• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.30 no.10
• /
• pp.992-999
• /
• 2003

The purpose of a grammar checker is to find a grammatical erroneous expression in a sentence, and to provide appropriate suggestions for them. To find those errors, grammar checker should parse the whole input sentence, which is a highly time-consuming job. B7or this reason, most Korean grammar checkers adopt a partial parser that can analyze a fragment of a sentence without an ambiguity. This paper presents a Korean grammar checker using a full parser in order to find grammatical errors. This approach allows the grammar checker to critique the errors between the two words in a long distance relationship within a sentence. As a result, this approach improves the accuracy in correcting errors, but it nay come at the expense of decrease in its performance. The Korean grammar checker described in this paper is implemented with 65 rules for checking and correcting the grammatical errors. The grammar checker shows 96.49% in checking accuracy against the test corpus including 7 million words.

• Proceedings of the IEEK Conference
• /
• 2000.11b
• /
• pp.172-175
• /
• 2000

In this paper, we address the requirement of VHDL parser for design rule checker, and the structure and implementing method of design rule checker which checks if IP design is valuable to reuse. This checker builds the grammar trees from the design rules, and the internal graphs representation from IP design data. It maps the nodes of the grammar trees and the internal graphs to check if it violates the design rules. The design rule checker can do the cross reference between source codes and error messages to find error position easy.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2021

The purpose of the study is to examine online grammar checkers and suggest when they could be used in English writing classes. The study was conducted in the second semester of 2019 at D University in Chungcheong-do, with a total of 35 first-year students participating in the study. For data collection, pre and post grammar tests, questionnaires, and learning journals were collected and analyzed. The results of this study are as follows. First, based on the results of the English grammar test, the online grammar checker was found to be effective in English writing class. Second, students judged whether accepting or not rather than accepting feedback provided by online grammar checker. Third, among the feedback provided by the online grammar checker, the order of (in)definite article, preposition, punctuation, verb number, and noun number were found. The several implications and limitations of this study are discussed.

• International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.22-29
• /
• 2021

This study evaluates the accuracy of corrective feedback from Grammarly, an online grammar checker, on essays written by cyber university learners in terms of detected errors, suggested replacement forms, and false alarms.The results indicate that Grammarly has a high overall error detection rate of over 65%, being particularly strong at catching errors related to articles and prepositions. In addition, on the detected errors, Grammarly mostly provide accurate replacement forms and very rarely make false alarms. These findings suggest that Grammarly has high potential as a useful educational tool to complement the drawbacks of teacher feedback and to help learnersimprove grammatical accuracy in their written work. However, it is still premature to conclude that Grammarly can completely replace teacher feedback because it has the possibility (approximately 35%) of failing to detect errors and the limitationsin detecting errors in certain categories. Since the feedback from Grammarly is not entirely reliable, caution should be taken for successful integration of Grammarly in English writing classes. Teachers should make judicious decisions on when and how to use Grammarly, based on a keen awareness of Grammarly's strengths and limitations.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2001

The goal of this paper is the pedagogical application of a Korean Spell/Grammar Checker to the web-based language learning system for Korean writing. To maximize the efficient instruction of our learning system \\`Urimal Baeumteo\\` we have to improve our Korean Spell/Grammar Checker. Today the NLP system\\`s performance defends on its semantic processing capability. In our Korean Spell/Grammar Checker. the tasks accomplished in the semantic level are: the detection and correction of misused derived and compound nouns in a Korean spell-checking device and the detection and correction of syntactic and semantic errors in a Korean grammars-checking device. We describe a common approach to the partial parsing using collocation rules based on the dependency grammar. To provide more detailed semantic rules. we classified nouns according to their concepts. and subcategorized verbs referring to their syntactic and semantic features. Improving a Korean Spell/Gl-Grammar Checker makes our learning system active and intelligent in a web-based environment. We acknowledge the flaws in our system: the classification of nouns based on their meanings and concepts is a time consuming task. the analytic unit of this study is principally limited to the phrases in a sentence therefore the accurate parsing of embedded sentences remains a difficult problem to solve. Concerning the web-based language learning system. it is critically important to consider its interface design and structure of its contents.

