• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.384-404
• /
• 2019

This study investigates the multidimensional structure of apparel design evaluation criteria and the details of each criterion by exploring how female college students majoring in apparel design in their 20s evaluate apparel design based on an exploratory approach. Data were analyzed through a categorization method of qualitative data after collecting from a literature review and three focus group interviews. The results identified the six evaluation criteria of apparel design (functional usefulness, convenience, aesthetics, psychological self suitability, social activity usefulness, and fashion trend). Functional usefulness and convenience assessed the extent to which primary features of apparel are reflected in apparel design, and aesthetics evaluated the aesthetic beauty of apparel design. Psychological self suitability estimated the extent to which apparel design expressed psychological self properly, and social activity usefulness appraised the extent to which apparel design contributed to the social activities of wearers. Last, fashion trend assessed the extent to which apparel design reflected fashion trend. The study results provide meaningful implications towards an apparel industry that wants to develop apparel design that appeals to consumers, educational institutions that aim to cultivate well-trained professionals in the apparel industry, and consumers who want to purchase clothes of satisfactory design.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.189-199
• /
• 2013

As many organizations have adopted and implemented ERP systems, concerns about ERP performance also have increased. Former researches studied the ERP implementation of general large or medium size enterprises but there are not enough studies on ERP systems of a specific industry domain. In this paper, we introduce a case study on ERP adoption methodology of global leading company 'D' in shipbuilding and marine engineering industry. We examined ERP implementation background, method and scope and evaluated ERP performance in perspective of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative research usually examines ERP performance based on financial statements and qualitative study typically examines organization change or improvement. As a result, ERP implementation in shipbuilding and marine industry can improve quantitative aspects such as cost, human resource and organization performance. As qualitative analysis, business process and tools can be unified and management transparency can be improved by ERP implementation. The result of this paper will be useful guideline for organizations which are considering ERP systems.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.918-932
• /
• 2021

Evaluation of the collaboration of the upstream and downstream enterprises in the manufacturing supply chain is important to improve their synergistic effect. From the supply chain perspective, this study establishes the evaluation model of the manufacturing enterprise collaboration on the basis of fuzzy entropy according to synergistic theory. Downstream enterprises carry out coordinated capital, business, and information flows as subsystems and research enterprises as composite systems. From the three subsystems, the collaboration evaluation index is selected as the order parameter. The compound fuzzy matter-element matrix is established by using its improved algorithm. Subordinate membership and standard deviation fuzzy matter-element matrixes are constructed. Index weight is determined using the entropy weight method. The closeness of each matter element is then calculated. Through a representative of the home appliance industry, namely, Gree Electric Appliances Inc. of Zhuhai, empirical analysis of data in 2011-2017 from the company and its upstream and downstream enterprise collaboration shows a good trend, but the coordinated development has not reached stability. Gree Electric Appliances Inc. of Zhuhai need to strengthen the synergy with upstream and downstream enterprises in terms of cash, business, and information flows to enhance competitiveness. Experimental results show that this method can provide precise suggestions for enterprises, improve the degree of collaboration, and accelerate the development and upgrading of the manufacturing industry.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.1105-1117
• /
• 2017

Financial technology, also known as FinTech, is one of the fast growing global businesses in since its inception in 2008. Fintech is a new economic industry, comprised of companies that adopted the latest technologies to provide more efficient financial services than the traditional financial services. Fintech companies are generally small to medium sized startups trying to disintermediate existing financial systems. FinTech companies can be differentiated in several areas, based on its business solutions and target customers. In Korea, the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending companies are the most prominent in the FinTech sector. P2P lending is a method of borrowing or lending money to individuals through online services without the use of an official financial institution as an intermediary. The P2P lending companies operate their services entirely online or mobile environment. Consequently, mobile P2P lending application users are dramatically increasing. Thus, it is worth evaluating the acceptance of the mobile apps of the P2P lending companies from a user's perspective. This paper discusses user acceptance of the mobile P2P lending apps, guided by the Technology Acceptance Model. We conclude that the users' acceptance of mobile P2P lending apps are significantly influenced by perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and user satisfaction. These in turn influenced their attitude towards using mobile P2P lending apps and intention to use.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.297-305
• /
• 2021

