1 |
Maccoby EE, Mnookin RH. Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;1992.
|
2 |
Kraus LJ, Thomas CR, Bukstein OG, Walter HJ, Benson RS, Chrisman A, et al. Practice parameter for child and adolescent forensic evaluations. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;50:1299-1312.
DOI
|
3 |
Riggio HR. Parental marital conflict and divorce, parent-child relationships, social support, and relationship anxiety in young. Pers Relationships 2004;11:99-114.
DOI
|
4 |
Johnston JR. High-conflict divorce. Future Child 1994;4:165-182.
DOI
|
5 |
American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. Child Custody Evaluation Standards. J Am Acad Matrimonial Law 2013;25:251-294.
|
6 |
Wyer MM, Gaylord SJ, Grove ET. The legal context of child custody evaluations. In: Weithorn LA, editor. Psychology and child custody determinations: knowledge, roles, and expertise. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press;1987. p.4-22.
|
7 |
JUSTIA US Law. Ex Parte Devine [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supremecourt/1981/398-so-2d-686-1.html.
|
8 |
Lyman RD, Roberts MC. Mental health testimony in child custody litigation. Law Psychol Rev 1985;9:15-34.
|
9 |
Mason MA. From father's property rights to children's rights: the history of child custody in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press;1994.
|
10 |
Hall AS, Pulver CA, Cooley MJ. Psychology of the best interest standard: fifty state statutes and their theoretical antecedents. Am J Fam Ther 1996;24:171-180.
DOI
|
11 |
Mnookin RH. Child-custody adjudication: Judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy. Law Contemp Probl 1975;39:226-293.
DOI
|
12 |
Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit AJ. Before the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press;1979.
|
13 |
Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act, 9A Uniform Laws Annotated, Sec. 316 (1979).
|
14 |
Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit A. Beyond the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press;1973.
|
15 |
Feller JN, Davidson HA, Hardin M, Horowitz RM. Working with the courts in child protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;1992.
|
16 |
Shuman DW. The role of mental health experts in custody decisions: science, psychological tests, and clinical judgment. Fam Law Q 2002;36:135-162.
|
17 |
Wald M. State intervention on behalf of "neglected" children: a search for realistic standards. Stanford Law Review 1975:27:985-1040.
DOI
|
18 |
Garrison M. How do judges decide divorce cases?: an empirical analysis of discretionary decision making. North Carol Law Rev 1996;74:401-552.
|
19 |
Scott ES. Pluralism, paternal preferences, and child custody. Calif Law Rev 1992;80:615-672.
DOI
|
20 |
Chambers DL. Rethinking the substantive rules for custody disputes in divorce. Mich Law Rev 1984;83:477-569.
DOI
|
21 |
Warshak RA. Punching the parenting time clock: the approximation rule, social science, and the baseball bat kids. Fam Court Rev 2007;45:600-619.
DOI
|
22 |
Mckay J, Shaver-Hast L, Sharnoff W, Warren E, Wright H. A family approach to treatment of postpartum depression. Zero Three 2009;29:35-39.
|
23 |
Jang CG. Child centered judgement in family court. Seoul: Joint Research Committee for Parental Education;2017.
|
24 |
Seoul Family Court. Guidance to consultation on familial judgment, familial mediation;2017 [cited 2020 Feb 2]. Available from URL: http://yeslaw.com/lims/front/page/fulltext.html?pAct=view&pPromulgationNo=180178#nolink.
|
25 |
Schwartz LL. A nightmare for King Solomon: the new reproductive technologies. J Fam Psychol 2003;17:229-237.
DOI
|
26 |
Bernet W. Child custody evaluations. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2002;11:781-804.
DOI
|
27 |
Emery RE, Otto RK, O'Donohue WT. A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: limited science and a flawed system. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2005;6:1-29.
DOI
|
28 |
Task Force for Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, Martindale DA, Lorraine M, Austin WG, Drozd L, Gould-Saltman D, et al. Model standards of practicefor child custody evaluation. Fam Court Rev 2007;45:70-91.
DOI
|
29 |
American Psychological Association. Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Am Psychol 2010;65:863-867.
DOI
|