• Title/Summary/Keyword: Evaluation principle

Search Result 518, Processing Time 0.028 seconds

The Same Distribution Principle and Its Applications

  • Liu, Yumin;Xu, Jichao
    • International Journal of Quality Innovation
    • /
    • v.2 no.1
    • /
    • pp.20-29
    • /
    • 2001
  • In this paper, the same distribution principle is developed based on the studies with many years for short run processes. The quality control philosophy and background of the principle are introduced. Some implementing techniques for the principle are presented, and application cases both in industry and evaluation & decision-making areas are shown.

  • PDF

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FOR EXPERT BASE WITH CONTROL CHART TECHNIQUES

  • Liu Yumin;Xu Jichao
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
    • /
    • 1998.11a
    • /
    • pp.189-197
    • /
    • 1998
  • The axiomatic hypothesis of the objective distribution of evaluation subjection will be proposed in this paper. On the basis of that, set up the random response model of the expert evaluation system and the quality control principle of expert base. Under this principle, develop the statistical quality control theory of expert base, further; provide the quality improvement technology for expert base.

  • PDF

The Security Quality of Computer Network (컴퓨터 네트워크의 보안 품질)

  • 신장균;박병호;유진철
    • Proceedings of the Korea Institutes of Information Security and Cryptology Conference
    • /
    • 1995.11a
    • /
    • pp.41-47
    • /
    • 1995
  • This research suggests a criterion, security quality, which is a unifying principle in computer network security that has the lack of a unifying principle. The security quality includes secrecy, integrity, recording, and availability among the factors that represent the security evaluation of the computer system. So, we defined the security quality, which is a basis for determining the security level, as the grand total of evaluation about each factor.

  • PDF

Use of Methods and Evaluation Systems of the Impact Mitigation Principle in German EIA (독일 환경영향평가에서의 자연환경의 평가절차)

  • Peters, Wolfgang
    • Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
    • /
    • v.2 no.2
    • /
    • pp.49-53
    • /
    • 1993
  • Before the EIA was established in the Federal Republic of Germany, the impact mitigation principle - a planning instrument, which has its legal foundation in the German nature conservation legislation already had {and still has} the function to valuate environmental impacts. The valuation principles and methods which have been developed in correlation to this instrument are now also used in the EIA. Particularly for the valuation of alternating effects on the different ecological landscape functions and for the valuation of ecological mitigation and compensation measures this valuation methods are used. These methods base on a special kind of modelling nature and environment Following the aim of the nature conservation act, which is to save the capacity of the landscape to perform its essential functions, not the ecological factors (soil, water, air etc.) itselfs are evaluated but the ecological functions of the landscape, which are based on the ecological factors.

  • PDF

A Research on Improving the Evaluation Model for Management Innovative Enterprises (서비스 경영 혁신 기업 평가 모형의 개선 방안 연구)

  • Roh, Jae-Whak
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.12 no.4
    • /
    • pp.279-302
    • /
    • 2010
  • A better selection model on management innovative enterprises is needed since the Korean government provides multi benefits to those selected enterprises. However, the selection model's propriety is suspicious because of the shortage of consideration of assessment items. In particular, the most important two assessment items, strategy and performance are suspected of multicollinearity because of high correlation scores. No consideration on multicollinearity among those items leads to erroneous selection which doubly counts the same components with different item names. The principle component analysis is applied to factor out the uncorrelated items. Using the resulted principle components, the new estimations are carried out. The comparison between estimated results from using principle components and non principle components shows that the present selection model overly considers the performance items compared to the real effect of items, which is a result of multicollinearity between performance and strategy.

  • PDF

Design Principle for Disassemblability of Products (제품의 분리용이성을 위한 설계원칙)

  • Mok, Hak-Soo;Han, Chang-Hyo;Jeon, Chang-Su;Song, Min-Jun
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers
    • /
    • v.16 no.6
    • /
    • pp.48-57
    • /
    • 2008
  • This paper shows the procedure to decide an optimal design principle for improving the disassemblability with considering of disassembly conditions. On the bssis of the disassembly mechanism of products and the structure of parts and subassembly, the disassemblability is classified into four categories: graspability, accessibility, transmission of disassembly power and handling. The weighting values of the influential factors are calculated by the method of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). The disassemblability is evaluated quantitatively. We established some score tables for the evaluation. Using these score tables, several principles for higher disassemblability in accordance with work conditions can be decided. An optimal design principle can be found by the comparison with the total scores of some disassembly conditions.

A Study on the Principle of Free Evaluation of Evidence in the Judgement of Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal (해양사고심판에서 자유심증주의의 한계에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Chang-Hee
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2010.04a
    • /
    • pp.422-427
    • /
    • 2010
  • The judgement of 'Koreon Maritime Safety Tribunal'(KMST) influences criminal/civil trials, and thus the judgement must be decided very carefully. The Judge must bear in mind the Principle of Free Evaluation of Evidence is restricted by the admissibility of evidence, in dubio proreo and others. Also, empirical role must be used very carefully with strict proof. Therefore the reasons of the proof shall be expressed on the adjudication.

  • PDF

Policy Evaluation for Policy Formation Stage of Meister High Schools (마이스터고등학교 직업교육정책 수립 단계에 대한 평가)

  • Cho, Jin-Ho;Kang, Kyung-Seok
    • Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education
    • /
    • v.25 no.2
    • /
    • pp.538-551
    • /
    • 2013
  • The purpose of this study is to evaluate policy formation stage of Meister high schools. The study analyzed the differences in the recognition of teachers, students, parents, and vocational education specialists about policy evaluation for policy formation stage of Meister high schools. The conclusions based on the results of the study are as follows: First, in context area the recognition of students showed relatively low level. It reflects that the principle of democracy is needed to the policy formation stage of Meister high schools. The participation of stake holders in the policy formation stage is essential. Second, in input area teachers recognized that the financial resources were sufficient. Vocational education specialists recognized that human resources, such as excellent teachers and Meister teachers, needed to recruited adequately. Third, many policies and institutions need to be established for Meister high schools. The Meister high schools should be selected based on the principle of equity. In the selection process vocational education specialists should be included for the principle of professionalism.

The Concept and Historical Background of Custody Evaluation

  • Lee, Myung Hoon;Chung, Dong Sun;Moon, Duk Soo;Kwack, Young Sook
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.53-57
    • /
    • 2020
  • This article reviews a wide range of literature on the standards and process of child custody evaluation in the US, and proposes custody evaluation standards appropriate to Korea. Custody evaluation refers to the process of making psychiatric and psychological evaluations of each parent and the child during a custody dispute and presenting to the family court a report of custody evaluation with the aim of safeguarding the best interests of the child. In the past, it was thought that children arethe fathers' possessions or that younger children should be raised by the mother; however, currently, custody rights are evaluated in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child. The principle is all-encompassing and vague and hence, the court makes increasingly more requests to mental health professionals for custody evaluation. Since the Seoul Family Court introduced the expert consultation system in 2017, the involvement of mental health professionals in child custody decisions has increased in Korea. Custody evaluators should try to be neutral and find the objective facts, keeping in mind that their role is to aid the court in making a custody decision.