• 한국도로학회논문집
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.145-157
• /
• 2006

도로건설사업에서 정책적인 의사결정이 필요한 경우, 다기준 평가방법인 AHP로 전문가 설문조사를 통한 정책적 분석을 시도하였다. 그러나 PI 제도 도입에 따라 도로관련 전문가뿐 아니라 지역주민, 환경단체 등 여러 관련 그룹의 다양한 의견이 제기되므로, 그룹간 의견을 종합하는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 도로건설사업의 PI 제도 운영실태를 연구 사례로 하여, AHP모형의 가중치 계산과정에서 각 그룹별로 설문조사한 자료를 이용하여, 의사결정과정에서 그룹별로 어떤 요인들을 중요시하는지 그룹별 AHP 분석을 시행하고, 그룹별 가중치가 반영된 통합 결과와 비교평가하였다. 분석결과, 그룹간 평가항목에서 분산분석(ANOVA)에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되어, 각 그룹마다 중요하게 여기는 평가항목의 우선순위가 상이함이 확인되었다. 종합평가 결과 평가대안은 동일한 결과를 보였으나, 첫째, 그룹간 AHP 분석결과 전문가 그룹과 주민 그룹간, 전문가 그룹과 시민단체 그룹간에 유의한 차이가 있어, 그룹별 평가 필요성이 제기되었다. 둘째, 통합평가를 위한 그룹간 평가가중치 산정결과에도 현저한 차이가 나타났으며, 가중치를 고려한 AHP분석방법이 다양한 그룹의 의사결정 지원도구로 활용될 수 있다고 판단된다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.249-276
• /
• 2019

Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a prediction model and decision rules for the elderly's suicidal ideation based on the Korean Welfare Panel survey data. By utilizing this data, we obtained many decision rules to predict the elderly's suicide ideation. Design/methodology/approach This study used classification analysis to derive decision rules to predict on the basis of decision tree technique. Weka 3.8 is used as the data mining tool in this study. The decision tree algorithm uses J48, also known as C4.5. In addition, 66.6% of the total data was divided into learning data and verification data. We considered all possible variables based on previous studies in predicting suicidal ideation of the elderly. Finally, 99 variables including the target variable were used. Classification analysis was performed by introducing sampling technique through backward elimination and data balancing. Findings As a result, there were significant differences between the data sets. The selected data sets have different, various decision tree and several rules. Based on the decision tree method, we derived the rules for suicide prevention. The decision tree derives not only the rules for the suicidal ideation of the depressed group, but also the rules for the suicidal ideation of the non-depressed group. In addition, in developing the predictive model, the problem of over-fitting due to the data imbalance phenomenon was directly identified through the application of data balancing. We could conclude that it is necessary to balance the data on the target variables in order to perform the correct classification analysis without over-fitting. In addition, although data balancing is applied, it is shown that performance is not inferior in prediction rate when compared with a biased prediction model.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.149-167
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was is to investigate the relationship between transformational leadership in families and psychological well-being and career decision-making self-efficacy. The samples were randomly selected from high school students studying liberal arts in Seoul. 400 survey questionnaires were distributed March 11 through 18, 2010. Among them, 386 completed surveys were utilized as the data for the statistic analyses. SPSS were applied. The main results of the study are as follows. First, adolescent children of mothers with leadership have higher psychological well-being than those from families of mothers without leadership. This has been determined as a result of reviewing the psychological well-being of adolescent children according to their mothers' transformational leadership in the family. Second, the adolescent group with mothers who show transformational leadership in managing the home have higher career decision-making self-efficacy than the group without such mothers. This was determined as a result of reviewing adolescent children's career decision-making self-efficacy according to mother's transformational leadership level in the family. Third, career decision-making self-efficacy according to adolescents' psychological well-being show positive relations by group. That is, adolescents living table lives are more positive about their future. Lastly, when comparing the relative contribution of the mother's transformational leadership in the family and psychological well-being on career decision-making self-efficacy, it has gained more credibility as stage ads. Based on the results, when mothers nurture children with a affection-based autonomy, children gain higher psychological well-being, which leads to firm beliefs about constructive futures. Therefore, for successful and systematic career development, CEO mothers' transformational leadership should serve as its foundation.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2007

Recently a multi-attribute structure analysis method is one of the evident areas of important points in the decision support system analysis. This research developed an internet/intranet-based solution builder for a three-step decision support system using fuzzy-AHP in the view of 1) brainstorming far the idea generation, 2) fuzzy-AHP (fuzzy analytic hierarchy process) as a multi-attribute structured analysis method and 3) aggregation logic model to integrate the results of individual analysis. We applied this decision support system to the make-or-buy decision problem for school foodservice system considering the multi-attributes in the decision making. A computer program is developed and demonstrated it internet/intranet-based decision problem. It was known that this solution builder provides decision makers a good tool for mate-of-buy group decision making.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제17권10호
• /
• pp.61-71
• /
• 2019

