• 제목/요약/키워드: Green building certification

검색결과 209건 처리시간 0.023초

영국 BREEAM과 G-SEED와의 비교분석을 통한 G-SEED 인증기준의 개선방안 도출 (An Improvements of G-SEED Standards by Comparing with BREEAM in the UK)

  • 김기한;구성한;조동우;채창우
    • 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
    • /
    • 제34권9호
    • /
    • pp.67-76
    • /
    • 2018
  • The improvements of G-SEED standards was studies in this research by comparing the composition, rating scores, and standards, including categories, issues and criteria of BREEAM in the UK. In this research, it was found that both certification systems had very similar composition and rating system, however, there was slight difference in the points of emphasizing the standards due to the differences in social awareness of green buildings in each country. As a result of the detailed comparison of both standards, in addition, it was found that almost half of criteria had different evaluation approaches such as evaluation methods and scopes between both standards even though they had same evaluation objectives; some of the differences were due to the social or cultural differences between the countries, and the others were not. Through the research, we were able to derive some criteria that need for improvements of G-SEED considering the domestic conditions in Korea.

시공단계 환경부하 저감 가이드라인 구축을 위한 주요 구성항목 도출 (Deduction of Critical Components for establishing the Environmental Load Reduction Guideline in Construction Phase)

  • 김창원;김춘학;조훈희;강경인
    • 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국건축시공학회 2012년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
    • /
    • pp.127-128
    • /
    • 2012
  • Recently, Construction industry has been trying to reduce environmental loads reflecting the global trend 'Green Growth'. Internal and External countries are provided 'green building certification', 'relevant law/regulations', 'guideline to life cycle', however, construction phase has been overlooked though environmental loads occurred intensively in this phase. Therefore, this study intend to deduct components reflected the guideline in construction phase and assess them quantitatively. The basis data is collected through survey targeting construction managers and related researchers and analyze these data using Analytic Hierarchy Process.

  • PDF

그린인프라 및 저영향개발 기술의 검증 및 인증 기법 개발 (Development of a Verification and Certification Method of Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Technologies)

  • 신현석;박종빈;이재혁
    • Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
    • /
    • 제3권2호
    • /
    • pp.92-99
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구는 최근 많은 관심을 받고 있는 그린인프라 및 저영향개발 (GI & LID) 기술에 대한 물순환 및 물환경 효율성 측정을 위한 실내 외 검증, 인증 시스템을 개발하였다. 기술의 검증 및 인증을 위한 실외시험시설은 건축형, 도로형, 주차장형, 빗물정원형, 생태공원형 등 크게 5구역으로 나누어 기술종류에 따라 시험이 가능하도록 시스템을 개발하였다. 또한, 실내실험으로는 수리/수문분야, 토질/지반분야, 환경분야 등 다양한 시험이 가능하도록 시험장비의 개발 및 구축을 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 GI & LID 검 인증시스템 구축을 위한 실내 및 실외 시험시설의 개발은 GI & LID 기술의 적용을 위한 객관적이고 신뢰성 있는 데이터 제공에 대한 기반을 마련함과 동시에 관련 사업의 활성화에 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

건축물 에너지효율등급 인증제도 의무화 대비 전문인력 양성에 대한 연구 (A Study on Training of Specialist to prepare Mandatory Building Energy Efficiency Rating Ssytem)

  • 장철용;한혜심;이나은
    • 한국태양에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국태양에너지학회 2011년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.138-143
    • /
    • 2011
  • Until now, measures for energy saving in buildings have been tried. Because particularly the role of buildings area is very important for implementing national greenhouse gas reduction targets and Green growth. But, lack of business linkages between each sector or the interest and participation of private sector are not enough. In addition, relevant personnel to do had not been systematized. It is expected that certification services will be increased according to the activation of Building Energy Efficiency Rating System and expansion of the target buildings so Government must be prepared to expand of certification system by training Professional staff. In this study, the basic data for the introduction of obligation of Building Energy Efficiency Rating System is suggested through analysis of the operating and laws system of Building Energy Efficiency Rating System along with efforts of Government for diffusion low energy buildings.

