• 경영과학
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.139-153
• /
• 2002

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is known as a very useful decision-making model developed for obtaining the relative weights of alternatives through pairwise comparison in the context of hierarchical structure. In this paper, we propose a method to reflect the reliability of evaluators in the process of pairwise comparison. This method is applied to the evaluation of aerospace technology alternatives. We have conducted a questionnaire survey for S company that is one of the representative aerospace companies in Korea. A questionnaire was designed for obtaining both the priority with considering the reliability of evaluators' importance weights (the modified AHP priority) and the priority with assuming equally reliable evaluators' importance weights (the AHP priority) in order to compare the priority derived by each of two methods. The result shows that there exists the difference hard to neglect between the final priorities gained by two methods.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.61-79
• /
• 2021

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to study the relative weights of Quality Scorecard (QSC) which was developed for a new quality concept, called Open Quality, in the era of Industry 4.0. Open Quality aims to ensure quality responsibility by accurately measuring the quality level and sharing the quality data with stakeholders. Methods: To analyze the importance of QSC, a survey study was conducted based on 10 types of industry. The relative weights of QSC measures are investigated by both the industry types and the organizational life cycle. Further, the relative importance of QSC was analyzed according to the organization's lifecycle. By dividing the aspects with respect to the result data, application method for QSC is further provided. Results: The result indicates that there are significant differences among Korean companies in terms of the level of Industry revolution stages. Among ten industry types, manufacturing and finance sectors show the highest importance of QSC. QSC measures are also considered more importance in growth stage of the maturity cycle than generator and decline stages. Conclusion: When QSC is adopted for Open Quality, its relative weights must be considered to cope with the unique characteristics of industrial types. Besides, QSC's contribution may vary according to the level of maturity of the target company.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.118-126
• /
• 2022

This study attempts a comparison between AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) in which the importance weight is structured by individual subjective values and regression model with importance weight based on statistical theory in determining the importance weight of casual model. The casual model is designed by for students' satisfaction with university, and SERVQUAL modeling methodology is applied to derive factors affecting students' satisfaction with university. By comparison of importance weights for regression model and AHP, the following characteristics are observed. 1) the lower the degree of satisfaction of the factor, the higher the importance weight of AHP, 2) the importance weight of AHP has tendency to decrease as the standard deviation(or p-value) increases. degree of decreases. the second sampling is conducted to double-check the above observations. This study empirically checks that the importance weight of AHP has a relationship with the mean and standard deviation(or p-value) of independence variables, but can not reveal how exactly the relationship is. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship with long-term perspective.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.327-332
• /
• 2010

본 논문에서는 다수의 성과지표를 동시에 고려하며 각 역의 운영조건을 반영하고 더불어 화물품목의 중요도를 반영하여 각 화물취급역의 성과를 평가하는 방안을 제안하였다. 본 논문에서는 187개 화물취급역에 대해서 품목별 '발송규모'와 '도착규모'를 성과지표로 사용하고 각 역의 '화물인력'과 '유치가능량'을 운영조건지 표로 사용하며 품목별 중요도를 확신영역 제약조건으로 반영하는 자료포락분석으로 효율성을 평가하였다. 이러한 결과는 철도경영자 또는 철도정책담당자의 경영전략이나 정책의사결정에 유용한 정보로 사용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.210-214
• /
• 2002

Association rule mining is an exploratory learning task to discover some hidden dependency relationships among items in transaction data. Quantitative association rules denote association rules with both categorical and quantitative attributes. There have been several works on quantitative association rule mining such as the application of fuzzy techniques to quantitative association rule mining, the generalized association rule mining for quantitative association rules, and importance weight incorporation into association rule mining fer taking into account the users interest. This paper introduces a new method for generalized fuzzy quantitative association rule mining with importance weights. The method uses fuzzy concept hierarchies fer categorical attributes and generalization hierarchies of fuzzy linguistic terms fur quantitative attributes. It enables the users to flexibly perform the association rule mining by controlling the generalization levels for attributes and the importance weights f3r attributes.

