-30
• /
• 2009

Two component orthodontic C-implants have been introduced as intermaxillary fixation (IMF) screws in cases of periodontal problems with bone loss, severely damaged teeth, or short roots. This retrospective research sought to investigate the complications and risk factors associated with the failure of two-part C-implants for IMF cases and to show the possible indications compared to one-component mini-implants. The study sample consisted of 46 randomly selected patients who had a total of 203 implants. Pearson chi-square tests of independence were used to test for associations among categorical variables. At least 19 of the total 203 implants failed (9.3%). There was no significant difference in implant failure due to gender, oral hygiene, and placement, although a significant difference due to soft tissue characteristics and root contact was observed. The two-component design of the mini-implant is reliable for difficult IMF cases. Note, however, that the factors influencing implant failure were found to be age, root damage, and condition of soft tissues.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.372-380
• /
• 2005

Condylar process of mandible, has the specialized anatomic structure compared with any other body structure, acts directly in connection with mastication and speech and so on. In general, mandibular condyle fractures have been managed by two methods as open and closed reduction. But, there are no reasonable consensus about the proper management of this injury. This study was designed for analysis of the prognosis of two methods of treatment, open and closed reduction, with positional change of fractured condyle and complications within 6 months post-intermaxillary fixation period. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 154 patients whose unilateral mandibular condyle fractures were treated by open or closed reduction in our department. The horizontal, sagittal, and coronal change of the condyle was examined using modified Towne's and panoramic radiographs before intermaxillary fixation(IMF), immediately after IMF, and at 6 months after IMF. Patients, whose mandibular condyle fractures were treated by closed reduction, had significantly shorter ramus height on the side of injury(P<0.05). But, fractured condylar fragments were displaced insignificantly with aspect to sagittal and coronal plane(P>0.05). The level of the fracture influenced the ramus length and the degree of coronal change in the closed reduction group(P<0.05). There was no significant correlation among the level of the fracture, treatment methods and complications(P>0.05). From the results obtained in this study, fractured mandibular condyles, were treated by closed reduction, had a tendency that continuous condylar displacement was occurred with aspect to horozontal and coronal plane in treatment period including intermaxillary fixation. And then there was a correlation between the level of the fracture and the position change in close reduction group statistically. These result suggested that care must be taken in basing treatment decisions on the degree of displacement of the condyle and in treating the mandibular condyle fractures for a long time.

• 대한두개안면성형외과학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2022

Background: Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) is a technique that allows for the reduction and stabilization of mandibular fractures. Several methods of IMF, such as self-tapping screws or arch bars, have been developed. This study aimed to validate the usefulness of IMF with a self-tapping screw compared to IMF with arch bars with focus on the patients' perspective. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who were treated for mandibular fractures at our hospital between August 2014 and February 2021. A total of 57 patients were enrolled in this study. Thirteen patients were excluded from the analysis: three patients were lost to follow-up, and 10 patients did not undergo IMF. Finally, 44 patients were analyzed, of which 31 belonged to the arch bar group, and 13 belonged to the screw group. Patient discomfort and pain during IMF application and removal were analyzed using a patient self-assessment questionnaire. The surgeon also assessed oral hygiene, IMF stability, and occlusion. Results: We applied IMF to 34 men (77%) and 10 women (23%). The mean age of the patients was 37.3 years. The most common fracture site was the angle (30%), followed by the parasymphysis (25%), the body (23%), the condyle (11%), and the ramus (11%). Patient discomfort and oral hygiene were statistically favorable in the screw group. The IMF application time was statistically shorter in the screw group (p< 0.001). IMF stability was not statistically different between the two groups. The pain score during IMF removal was lower in the screw group (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to arch bars, IMF screws provide more comfort during the IMF period, help maintain favorable oral hygiene, and have a shorter application time. From the patient's perspective, IMF screws are an excellent alternative to conventional arch bars when applicable.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2015

Objective: We compared the skeletal and dental changes that resulted from the use of two methods of intermaxillary fixation (IMF)-miniscrews and surgical archwire-in 74 adult patients who had Class III malocclusion and were treated with the same orthognathic surgical procedure at a hospital in Korea. Methods: All the patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation. They were divided into two groups according to the type of IMF used-group 1 underwent surgical archwire fixation and group 2 underwent orthodontic miniscrew fixation. In a series of cephalograms for each patient, we compared vertical and horizontal tooth-position measurements: (a) immediately after surgery ($T_0$), (b) 3 months after surgery ($T_1$), and (c) 6 months after surgery ($T_2$). Cephalometric changes within each group were examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) while the independent samples t -test procedure was used to compare the two groups. Results: After surgery, the maxillary incisors tended to be proclined in both groups although there were no significant differences. Incisor overbite increased significantly in both groups from $T_0$ to $T_1$, and the miniscrew group (group 2) showed slightly greater overbite than the archwire group (group 1). Conclusions: This study suggest that the use of orthodontic miniscrews and orthodontic surgical archwire for IMF in adult patients results in similar skeletal and dental changes.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.457-466
• /
• 1999

