• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.59-65
• /
• 2014

Objectives : The purpose of the study is to investigate the awareness and influencing factors of class evaluation in dental hygiene students. This study will establish the measures for educational quality improvement and basic data for effective way of education. Methods : A self-reported questionnaire was filled out by 968 dental hygiene students in Busan, Gyeongnam, and Ulsan from August 26 to September 6, 2013. SPSS 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results : Senior students felt the necessity of class evaluation improvement. In class evaluation items by grade, evaluation entity was the most significant factor. The students answered that teaching sincerity was the most important factor in class evaluation. Conclusions : The students thought that class evaluation depended on the entity and sincerity of the class contents.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.73-95
• /
• 2010

This study shows the scientific and systematic Evaluation Model using factor analysis and AHP methods for the success of defense Information System R&D projects. The evaluation model was divided into 7 evaluation factors such as Developing support, Developing infrastructure, Developing management and test & evaluation, Support factors for strength, Understanding & developing strategy, Developing technology & organization, and Developing performance. And those were composed of totally 24 low level Evaluation index. The Developed Evaluation Model in the paper could be contributed more to objectively and transparently company selection of defense Information System R&D and other defense R&D Projects in the future.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.49-56
• /
• 2019

본 연구의 항만보안 향상을 위해 중요한 평가요인들을 발굴하고 요인들 간 상대적 중요도를 분석하는데 있다. 이를 위해 문헌조사 및 항만보안 업무 종사자들로 구성된 전문가 그룹의 브레인스토밍(Brainstorming)을 통해 평가요인을 선정하여, 4개의 대분류 요인과 12개의 중분류 요인으로 분류하였다. 계층적으로 분류된 평가요인을 전국의 항만보안 관련 업무를 수행하고 있는 공무원, 항만공사와 항만보안공사 종사자, 항만보안관련 교육기관 종사자들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하고, 계층분석법(AHP)을 이용하여 중요도를 산출하였다. 또한 그룹 간 중요도 인식 차이를 알아보기 위하여 통계 분석을 실시하였다. 평가요인 중요도 분석 결과, 보안 운영시스템 강화 요인이 가장 높았고 하드웨어 개선, 보안인력 증원의 순으로 나타났다. 또한 대분류의 정책적 지원 및 시설 지원, 인력 예산 지원에서 그룹 간 인식 차이를 확인할 수 있었다. 분석 결과를 통해 항만 내 통합모니터링시스템 구축을 통한 보안 운영체제의 개선이 우선적으로 요구되며, 그룹 간 인식 차이를 이해하고 이를 바탕으로 유기적인 협조체제의 구축이 필요함을 알 수 있었다. 이 연구결과는 후속연구로 수행될 국내 항만보안 효율성 측정을 위한 평가요인으로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.26-44
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to investigate these major factors on patient satisfaction, and to examine the affecting level of major factors in. The subjects in this study was 70 hospitals that were surveyed the hospital evaluation program containing the survey of patient satisfaction by KHIDI(Korea Health Industry Development Institute) from 1997 to 1999. The collected data was analysed SPSS for Windows(Ver 10.0). On basically, frequency analysis, t-test, and ANOVA was performed and, for more analysis, correlation analysis, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, logistic regression analysis was utilized. According to this study, the major factors of inpatient satisfaction are divided 3 types facility factor, manpower factor, and service factor. And the major factors of outpatient satisfaction are analyzed 5 types; facility factor related direct medical service, facility factor related indirect medical services, manpower factor, pharmacy factor, and facility factor related utilization convenience. The importance of this study lies in the identification of major factors on hospital patient satisfaction.

• 한국멀티미디어학회논문지
• /
• 제24권8호
• /
• pp.1161-1170
• /
• 2021

The MOBA game is updated every year with a new season, the new season update brings fun to the game users and also makes them feel unfamiliar with the new gameplay. In order to let game users better adapt to the new season, this study will extract the new season balance evaluation factors. Firstly, we used one-on-one review to collect the unbalanced factors that game users had encountered at the beginning of the new season of the MOBA game, and secondly, we organized the collected review data into a questionnaire and conducted a survey. The first step of the experiment was to filter out the lower factors through exploratory factor analysis and extract the balance evaluation factors of the MOBA game new season. The second step of the experiment was to examine the correlation between the factors through confirmatory factor analysis, as well as to confirm the appropriateness and explanatory value of the factors. The analysis resulted in "Game character experience", "Game view's expression", "Game level", and "Composition of the game setting" are the four factors. Finally, through correlation analysis, the most relevant factor for game satisfaction is the "Game character experience", and each factor is correlated with each other.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.3-10
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to select and analyze words that represent various emotional states towards a spatial environment. Selecting appropriate words for the sensibility evaluation of a spatial environment is a process of constructing sensibility indicators, so that an accurate selection of sensibility words is very important. To collect basic words for this study, words for expressing sensation, emotional states, and sensibility regarding a spatial environment have been collected first via free association and a literature review of previous studies. In the second stage, the selected words are refined. Fifteen evaluators have participated in the first process of refining words, 140 college students participated in the second process, and than the final list of 277 refined words has been selected. During the third stage, 15 specialists were asked to evaluate the appropriateness of sensibility evaluation words, for that 7 point-scale has been applied. Then, 99 words with an average point of 4.55 or more and a standard deviation of 1.55 or lower were selected. After investigating the similarity in the meanings of the selected words, 55 pairs of contrasting words have been selected as a final list of sensibility evaluation words. During this last stage, 307 college students majoring in related fields were asked to evaluate the appropriateness of sensibility evaluation words for a spatial environment, and 7 point-scale was obtained. A factor analysis, cluster analysis, and multidimensional analysis have been conducted on the data obtained from these survey. According to the results of the factor analysis, the eight important factors are obtained from the sensibility evaluation criteria of a spatial environment(form, texture, function, value, comfort, aesthetics, atmosphere, and affinity). The factors obtained from this study can be used in the beginning stage of evaluating the sensibility factors of a spatial environment. In addition, the results of this study can be used as basic data when constructing a list of evaluation indicators to select various complex sensibility words for a space; or as general indicators when evaluating various spatial design factors.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.229-252
• /
• 2017