A contractor or a main contractor is a company with full capacity to construct all project's works for the owner. A subcontractor is an organization that works with the main contractor to execute and complete work packages for the project. Selecting an effective subcontractor will help the efficiency and success of any projects in the construction industry. Therefore, this study identified subcontractor evaluation factors in Vietnam by collecting questionnaire survey data from engineers and staffs in the construction industry project environment. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then performed to identify the critical factors when evaluating and selecting the subcontractor in construction projects. Moreover, when considering the impact level in terms of the average value, the research results showed that the most critical concern was the subcontractor's reputation. Furthermore, the top five factors affecting the sub-contractor evaluation and selection are (i) reputation, (ii) price, (iii) construction techniques, (iv) ability to implement projects according to commitments, and (v) subcontractor competence (the team of workers, technician staff, engineers with full capacity according to regulations). These research results provide an overall perspective that will help main contractors develop suitable subcontractors' evaluation and selection factors in their projects in the construction industry.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.372-380
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to develop the methods for evaluating the business value of a company's technical portfolios. In this study, technical portfolios of 10 major manufacturers and e-Biz industries are examined first from a business model perspective. Subsequently, we suggest future direction of R&D for the pharmaceutical industry by deducing the leading industries sharing similar traits with the pharmaceutical industry. Methods: In order to evaluate and analyze the patents of the major leading industries based on the constituents of a business model, the target patents were selected through the following procedure. Results: First, In this study, using the data obtained from the patent analysis, the differences in the technology portfolios of specific business entities based on the constituents of their business models. Second, deduced business rules of particular business entities through classification analysis and role-model of pharmaceutical industry Conclusion: If enterprise discovers technological change and characters of other enterprise or technology, enterprise could judge a direction of technology which will be developed in the near term and a plan which utilized existing technology to increase enterprise's profits.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.91-108
• /
• 2003

인터넷과 웹을 전략적으로 이용하는 기업들이 기하급수적으로 증가하면서, 많은 기업들이 웹 사이트를 구축하여 운영하고 있다. 그러나 아직도 대부분의 기업들은 이를 충분히 활용하고 있지 못한 실정이다. 훌륭한 웹사이트를 구축했다 할지라도, 웹사이트가 사용자의 니즈를 충족시키지 못하고 사용자들이 웹사이트에 흥미를 느끼지 못한다면 웹사이트의 효과는 줄어들 것이다. 본 연구는 이러한 측면에서 사용자의 관점에서 본 웹 사이트의 동기유발 효과에 대하여 연구하였으며, 업종별 웹사이트 평가는 WebMAC Business에서 제공하는 흥미적 요인, 의미적 요인, 구조적 요인, 사용용이성 요인으로 사용자의 모티베이션을 측정하였다. 결과적으로, 이들 4가지 요인들은 업종별로 유의한 차이를 보였으며, 금융업, 인터넷 기업, 소매업에 비해 제조업은 상대적으로 웹 사이트의 모티베이션이 낮게 평가되었다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.131-143
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This paper discusses the intrinsic assumption of one-dimensional relationship between the upper and lower levels in AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) for the Preliminary Feasibility Study of National R&D Program. This assumptions has not been questioned in academia and industry so far. Methods: This discussion is induced by understanding the Theory of Attractive Quality (Kano et al. 1984) and explains the limitation of AHP in the preliminary feasibility study of national R&D program. Results: In this paper, we propose a new questioning method based on two dimensional perspective, which is named as 2D-AHP (two dimensional AHP), to overcome the limitation. The main idea stems from the observation that the relationship between the upper and lower levels in AHP can vary depending on the subject of R&D. Conclusion: The two dimensional perspective pointed out in this paper should be more deeply studied in the field of MCDM(multi-criteria decision making) since it can be applied to the more general problems in human decision making.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.331-364
• /
• 2013

이 연구는 첨단화 융합화 복합화 경향이 특히 강한 정보통신 분야에서의 평가 신뢰성을 높이기 위해서는 평가의 전문성이 획기적으로 제고되어야 한다는 문제의식에서 출발하고 있다. 이를 위해 지식경제 기술혁신사업 중에서 정보통신 분야의 기반구축과 산업 진흥을 담당하는 정보통신산업진흥원의 평가 전문성을 평가자 선정, 평가자 전문성 발휘여건, 평가자의 이력관리라는 전 과정 평가관리의 분석틀을 활용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과는 정보통신산업진흥원의 평가제도는 다른 기관에 비하여 평가자 선정과 평가자의 이력관리는 양호하나, 평가자의 전문성 발휘 여건은 상대적으로 개선과 보완이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 이에 따라 각 분석요소에서의 평가 전문성 향상을 위한 정책대안을 단기와 장기로 분류하여 총 12가지로 논의하였다.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제2권4호
• /
• pp.71-76
• /
• 2016

본 논문에서는 미국, 영국, 일본, 중국, 한국의 비식별화 정책비교를 통하여 향후 비식별화 규제의 방향과 빅데이터 산업 활성화 방안을 제시한다. 비식별화 기술과 적정성 평가기준을 효율적으로 활용할 경우, 개인의 사생활을 침해하지 않고 개인정보보호법 제약을 피하면서 개인정보를 산업적으로 활용하여 서비스와 기술을 발전시킬 수 있다. 역작용으로는 비식별화 된 데이터들의 집합체로서 개인을 재식별 할 수 있는 재식별화 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 비즈니스 관점에서는 빅데이터 산업이 활성화되기 위해서 규제의 해소와 빅데이터 활용 등을 위한 제도완화가 필요하며 정보보호 측면에서의 보안강화 조치와 제도정비도 필요하다.