Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2013.25.2.534

Policy Evaluation for Policy Formation Stage of Meister High Schools  

Cho, Jin-Ho (Inha University)
Kang, Kyung-Seok (Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education / v.25, no.2, 2013 , pp. 538-551 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate policy formation stage of Meister high schools. The study analyzed the differences in the recognition of teachers, students, parents, and vocational education specialists about policy evaluation for policy formation stage of Meister high schools. The conclusions based on the results of the study are as follows: First, in context area the recognition of students showed relatively low level. It reflects that the principle of democracy is needed to the policy formation stage of Meister high schools. The participation of stake holders in the policy formation stage is essential. Second, in input area teachers recognized that the financial resources were sufficient. Vocational education specialists recognized that human resources, such as excellent teachers and Meister teachers, needed to recruited adequately. Third, many policies and institutions need to be established for Meister high schools. The Meister high schools should be selected based on the principle of equity. In the selection process vocational education specialists should be included for the principle of professionalism.
Keywords
Policy evaluation; Meister high schools; Vocational education policy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Nakamura, R. T. & Smallwood, F.(1980). The politics of policy implementation, New York: St. Martin's.
2 Park, J. Y. et al.(2003). Introduction to educational administration evaluation, Seoul: Ha-Woo Publisher.
3 Poister, T. H.(1978). Public program analysis: Applied research methods, Baltimore: University Park Press.
4 Rho, W. J.(2007). Principles of public policy, Seoul: Park-Young Publisher.
5 Seo, J. H.(1986). Educational policy process and evaluation, The Journal of Education Evaluation, 1(1), 95-119.
6 Suchman, E. A.(1967). Evaluative research: Principles and practice in public service & social action programs, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7 Chelimsky, E.(1985). Program evaluation: Patterns and directions, Washington D.C.: The American Society for Public Administration.
8 Dror, Y.(1963). The planning process: A fact design, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 29(1), 46-58.   DOI
9 Dror, Y.(1968). Public policy making reexamined, Scranton, PA.: Chandler.
10 Dunn, W. N.(1981). Public policy analysis: An introduction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11 Greene, J. C.(1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.   DOI
12 Jang, K. W.(2001). Policy evaluation for vocational education in the Republic of Korea, Seoul National University, Ph. D. dissertation.
13 Jung, J. G.(1997). Principles of public policy, Seoul: Dae-Myung Publisher.
14 Kang, H. K.(2003). Evaluative study of the policy for the specialized vocational high schools. Chonbuk National University, Ph. D. dissertation.
15 Kim, J. W. et al.(2012). Performance evaluation and future tasks of Meister High School Policy, Seoul: KRIVET.
16 Lesswell, H. D.(1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell(Eds.). The policy sciences, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
17 MEST(2008). 300 high school diversification projects, Seoul: MEST.
18 MEST(2008). Korean Meister High Schools development plan leading vocational high school, Seoul: MEST.
19 MEST(2010). Vocational high school educationadvancement plan, Seoul: MEST.
20 Na, S. I. et al.(2007). Development of programs supporting specialized vocational high school by government departments, Seoul: MEHR.