• Title/Summary/Keyword: Goldberg device

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Effects of Goldberg Device Learning Program on Creative Personality of the Primary Gifted Students (골드버그 장치 수업 프로그램이 초등 영재 학생들의 창의적 인성에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Young-Jun;Son, Jeong-Woo
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.22 no.2
    • /
    • pp.451-465
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of a Goldberg device learning program on primary gifted students' creative personality. Based on the concept of creative personality derived from a literature review, a learning program has been developed and applied to 18 primary gifted class students and 20 invention club students. Creative personality consists of eight components: patience/persistence, confidence, humor, curiosity, imagination, openness, adventurous spirits, and independence. Creative personality tests were conducted before and after Goldberg device learning program lessons. The results of the tests indicate that (1) the Goldberg device learning program affected all eight components of creative personality positively; and (2) the invention club students showed a greater improvement in creative personality than the gifted class students. These findings suggest that Goldberg device learning programs can be effective to learn various scientific principles and improve students' creative personality.

Development of Goldberg device-based Software Convergence Education Tool (골드버그 장치 기반 소프트웨어 융합교육 도구 개발)

  • Lee, Sihoon;Kim, Sunghoon;Son, Jungmyung;Kim, Eungyeong;Cho, Wansub
    • Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
    • /
    • v.25 no.3
    • /
    • pp.547-555
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study is to develop a Goldberg device-based software(SW) convergence Education tool. The 2015 revised curriculum emphasizes convergence with various subjects for effective SW education. In particular, physics is often used as a material for SW convergence education because it is closely related to computational thinking such as sequential movement, quantification of energy and simulation. In this study, we developed an educational program based on the Goldberg device that utilizes physical knowledge, concepts and manipulation. In order to verify the effectiveness of the program, the survey questions were developed through Delphi verification and a basic satisfaction survey was conducted based on this. As a result, the developed program can be effectively used as a program for SW convergence education.

Problem Solving Strategy for Goldberg Machine Task According to the Cognitive Styles of Elementary Gifted Students Group (초등영재학생의 인지양식 그룹별 골드버그 장치에 대한 문제해결전략)

  • Kwon, Yong-Tae;Kang, Ho-Kam
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.77-93
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this study was to explore the problem solving strategy for Goldberg machine tasks of the gifted students in elementary science depending on the cognitive style(tendency to field-dependent and field independent). It was aimed to provide suggestions for the features and differences of the problem solving strategies of the gifted students in elementary science according to their cognitive styles. A total of 16 students, from the gifted class of P elementary school in Hwaseong were sampled for the research, cognitive styles Test was conducted to divide the students in teams, and the teams were classified according to cognitive style tendencies to five groups of field-dependent group, weak field-dependent group, mixed group, weak field-independent group and field-independent group. The Goldberg device task given was to make a Goldberg device within the angle framework of (Figure) 1, for a bead to start from the starting point and to reach the final point the last. The results are as follows: First, regarding the plan for producing the device, the stronger the field-independent tendency, they established more specific strategy-reflected plan; the stronger the field-dependent tendency, they established less specific strategy-reflected plan. Second, all cognitive style groups took a limited period of time into consideration, to fabricate the devices for the ball to arrive the last using a fine adjustment rather than many devices. Third, the field-independent group used a lot of logical reasoning; the field-dependent group used a lot of intuitive thinking. Fourth, the field independent group properly utilized strategies such as cooperation and role allocation; the field-dependent group tried to solve the task personally rather than cooperatively with poor role allocation. Fifth, the intermediate mixed group solved the problem better than the inclined groups such as field-dependent or field-independent groups.