• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.163-192
• /
• 2009

본 연구의 목적은 정규교육과정 내에서 초등학교 일반학급 수학 영재아를 위한 효율적인 영재교육 방안을 탐색해 보고, 영재의 특성을 고려한 심화학습 프로그램을 개발하여 실제로 일반학급의 교수 학습 환경에 적용한 후, 그 효과를 분석하는 것이다. 문헌연구를 통해 초등학교 일반학급 수학 영재아 지도를 위한 복식수업 형태의 영재교육 방안을 제시하였고, 수학영재 심화학습 프로그램을 개발하여 초등학교 1학년 한 학급 6명을 대상으로 적용하여 그 효과를 분석하였다. 연구의 결과 첫째, 일반학급에서 복식수업 형태로 수학 영재교육을 실시하는 것은 수학 영재아 측면에서 매우 효과적이었다. 둘째, 수학영재 심화학습 프로그램은 수학 영재아의 수학적 사고력과 창의성 계발에 매우 효과적이었다. 셋째, 수학 영재아 선발 과정에서 교사의 추천과 영재성 검사는 둘 다 매우 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구는 영재교육이 방과후 교육 형태의 특별교육으로만 운영될 것이 아니라 정규교육과정 내에서 보다 효율적인 방법으로 운영함으로써 수학 영재아의 요구에 부합되면서도 영재교육의 효과를 극대화할 수 있음을 제안하고 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.33-50
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 S대학부설 과학영재교육에서 교육받고 있는 수학영재아들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하고 이를 바탕으로 수학영재아, 부모, 교사 면담을 실시하여 영재성, 영재교육의 필요성, 인과적 귀인 등에 관한 그들의 관점을 조사하였다. 그 결과, 다음을 확인하였다. 첫째, 영재아들의 부모나 교사는 지적 능력을, 영재아들은 창의성을 영재성의 가장 중요한 요소라고 생각하였다. 둘째, 영재아들은 교육환경에 따라 서로 다른 의사소통 능력을 보인다. 셋째, 수학영재아들은 자신의 영재성이나 문제해결능력을 내적요인에 귀인하는 반면, 부모나 교사는 외적요인에 귀인한다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.241-252
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of a science gifted education program. 155 students who experienced the SNU science gifted education program were interviewed. The interview questions consisted of eligible questions from 'Interview Protocol of Hertzog' (2003) based on 'Recommended Practice in Gifted Education (Shore, Cornell, & Ward, 1991)'. All interviews were immediately transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. It was found that scientifically gifted students had similar concepts of the gifted to what scholars consider as the gifted. Comparing the programs to school education program, the students agreed that the science gifted education program provided more experiments opportunities, higher and deeper level of contents, and more active interactions. Regarding long-term effects, it was found that program influenced on students' decisions for the future, stimuli and expansion of horizons, school work and entrance examinations. Students gained self-confidence and became more interested in science. Some pointed out that they felt greater stimulated, although some indicated an elevated level of self conceit. Implications of science gifted education were found based on these results.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.316-329
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to examine how middle school students perceived the operation of on-line and off-line math-gifted education. The research questions were as follows: 1. How do students recognize the current situation concerning the operation of on-line and off-line gifted education? 2. How do students recognize the effect and satisfaction level of on-line and off-line gifted education? 3. How do students recognize the improvement of on-line and off-line gifted education? The subjects in this study were 591 students who included 208 in on-line classes and 383 in off-line classes. The results were as follows: First, the students who were enrolled in the on-line and off-line classes regarded gifted people as ones who had a superb ability in a particular field and as ones who think creatively. Second, all the students in on-line and off-line classes found gifted education to be of use to developing their potentials, and they had the biggest preference for experiential field study as the most effective teaching method. Third, concerning their needs for the management of gifted classes, they asked for immediate Q&A services over the Internet.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.459-469
• /
• 2021

In this study, we investigated the difference in the affective characteristics between science-gifted students and general students through the positive experiences about science (PES) index. We also explored ways to apply the characteristics of gifted classes suggeseted by the teachers of this study, which had a positive effect on science-gifted students, to general science classes. For this study, a PES survey was carried on middle school science-gifted students enrolled in the gifted education center in the central region and general middle school students in the same area who had no experience in gifted education. Based on the survey result, we conducted in-depth interviews with teachers, having teaching experience with both science-gifted and general students. The results revealed that science-gifted students showed a significantly higher PES index than general students in all five areas of PES. The area with the largest difference between the two groups was science-related self-concept and the smallest was science academic emotion. Teachers suggested ways to apply the characteristics of science-gifted classes to general science classes, such as organizing general science classes around inquiry activities, supporting class materials such as MBL or tablets, reconstructing the classes using materials reflecting students' needs, and changing the textbook content and narrative style, to induce students' interest and curiosity. Based on the study results, ways to enhance the PES through science classes for general students were proposed.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.152-158
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this work is to investigate pre-service elementary teachers' belief in science gifted education. To do that, from September to November 2012, this research had been conducted with 42 students who were in the third year of P University of Education. The conclusions of this work are presented as follows: First, the pre-service elementary teachers considered exploration ability to be the most important talent for the gifted students in science, and chose task commitment as the next most important. They regarded intelligent ability and leadership ability as the relatively less important. Secondly, regarding the most important tool in choosing scientifically gifted students, the pre-service elementary teachers preferred creativity test. It was found that they considered the intelligence test and academic achievements, which require intelligent ability, to be the less important. Thirdly, regarding the special knowledge related to science gifted education, the pre-service elementary teachers considered pedagogical knowledge about the gifted to be the most important. Fourthly, regarding a class type for gifted students in science, the pre-service elementary teachers most preferred project learning. Project learning is a learning method in which students choose an interesting problem and solve the problem in cooperation with group members. It is the most widely used exploration class in gifted education. It is in the same context as the result that exploration ability is the most important factor to elementary gifted students in science. This work revealed that, with regard to a talent for the gifted in science, judgment of the gifted in science and science gifted education, the potential ability and affective ability of gifted students are considered to be more important than their intelligent ability. Therefore, it was analyzed that pre-service elementary teachers' belief in the gifted students in science is almost consistent with the recent trend of gifted education.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제19권10호
• /
• pp.1283-1291
• /
• 2010

