• Title/Summary/Keyword: Evaluation of System Level

검색결과 2,594건 처리시간 0.029초

농촌주택의 노후도 평가요소 도출을 위한 기초연구 (A Basic Study on the Evaluation Factor for Deteriorated Level of Rural House)

  • 박길범;박준모;김옥규
    • 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국건축시공학회 2014년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
    • /
    • pp.107-108
    • /
    • 2014
  • The rural area has aged and depressed for urban area in Korea. Furthermore, the rural house has deteriorated and is vulnerable to disaster which collapse, fire, landslide, and so on. For this matter, it need to an evaluated system for deteriorated level of rural house. The evaluated system has a repairing method and an estimated cost for rural house to offer native in rural area. This study could draw evaluation factor for deteriorated level of rural house as a basic study for the evaluated system. The evaluation factors is compared the Korean housing performance grade indication system, the Korean green building certification criteria, and the Japanese housing performance indication system. As a result, they could eight types. There are a mothproof, an waterproof, a finishing material, an asbestos cement slate of roofing, a mobility right, an opening and closing of doors and windows, an indoor environment.

  • PDF

건물 에너지관리 실태 및 수준 평가 - 유지관리자를 대상으로 - (Questionnaire survey & Evaluation for Quality Level of Energy Management System in Buildings - survey for maintenance personnel -)

  • 곽노열;조승혁;권한솔;허정호
    • 한국태양에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국태양에너지학회 2008년도 추계학술발표대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.112-119
    • /
    • 2008
  • In order to ensure building energy management at an appropriate level continuously, it is necessary to define clearly service work of energy management and to suggest evaluation index whether energy management in buildings is fit and improvement is needed or not. But, evaluation index of energy management level in buildings is not suggested yet in Korea. So, the purpose of this paper is to suggest evaluation index of energy management level in buildings, investigate the present state of Korean buildings and evaluate energy management levels. As a result of surveys of evaluation index of energy management, it is found that portion of level 1, which is the best level, is higher than any other level, level 2, level 3. And, throughout analysis, it is found that as total floor area is larger, evaluation index of energy management level is better, and, in order to increase energy management level, first of all, there is necessary for building's users to change understanding about energy saving and make a reform of national policy of energy management in buildings. Because there is rich relationship between items among evaluation index of this stuff and result value of evaluation index, evaluation index of energy management suggested in this study is available to evaluate energy management level in buildings.

  • PDF

수산자원조성사업의 합리적인 평가체계 도입 방안에 관한 연구 (A Study on Establishing the Evaluation System of the Stock Enhancement Program)

  • 김대영;류정곤;이정삼
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제41권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-24
    • /
    • 2010
  • The main goal of the study is to propose an objective and standardized evaluation system of stock enhancement programs. In order to achieve this goal, the study first suggested the need for stock enhancement program evaluation system through the review of current status and problems. Second, the study identified possible problems of the existing stock enhancement program evaluation by reviewing domestic and foreign evaluation systems. Finally the study proposed a new evaluation system and implementation plan of it. This study also classified the program evaluation criteria into ex-ante evaluation and ex-post evaluation according to the evaluation point in time, and applied the economic, political and technical feasibility tests into the evaluation of the stock enhancement program in order to solve the current problems of the evaluation. The evaluation process of the stock enhancement program is composed of an evaluation system design, estimation of weights using the analytical hierarchy process, design of estimation standard, conversion of scores and final summary of the evaluation. The central government takes the lead in the evaluation of the regional (metropolitan city or province) projects and the regional government is in charge of the evaluation of the local (city or county) projects. For the implementation of the ex-ante evaluation, either the regional or local governments ask for the evaluation and then submit an evaluation plan and other necessary documents to the upper level governments. The ex-post evaluation is then carried out by the upper level governments.

병원정보시스템 품질에 대한 인식 및 평가 (Perception and Evaluation of Quality of Hospital Information System)

  • 임정도
    • 보건의료산업학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-13
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of quality property of hospital information system, the quality level, and its effects. The participants were 730 employees who are using hospital information system in hospitals. In order to analyze the relationship, the quality property regulates the consideration of user's taste and the state of user's favor for the design of hospital information system, and the quality level regulates user's convenience and properness. The main results from this study can be summarized as follows, First, the perception of quality property for hospital information system showed few significance level between occupation, but revealed significance level between position. The evaluation of quality level showed significance level depending on the occupation and position. Second, quality property which generally affects to the quality level of the hospital information system were different between types of occupation and quality factor.

품질시스템 평가모델 (An Evaluation Model of Quality System)

  • 김종수;황승국
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제27권4호
    • /
    • pp.95-113
    • /
    • 1999
  • This paper is to propose an evaluation model of quality system using the concept from the evaluation method of each stage in QFD(Quality Function Deployment). The data of the performance level and weights for the quality system and the job on quality loop in each enterprise has been obtained from the 8 experts who are in charge of quality system construction. Here, the weights were computed by means of the eigenvector method. In this paper, we can acquire the evaluated score for the present level of the quality system. This method will help to manage and improve the quality system. We show the efficiency of this method by illustrating case studies.

