• 제목/요약/키워드: HANDSPRING

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.022초

핸드스프링 몸펴 앞공중1회 비틀기 동작의 소요시간 및 각운동량 분석 (An analysis angular movement and performance time during handspring salto forward stretched)

  • 권오석;윤양진;서국웅
    • 한국운동역학회지
    • /
    • 제12권2호
    • /
    • pp.229-244
    • /
    • 2002
  • 남자 기계체조 국가대표 선수 3명과 대학선수 3명을 대상으로 핸드스프링 몸펴 앞공중1회 비틀기 동작을 구간 및 국면별로 분석하고 동작의 숙련도에 따라 역학적 변인이 집단 간 어떠한 차이를 보이는지를 구명하기 위하여 Kwon3D 프로그램을 활용하여 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 시간요인에서 보폭을 크게 딛는 것이 손을 빠르게 지지 할 수 있고, 핸드스프링 체공시간은 짧게 하여야 발구르기의 압력을 높여 비틀기동작에서 체공 소요 시간이 길어지므로 비틀기 수행의 완성도를 높일 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 각운동량 요인에서 기술수행 시 전체적으로 좌우(X)축에 대한 각운동량이 전후(Y)축과 수직(Z)축에 대한 각운동량에 비해 더 큰 값을 보였다. 좌우 축 각운동량은 지면에서 이지되어 동작을 수행하는 핸드스프링회전과 앞공중1회 비틀기에서 숙련자가 상대적으로 더 큰 각운동량 보이는 것으로 나타났다.

핸드스프링 몸접어 앞공중돌기동작의 운동학적 분석 (The Kinematic Analysis of Handspring Salto Forward Piked)

  • 권오석
    • 한국운동역학회지
    • /
    • 제17권1호
    • /
    • pp.145-153
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the phase-by-phase elapsed time, the COG, the body joint angle changes and the angular velocities of each phase of Handspring Salto Forward Piked performed by 4 college gymnasts through 3D movement analysis program. 1. The average elapsed time for each phase was .13sec for Phase 1, .18sec for Phase 2, .4sec for Phase 3, and .3sec for Phase 5. The elapsed time for Phase 1 to Phase 3 handspring was .35sec on average and the elapsed time for Phase 4 to Phase 5 handspring salto forward piked was .7sec on average. And so it showed that the whole elapsed time was 1.44sec. 2. The average horizontal changes of COG were 93.2 cm at E1, 138. 5 cm at E2, 215.7 cm at E3, 369.2 cm at E4, 450.7 cm at E5, and 553.1 cm at E6. The average vertical changes of COG were 83.1 cm at E1, 71.3 cm at E2, 78.9 cm at E3, 93.7 cm at E4, 150.8 cm at E5, and 97.2 cm at E6. 3. The average shoulder joint angles at each phase were 131.6 deg at E1, 153.5 deg at E2, 135.4 deg at E3, 113.4 deg at E4, 39.6 deg at E5, and 67.5 deg at E6. And the average hip joint angles at each phase were 82.2 deg at E1, 60 deg at E2, 101.9 deg at E3, 161.2 deg at E4, 97.7 deg at E5, and 167 deg at E6. 4. The average shoulder joint angular velocities at each phase were 130.9deg/s E1, 73.1 deg/s at E2, -133.9 deg/s at E3, -194.4 deg/s at E4, 29.4 deg/s at E5, and -50.1 deg/s at E6. And the average hip joint angular velocities at each phase were -154.7 deg/s E1, -96.5 deg/s at E2, 495.9 deg/s at E3, 281.5 deg/s at E4, 90.3 deg/s at E5, and 181.7 deg/s at E6. The results shows that, as for the performance of handspring salto forward piked, it is important to move in short time and horizontally from the hop step to the point to place the hands on the floor and jump, and to stretch the hip joints as much as possible after the displacement of the hands and to keep the hip joints stretched and high in the vertical position at the takeoff. And it is also important to bend the shoulder joints and the hip joints fast and spin as much as possible after the takeoff, and to decrease the speed of spinning by bending he shoulder joints and the hip joints quickly after the highest point of COG and make a stable landing.

핸드스프링 동작의 운동학적 분석 (A Kinematical Analysis of Forward Handspring Motion)

  • 배남은
    • 한국운동역학회지
    • /
    • 제13권2호
    • /
    • pp.89-100
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this research was to analyze 3-D kinematics variables for handspring of basic motion in the heavy gymnastics in order to investigate kinematical difference between expert and novice. Therefore, the purpose of this research was provide quantitative information, systematic provision, rules, establishment of basic skill for improving skill and teaching athletes. And in the research, results were as followings. 1. In the time variables, total time was that expert took 0.745sec and novice took 0.829sec, and as duration time of each event, expert was faster than novice in the all motion event except till second event of the preparation motion. 2. In the center of body variables, vertical direction variables, the displacement of body center hight was that expert showed 61.26% and novice showed 54.48% in the third event of all motion, also all event were showed expert was higher displacement than novice except first of event in preparatory stage. 3. In the angle displacement of main joint, the right direction was that expert showed 154.12degree and novice showed 174.85degree and the left direction was that expert showed 159.29degree and novice showed 171.46degree In the second event of main joint curved point at the same time hand was reached floor. In the angle displacement of knee joint in the third event of all motion, expert showed 155.25degree and novice showed 154.00degree In right, and expert showed 155.24degree and novice showed 154.55degree in left. In this result, both were same motion type. In the angle displacement of hip joint in the third event of the all motion, expert showed 142.80degree and novice showed 134.17degree in right, and expert showed 140.28degree and novice showed 144.94degree in left. In this result, motion pattern of expert was same both sides, but novice was different. According to the results, to increase efficiency of motion and aesthetic effect in the all motion, it should stretch displacement and height of body center and make similarly angle of right and left joint.

남자 체조 YANG-1과 YANG-2 도마 동작의 운동학적 비교 (Kinematic Comparisons between Yang-1 and Yang-2 Vaults in Men's Artistic Gymnastics)

  • 박철희;김영관
    • 한국운동역학회지
    • /
    • 제24권4호
    • /
    • pp.317-327
    • /
    • 2014
  • As a single subject study, it was purposed to investigate kinematic differences between Yang Hak Seon vault (i.e., handspring forward and salto forward straight with triple twist, Yang-1 vault hereafter) and Tsukahara $1260^{\circ}$ twist with salto forward straight (Yang-2 vault hereafter) in gymnastics. Yang Hak-Seon (23 years, 160 cm, and 52 kg) voluntarily participated in this study. Motion capture system, consisting of fourteen cameras, were used to measure Yang-2 vault with the sampling rate of 200 Hz. Twenty six reflective markers were placed on major anatomical points of 15 body segments. Successful two trials of Yang-2 vault were collected and analyzed for the comparison. Compared Yang-1 results were based on the previous study of Park and Song (2012). Results indicated superior linear kinematics of Yang-1 vault to those of Yang-2 vault before the touchdown of vault table. However, Yang-2 vault revealed superior angular kinematics to Yang 1 vault showing more trunk twist angle (a triple and a half twist) and its faster angular velocity during the airborne. The Yang 2 vault could has advantage of increasing angular motion than Yang 1 vault as a result of a half turn off the springboard onto the vault table and a sequential touchdown of the hands.