• Title/Summary/Keyword: HEMP Shelter

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Development of the HEMP Generation, Propagation Analysis, and Optimal Shelter Design Tool (고 고도 전자기파(HEMP) 발생과 전파해석 및 방호실 최적 설계 Tool 개발)

  • Kim, Dong Il;Min, Gyeong Chan
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
    • /
    • v.18 no.10
    • /
    • pp.2331-2338
    • /
    • 2014
  • The HEMP threat may have acquired new, and urgent, relevance as the proliferation of nuclear weapons and missile technology accelerates of the North Korea, for example, is assessed as already having developed few atomic weapons, and is on the verge of North Korea already has missiles capable of delivering a nuclear warhead against South Korea. ITU K.78, K81 and IEC recommended its counter-measuring for the industrial facilities with navigation and sailing facilities in order to obviate the all of processor equipped system malfunctions from the EMP/HEMP but its simulation must only be done by the computer simulation which had studied on the 1960-1990 years USA/AFWL papers. This result has a significant activities to the South Korea being under the North Korea threat because all of HEMP related products was strongly limited for export. The HEMP cord which was developed newly by the KTI including the HEMP generation & propagation analysis, optimal shelter design tool, essential EM energy attenuation in multi-layered various soils and rocks and HEMP filter design tool. Especially, the least square fitting method was adopted to analysis for the EM energy attenuation in the soils and rocks because it has a various characteristics based on the many times field test reports.

Comparison of SE Evaluation Methods for HEMP Shelters (HEMP 방호시설의 SE 평가방법의 비교)

  • Chung, Yeon-Choon;Lee, Jongkyung;Kwun, Suk-Tai
    • The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science
    • /
    • v.25 no.11
    • /
    • pp.1197-1200
    • /
    • 2014
  • Two test standards to be applied for evaluating shielding effectiveness of HEMP protection facilities, MIL-STD-188-125-1 and IEEE std. 299, provide different test results in spite of the same facility. In particular, at the frequency range of 10 kHz~20 MHz, it is confirmed that the test results by the IEEE Std. 299 are about 20~30 dB lower than the evaluated results by MIL-STD-188-125-1. These results are due to the different measurement conditions specified in the two test standards. Therefore, IEEE Std. 299 can be applied for the shortening of test distance, but the required SE performance based on MIL-STD-188-125-1 must be modified.