Purpose - This study aims to explore the impact of factors on Korean consumer goods purchase decision of Vietnam's Generation Z. Research design, data, and methodology - A mixed research method was utilized in this study including focus group, in-depth interview, pilot study, and official study. The conceptual model and hypothesis were tested using data collected cross-sectional by questionnaire, from a sample of 439 respondents, by both electronic and paper surveys with non-probability and convenience sampling. The SPSS 20 and AMOS 20 software were employed to analyze the data. Results - Results showed that Vietnam's Generation Z was strongly impacted by social media, Hallyu, country of origin, social norms, and perceived usefulness. Besides, Korean consumer goods purchase decision of Vietnam's Generation Z also were impacted by intermediary factors such as trust, social norms, product involvement, perceived quality, perceived usefulness, attitude, and buying intention. There were differences in factors affecting the purchase decision of the boy and girl Generation Z group. Conclusions - The factors impacting on Korean consumer goods decision of Vietnam's Generation Z are very important for Korean firms and government. The findings provide Korean firms opportunity for appropriate to be carried out factors impacting Korean consumer goods to generation Z in Vietnam successful.

• 한국가족관계학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.121-137
• /
• 2018

Objectives: This study examined the effects of perceived equity in decision-making and gender role attitudes on marital satisfaction among Chinese-Han and Korean-Chinese migrant women. Methods: Data were drawn from the 'National Survey on the Multi-Cultural Families in 2015' and 1,350 Chinese migrant women born after 1979 under the implementation of "one child policy" were selected. Chi-squared test, t-test, and multiple regression analysis were performed for analysis. Results: There were differences between Chinese-Han and Korean-Chinese in marital satisfaction and perceived equity in decision-making. For Chinese-Han, 'balanced group (perceived fairness in decision-making)' showed higher marital satisfaction than 'underbenefited group (husband is more dominant in decision-making)'. For Korean-Chinese, there was no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: This study found how the perception of equity in decision-making would affect the quality of international marriage relationship. Especially, for Chinese-Han women, the equity plays an important role in marriage relationship.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.92-98
• /
• 2010

The AHP methodology compares criteria, or alternatives with respect to a criterion, in a natural, pairwise mode. AHP has been applied in a wide variety of applications multi objective decision making being just one. If a group of expert with different aspect, they need some way to revise expert group. We proposed the concatenation of expert to survey the AHP pairwise question for multi-attribute decision making. In this paper, we suggest a way to revise the expert's priorities in hierarch using concept of different group opinion.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2000

본 논문은 교통사업들의 투자우선순위 결정시 적용 가능한 방법을 제시한다. 지금의 평가방법을 부정하는 새로운 방법이라기보다는 기존의 평가방법을 보완하는 기법이다. 특히 특성이 다른 교통사업들간의 평가시 이들 특성들이 평가과정에 감안되지 않을 경우는 평가결과의 대외 설득력이 부족하게 된다. 이를 극복하기 위해 지금까지 각종 정량적 정성적 방법을 동원하였지만 그 범위와 방법에 한계가 존재하였다. 이를 보완하는 대안으로서 본 논문에서는 기존 평가과정에서 고려되기 어려운 사업의 여러 특성들을 전문가들의 경험과 판단을 통해 최대한 반영하는 방법을 제시한다. 이 기법의 기본 이론은 집단의사결정이론(group decision theory)이며, 여기에 퍼지이론이 접목된 퍼지집단 결정이론(fuzzy group decision theory)을 적용하였다. 이 이론은 개인의 대안별 선호(우선순위)로부터 집단의 선호관계(우선순위)를 도출할 수 있다. 또한 도출된 투자우선순위결과에 대한 집단의 동의수준(만족도)을 추정할 수 있다. 이러한 정보는 최종 정책결정자의 중요한 판단자료로서 사용되어 질 수 있다. 그 동안 교통사업의 투자우선순위결정과정의 객관성의 부족으로 사업간 우선순위결과에 대한 신뢰가 그리 높지 않았다. 본 논문에서 제시한 방법은 기존의 투자우선순위의 평가방법을 보완하여 대외적인 신뢰성을 제고할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.125-154
• /
• 1993

Almost all result for group decision support systems (GDSS) have been obtained in a United States context, based on conventions and culture of American group processes. This paper reports on the construction and testing of a prototype GDSS to support international negotiation. The system was shown to work and to provide gains in both the quality of the interaction and the attitude toward the decision reached. Although the prototype system is narrow in scope, focusing on two specific cultures and a single scenario and uses simple and limited technology, the results obtained suggest that computer-based intercultural GDSS can help people in staving focused, in managing the added complexity of multinational negotiation, and in interacting effectively with one another.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.75-92
• /
• 1999

Executive information systems (EIS) developers are faced with an increasingly difficult choice problem in the evaluation and selection of software packages. For many reasons, they frequently must depend on identification and evaluation of features of packages. When EIS software evaluation is regarded as an unstructured or semi-structured group decision making problem, the most appropriate decision-aiding methods are needed to help effective group interaction. This paper examines evaluation criteria of full-featured EIS packages and considers the priority of these criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Two exploratory phases are presented. In the first phase, an approach combining the AHP with the linear weighted attribute method is presented to computer qualities of some packages. In the second phase, the decision making group includes EIS developers, users, and vendors to prioritize evaluation criteria.