In this study, we developed the environmental education program focused on the communication with the exhibits at the ecological museum applicable to the environmental education for gifted students. For this study, we chose 60 gifted students attending U Institute of Education for the gifted, and classified these students into two groups, then applied newly developed program to the 30 experimental group students, and applied general environmental education program to the 30 comparative group students. Below are the study results: First, the environmental education program focused on the communication with the exhibits at the ecological museum was much effective in increasing environmental sensitivity of gifted students as compared to the general environmental education program. Second, the environmental education program focused on the communication with the exhibits at the ecological museum was much more effective in increasing the willingness to environmental act for gifted students as compared to the general environmental education program Third, the satisfaction of the gifted students about the environmental education program focused on the communication with the exhibits at the ecological museum was higher than the general environmental education program.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.100-107
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to assess gifted students' conceptions about nature of science (NOS). Scientifically gifted students who are expected to be professionals in the future should possess an adequate understanding of NOS that if firm foundation for scientific career. 47 volunteers from the 8th grade gifted science program in Seoul National University Gifted Education Center participated to answer questions inquiring NOS conceptions. Their answers were analyzed and compared to different groups such as non-gifted students and younger gifted students. As a result, gifted students' understanding of NOS appeared to surpass that of non-gifted students in many aspects and it seemed that gifted students formed their NOS view in early ages. The relative weakness in their NOS conceptions was found in understanding of scientific enterprise. Their strong misunderstanding about obstacles that minority people would face in scientific enterprise was noticed, too. They admitted that there has been discrimination in scientific enterprise, but they wrongly believed that outstanding scientists cannot be affected by it. Further studies will be required to probe more.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.278-289
• /
• 2015

연구의 목적은 영재교육대상자의 선발 방법이다. 즉, 시험 선발과 자동 진급에 따라 선발된 영재학생간의 학업정서, 메타인지, 자기효능감을 차이를 비교, 분석함으로써 선발 방법에 따른 영재 학생의 특성을 이해하고 효과적인 영재교육을 위한 영재교육대상자 판별 및 선발에 있어서의 타당한 근거를 마련해 보고자 한다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영재선발방법에 따라 선발된 영재 학생간의 학업정서, 메타인지능력 및 자기효능감의 연구에서는 시험 선발 영재학생과 자동 진급 영재 학생 간에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 영재라는 동질 집단 조건에서는 선발방법의 차이에 따른 영향은 없는 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, 동일한 선발된 방법에 따른 비교에서, 영재학생의 학업정서를 살펴보면, 시험선발의 경우 초등과 중등 모두에서 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 자동진급에서는 중등의 영재교육기관별 분석에서 영재교육원 학생이 영재학급 학생보다 높았음을 알 수 있었다(p<.05). 메타인지능력에서 있어서는 초등에서는 차이가 없었으나, 중등의 경우 시험선발에서 남학생이, 영재교육원 학생이 높았고(p<.05), 자동진급에서는 영재교육원 학생이 높았음을 알았다(p<.05). 또한 자기효능감에서는 선발 방식에 따라 차이가 없었고 단지 자동진급에서 영재교육원 학생이 영재학급학생보다 높았음을 알았다(p<.05).

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.367-374
• /
• 2018

4차 산업혁명시대에 필요한 인재를 양성하기 위해서는 영재를 선발하여 체계적으로 교육하는 것이 필요하다. 특정 분야에 뛰어난 영재도 중요하지만 이보다는 수학, 과학, 정보 분야의 융합 인재가 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 대학영재교육원의 영재 교육 대상자들을 선발할 때에 정보영재의 특성이 반영된 평가 요소가 과학영재 선발에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 대해 알아본다. 정보영재의 특성에서 인지적인 요소들인 규칙화 능력, 추론화 능력, 효율화 능력, 일반화 능력, 구조화 능력, 추상화 능력이 과학영재를 선발하는데 있어 상관 관계가 매우 높게 나타났다. 과학영재교육원 지원자들 그룹에서의 상관 관계가 1차 합격자 그룹보다 더 높고, 최종 합격자들 그룹보다 더욱 높다. 이것은 정보영재의 특성을 나타나는 문항들이 과학영재 선발에 많은 영향을 미친다는 것을 의미한다.