• Title/Summary/Keyword: ISO 22000

Search Result 19, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

A Korean Food Safety Management System(FSMS) Based on the Premises of ISO 22000 (ISO 22000 국제규격 제정에 따른 한국형 식품안전경영시스템(FSMS) 구축모델과 적용방안)

  • Moon, Jae-Sung;Yoo, Wang-Jin;Lee, Cheol-Gyu
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.33 no.3
    • /
    • pp.41-46
    • /
    • 2005

  • The production, processing, sale and service of food materials are not subject to attainment via a single country. In accordance with internationalization of the world, issues related to food safety have emerged as critical international concerns and they are closely associated with the health and interest of domestic consumers, producers, manufacturers, and distributors. As a third party certification standards, ISO 22000 is in progress International Organization for Standardization(ISO) and the Draft International Standard(DIS) has already been presented on December 2004. The purpose of this study is to analyze the international standards, guidelines and legislation in regard of Food Safety Management System(FSMS) including ISO 9001, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point(HACCP) and Product Liability(PL) so as to present Korean-model Food Safety Management System requirements and system establishment model.

  • PDF KSCI

An Integrated System of Quality, Food Safety, Environment, Health, and Safety for Small Agricultural Companies

  • Lee, Kwan-Suk
    • Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.363-370
    • /
    • 2012

  • Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze standards of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, KOSHA 18001, GAP and ISO 22000 to make an integrated system and check whether an integrated system can be used at small size companies. Background: There are many certification criteria for quality, safety and health such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, KOSHA 18001, GAP and ISO 22000. However, these criteria are difficult and complicated to be used at a small size company. Thus. it is not easy for small size companies to obtain certifications using these criteria. But customers and workers of small size companies want the key points of these systems to be implemented. Method: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, KOSHA 18001, GAP and ISO 22000 were analyzed to find the commonality and duplications as well as the importance of the items in these standards. And a survey was conducted to check whether certain aspects of the anticipated integrated system can be implemented at small size companies. Results: Items were classified into categories based upon the importance to food safety, quality, safety, environment, and health. Items which are common among standards were also identified and thus give ideas to make the new standards simpler than the currently available standards. Items which were important but may not be easily implemented at the small size companies were also identified. Conclusion: By considering the fact that the currently used accreditation standards have many similar aspects, these systems can be integrated into one new system which small size companies can use relatively easily.

  • https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.2.363 인용 PDF KSCI