국내에서 사서직무만족도 연구는 꾸준히 진행되어 왔다. 그러나 직무만족 평가지표 자체에 관한 연구는 거의 이루어지지 않았고, 대부분의 직무만족도 평가는 오래전에 개발된 국외의 지표를 사용하고 있기에 평가지표에 관한 연구가 반드시 필요한 시점이다. 본 연구는 사서 직무만족도에 대한 68편의 학위논문을 대상으로 최근으로부터 10년씩 기간을 구분하고 평가요인의 시대별 흐름과 관종별 차이를 분석하였다. 그 결과 시대별 흐름에는 평가요인의 변화가 있었으며 도서관 유형 간의 차이는 미미했다는 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 나아가 요인, 문항, 현재 모두 반영될 수 있는 세 가지 기준을 적용하여 12개의 평가요인과 39개의 설문문항으로 구성된 사서직무만족에 대한 표준평가지표를 제시하였다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2009년도 세계 도시지반공학 심포지엄
• /
• pp.524-528
• /
• 2009

An influence factors for soundness evaluation of river levee include resistibility and embankment for piping of ground consisting embankment in case piping, permeability coefficient of ground, height of embankment, the width of crest, material characteristics of embankment and foundation ground, shape of embankment slope, an influence for penetration of rainfall or river water in case slope stability. In this study, it was operated a feasibility investigation of existing design result, stability evaluation for permeability coefficient use and permeability coefficient change of foundation ground to investigate an influence in line with permeability coefficient change for result of river levee penetration analysis. The evaluation results of influence factors, the permeability coefficient used in design and it was evaluated influence in safety factor of piping. After the evaluation of influence factors, the permeability coefficient used in the design appears with the fact that differs in a design report about same soil, Accordingly, the stability investigation of embankment by application of literature data can affect stability evaluation results by change factors like a permeability coefficient, void ratio. It should be certainly used material properties by a test in soundness evaluation of river levee.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to propose evaluation factors for elementary school facility in terms of educational adequacy. The focal point of this study is to clarify the proper measure of educational facility evaluation in the light of specific characteristics of facility. In order to improve the level of educational adequacy, more information is needed regarding school facility design and various factors which affect to the design. This is important works because such information is essential in implementing facility design to meet the needs of the new educational policy. To get the goal, first, it is attempted to analyse the meaning of design information which deeply affect on the school facility design. The design information is classified into three main aspects, such as human aspect, social aspect and physical aspect. The design information regarding the physical space verses human psychology and behavior belongs to category of human aspect. Pedagogic ideology which varies depend upon the time and regions is classified into the category of social aspect. The Physical aspect means efficient equipment performance of space to support educational activities effectively. Secondly, as for the educational adequacy evaluation concern, it is attempted to select more items which usually has been neglected by the existing evaluation criteria which mainly emphasized functional performances only. With the premise of the above, in this paper, it is attempted to propose proper evaluation factors in terms of educational adequacy for school facilities. As the research methods, researching of literature on this subject, field trip, interview, site analysis, and survey is used.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.137-149
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to develop a descriptive paper test item which can evaluate elementary school students' HGA (scientific Hypothesis Generating Ability) and to propose a counting formula that can easily assess student's HGA objectively and quantitatively. To make the test item can possibly evaluate all the students from 6th graders to 3rd graders, the 'rabbit's ear' item is developed. Developed test item was distributed to four different elementary schools in Seoul. Total 280 students who were in the 6th grade solved the item. All the students' reponses to the item were analyzed. Based on the analyzed data evaluation factors and evaluation criteria are extracted to design a Hypothesis Generating ability Quotient (HGQ). As the result 'Explican's Degree of Likeness' and 'Hypothesis' Degree of Explanation' are chosen as evaluation factors. Also precedent evaluation criteria were renewed. At first, Explican's Degree of Likeness evaluation criterion was turned four levels into three levels and each content of evaluation criterion is also modified. Secondly, new evaluation factor 'Hypothesis' Degree of Explanation' was developed as combined three different evaluation criteria, 'level of explican', 'number of explican' and 'structure of explican'. This evaluation factor was designed to assess how the suggested hypothesis can elaborately explain the cause of one phenomenon. Newly designed evaluation factors and evaluation criteria can assess HGA more in detail and reduce the scoring discordant through the markers. Lastly, Developed counting formula is much more simple than precedent Kwon's equation for evaluating the Hypothesis Explanation Quotient. So it could help easily distinguish one student's scientific hypothesis generating ability.