• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.67-79
• /
• 2016

Purpose: To develop strategies for research and development (R&D) in nursing service based on the policy direction of government supported R&D in Korea. Methods: This was a descriptive study to develop strategies for promoting R&D in nursing by analyzing investment trends and status quo, policy directions, and implementation of the details of government supported R&D through government reports, websites of relevant agencies and literature reviews. Results: Few nursing experts participated in clinical research on overcoming major diseases and in R&D for well-being and care. Development of nursing topics that meet the direction of government supported R&D were lacking. Insufficient implementation of nursing service R&D in a timely manner equipped with a performance-based system. Few research studies in R&D projects that included research using big data or contributing to developing medical instruments. Finally, an insufficient number of nursing specialists participated on government R&D advisory committees. Conclusion: For nursing service R&D development efforts should be toward quantitative expansion and qualitative improvements by sensitively recognizing policy direction of government supported R&D. The promotional capacity of nursing service R&D must be reinforced through a multidisciplinary approach and collaborative association with other professionals and the inclusion of nurse specialists on government R&D advisory committees.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2013

기업의 R&D 노력과 혁신에 관한 선행연구들은 주로 R&D 노력이 혁신에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 관한 분석에 집중하였는데, 이들 연구의 핵심결과는 일관적인 실증분석의 결과를 가져다주지 못하였다. 또한 기업의 혁신을 강화하기 위한 정부의 정책지원은 기업혁신을 창출시키기 위한 중요한 요소로써 간주되어 왔음에도 불구하고 정부정책지원이 기업의 R&D 노력이 혁신으로 이어지는데 있어서의 역할을 규명한 연구는 극히 드문 실정이다. 실제로 대부분의 정부정책지원에 관한 연구 역시 혁신에 직접적인 효과성이 있는지에 관한 연구에 편중되어 왔다. 본 연구는 과학기술정책연구원(STEPI)에서 조사한 2008년 제조업 기업의 기술혁신활동조사표(2008년도)를 이용하여 R&D가 기업의 혁신에 미치는 영향 및 그러한 관계에서 정부정책지원의 조절효과를 규명하려고 시도하였다. 실증분석의 결과는 R&D는 혁신에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, R&D와 혁신간 관계에서 정부정책지원의 조절효과를 분석한 결과 역시 긍정적으로 나타났다. 이는 기업의 정부정책지원을 많이 받을수록 R&D와 혁신 간의 긍정적 관계가 더 높아진다는 것을 의미하는 것으로 정부정책지원의 긍정적 조절효과가 존재하고 있음을 보여준다. 따라서 기업에 필요한 혁신은 기업의 R&D 노력으로 달성될 수 있는데 R&D 노력이 보다 효율적으로 혁신과 연계되기 위해서는 정부정책지원이 필요가 있음을 시사하고 있다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.281-294
• /
• 2021

Purpose - The purpose of this study was verifying the policy effects by field of innovative growth engines, focusing on the discussion of the relationship between government support and corporate R&D activities (substitute/complementary goods), and based on the results, policy recommendations for promoting private R&D were carried out. Design/methodology/approach - Through literature research, academic/theoretical discussions about relationship between government support and corporate R&D activities were synthesized. Next, survey data were collected for companies engaged in the field of innovative growth engines and empirical analysis was conducted on the relationship between government support and R&D activities in 13 major sectors. Findings - First, as a result of analyzing all companies regardless of sector, government R&D subsidies had a positive (+) relationship with R&D activities of companies engaged in innovative growth engines, that is, a complementary relationship. Next, as a result of performing empirical analysis by dividing the 13 fields, it was found that 9 fields were complementary goods in which government support had a positive (+) effect on the R&D activities of companies. On the other hand, in the remaining four fields, the effect of government support on corporate R&D activities was not statistically significant. Research implications or Originality - In order to promote R&D activities of companies in the 9 fields where government support acts as a complementary product, it is necessary to establish policies centered on direct government support. On the other hand, it would be more desirable to seek indirect support rather than direct support in the 4 fields where government support did not have a statistically significant effect on corporate R&D activities.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.145-168
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.95-118
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister?in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to?build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity.?It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400?million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 자원환경지질
• /
• 제51권3호
• /
• pp.279-289
• /
• 2018

