• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2008

SCM is one of the important key issues in Internet-based business environment. This study intends to suggest a research model to measure the influence of environmental, organizational, information technology factors on organizational performance using the four perspectives of balanced scorecard (BSC). 9 independent variables and 4 dependent variables were adopted from existing literature review. 103 companies data were collected by survey. Four hypotheses in this study were generated to analyze the positive relationship of environmental, organizational, information systems on organizational performance with 4 perspectives of BSC. The results of hypothesis testing show as follows. First, organizational performance of learning and growth perspective has a positive influence of IS maturity, process innovation, top management support, use of SCM package, IS interoperability, and objectives sharing. Second organizational performance of infernal process perspective has a positive influence of process innovation, IS interoperability, objectives sharing, top management support, use of SCM package, competitiveness, and IS maturity. Third, organizational performance of customer perspective has a positive influence of IS interoperability, objectives sharing, process innovation, IS maturity, competitiveness, and use of SCM package. Finally, organizational performance of financial perspective has a positive influence of process in innovation, use of SCM package, IS maturity, objectives sharing, IS interoperability, and top management support. The contribution of this study is that it provides a conceptual framework and empirical evidences of the causal relationship between environmental, organizational, IS factor and organizational performance with 4 perspectives of BSC.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.121-132
• /
• 2005

Nowadays, Information Technology(IT) has become one of the most critical managerial decision areas, because its role in the business practice tends to be more important and hence the amount of the investment in growing. Since there is no dominant and promising measure to evaluate the IT performance, the managements have difficulties on the decision process for IT investment. In this paper, we propose an IT performance evaluation model. The proposed model starts with finding the business performance evaluation areas and the corresponding KPIs, and then concentrates on the IT performance evaluation areas corresponding to the business performance evaluation areas. To extract the specific and reliable KPIs for the IT performance measure, we map the business performance evaluation areas into the corresponding IT performance evaluation areas and then combine and adjust these KPIs with the KPIs obtained from the experiential field interview. Finally, We present the complete model which has 11 business performance indices and 48 IT performance indices are completed.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.33-60
• /
• 2009

This study explores the limitation in making a causal model through an existing case and proposes an alternative plan to improve a theoretical system of causation modeling. To make a dynamic and actual model, several principles are needed such as reality based analysis of system structures and dynamics, consistent expression of causations, conversion of numerical formulas to causal relations, classification and arrangement of variables by size of concept, etc. However, it is hard to find cases to apply these considerations from existing models in System Dynamics. Therefore, this study verifies errors of derived models from literatures and proposes principles and guides that should be considered to make a sound dynamic model on a causal map. It contributes to making an opportunity for exciting public opinion to improve theory about causal maps, yet it has limitation that the study does not advance forward to the experimental step. For future study, it plans to make up by classifying and leveling causal variables, developing a dynamic BSC model.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.63-80
• /
• 2006

본 연구에서는 체계적인 조달방식을 가지는 중립적 B2B 전자시장을 위한 성과평가의 규범적 모형을 제시한다. 이 모형은 활용 가능한 성과측정 시스템 중 매우 강력하고 안정적인 도구인 균형성과표에 기반을 두고 있다. 이 연구에서는 구조적인 모형을 개발하고 전문가로부터 가중치를 도출하도록 하기 위하여 AHP를 사용하였다. e-비즈니스 기업, 특히 B2B 전자시장의 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인은 기존 문헌을 바탕으로 도출되었다. 모형의 유용성을 확보하기 위하여, 국내 B2B 전자시장에 근무하고 있는 전문가들의 자문을 구하였다. 이들 전문가들은 벤처 캐피털리스트, B2B 전자시장의 최고경영자, 컨설턴트 등으로 구성되었다. 전문가들의 자문을 통하여 주요 평가 요인들을 도출하였으며, 계층 구조를 결정하였다. 계층 구조를 결정한 후에, 전문가들에 대한 설문조사를 통하여 평가 요인들의 가중치를 결정하였다. 가중치는 설문응답의 기하평균을 이용하여 계산하였다. 제시한 모형의 적용 가능성을 파악하기 위하여 국내 2개의 실제 B2B 전자시장에 대한 사례연구를 수행하였다. 사례연구의 결과, 제시된 평가모형이 B2B 전자시장의 성과평가에 유용하고 적용 가능함이 검증되었다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.194-203
• /
• 2008

건설R&D 사업은 1994년에 12억원으로 시작하여 2004년에는 300억원으로 총 1,257억원(총 418건)을 투자하였지만, 과제당 연구비가 약 3억원으로 소형과제 위주로 추진됨으로써, 건설현장에 적용할 수 있으며, 사업화가 가능한 연구결과물은 거의 없었다. 또한 건설R&D 성과측정에 대한 관심이 상대적으로 적었고 그 중요성도 인식하지 못했던 것이 사실이었다. 특히 건설 R&D 성과측정 결과를 비교하기 위한 정형화된 방법론 및 계량화된 측정 자료를 가지고 있지 못해서 연구성과를 기반으로 한 지속적인 연구개발 투자보다는 매년 기술수요조사에 대응하는 형태의 연구개발투자가 이루어졌다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 스타기술 평가를 위한 성과지표들을 선정하기 위해 Balanced Score Card (BSC) 방법론을 응용하여 건설분야 R&D에 맞도록 생산성, 지식축적, 인력양성, 공공복지 4가지로 수정하며 건설R&D 성과분석 방법론을 제안하였다. 이렇게 계량화된 성과자료는 건설 R&D 투자의 근거자료가 되고 그동안 측정하기 어려웠던 건설기술의 가치에 대한 신뢰성을 제고하여 건설R&D 예산을 지속적으로 확보하기 위한 중요한 기본 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.161-170
• /
• 2008

