• Title/Summary/Keyword: Genomic research

Search Result 1,292, Processing Time 0.052 seconds

Genomic DNA probe and purification of Theileria sergenti merozoites in Korean cattle (한우에 감염된 Theileria sergenti merozoite의 순수분리와 genomic DNA probe에 관한 연구)

  • Chae, Joon-seok;Lee, Joo-mook;Kwon, Oh-deog;Chae, Keon-sang
    • Korean Journal of Veterinary Research
    • /
    • v.34 no.2
    • /
    • pp.387-394
    • /
    • 1994
  • To make the genomic DNA probe of Theileria sergenti, the merozoites were purified from bovine erythrocytes. The infected erythrocytes were lysed by Aeromonas hydrophila(Ah-1) hemolysin, and the parasites were isolated by ultracentrifugation on a Percoll discontinuous density gradient. For construction of a T sergenti genomic DNA library, T sergenti DNA was digested with Pstl and the fragments were ligated into the PstI site of pUC19 before transformation of Escherichia coli JM83. Out of thousands of transformants obtained by transformation of E coli JM83 with the genomic library, three plasmids were chosen. The sizes of the inserted DNAs were 2.9kb(2.4kb and 0.5kb) in pKTS1, 4.3kb in pKTS2 and 1.5kb in pKTS3, respectively. The DNA fragments used as probe KTS1(2.4kb), KTS2(4.3kb) and KTS3(1.5kb) were labeled digoxigenin-11-dUTP for the Southern hybridization. In Southern hybridization, all of the probes(KTS1, KTS2 and KTS3) reacted specifically to T sergenti DNA, but not to bovine leucocyte DNA. In order to find out the sensitivities of the digoxigenin-11-dUTP-labeled KTS1 and KTS3 as the probes, purified merozoite DNA and bovine DNA (control) were checked by dot blot hybridization with the probes. Both of the probes, KTS1 and KTS3, detected as minimum amount of 975pg of the T sergenti DNA, but not bovine DNA even to 500ng.

  • PDF

Ubiquitin E3 ligases in cancer: somatic mutation and amplification

  • Eun-Hye Jo;Mi-Yeon Kim;Hyung-Ju Lee;Hee-Sae Park
    • BMB Reports
    • /
    • v.56 no.5
    • /
    • pp.265-274
    • /
    • 2023
  • Defects in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair signaling permit cancer cells to accumulate genomic alterations that confer their aggressive phenotype. Nevertheless, tumors depend on residual DNA repair abilities to survive the DNA damage induced by genotoxic stress. This is why only isolated DNA repair signaling is inactivated in cancer cells. DNA DSB repair signaling contributes to general mechanism for various types of lesions in diverse cell cycle phases. DNA DSB repair genes are frequently mutated and amplified in cancer; however, limited data exist regarding the overall genomic prospect and functional result of these modifications. We list the DNA repair genes and related E3 ligases. Mutation and expression frequencies of these genes were analyzed in COSMIC and TCGA. The 11 genes with a high frequency of mutation differed between cancers, and mutations in many DNA DSB repair E3 ligase genes were related to a higher total mutation burden. DNA DSB repair E3 ligase genes are involved in tumor suppressive or oncogenic functions, such as RNF168 and FBXW7, by assisting the functionality of these genomic alterations. DNA damage response-related E3 ligases, such as RNF168, FBXW7, and HERC2, were generated with more than 10% mutation in several cancer cells. This study provides a broad list of candidate genes as potential biomarkers for genomic instability and novel therapeutic targets in cancer. As a DSB related proteins considerably appear the possibilities for targeting DNA repair defective tumors or hyperactive DNA repair tumors. Based on recent research, we describe the relationship between unstable DSB repairs and DSB-related E3 ligases.