• 제목/요약/키워드: Ethics committee

검색결과 82건 처리시간 0.024초

대한소아청소년정신의학회 의료윤리규정: 왜 필요한가? (The Code of Medical Ethics for the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Why Is It Important?)

  • 구영진;황준원;이문수;양영희;방수영;강제욱;이대환;이주현;곽영숙;김승태;노경선;박성숙;반건호;송동호;안동현;이영식;이정섭;조수철;홍강의
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.2-30
    • /
    • 2016
  • This article provides an overview of the developmental history and rationale of medical ethics to establish the code of ethics and professional conduct of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (KACAP). Most medical professional organizations have their own codes of ethics and conduct because they have continuous responsibility to regulate professional activities and conducts for their members. The Ethics and Award Committee of the KACAP appointed a Task-Force to establish the code of ethics and conduct in 2012. Because bioethics has become global, the Ethics Task Force examined global standards. Global standards in medical ethics and professional conduct adopted by the World Medical Association and the World Psychiatric Association have provided the basic framework for our KACAP's code of ethics and professional conduct. The Code of Ethics of the Americal Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry has provided us additional specific clarifications required for child and adolescent patients. The code of ethics and professional conduct of the KACAP will be helpful to us in ethical clinical practice and will ensure our competence in recognizing ethical violations.

RETRACTED: Design of LEO Constellations with Inter-Satellite Connects Based on the Performance Evaluation of the Three Constellations SpaceX, OneWeb and Telesat

  • Peng Zong;Saeid Kohani
    • 대한원격탐사학회지
    • /
    • 제40권3호
    • /
    • pp.317-317
    • /
    • 2024
  • Notice: This article has been retracted as a result of the review (on May 14, 2024) by the Research Ethics Committee of the Korean Society of Remote Sensing, which confirmed research misconduct (plagiarism). The Korean Journal of Remote Sensing (KJRS) Editorial Office received a report alleging plagiarism in a paper published in KJRS authored by Zong and Kohani (2021). Following a thorough investigation by our Research Ethics Committee, we found significant similarities between the original paper (Lee and Mortari, 2017) and the paper (Zong and Kohani, 2021) published in KJRS. The scope of the plagiarism included a number of identical figures, tables, and equations, as well as textual content. As a result, the Research Ethics Committee of the Korean Society of Remote Sensing has decided to retract the paper (Zong and Kohani. 2021) for deliberately using the ideas, research content, and results of others without proper approval or citation. To preserve academic integrity, we take responsibility for enforcing ethical policies and proceeding with the follow-up actions: 1. Disclosure and preservation of the facts and reasons for the retraction of the plagiarized paper, 2. Prohibition of submissions for the next three years for the authors of the plagiarized paper, 3. Notification to the authors’ affiliated institution of the retraction of the plagiarized paper. We deeply regret to report for retraction of the article and apologize to the readers of KJRS and to the authors of the original work for any inconvenience caused.

The Importance of Research Ethics and the Countermeasures for Journals: Case Study of KJFHC

  • CHA, Seong Soo;YOUN, Myoung Kil
    • 연구윤리
    • /
    • 제3권1호
    • /
    • pp.13-16
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to remind the importance of research ethics in research and publication, and to suggest the direction of research ethics by taking examples of research ethics recently implemented by KJFHC. Research design, data and methodology: With reference to the research of existing researchers, why research ethics is important, what are the violations of research ethics, and the efforts of the editorial committee of KJFHC to strengthen research ethics are presented as an example. Results: It is a reality that the concept of research ethics is becoming more complex and important with the introduction of various new academic fields. At this point in time, researchers need to pay more attention to the easily overlooked concept of research ethics. In research ethics, the most important thing is not punishment through monitoring and supervision, but prevention activities of research ethics that can prevent research misconduct before it occurs. As a preventive activity for research ethics, it can be said that the most important is the establishment of a systematic education system and active educational activities of universities and related institutions. Conclusions: This study avoids the general status and solutions for research ethics, and explains the case of the actual academic journal KJFHC and suggests alternatives.