• The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• v.21 no.6
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2021

The current study examined the cyber learners' perceptions of the educational usefulness of Grammarly, an online grammar checker, after it was used to provide feedback to cyber university students in a situation where the instructor could not provide sufficient feedback on their written work in English. The survey results, revealed that the majority of learners had positive attitudes to the usefulness of Grammarly. In particular, the feedback immediately available whenever needed was regarded as helpful in improving English sentences, and most learners were highly satisfied with the amount of the feedback provided by Grammarly. It was also found that Grammarly had positive effects in terms of the affective domains, helping learners to improve their interest and confidence in English writing. In particular, Grammarly was found to be effective in reducing writing anxiety in English, one of the main factors negatively affecting writing performance in English. However, along with these positive results, limitations such as inaccurate feedback and inadequate explanation of errors were also found. Therefore, when Grammarly is used for English education, it is necessary to conduct multifaceted research to develop effective teaching methods that can minimize the problems that may arise from these limitations.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartB
• /
• v.18B no.6
• /
• pp.405-414
• /
• 2011

Korean grammar checkers typically detect context-dependent errors by employing heuristic rules that are manually formulated by a language expert. These rules are appended each time a new error pattern is detected. However, such grammar checkers are not consistent. In order to resolve this shortcoming, we propose new method for generalizing error decision rules to detect the above errors. For this purpose, we use an existing thesaurus KorLex, which is the Korean version of Princeton WordNet. KorLex has hierarchical word senses for nouns, but does not contain any information about the relationships between cases in a sentence. Through the Tree Cut Model and the MDL(minimum description length) model based on information theory, we extract noun classes from KorLex and generalize error decision rules from these noun classes. In order to verify the accuracy of the new method in an experiment, we extracted nouns used as an object of the four predicates usually confused from a large corpus, and subsequently extracted noun classes from these nouns. We found that the number of error decision rules generalized from these noun classes has decreased to about 64.8%. In conclusion, the precision of our grammar checker exceeds that of conventional ones by 6.2%.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1996.10a
• /
• pp.469-475
• /
• 1996

이 논문은 형태소 사이의 문법 관계(Grammar Relation)에 기반하여 형태소 간의 의존 관계를 규정하고, 이를 바탕으로 의미 오류와 문체를 검증하는 문법 검사기를 제시한다. 이 방법으로 다수 어절에 걸친 의미적 오류 뿐만 아니라 번역체 문구와 뜻의 전달을 어렵게 하는 문구 등과 같이 문장을 힘없게 만드는 문체 오류를 검증한다. 또한 이러한 오류를 검증하기 위한 지식베이스의 구현과 의존 문법(Dependency Structure Grammar)을 이용한 부분 문장 분석 알고리즘을 제시한다. 이 논문에서 제시한 문법 검사기는 향후 파싱 등의 문장 분석에 중요한 자료로 이용될 것으로 기대한다.

• Journal of KIISE
• /
• v.42 no.5
• /
• pp.629-636
• /
• 2015

The types of errors corrected by a Korean spelling and grammar checker can be classified into isolated-term spelling errors and context-sensitive spelling errors (CSSE). CSSEs are difficult to detect and to correct, since they are correct words when examined alone. Thus, they can be corrected only by considering the semantic and syntactic relations to their context. CSSEs, which are frequently made even by expert wiriters, significantly affect the reliability of spelling and grammar checkers. An existing Korean spelling and grammar checker developed by P University (KSGC 4.5) adopts hand-made correction rules for correcting CSSEs. The KSGC 4.5 is designed to obtain very high precision, which results in an extremely low recall. Our overall goal of previous works was to improve the recall without considerably lowering the precision, by generalizing CSSE correction rules that mainly depend on linguistic knowledge. A variety of rule-based methods has been proposed in previous works, and the best performance showed 95.19% of average precision and 37.56% of recall. This study thus proposes a statistics based method using a conditional probability model with dynamic window sizes. in order to further improve the recall. The proposed method obtained 97.23% of average precision and 50.50% of recall.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.223-255
• /
• 2008

In this paper, we introduce an automatic system of scoring English essays. The system is comprised of three main components: a spelling checker, a grammar checker and a lexical cohesion checker. We have used such resources as WordNet, Link Grammar/parser and Roget's thesaurus for these components. The usefulness of an automatic scoring system depends on its reliability. To measure reliability, we compared the results of automatic scoring with those of manual scoring, on the basis of the Kappa statistics and the Multi-facet Rasch Model. The statistical data obtained from the comparison showed that the scoring system is as reliable as professional human graders. This system deals with textual units rather than sentential units and checks not only formal properties of a text but also its contents.