• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.153-192
• /
• 2014

This article's purpose is to overcome the inadequacy of deliberative democracy for communication on the basis of Haewonsangsaeng. The inadequacy of deliberative democracy for communication is presented as the following two. First, as deliberative democracy treats civic virtue as instrumental thing, deliberative democracy is still in moral solipsism. Second, as deliberative democracy doesn't consider 'the inequality of power' among diverse political positions, the project of deliberative democracy for communication ends up in the exposure of the inequality of power among diverse political positions. Sangsaeng in Haewonsangsaeng concerned with inter-relationship over individualism treats civic virtue as original motility. In this context, Sangsaeng in Haewonsangsaeng is the alternative notion to overcome the first inadequacy of deliberative democracy for communication. Haewon in Haewonsangsaengas is the condition for Sangsaeng. and Haewon's method is to exclude or to eliminate the structural frame of Sanggeuk meaning mutual conflict and antagonism. This article presents two structural frame of Sanggeuk. First, First structural obstacle as internal obstacle is suggested through analyzing pluralism on the basis of existential philosophy. The result of the analysis is the 'antagonism' between the hegemonical value and the peripheral value. Second structural obstacle as external obstacle is the extinction of public sphere caused by the growth of market and the expansion of bureaucracy.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제24_2집
• /
• pp.1-55
• /
• 2015

Haewonsangsaeng(解冤相生; the resolution of grievances and mutual beneficence) along with sininjohwa(神人調化; harmonious union of divine beings and human beings) belongs to the mid-stage of the Four Tenets. Thus, it is a core factor to achieve creative conjunction of the virtues of yin and yang and realization of the Dao in the world. It is very significant that Daesoonjinrihoe includes haewonsangsaeng in its dogma. Daoism has focused on the resolution of grievances with haewonseokgyeol(解怨釋結) from the beginning of its foundation. Haewon(解冤; the resolution of grievances) is the important matter which Chinese Daoism has paid attention to. This study compares the similarities and differences between Haewon thoughts of Daesoonjinrihoe and Daoism in order to help promote communication of Korean and Chinese culture.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제20권
• /
• pp.193-222
• /
• 2009

There is no place in the scriptures of Daesoonjinrihoe(大巡眞理會) where Indian philosophy is directly discussed. The philosophies dealt with in Daesoon thought are mostly those of Christianity, Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. Of course, the thoughts that are not widely known and those that are not considered to be worth comparing with the Daesoon thought must have been omitted. It seems that Indian philosophy and Daesoon thought have considerable similarity. First of all, the two philosophies are rooted in religion. True, there is no dearth of religious philosophies in the East, for instance, Confucianism and Taoism, and yet comparing Daesoon thought and Indian philosophy is significant because they both presuppose a theistic paradigm. At the core of the two perspectives, there is personal God, i.e., Isvara or Gucheon Sangje (九天上帝), upon whom human beings and the world absolutely depend as his creation. Unlike traditional Christian theology, the two philosophies are alike in being indifferent to proving the existence of the deity and focusing on his form and role. In this article, the author try to examine the meaning of the four tenets of Daesoonjinrihoe(Eumyanghapdeok 陰陽合德, Shininjohwa 神人調化, Haewonsangsaeng 解冤相生, Dotongjingyeong 道通眞境) from the perspective of Indian philosophy in general, Purusa-sukta of Rig-veda, theistic Upanisads, and Ramanuja's Visistadvaita(限定不二論) in particular. Before making up the main subject, the author inquires into the characteristics of Ultimate Reality in Daesoon thought and Indian philosophy.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.25-52
• /
• 2004

The history of the mankind, that is the history of the war, have been continued with the consecutive of the struggle and confrontation. In the history of many war, the most important factor of them is just the religion. so that today, for the mankind to long for the peace, all believers are charged with very important mission. Confronting with the 21th century, yet the war is not ceasing in an earth one side. At this time if we are to investigate the problem of real peace, we need to present uprightly the direction of basic religious factor and solution. In Korea, which is keeping deep religious mind, the Daesoon thought that appears newly at the modern times is proposing the 'Haewonsangsaeng'(eliminating resentment and helping one another) as new peace idea of 21th century. In this thought, we can discover the reason of the conflict to appear in the history of mankind. And there is a new idea of peace, that is to say, which is called 'sangsaeng'(mutual aid and cooperation). In this article, centering upon Sangsaeng idea, I try to introduce the new viewpoint of Daesoon thought about the conflict and peace.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제24_1권
• /
• pp.291-313
• /
• 2014

Religious organizations execute various social welfare programs on the basis of their religious ideology and faith. Their practice vividly aim at mission, propagation, edification, and spreading, but also is practised as a way of philanthropy, an universal value. Daesoonjinrihoe's social welfare program can be understood in this respect. This paper investigates on which idea Daesoonjinrihoe's social welfare program takes its basis, and examines the current situation and tasks of the social welfare program. Daesoonjinrihoe runs their social welfare program on the idea of 'Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life[Haewonsangsaeng: 解冤相生]' and 'Boeunsangsaeng(報恩相生)'. Their program is concentrated on medical welfare, welfare for elderly people, and youth welfare. It is noteworthy that Daesoonjinrihoe's welfare program is not subsidized by government as much as those of other religious organizations. This paper looks into the tasks for Daesoonjinrihoe's social welfare program in terms of operational system and hardware, and suggests that we need to show interest in multicultural welfare systems and support it as Korean society is becoming a more multicultural society.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제33집
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2019

