DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Kinematic Analysis of Handspring Salto Forward Piked

핸드스프링 몸접어 앞공중돌기동작의 운동학적 분석

  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the phase-by-phase elapsed time, the COG, the body joint angle changes and the angular velocities of each phase of Handspring Salto Forward Piked performed by 4 college gymnasts through 3D movement analysis program. 1. The average elapsed time for each phase was .13sec for Phase 1, .18sec for Phase 2, .4sec for Phase 3, and .3sec for Phase 5. The elapsed time for Phase 1 to Phase 3 handspring was .35sec on average and the elapsed time for Phase 4 to Phase 5 handspring salto forward piked was .7sec on average. And so it showed that the whole elapsed time was 1.44sec. 2. The average horizontal changes of COG were 93.2 cm at E1, 138. 5 cm at E2, 215.7 cm at E3, 369.2 cm at E4, 450.7 cm at E5, and 553.1 cm at E6. The average vertical changes of COG were 83.1 cm at E1, 71.3 cm at E2, 78.9 cm at E3, 93.7 cm at E4, 150.8 cm at E5, and 97.2 cm at E6. 3. The average shoulder joint angles at each phase were 131.6 deg at E1, 153.5 deg at E2, 135.4 deg at E3, 113.4 deg at E4, 39.6 deg at E5, and 67.5 deg at E6. And the average hip joint angles at each phase were 82.2 deg at E1, 60 deg at E2, 101.9 deg at E3, 161.2 deg at E4, 97.7 deg at E5, and 167 deg at E6. 4. The average shoulder joint angular velocities at each phase were 130.9deg/s E1, 73.1 deg/s at E2, -133.9 deg/s at E3, -194.4 deg/s at E4, 29.4 deg/s at E5, and -50.1 deg/s at E6. And the average hip joint angular velocities at each phase were -154.7 deg/s E1, -96.5 deg/s at E2, 495.9 deg/s at E3, 281.5 deg/s at E4, 90.3 deg/s at E5, and 181.7 deg/s at E6. The results shows that, as for the performance of handspring salto forward piked, it is important to move in short time and horizontally from the hop step to the point to place the hands on the floor and jump, and to stretch the hip joints as much as possible after the displacement of the hands and to keep the hip joints stretched and high in the vertical position at the takeoff. And it is also important to bend the shoulder joints and the hip joints fast and spin as much as possible after the takeoff, and to decrease the speed of spinning by bending he shoulder joints and the hip joints quickly after the highest point of COG and make a stable landing.

Keywords

References

  1. 권오석, 오정환(2003). 매트운동에서 핸드스프링 몸굽혀 앞공중돌기와 몸펴 앞공중돌기의 운동학적분석. 한국체육교육학회지 7(3호), 275-286.
  2. 김상복(1995). 뒤공중돌기 동작의 운동역학적분석. 한국체육학회지 34(2), 415-425.
  3. 김영란(2000).평균대 오르기 과정의 운동역학적 변인이 공중돌기 국면에 미치는 영향. 한국체육대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  4. 배남은(2003). 핸드스프링 동작의 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회지 13(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2003.13.2.089
  5. 오정환(2003). 핸드스프링 몸 굽혀앞 공중 돌기 동작의 운동학적 분석. 충남대학교 체육과학연구소논문집, 21(1), 114-118.
  6. 윤양진, 서국웅, 권오석(2001). 핸드스프링 몸펴 앞공중 1회전 비틀기 동작의 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회 학술대회 논문집.
  7. 윤희중, 이연종, 김영란(1993). 마루운동에서의 앞공중돌기에 대한 운동역학적분석. 체육대학교 체육과학연구소 논문집. 12(1), 83-89.
  8. 윤희중, 류지선, 김동민, 김영란(2000). 평균대 경기 시 앞 공중돌기 동작에 대한 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회지, 9(2), 291-305.
  9. 황인승, 이성철(1987). 우수체조선수의 마루운동시 3차원 각 운동량의 결정. 연세 논총 21(1), 299-313.
  10. Abdel-Aziz, Y.I, & Kararah, M.(1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetry (pp.1-18). Falls Church, VA: Americal Society of Photo-grammetry.
  11. Doris, I. Miller. & Mauno A. Nissinen. (1987). Critical examination of grand reaction force in the running forward somersault. International Journal of sports Biomechanics, 3, 189-206.
  12. James G. Hay.(1985) The Biomechanics of sports techniques. Third Edition.
  13. Kinolik, Z, Garhammer, J. 7 Gregor, R.T(1981) Biomechanical comparison of front aerial somersaults performed from different starting positions. Biomechanics Ⅶ-B. 531-536.
  14. Kwon, Y.H.(1994). KWON3D, Motion Analysis Pakage Ver2.1
  15. Plagenhoef, S.(1971). Patterns of human motion: A cinematographic analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.