• 한국농촌계획학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농촌계획학회 1998년도 임시총회 및 추계 학술논문발표회
• /
• pp.28-30
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to find the adjective check list for rural stream landscape evaluation. The methods used in this study were to make the adjective check list suitable for stream landscape, to measure the adjective check list by the method of semantic differential scale, and to find the adjective check list suitable for evaluation of stream landscape. The adjective check list suggested in this study can guarantee objectivity of evaluation in improving or restoring stream landscape.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.229-244
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 교과별 수행평가 도서목록에 대한 중고교 학생들의 인식 및 관심 수준을 알아보고 나아가 그러한 수준에 따른 만족도 및 교육성과와의 관계를 알아본 연구이다. 이를 위하여 서울시 소재의 2개의 중학교와 고등학교의 학생 200명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 성별과 학교급별에 따라서 교과별 수행평가 도서목록에 대한 학생들의 관심 수준에는 차이가 있었다. 둘째, 교과별 수행평가 도서목록에 대하여 관심이 있는 학생이 수행평가에 더 많은 시간과 노력을 소비하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 교과별 수행평가 도서목록에 대한 인식 수준에 따라서 지식습득과 학업성취도와의 관계가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 선택 기준과 만족도에도 유의미한 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.145-149
• /
• 2003

This study was carried out to present rural functional resources through classification and preparation of checklist for ecological and cultural resources which considered various aspect of agriculture and rural area. In this study the function of ecological and cultural resources classified 6 functions such as natural environment, free environmentally agricultural products, experience of agricultural products, recreational places, rural life experience, and Interchanges of human resources. Prepared evaluation list through this study can explain a local characteristics based on 6 functions of agricultural and mountain village. This evaluation list was focused on the magnitude of the resources which motivate the visiting of city-dweller as a consumer, for an actual regional plan, investigation of the inhabitant consciousness survey should be needed, simultaneously.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.69-73
• /
• 2008

To curb a rapid increase in expenditures for pharmaceuticals, the Korean government introduced a positive list system and a negotiation process for drug prices at the end of 2006. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals has begun to have a pivotal role in the listing and pricing of drugs for the Korean National Health Insurance. There are some points to discuss regarding the use of economic evaluation in the listing and pricing in the context of the Korean system. First, the listing and pricing processes have been fragmented, evoking complaints from pharmaceutical companies and delaying the access of new drugs to patients. Second, there is a concern that the positive list system may limit the range and availability of drugs for patients to choose for treatment. Third, the time schedule for de-listing of existing drugs may not be realistic. Fourth, it is not always easy to provide reliable evidence of cost-effectiveness due to a lack of materials. Fifth, there is no consensus on the range of the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) acceptable to the Korean society. In conclusion, in the near future, it will be necessary to evaluate the achievements that the economic evaluation has provided to the Korean society.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.73-81
• /
• 2012

Object: The aim of this study is to suggest a list of priority chemicals for the Hazard & Risk Evaluation of Chemicals (HREC) controlled by the Industrial Safety and Health Act (ISHA). Method: Screening assessment was done for 642 chemicals whose exposure threshold limit values were set by the Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL). Hazard data were collected from Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency (KOSHA) and/or other toxicity database. Exposure data were obtained from KOSHA internal database. The hazard and exposure scores of chemicals were listed by order of priority in accordance with GHS classification and exposure index data. Result: From the result of screening risk assessment for 642 chemicals, we extracted a list of 13 priority chemicals for HREC performed by the ISHA. A priority list of 27 chemicals which have carcinogen, mutagen and/or reproductive toxicity but not controlled by the ISHA was suggested for additional evaluation as "chemicals for special management".

• 약학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.126-132
• /
• 2007

Demand for manpower of conducting pharmaco-economic evaluation was investigated. The priority order of conducting economic evaluation on the already listed drugs was set by the budget impact for health insurance by the therapeutic groups. Manpower demand was estimated by the Anatomical, Therapeutical, Chemical (ATC) code. The total number of economic evaluation on the already listed drugs is estimated to be 346 cases. Based on these numbers, at least 53${\sim}$102 of full-time-equivalent (FTE) manpower is needed for conducting economic evaluation per year in the following 5 years.