APEC ENGINEER 윤리강령 (The Code of Ethics for APEC Engineer)

  • 백이호
    • 기술사
    • /
    • 제34권1호
    • /
    • pp.78-82
    • /
    • 2001
  • Korea APEC ENGINEER Monitoring Committee had announced the Code of Ethics for APEC ENGINEER in Oct. 1999. Korea APEC ENGINEER REGISTER had included the ethical model of APEC ENGINEER as required essential subject to be lectured for continuing professional development. The code of ethic is necessary for the benefit of the engineers themselves. The code of ethic is necessary for the benefit of the engineers themselves. The comparison between Korean code of ethics and Australian code of ethics shows that Australian gives more points to the Engineer's role to protect the safety of the public. Korea has too many laws regulating the engineers'practice, which can be handled by the cede of ethics. From now on, we, engineers should pay more attentions to the code of engineer's ethics and establish new and best model of ethics by enough discussion.

  • PDF

대학생 상황판단형 공적윤리 역량 진단도구 개발과 타당화: S대학교를 중심으로 (Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test for a Competencey of Public Ethics: A Case of an University in South Korea)

  • 송영숙
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제16권7호
    • /
    • pp.4478-4488
    • /
    • 2015
  • 본 연구의 목적은 S대학교 사례에 기초하여 대학생 상황판단형 공적윤리 역량 진단도구를 개발하고, 개발된 진단도구의 타당성을 검증하는 것이다. 이를 위해 준거집단과 전문가 위원회를 구성하고, 중요 상황 수집과 상황 시나리오를 개발하였다. 또한 반응대안 개발과 가중치 추출을 실시하고, 519명의 학생들을 대상으로 본 조사를 실시하여 진단도구에 대한 타당도 분석을 수행하였다. 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석결과 2개 요인으로 수렴되었으며, 구조모형의 적합성을 확인하였다. 또한, 기존에 공인된 HEXOCO 성격검사의 정직/겸손성 요인과의 상관분석 결과, 공적윤리 역량의 세부 역량은 정직/겸손성 요인의 하위요인 모두와 통계적으로 유의한 상관을 나타내고 있어 공적윤리 역량 측정도구는 개인의 윤리적 행동과 공공성의 특성파악에 유용하다는 것을 확인하였다. 이와 같은 결과는 대학생들이 인격과 지성을 겸비한 우수 인재로 성장하기 위해 필수적인 공적윤리역량을 진단하는 데 있어 상황판단형 역량진단도구를 대학의 특성에 맞도록 개발하여 학생의 선발이나 역량개발, 교육과정 개편, 교육프로그램 효과 분석 등에 다양하게 활용하는데 시사점을 제시하고 있다.

Operational issues of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Korea

  • Ahn, Na;Park, Jaehak;Roh, Sangho
    • Journal of Veterinary Science
    • /
    • 제23권4호
    • /
    • pp.59.1-59.5
    • /
    • 2022
  • Korean Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is currently facing some operational pressing issues. 1) Review of the animal protocol containing controversial technology. 2) Review of the multi-institution animal protocol. 3) Review of veterinary clinical trials for client-owned animals. 4) Delay in the review process in large institutions with a single IACUC. Here, the following three solutions are proposed to address the above issues. 1) Establishment of public IACUC. 2) Establishment of the Veterinary Clinical Study Committee as an advisory body to the IACUC. 3) Operating multiple committees rather than increasing the number of committee members on a single committee.

간호학 연구의 윤리적 접근 (Bioethical Approach for Nursing Research -Focused on the Use of Research Ethics Committees)

  • 정인숙
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제45권3호
    • /
    • pp.315-322
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: This paper was written to introduce methods of using the research ethics committee (RES) from requesting the initial review to reporting the close-out for nursing researchers. Methods: General ethical principles were described by reviewing the 'Bioethics and Safety Act' and other related guidelines, and constructing some questions and answers. Results: The results were composed of three parts; definition of RES, steps in using RES, and archiving. The 7 steps for using RES were; identifying whether the study needed to be reviewed, by the RES identifying whether the study could be exempted, requesting the initial review after preparing documents, requesting the re-review, requesting an amendment review, requesting a continuing review and reporting the close-out. Conclusion: Nursing researchers need to receive RES approval before starting nursing research involving human subjects. Nursing researchers are urged to use the steps reported in this paper to receive RES approval easily and quickly.

출판하여 살아남기 (Publish or Perish)

  • 최원식
    • 대한핵의학회지
    • /
    • 제37권5호
    • /
    • pp.263-268
    • /
    • 2003
  • Purpose: This editorial deals with the basic structures of medical papers in general and emphasizes the ethics of authors and reviewers. A majority of the content originated from educational material issued at the 2002 Annual Meeting for the Korean Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Current issues from the publication of the Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine were also included.