• Korean Chemical Engineering Research
• /
• 제59권2호
• /
• pp.186-190
• /
• 2021

규제당국은 유해 물질 배출을 저감 하는 규제를 시행하면서, 규제 이행에 따른 다양한 활동의 편익/비용 비율로 그 타당성을 제시한다. 그리고 비율 산정과정에서 규제 관련 속성의 중요도 가중치를 반영한다. 그런데, 전문가들은 가중치 설문 응답에서 애매함을 보이고 있으며, 정확한 의사 결정을 위해서는 이를 제거해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 이를 위한 퍼지-계층화 방법론을 이용하여 타당성여부를 적용하고, 이를 2019년 11월 시행된 우리나라의 '배출 저감 계획'규제 타당성 평가에 적용하였다.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.117-121
• /
• 2013

철도선로구간의 노후도는 궤도, 노반, 교량, 터널 등 요소시설의 노후도로 결정되며 궤도의 선형 또한 선로구간 노후도에 영향을 준다. 본 논문에서는 계층구조분석(analytic hierarchy process: AHP)과 자료포락분석(data envelopment analysis: DEA)을 활용하여 선로구간의 노후도를 평가하는 방법을 제시한다. AHP는 다수의 전문가들이 평가하는 각 요소시설의 중요도를 체계적으로 파악할 수 있도록 해준다. 요소시설에 대한 중요도는 전문가에 따라 달라질 수 있다. DEA는 선로구간 요소시설의 중요도 가중치 범위를 체계적으로 반영하여 선로구간의 노후도를 평가할 수 있도록 해준다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.55-83
• /
• 1995

This paper addresses three central decision-making problems frequently encountered in developing evaluation checklists for ex-post evaluation of R&D projects at private R&D centers: 1) what kind of evaluation elements and factors should be included in the evaluation forms\ulcorner 2) how much weight should be assigned to each evaluation factor and element\ulcorner and 3) could the same evaluation elements and factors with weights be applied all the project type(research, development, and engineering)\ulcorner To answer these questions, we identified the evaluation elements/factors based on the review of relevant literature and measured the perceptions of researchers, R&D managers, and top managements of the three private R&D centers to get the information about the importance levels of the elements and the weights of the factors for each of the three project types. The findings include that 1) all the evaluation elements derived from the literature exhibited high importance levels, and 2) the importance levels of the elements and the weights of the factors were quite varied along the project types. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings for ex-post evaluation of R&D projects are discussed.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.69-77
• /
• 2010

This methodological research was designed to develop performance evaluation key indicators (PEKIs) for management by objectives (MBO) and to estimate their weights for hospital nurses. Methods: The PEKIs were developed by selecting preliminary indicators from a literature review, examining content validity and identifying their level of importance. Data were collected from November 14, 2007 to February 18, 2008. Data set for importance of indicators was obtained from 464 nurses and weights of PEKIs domain was from 453 nurses, who worked for at least 2 yr in one of three hospitals. Data were analyzed using $X^2$-test, factor analysis, and the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Results: Based upon Content Validity Index of .8 or above, 61 indicators were selected from the 100 preliminary indicators. Finally, 40 PEKIs were developed from the 61 indicators, and categorized into 10 domains. The highest weight of the 10 domains was customer satisfaction, which was followed by patient education, direct nursing care, profit increase, safety management, improvement of nursing quality, completeness of nursing records, enhancing competence of nurses, indirect nursing care, and cost reduction, in that order. Conclusion: PEKIs and their weights can be utilized for impartial evaluation and MBO for hospital nurses. Further research to verify PEKIs would lead to successful implementation of MBO.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.33-43
• /
• 2024

Purpose:The acute hospital accreditation program launched in South Korea has shown positive effects on safety culture and quality of care. However, relative weights have not yet been investigated for accreditation criteria with a hierarchical structure. This study aimed to derive the relative weights of acute-care hospital accreditation criteria. Methods: We conducted an online survey using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique to assess the validity, importance, and urgency of acute hospital accreditation criteria. The AHP online survey link was distributed in November 2022 after obtaining informed consent from 10 experts in hospital accreditation. Results: 'Basic value system' ranked highest, while 'patient care system' ranked second in terms of validity, importance, and urgency. 'Performance management system' had the lowest validity and urgency, while 'organizational management system' carried the lowest importance. Within the 'patient care system' domain, 'surgery and anesthesia sedation management' scored highest in validity and importance, and 'patient care' scored highest in urgency. 'Care delivery system and evaluation' received the lowest scores for all three aspects. In the 'organizational management system' domain, infection control ranked highest in terms of validity, importance, and urgency. The lowest validity was observed for 'management and organizational operation' and the lowest importance and urgency were noted for 'human resource management'. Conclusion: The weights for validity, importance, and urgency, as shown in each domain and chapter, and the number of measurable elements included, are largely inconsistent. This study will contribute to the development of the structure and scientific improvement of accreditation standards.