• 한국가스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국가스학회 2005년도 추계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.59-65
• /
• 2005

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.3-10
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to select and analyze words that represent various emotional states towards a spatial environment. Selecting appropriate words for the sensibility evaluation of a spatial environment is a process of constructing sensibility indicators, so that an accurate selection of sensibility words is very important. To collect basic words for this study, words for expressing sensation, emotional states, and sensibility regarding a spatial environment have been collected first via free association and a literature review of previous studies. In the second stage, the selected words are refined. Fifteen evaluators have participated in the first process of refining words, 140 college students participated in the second process, and than the final list of 277 refined words has been selected. During the third stage, 15 specialists were asked to evaluate the appropriateness of sensibility evaluation words, for that 7 point-scale has been applied. Then, 99 words with an average point of 4.55 or more and a standard deviation of 1.55 or lower were selected. After investigating the similarity in the meanings of the selected words, 55 pairs of contrasting words have been selected as a final list of sensibility evaluation words. During this last stage, 307 college students majoring in related fields were asked to evaluate the appropriateness of sensibility evaluation words for a spatial environment, and 7 point-scale was obtained. A factor analysis, cluster analysis, and multidimensional analysis have been conducted on the data obtained from these survey. According to the results of the factor analysis, the eight important factors are obtained from the sensibility evaluation criteria of a spatial environment(form, texture, function, value, comfort, aesthetics, atmosphere, and affinity). The factors obtained from this study can be used in the beginning stage of evaluating the sensibility factors of a spatial environment. In addition, the results of this study can be used as basic data when constructing a list of evaluation indicators to select various complex sensibility words for a space; or as general indicators when evaluating various spatial design factors.

• 한국물환경학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.348-358
• /
• 2017

The process of evaluating and selecting the best available techniques presents various characteristics for each country. In the case of EU, BAT is selected through TWG meeting after first screening, mass and energy balance, impact assessment and decision support process. Korea has proposed four principles to select BAT that can be carbon neutral for each environmental infrastructure in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to evaluate and select the best available technique, it is necessary to differentiate the method according to whether it is a technique generally applied at the current workplace, whether it is a single technique or a combination technique, and whether it is a technology technique or management technique. In the case of a single technique, it should be evaluated whether it is a technique applied in the workplace, excessive cost, superior environmental technique over BAT, and secondary environmental pollution. In the case of multiple techniques, it is necessary to examine whether the emission standards are met and whether the pollutants can be treated at the same level as BAT. In the case of BAT candidates for management techniques, whether or not they contribute directly or indirectly to lowering the emission level of pollutants can be an important evaluation item. In the case of environmental techniques that are not generally applied in the workplace, it is recommended that the following 8 steps be carried out, including those prescribed by law. In the first stage, the list of performance evaluation factors is listed. In the second stage, the level of disposal of pollutants and the level of satisfaction with standards are listed. In the third stage, the environmental evaluation elements are listed. In the fourth stage, Is to list the economic evaluation elements, step 6 is to list the pollution and accident prevention evaluation factors, step 7 is the quantitative evaluation of the technical working group, and step 8 is BAT confirmation through deliberation of the central environmental policy committee.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제106권2호
• /
• pp.111-120
• /
• 2017

IUCN의 적색목록은 전 세계 규모에서 가장 신뢰받는 멸종, 희귀 동식물종의 평가와 보전 정보를 제공하고 있다. 2016년 7월까지 한반도에 분포하는 식물중 IUCN 적색목록 평가를 받은 종은 236종으로, 5종이 멸종위기종(CR), 20종이 위기종(EN), 9종이 취약종(VU)으로 확인되었다. 나머지 189종은 약관심종(LC)으로 평가되었다. 환경부는 2011년 국가적 색목록 평가라는 명목 하에 IUCN 적색목록과 내용, 형식이 다른 정성적 기준에 따라 평가 결과를 제시하였다. 이와는 별개로 환경부는 멸종위기종 I급과 II급 목록을 57종으로 수정 제시하였다. 이 목록은 IUCN의 적색목록과 비교시 일부 공통종이 있으나 공통종도 보전상의 지위가 일치하지 않는다. 이런 평가 내용의 불일치의 이유는 남한이라는 제한된 지역 수준의 평가로는 전 세계 규모의 평가와는 결과가 일치할 수 없기 때문이다. 평가에 필요한 정보가 부실하게 제시되거나 정보가 없는 상태에서 자의적 평가가 이루어진 경우도 있다. 국가 단위의 종 관리를 위해서는 멸종과 절멸에 대한 엄밀한 용어 적용과 남한에 국한된 제한적 시각의 편향된 결과를 배제하고, 분류학적 실체에 근거한 종 선정, 평가를 위한 개체군의 크기, 분포, 개체수, 개체군 증감에 대한 구체적 자료 제시와 수집이 필요하다. 환경부의 현재 멸종위기동식물 목록은 '국내절멸위기목록'으로 변경하고, 전 세계 단위의 IUCN적색목록 평가종을 '멸종위기목록'으로 이원화해서 관리할 필요가 있다. 현재 국가 기관에서 제시하는 몇 백 종의 과도한 목록 보다는 우선 평가 대상의 종을 순차적으로 늘려가면서, 평가 및 종관리에 내실을 다지는 것이 필요하다.