• Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
• /
• v.39 no.4
• /
• pp.535-541
• /
• 2010

Excessive intake of sodium is known as a risk factor for hypertension, and Korean adults consume sodium 3 times higher than Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference on sodium content between analyzed and estimated by food composition table and food exchange list. Seven days of low salt diet and seven days of high salt diet were prepared, and sodium contents were estimated by food composition table and food exchange list and measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Sodium contents of diet per day estimated by food exchange list significantly differed from analyzed content, but those estimated by food composition table were not. However, when absolute differences from analyzed content were compared by dishes in the low and high salt diet periods, there were significant differences among estimated sodium content by food composition table and food exchange list and analyzed sodium content. The discrepancy between those results was due to that absolute value was used to compare sodium contents of dishes but not to compare sodium contents of days. In addition, main dish, side dish, and soup were significantly different among estimated sodium content by food composition table and food exchange list and analyzed sodium content. Actual sodium contents of Jap-Chae Deop-Bap and Roasted chicken with oyster sauce differed to a great extent from estimated contents by food exchange list and food composition table. In conclusion, actual sodium contents of Korean dishes were significantly different from those estimated by food composition table and food exchange list, and thus these differences in salt content should be considered on planning of low-salt menu for hypertensive patients.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.49 no.3
• /
• pp.33-53
• /
• 2018

Many public libraries have restricted or forbidden most food and drink on the basis of a number of reasons, and it is necessary to demonstrate that it is legitimate or unfair. To this purpose, the researchers surveyed 485 public library users residing in Daegu City on the perception of food and drink policy. Based on survey results, the researcher suggested improvement directions from various perspectives. First, public library should proactive review the restriction policy in terms of social paradigm. Second, allowing food and drink is a strategy and a right way to justify the existing value and social role of public libraries and strengthen the ecosystem in terms of guaranteeing basic rights of users. Third, it is desirable to emphasize the pure function rather than the dysfunction due to food and drink allowance in terms of facilitating the collection and space use. Fourth, the totalitarian thinking that restrict all or most food and drink in the bylaws or library regulations should be avoided. Finally, public library should allow all food and drink, but it is necessary to prescribe a kind of the food which can be consumed by space, and actively promote to the user.

• Food Industry And Nutrition
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2015

• Food Industry And Nutrition
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.15-18
• /
• 2009

• Food Industry And Nutrition
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Food Technology
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.132-138
• /
• 2009

• Bulletin of Food Technology
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.154-158
• /
• 2010

• Bulletin of Food Technology
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.428-434
• /
• 2010

• Bulletin of Food Technology
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.640-649
• /
• 2009

• Bulletin of Food Technology
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.486-501
• /
• 2010