  • PDF

국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구 (A Study on the Development and Institutionalization Plan of a Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System)

  • 김영현;하진식
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제50권2호
    • /
    • pp.183-197
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative evaluation model for the defense quality management system and suggest institutionalization plans. To this end, another existing evaluation model was reviewed and analyzed to develop a quantitative evaluation model applicable to military institutions. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a DQMS quantitative evaluation model, a military product quality level survey model and a defense quality model operated in the defense field were analyzed. In addition, evaluation models and indicators were analyzed by investigating evaluation models operated by other institutions and private sectors. Results: As a result of the study, the total score of the DQMS model was 1,000 points, 600 points for maturity level indicators and 400 points for operation performance indicators, and the evaluation items consisted of 7 major categories and 25 middle categories. The maturity level index 600 points are 70 points for organizational situation, 60 points for leadership, 40 points for planning, 100 points for support, 180 points for operation, 90 points for performance evaluation, and 60 points for improvement. Conclusion: It will be easy to quantify and evaluate the operating level of DQMS certified companies through the application of the DQMS quantitative evaluation model and evaluation criteria presented in this study. As a result, it will be possible to grasp the level of quality management system and the areas of improvement, and the overall level of improvement can be expected by inducing voluntary improvement activities through sharing of best practices and identifying improvement cases.

시스템의 관리수준에 따라 태도와 기대가 성과에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of User attitude and Expectation on the System performance according to Management level of Information System)

  • 한경일
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.91-100
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study is to confirm whether user attitude and expectation make a significant difference on the system performance according to management level of IS. The management level is defined as a evaluation of IS and project management. Field research was employed to empirically investigate the relationship among the variables. The finding of the study can be summarized as follows. The positive attitude has a favorable effect on the system performance. But high expectation shows low performance under the strict evaluation.

  • PDF

일개 의과대학 교육프로그램 평가체제에 대한 연구 (Educational Program Evaluation System in a Medical School)

  • 윤소정;이상엽;임선주
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.131-142
    • /
    • 2020
  • A systematic educational program evaluation system for continuous quality improvement in undergraduate medical education is essential. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are two distinct but complementary processes referred to in an evaluation system that emphasizes formative purpose. Monitoring involves regular data collection for tracking process and results, while evaluation requires periodic judgment for improvement. We have recently completed implementing an educational evaluation using the M&E concept in a medical school. The evaluation system consists of two loops, one at the lesson/course level and the other at the phase/graduation level. We conducted evaluation activities in four stages: planning, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement. In the planning phase, we clarified the purpose of evaluation, formulated a plan to engage stakeholders, determined evaluation criteria and indicators, and developed an evaluation plan. Next, during the monitoring phase, we developed evaluation instruments and methods and then collected data. In the evaluation phase, we analyzed results and evaluated the criteria of the two loops. Finally, we reviewed the evaluation results with stakeholders to make improvements. We have recognized several problems including excessive burden, lack of expertise, insufficient consideration of stakeholders' evaluation questions, and inefficient data collection. We need to share the value of evaluation and build a system gradually.

연구개발의 실적평가에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Research and Development)

  • 김성희;하정진
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제19권39호
    • /
    • pp.163-170
    • /
    • 1996
  • Several formerly independent trends including the increasing rate of technological change, the demand for greater efficiency and productivity in R&D and innovation. The purpose of this study is describe performance evaluation of research and development. Performance evaluation level of R&D have three levels: individual level, research group level, laboratory level. There are development evaluation factors and evaluation routin in each levels.

  • PDF

조직의 안전보건경영 활동이 안전보건 성과에 미치는 영향 연구 : 공공기관 안전활동 수준평가 사례 중심으로 (A Study on the Effect of Organizational Safety and Health Management Activities on Safety and Health Performance : Focusing on the Case of Public Organizations Safety Activity Level Evaluation)

  • 설문수;이준원;박만수;소한섭;김병직
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제44권2호
    • /
    • pp.132-139
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of organizational safety and health management activities on safety and health performance by using the results of safety activity level evaluation of public organizations. To this end, a research model was established by using three fields as independent variables among the four areas of the safety activity level evaluation index: safety and health system, safety and health activity plan, and safety and health activity level, and the safety and health activity performance field as a dependent variable. Correlation analysis and regression analysis between major variables were performed. As a result of the correlation analysis, the safety and health activity performance had a significant positive (+) correlation with all of the safety and health system, safety and health activity plan, and safety and health activity level. The safety and health system had a significant positive (+) correlation with the safety and health activity plan and safety and health activity level, and the safety and health activity plan had a significant positive (+) correlation with the safety and health activity level. And as a result of the regression analysis, it was found that the organization's safety and health system, safety and health activity plan, and safety and health activity level all had a significant positive (+) effect on safety and health activity performance.