하악 후퇴술 후의 골격성 재발과 치열 변화는 악간고정(intermaxillary fixation, IMF)제거 후 뿐만 아니라 악간고정기간 중에도 일어난다고 보고되고 있다. 악간고정기간 중에 일어나는 골격성 재발에 따른 골편간 견고한 융합의 방해, 보상성 치아이동, 전치부 개방교합 등과 같은 여러 가지 부작용은 술후 교정치료에 많은 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로 임상적으로 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 본 연구는 악간고정기간 중에 일어나는 골격성 재발과 치열의 변화를 알아보고자 시행하였으며, 하악전돌증의 치료를 위해서 양측성 하악지 시상분할골절단술(bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, BSSRO)과 강선고정 (wire fixation), 악간고정을 시행한 28명을 대상으로 하였다. 본 연구에서는 측모 두부 방사선 사진을 통하여 수술에 의한 골편들의 이동량과 방향, 악간고정기간 중의 골격성 재발과 치열 변화의 양과 방향을 측정하였다. 또한 수술에 의한 골편들의 이동과 골격성 재발과의 상관관계, 골격성 재발과 치열 변화간의 상관관계를 평가하였다. 본 연구를 통하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 수술에 의한 골편의 이동방향은 원심골편은 후상방으로, 근심골편은 시계방향으로 회전하였다. 2. 악간고정기간 중에 원심골편의 전방부는 후방 변위, 후방부는 상방 변위하였으며 근심골편은 상방 변위와 함께 근심골편의 gonion(p-Go)부위는 전방 변위를 하였다. 악간고정기간중에 근심골편의 gonion(p-Go)의 전방 변위는 수술에 의한 근심골편의 gonion (p-Go)의 후방으로의 이동량과 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 즉, 수술에 의한 근심골편의 gonion(p-Go)의 후방으로의 이동이 많을수록 악간고정기간 중의 근심골편의 gonion(p-Go)의 전방 변위는 증가하였다. 3. 악간고정기간 중에 수평피개, 수직피개는 변화가 없었다. 상악 전치부는 후방경사(retroclination), 하악 전치부는 후방경사, 정출이 일어났으며, 이러한 보상성 치아이동은 악간고정기간 중의 근심골편의 gonion(p-Go)의 상방 변위와 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 즉, 악간고정기간 중의 근심골편의 gonion(p-Go)의 상방 변위가 클수록 보상성 치아 이동량도 증가하였다.

• 대한두개안면성형외과학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.51-54
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The choice of open versus closed reduction for mandibular subcondylar fracture is a debatable issue. To evaluate the advantage of open approach to closed method with IMF(intermaxillary fixation), we conducted a retrospective study to compare the outcomes of each method. Methods: From 2002 to 2006, 29 patients with mandibular subcondylar fractures were treated by open or closed reduction. 17 patients were treated by open reduction and 12 patients by closed reduction and IMF. Each group was assessed for duration of mandibular immobilization, incidences of buccal palsy, malocclusion, TMJ(temporomandibular joint) pain, and deviation of the mandible on mouth opening. Results: All cases showed accurate reduction in anatomical position, no significant displacement and no deviation on mouth opening during the follow-up period. IMF period is statistically shorter in open reduction (p<0.05). Differences in incidence of other complications were not significant statistically. Conclusion: As there are significant independent morbidities associated with IMF which requires postoperative rehabilitation, prolonged temporomandibular immobilization should not be overlooked. Some patients with poor compliances will not tolerate IMF in nonsurgical treatment. In the aspect of patient's convenience and early recovery by short IMF period, open reduction would be recommended as a better treatment method.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.12-20
• /
• 1989

This is a retrospective study on 452 patients with maxillofacial bone fracture. The patients were treated at the Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, WON KWANG UNIV. HOSPITAL from Aug. 1, 1984 to Sept. 30, 1988. The results were as follows. 1. The facial bone fractures occured most frequently in the twenties (35.3%)and male were predominant(75%) than female. 2. The most frequent etiologic factor was traffic accident. 3. The most common location of facial bone fracture was mandible(57%). Zygomatic bone & arch(39.9%) were most common on middle 1/3 of the face and symphysis(37.1%) were most common on the mandible. 4. The time from injury to treatment was variable from under the 1 week (65%) to over the 1 week(35%). In most case of the patients were treated beyond the 3 days(51.5%). 5. The relationship of intermaxillary fixation period and treatment method was an intimate relationship. The IMF period was reduced by the use of plate and screw osteosynthesis. 6. The weight loss was proportioned to intermaxillary fixation period.