2017년 신정부 출범과 함께 문재인 정부 국정운영 5개년 계획 및 100대 국정과제가 발표된 바 있으며, 과학기술정보통신부, 산업통상자원부, 해양수산부, 국토교통부, 환경부, 행정안전부 등의 정부부처는 R&D 분야를 포함한 2018년 업무계획을 발표하였다. 정부 정책의 변화를 분석하고 그에 따른 연구개발을 추진하는 것은 공공 연구개발 기관의 주요 임무일 것이다. 이에 연구에서는 신정부의 R&D 정책 변화와 2018년도 지질자원 관련 정부부처 R&D 정책 방향 및 전략 계획을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 1) 과학기술 전반에서 4차 산업혁명을 통한 혁신성장 주도와 2) 환경 에너지 분야의 청정에너지 공급 및 기후변화 대응, 3) 국민생활문제 해결 및 재난 대응을 통한 국민 삶의 질 향상의 정부정책 방향을 확인할 수 있었다. 정부의 투자방향을 고려하여, 국가사회의 문제 해결 및 과학기술로 인한 성장을 위한 지질자원 분야 연구개발 주도가 필요하다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.79-97
• /
• 2003

R&D expenditure of Korean firms has been increasing drastically since 1980 and occupied 84% of total R&D expenditure in 1994. After 1994, however, the growth rate of industry R&D expenditure has dropped below single digit. R&D concentration rate of upper 20 companies declined from 61.9% in 1999 to 49.8% in 2001. The technology trade balance has diverged by 2.8 billion dollars in 2000 compared to around 0.3 billion dollars in 1985. We find several reasons on declining the industry R&D growth rate in Korea. First, we carefully say there might be an crowding out effect in increasing government R&D investment from Granger causality test between industry R&D and government R&D. Second, the decreasing benefit of tax credit since 1992 on industry R&D expenditure has caused the decrease of industry R&D growth rate. Third, the type of R&D cost becomes to similar to matured countries type of cost, which means the portion of capital expenditure has been decreased since late of 1980s. Therefore, industry R&D growth rate gets to saturation point. We draw several policy implications from the changing structure of business R&D of Korean company. Firstly, to stimulate industry R&D investment Korean government needs to strengthen tax credit policy. Secondly, to induce foreign direct investment Korean government needs to establish technology infrastructures and high quality of manpower. To utilize foreign technology resources Korean government need to introduce global R&D program executed by foreign scientist as an Project Leader.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.255-274
• /
• 2001

This study aims to provide information about the priority setting and budget coordination of government R&D spendings in Korea. Based on the result of "Survey, Analysis and Evaluation of National R&D Programs"in FY 2000. this paper reviews the government R&D expenditures by the concerned variables such as program objectives, sector of performance, character of work and technology fields. It is found that R&D spendings on the areas of industrial development, information technology, and development research are funded pretty high. Also, it turns out that, considering program objectives and character of work, there are some redundancies of R&D programs among government agencies. Policy implications are suggested.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권12호
• /
• pp.3797-3803
• /
• 2009

우리나라 IT산업성장에서 혁신잠재력과 혁신수행능력이 중요한 역할을 했다. 글로벌 R&D센터는 IT산업의 혁신의 중요한 요소이다. IT산업에서 혁신환경에 대한 글로벌 R&D센터구조를 파악하기 위하여 R&D센터구성원과 정책입안자 각 50명씩 현장설문을 실시하였다. 본 실증분석결과를 보면 단기적으로 R&D정책은 연구영역과 시장역역의 인식차이를 해소하는 촉진자로서 역할이 중요하며, 중기적으로 R&D정책은 개발과 시장의 영격의 인식차이를 좁히는 조정자로 그리고 장기적으로는 기술능력과 시장의 확산 자로서 역할이 중요함을 보여준다. IT 정책입안자는 R&D정책에서 글로벌 R&D센터를 혁신체계의 요소로 활용하는 것이 요구된다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.183-203
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the R&D subsidies by the government on the private firms' R&D investments in the Korean pharmaceutical industry, which are supposed to have positive effects on their economic performance. We also estimate the relationship between the private firms' R&D investments and firms' economic outcome. Empirical analysis is done by Error Component 2 Stage Least Squares(EC2SLS) estimation using 43 pharmaceutical firms' 8 years' panel data. The elasticity of the government R&D subsidies on the private R&D investments is 0.021%, which we cannot say 'efficient'. Also R&D investments have positive effects on the economic outcome of the pharmaceutical firms, as we expected. We propose several suggestions in the conclusion for the efficient way of government R&D subsidies to induce more private R&D investments.