The Concept and Historical Background of Custody Evaluation |
Lee, Myung Hoon
(Raon Psychiatric Clinic)
Chung, Dong Sun (W Psychiatric Clinic) Moon, Duk Soo (Department of Psychiatry, Jeju National University School of Medicine) Kwack, Young Sook (Department of Psychiatry, Jeju National University School of Medicine) |
1 | Maccoby EE, Mnookin RH. Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;1992. |
2 | Kraus LJ, Thomas CR, Bukstein OG, Walter HJ, Benson RS, Chrisman A, et al. Practice parameter for child and adolescent forensic evaluations. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;50:1299-1312. DOI |
3 | Riggio HR. Parental marital conflict and divorce, parent-child relationships, social support, and relationship anxiety in young. Pers Relationships 2004;11:99-114. DOI |
4 | Johnston JR. High-conflict divorce. Future Child 1994;4:165-182. DOI |
5 | American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. Child Custody Evaluation Standards. J Am Acad Matrimonial Law 2013;25:251-294. |
6 | Wyer MM, Gaylord SJ, Grove ET. The legal context of child custody evaluations. In: Weithorn LA, editor. Psychology and child custody determinations: knowledge, roles, and expertise. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press;1987. p.4-22. |
7 | JUSTIA US Law. Ex Parte Devine [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supremecourt/1981/398-so-2d-686-1.html. |
8 | Lyman RD, Roberts MC. Mental health testimony in child custody litigation. Law Psychol Rev 1985;9:15-34. |
9 | Mason MA. From father's property rights to children's rights: the history of child custody in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press;1994. |
10 | Hall AS, Pulver CA, Cooley MJ. Psychology of the best interest standard: fifty state statutes and their theoretical antecedents. Am J Fam Ther 1996;24:171-180. DOI |
11 | Mnookin RH. Child-custody adjudication: Judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy. Law Contemp Probl 1975;39:226-293. DOI |
12 | Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit AJ. Before the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press;1979. |
13 | Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act, 9A Uniform Laws Annotated, Sec. 316 (1979). |
14 | Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit A. Beyond the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press;1973. |
15 | Feller JN, Davidson HA, Hardin M, Horowitz RM. Working with the courts in child protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;1992. |
16 | Shuman DW. The role of mental health experts in custody decisions: science, psychological tests, and clinical judgment. Fam Law Q 2002;36:135-162. |
17 | Wald M. State intervention on behalf of "neglected" children: a search for realistic standards. Stanford Law Review 1975:27:985-1040. DOI |
18 | Garrison M. How do judges decide divorce cases?: an empirical analysis of discretionary decision making. North Carol Law Rev 1996;74:401-552. |
19 | Scott ES. Pluralism, paternal preferences, and child custody. Calif Law Rev 1992;80:615-672. DOI |
20 | Chambers DL. Rethinking the substantive rules for custody disputes in divorce. Mich Law Rev 1984;83:477-569. DOI |
21 | Warshak RA. Punching the parenting time clock: the approximation rule, social science, and the baseball bat kids. Fam Court Rev 2007;45:600-619. DOI |
22 | Mckay J, Shaver-Hast L, Sharnoff W, Warren E, Wright H. A family approach to treatment of postpartum depression. Zero Three 2009;29:35-39. |
23 | Jang CG. Child centered judgement in family court. Seoul: Joint Research Committee for Parental Education;2017. |
24 | Seoul Family Court. Guidance to consultation on familial judgment, familial mediation;2017 [cited 2020 Feb 2]. Available from URL: http://yeslaw.com/lims/front/page/fulltext.html?pAct=view&pPromulgationNo=180178#nolink. |
25 | Schwartz LL. A nightmare for King Solomon: the new reproductive technologies. J Fam Psychol 2003;17:229-237. DOI |
26 | Bernet W. Child custody evaluations. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2002;11:781-804. DOI |
27 | Emery RE, Otto RK, O'Donohue WT. A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: limited science and a flawed system. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2005;6:1-29. DOI |
28 | Task Force for Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, Martindale DA, Lorraine M, Austin WG, Drozd L, Gould-Saltman D, et al. Model standards of practicefor child custody evaluation. Fam Court Rev 2007;45:70-91. DOI |
29 | American Psychological Association. Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Am Psychol 2010;65:863-867. DOI |