  • PDF

Analysis of Energy Performance and Green Strategies in the Foreign High-Performance Buildings

  • Park, Doo-Yong;Kim, Chul-Ho;Lee, Seung-Eon;Yu, Ki-Hyung;Kim, Kang-Soo
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.21-28
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: In this study, we analyzed the energy performance levels and high-performance technology trends through the case studies of foreign high-performance buildings. Method: Buildings built within 10 years were selected for the analysis of recent trends. we analyzed the buildings of U.S.A, Germany and Japan using LEED certified buildings, Passive House certified buildings and CASBEE certified buildings database for the case study of foreign high-performance buildings. A total of 20 high-performance buildings including 14 cases in U.S.A, 4 cases in Germany and 4 cases in Japan were selected. Annual energy consumption levels for 20 high-performance buildings were collected with the actual energy consumption data or data from simulation programs officially recognized by DOE. Annual energy consumption were compared with the energy performance standard of the office buildings in the CBECS database, ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004 and Building Energy Efficiency Rating System in Korea. Result: The order of the green strategies applied in the main categories are Renewable Energy(63%), Indoor Environment Control(51%), Envelope Improvement(44%) and HVAC System & Control(28%). Specified strategies most widely used in the sub-categories are high-performance Insulation (70%), High Efficiency Heating, Cooling Source Equipment(85%), Photovoltaic&Solar Thermal(80%) and Daylighting(80%).

조경분야 탄소성적표지제도 적용실태 및 대응전략 (Status and Response Strategies of Carbon Labeling in Landscape Architecture)

  • 김정호;윤용한
    • 한국환경과학회지
    • /
    • 제24권6호
    • /
    • pp.709-720
    • /
    • 2015
  • After analyzing the actual acquisition status of carbon labeling by year and by product for the past four years, as well as its certification in the construction-related sectors of greenhouse gas emission, this study attempted to present the problems and coping strategies upon issuing the carbon labeling certification in the landscape architecture. During the period of this analysis, the carbon labelings were acquired by 134 enterprises, 267 workplaces, and 735 products, while the percentage of acquisition was highest in the regular non-durable goods(49%), followed by energy-consuming durable goods(26%), regular production goods (19%), regular durable goods(3%), and service(3%). Furthermore, the acquisition certifications in construction sectors, were highest in the various pipes/panel(8 cases), followed by concrete(6 cases), gypsum board(4 cases), and landscape architecture materials(2 cases). The landscape architecture only had two cases in the acquisition certification for the first time in 2012, which accounted for 0.27% of the entire certification products, due to the uncertainty in the process, the lack of professionalism, and the lack of comprehension. However, the study conducted on the coping strategies for carbon labeling in the landscape architecture revealed the following: (1) regular reporting system management through the division of labor in the head office and factories, (2) the building of objective DB through the adoption of data management programs such as SAP, (3) continuous promotion and vitalization of the incentive system, (4) the adoption of mandatory or preferential application system in landscaping projects, management, and bidding, (5) enhancement of elasticity in deliberation of certification by recruiting experts in the landscape architecture sectors, and (6) provision of incentives for the cooperative firms acquiring the certification and support for their participation.

지식창출과 활용의 괴리: 녹색기술인증의 제도론적 분석 (KNOWLEDGE DECOUPLING: AN INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO THE GAP BETWEEN CREATION AND UTILIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES)

  • 박상찬;차현진
    • 지식경영연구
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.117-138
    • /
    • 2017
  • While prior work has noted the importance of knowledge creation in gaining competitive advantages, much less is understood about why firms do not actually use what they create. Building upon institutional approaches to organization studies, we offer a new framework to explain the gap between knowledge creation and utilization. We test our framework in an empirical context of sustainable innovation and environmental technologies where ideas of environmental sustainability have recently gained public popularity and shaped how interested audiences make evaluative assessments of firms. In such a context, firms are apt to perceive the social attention toward sustainability to be a normative pressure, which causes them to create new knowledge and develop technologies consistent with the pressure. Using data from the government-initiated certification system for green technologies, our study finds that firms do not always fully implement new environmental technologies they develop in response to the certification program, the situation we refer to as knowledge decoupling. We also examine a set of conditions under which knowledge decoupling becomes more or less amplified. Taken together, our findings show how a firm's knowledge creation and utilization is shaped by its external institutional environment as well as internal learning processes.