대순사상의 인간관에 대한 연구는 크게 내부자와 외부자 그리고 종교학의 입장에서 진행되어 왔다. 본 논문은 엘리아데가 주창한 신인간주의의 관점에서 대순사상의 인간관을 분석한다. 대순사상의 인간관은 엘리아데의 종교적 인간의 주요 특징을 잘 구현하고 있다. 대순사상은 미로와 같은 인생의 중층성과 복잡성을 다루며, 그 중심에 증산의 인간관을 위치시킨다. 증산은 선천의 인간이 직면한 실존문제를 진단하고, 후천의 세계관 변혁을 위한 해원상생과 보은상생의 종교적 처방을 내린다. 동학혁명에 대한 새로운 종교적 대안으로서, 증산은 평화의 길을 제시하였다. 천지공사를 통하여, 선천의 상극관계를 후천의 조화관계로 변화시킨다는 목표를 담고 있다. 대순사상의 우주론은 삼계 가운데 신인관계를 재정립하고, 구천상제의 인신화현을 통하여 권선징악의 윤리관과 인존사상을 제시한다. 결론적으로 엘리아데의 신인간주의의 관점에서 대순사상의 인간관은 더 이상 해명이 필요 없는 종교적 인간관이다.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제24_1권
• /
• pp.97-144
• /
• 2014

Jeungsan(甑山) carried out the Universal Redesign(天地公事) through which the former world full of a mutual opposition(相克) can be peacefully transferred into the latter world composed of a mutual beneficence(相生). Although the Universal Redesign consists of such three factors heaven, earth, and human, it converges towards Human Redesign in that humans are the main agents for heaven and earth. Human as Redesign object is characterized as a member of community, not an anarchistic individual. The Universal Resign of Jeungsan is eventually connected with the construction of a country comprising a mutual beneficence in that it is the most typical strain among all the human communities. His Universal Resign for foundering the foremost country does not target all the countries, but only one country upon and through which the world with a mutual beneficence can be formed. He executed the Universal Redesign based on such three principles as Haewon sangsaeng(解冤相生), Boeunsangsaeng(報恩相生), and Wonsibanbon(原始返本), Judging from such principles, Korea can be naturally selected as the target of the Universal Redesign for constructing the foremost country. It is approaching when the Universal Redesign in order to transform Korea into the foremost country comes true. The first step for Korea to be made as the foremost country is the construction of DMZ World Peace Park (DWPP) which was proposed by Bak Geunhye, the Korean President, to Obama, the President of USA, in 2013 she visited there. DWPP can be expected to be a center for corporation and interchange between South and North Korea under the interest and support of the world including UN, furthermore, the Capital area of reunified Korea, and finally the world hub of inter national political and economic relation. DWPP is planned to be built at the core of the best place in Korea which is a propitious spot all over the world, upon which a new world capitalism order armed with mutual beneficence can spread.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제46집
• /
• pp.189-234
• /
• 2023

오늘날 서구 윤리학에서 규범윤리 중 하나인 덕윤리는 아리스토텔레스의 덕이론에 기반하고 있다. 덕윤리는 행위보다 행위자의 성품(性品)을 중심에 두며 의무론과 공리주의 같은 외면적 행위 기준의 도덕이론이 갖는 문제점을 해소하는 윤리관으로 평가받고 있다. 이글은 덕의 속성이나 개념을 알아보는 덕이론의 입장에서 강증산 성사(聖師)의 덕의 특징을 살펴보고자, 아리스토텔레스의 덕과의 비교를 목적으로 한다. 먼저 덕의 속성으로서 두 사상의 덕은 형이상학적 기원으로 영혼과 도가 있고, 각각 이성및 마음과 관련하여 작용한다. 아리스토텔레스의 덕은 인간 이성의 탁월한 성품을 가리키고 이에 대해 강증산의 덕은 청정한 본질로 회복하려는 마음 수행에서 나오는 성품이라 할 수 있다. 덕은 그것이 추구하는 좋은 삶 개념을 포함하여 설명하게 되는데 이때 좋은 삶으로서 각각 에우다이모니아와 해원상생으로 대응된다. 아리스토텔레스의 에우다이모니아를 실현하기 위한 성품으로 덕은 중용(中庸)의 덕을 강조하며, 강증산의 해원상생을 실현하기 위한 성품으로서 덕은 무자기(無自欺)와 대인대의(大仁大義)의 덕이 있다. 두 덕이론의 유사점은 덕이 인간으로서 목적을 다하기 위해 좋은 삶을 실현하는 성품으로서 목적론적 성격이 있다는 것이다. 이와 관련하여 공통적으로 실천적 지혜와 지속적인 덕 함양의 과정이 필요하다. 또 다른 유사점으로 덕에 중(中)을 추구하는 의미가 있다는 것이다. 차이점은 덕의 속성과 관련하여 영혼과 도는 다른 측면의 개념이며 아리스토텔레스의 덕은 강증산의 덕과 달리 천부적이며 본성적인 것이 아니라는 차이가 있다. 또한 좋은 삶으로서 에우다이모니아가 인간사회에 국한된 좋은 삶이라면 해원상생은 인간, 신, 만물을 대상으로 하는 좋은 삶이라는 점에서 차이가 있다. 아리스토텔레스의 중용의 덕이 이성적인 면이 강조된다면 강증산의 무자기와 대인대의의 덕은 이성적 측면 외에도 마음을 통해 남을 이해하는 정서적인 면과 상호간 관계적 덕의 측면이 있다는 면이다.