• Title/Summary/Keyword: Fellowship

Search Result 118, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Real-time Impact Evaluation of a Capacity-Building Health Project in Lao PDR

  • LEE, KYE WOO;KIM, TAEJONG
    • KDI Journal of Economic Policy
    • /
    • v.37 no.4
    • /
    • pp.75-88
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study presents a real-time impact evaluation of a human capacity-building health project in Laos, financed by a Korean aid agency and executed jointly by Laotian and Korean higher educational agencies. The project aims to improve the health status of Laotians by enhancing practicing doctors' clinical performance capacity, to be attained by advancing academic achievement at the University of Health Sciences (UHS) in Laos. Therefore, this real-time impact evaluation adopted the difference-in-differences regression analysis method, showing that the project improved the academic achievement of the UHS students who were taught by the project fellowship awardees more, compared to the UHS students who were taught by non-fellowship faculty members. It remains to be evaluated whether these UHS students taught by the project fellowship recipients would also perform better clinically in public hospitals in the future.

  • PDF

Foreign Systems of Education for Gastrointestinal Fellows (소화기내과 전임의 교육 체계에 대한 해외 사례)

  • Lee, Jeong Hoon
    • The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology
    • /
    • v.73 no.1
    • /
    • pp.3-6
    • /
    • 2019
  • There is a growing interest in gastroenterology and hepatology fellowship training in Korea and other countries. The Korean Society of Gastroenterology held an international symposium for gastroenterology and hepatology fellowship training, titled, "GI Fellow Training in Asia-Pacific Countries" on April 14, 2018. The Japanese education system was different for each hospital. The American societies for gastroenterology set up their education system together and have continued with frequent modification. The Taiwan and Singapore education systems are well organized and localized. We need a well-organized and sustainable education system for gastroenterology and hepatology fellowship training suitable for Korea.

A study on the determinants of leisure time use by marital status of middle-aged one-person households (중년1인가구의 혼인상태별 여가시간사용 결정요인 분석)

  • Seo, Jiwon;Yang, Jinwoon
    • Journal of Family Resource Management and Policy Review
    • /
    • v.21 no.3
    • /
    • pp.77-95
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study is to examine the factors related to leisure time to understand middle-aged one-person households. Data are from the recent survey of lifetime use in 2014 by Statistics Korea(N=1,138). Middle-aged one-person households aged 40-59 years were categorized into four groups by marital status (unmarried/married/widowed/divorced). Major results were found as follows: First, the total leisure time per day was 238 min in the middle-aged one-person households. The majority of the total leisure time was spent on 'fellowship & leisure activities'(204 min on weekdays, 283 min on weekends). Especially, time spent on real-time TV watching hours was the longest, as long as 89 min on weekday and 150 min on weekends. Second, gender differences were significant in terms of leisure time use in the middle-aged one-person households. Females spent less time on leisure than their male counterparts on both weekdays and weekends. In addition, gender differences related to marital status were significant. Third, on weekdays, the determinants of leisure time use among the middle-aged one-person households were health and type of employment for 'participation & volunteer activities', and gender, age, marital status, and type of employment variables for 'fellowship & leisure activities.' On weekends, time spent on 'participation & volunteer activities' were influenced by marital status, residential area, and type of employment, while time spent on 'fellowship & leisure activities' were significantly related to gender, type of employment, type of job, holiday system, and income.

An Analysis of the Differences in Research-related Constructs: Serial Comparson of the Graduate Students in Global Ph. D Fellowship and Brain Korea 21 Projects (대학원생들의 연구관련 성과 변인들의 차이 분석: 글로벌 박사양성 프로젝트와 두뇌한국21사업을 중심으로)

  • Jang, Deok-Ho
    • Journal of Engineering Education Research
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.20-27
    • /
    • 2013
  • The purpose of this study is to compare the key research-related constructs, research insterest, research self-efficacy, research productivity, and research outcome expectation of the graduate students, who are participating in Global Ph.D Fellowship (GPF) and Brain Korea (BK) 21 projects. The overall results show that the mean scores of GPF students in research interest, research self-efficacy, research productivity, and research outcome expectation are higher than those of BK21. However, the higher mean scores of doctoral students in both GPF and BK21 projects imply that the longer you stay in graduate program, the better researcher you can be. Although GPF program selected higher potential students and they seem to work very hard with high expectation to be competent researchers, compatible outcome also could be possible by BK21 project.

Research Productivity of Graduate Students in GPF program of Korea

  • Kim, Ki-Hyoung
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.72-93
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study analyzed the factors that influence the research productivity of 236 graduate students who are funded by the Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea. Research productivity was measured by the number of SCI publications, and the explanatory factors are the demographic factor, the financial factor, the reputation of institutions and the supervisor factor. This study included 2 indices such as the reputation of institutions and the research productivity of supervisors to check the halo effect unlike other studies. Results are as follows: 1) no gender difference, 2) better performance by younger age group, 3) no difference even if the students are additionally funded by other research support programs, 4) no halo effect by the reputation of institution but rather better performance from low ranked universities, 5) and a positive halo effect by supervisors.