A Comparative Study on Office Building Criteria between G-SEED and LEED

  • Mok, Seon-Soo;Cho, Dong-Woo;Park, Ah-Reum
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.59-66
    • /
    • 2014
  • G-SEED aims for establishing green environmental building with energy saving and has started for evaluating with multi-residential complex in 2002 by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure & Transport (MOLIT) and the Ministry of Environment to develop the current 10 building types and new & existing building types to be applied. Since G-SEED has been developed for more than 10 years, the strategy of globalization is needed with constant review itself and comparison between other assessments to understand current situation from the global perspectives. This study draws similarities and differences of G-SEED and LEED criteria by the comparison from re-constructed LEED criteria based on G-SEED. "Energy & Pollution" is the most concerned category in both assessments as the result of analysis on category rates. Next concerns are "Material & Resources", "Indoor Environment" and "Water Management". The unique categories in both criteria are "Ecological Environment" in G-SEED and "Innovation & Design Process" in LEED. The conclusion of this research is that two assessments are organized at different locations and with different strategies for developing green building but there are common concerns such as energy saving, material use, indoor environment. As a result, it is expected to use fundamental data for developing G-SEED for global standard.

친환경 요소가 적용된 국내외 공동주택 사례의 친환경성 비교 분석 연구 (Research on Comparative Analysis of Environment-friendly Features in the case of home and overseas Apartment house applied by Environment-friendly Factors)

  • 우소연;남경숙
    • 한국실내디자인학회논문집
    • /
    • 제20권5호
    • /
    • pp.170-177
    • /
    • 2011
  • Recently, there has been increasing concern for green growth and environment-friendly construction work is being revitalized; hereupon this study is going to understand the present situation of environment -friendly features of the apartment house through the case study of environment-friendly apartment house in and outside the country, and to suggest the developmental direction of the domestic apartment house. First, this study is to look into respective environment-friendly factors by considering the theoretical background of environment-friendliness and certification of environment-friendly structures, and analyzing the cases of apartment house in and outside the country. This study selected as the survey target the apartment buildings located at 5 places which were completed after 2003 and obtained the domestic 'Green Building Certification Criteria'[hereinafter, GBCC] in metropolitan areas in domestic cases and the survey target to the apartment building at 5 places which were completed after 2003 and obtained the US 'Leadership in Energy and Environment Design' [hereinafter, LEED] in overseas cases. For comparative analysis of each case, this study evaluated each case twice using GBCC and LEED to be more objective in evaluation. As a result, it was found that domestic cases focused on nature-friendly landscaping and the use of the certified products while overseas cases focused on minimizing the environmental impact such as raising the energy reduction ratio and reducing water resources and consumption of resources. Accordingly, there seems to be a need for practical energy-reduction & resources-saving scheme in order for domestic environment-friendly apartment buildings to reach the level of the LEED certification.

옥상녹화 적용확대를 위한 녹색건축인증제도 개선방안 연구 - 미국 LEED 및 영국 BREEAM의 비교·분석을 중심으로 - (Study on Improvement Measures of Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design for Expansion of Applying Green Roof - Focused on LEED in the USA and BREEAM in the UK -)

  • 김지현;권혁삼;김정곤;이범식
    • 대한건축학회논문집:구조계
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.75-82
    • /
    • 2018
  • Green roof in Korea has been recognized as part of landscape area and local governments enacted municipal ordinance for supporting green roof thereby assisting part of expenses spent for green roof within a range of budget for buildings which are eligible for the green roof support of existing buildings. However, it is necessary to enforce a regulation of mandatory green roof for new buildings in order to expand green roof application and provide a variety of assistances such as subsidy payment, tax relief, and mitigation of floor area ratio-related regulation as done in other advanced nations. In particular, LEED(Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design) in the USA applies additional point directly for green roof in terms of the reduction in heat island effects. For example, the following items are beneficial to have additional points: habitat preservation or restoration, external space, rainwater management, reduction in outdoor water usage, minimum energy performance, and optimum energy performance. In addition, the BREEAM(Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) in the UK specifies green roof as one of assessment items to be complied in terms of diversity of species. As such, LEED and BREEAM reflect direct and indirect effects of green roof on assessment criteria, which suggest a direction to green building certification criteria in Korea where only additional points are given for green roof according to soil depth.