최근 첨단기술과 핵심정보의 불법적인 유출 및 해킹과 바이러스 등으로 인한 피해사례가 계속 증가하고 있으나, 기업에서의 보안사고 방지와 예방체제는 아직도 미흡한 편이다. 대기업을 중심으로 회사의 중요한 정보를 보존하기 위한 장치로써 정보보호관리체계(ISMS)를 도입하여 운영하고 있으나, 기존의 정보보호수준 진단 및 측정 모델은 주로 ISO 27001에 기반을 둔 정보보호정책과 제도의 수립여부, 또는 IT 분야에 초점을 둔 지표 중심으로 평가를 함으로써 기업의 전반적인 보안수준 평가와 보안사고 예방체제 강화에는 부족한 점이 많았다. 본 논문에 소개 된 정보보호수준 측정모델은 기존의 정보보호관리체계는 물론, 정보보호활동의 성과를 정량적으로 평가하여 각종 보안사고의 예방 및 대응방안 수립에 활용 가능하도록 국내외 사례연구와 함께 경영관리기법으로 많이 사용되고 있는 BSC(Balanced Scorecard)를 적용한 실용성에 초점을 맞추어 개발하였다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.95-123
• /
• 2006

It is needed to evaluate information systems actively which has already developed to improve future performance of the organization and foster the activation of information system. The introduction or development of information system also can bring about a organizational success. To measure exactly the organizational performance of information systems, it is needed to develop a new valuation model for a specific information system from a objective pint of view, as well as to equip a standard methodology using BSC measurement. The information system valuation from a objective point of view is of importance as the basic information for the decision to obtain information system. This paper takes aim at investigating a new information system valuation model and developing a information system valuation system using case-based reasoning for predicting currency value of information system in each organization. A new information system valuation system is developed as a web-enabling base. Using this, users are able to estimate the value of specific information system on a real time efficiently.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.117-154
• /
• 2006

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the current institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRIs). Under the current evaluation systems, twenty GRIs are grouped into three Research Groups and each Group has its own evaluation systems. One problem of the current institutional evaluation systems is that the systems cannot reflect individual GRIs' characteristics. The following methods are used. First, based on four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton(1992)'s Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model, six perspectives appropriate to GRUs' characteristics are derived. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI Research Groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRIs' evaluatees are asked to allocate appropriate weights on the performance measures. Evaluatees' weights of a GRI are compared with average weights of the related Group. Finally in every BSC's perspective, GRIs that have extraordinarily over-scored or under-scored weights are analyzed in terms of GRIs' missions, customers, capability of human resources, etc. In the Basic Research Group, the Korea Basic Science Institute is deviated in the financial perspective and the strategic direction perspectives. In the Public Research Group, Korea Institute of Construction Technology is significantly different from other GRIs in three perspectives. Five out of eight GRIs in the Industrial Research Group, GRIs are significantly different each other in several perspectives. It could be concluded that the current institutional evaluation systems are least appropriate in measuring performance of the GRIs of the Industrial Research Group.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.209-234
• /
• 2007

Recently, balanced scorecard is widely used in the public sector as well as in the private sector. Balanced scorecard system of a particular hospital is a very useful tool in the sense that it shows various measures for the management including the traditional financial measures. However, since it does not show the impact of action items, managers have to analyze his potential decisions. On the other hand, a system dynamics model for the management of a hospital can be used to predict future management status. In this paper, a balanced scorecard system with a system dynamics model is developed for a small sized hospital, and the feasibility and applicability of the system have been tested. It turns out the combination of the balanced scorecard and system dynamics technique can be comprised each other. The balanced scorecard system can take advantage of the data forecasted by the system dynamics model including the implementation of action items taken today. On the other hand, the key performance indicators and action items from the balanced scorecard system provide guidelines the scope and direction of the system dynamics model. The additional efforts of developing a system dynamics model are well compensated by the additional colorful functionalities of the system. This paper also covers the future research areas for the combined system to be more effectively developed.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2004

This paper proposes an empirical evidence about contextual factors which determine perceived business performances of small firms resulted from IT investment. In this paper, small firms are defined as firms of which total employees are below fifty. These small firms account for 95% of total number of private companies in Korea. We used a perceived IT performance model based on Balanced Scorecard framework to evaluate IT performance of small firms. And data were collected by Web and e-mail survey method with multiple screening. Statistical results show that business performance of small firms are differentiated in terms of firm size, location, longevity, age of owner, education level of owner, while industry sector, profitability, sex of owner don't make significant differences.