• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제48권6호
• /
• pp.679-691
• /
• 2018

Purpose: This study was aimed at identifying the types of perceptions of ethical issues among perioperative nurses. Methods: Q-methodology focusing on individual subjectivity was used with data collected in November 2016. Thirty-four Q-statements were selected and scored by the 35 participants on a 9-point scale with normal distribution. Participants were perioperative nurses working in advanced general hospitals and general hospitals. The data were analyzed using the PC-QUANL program. Results: A total of 35 perioperative nurses were classified into 4 factors based on the following viewpoints: self-centered (type 1), onlooking and avoiding (type 2), patient-centered (type 3), and problem-centered (type 4). The 4 factors accounted for 57.84% of the total variance. Individual contributions of factors 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 41.80%, 7.18%, 5.20%, and 3.66%, respectively. Conclusion: The major contribution of this study is the clarification of perioperative nurses' subjective perceptions of ethical issues. These findings can be used in formulating effective strategies for nursing educators, professional nurses, and nursing administrators to improve ethical decision-making abilities and to perform ethical nursing care by the appropriate management of ethical issues in everyday nursing practice.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제46호
• /
• pp.31-62
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 신변보호요원의 윤리적 딜레마에 대한 현상학적 연구로 신변보호요원을 대상으로 윤리적 딜레마에 대한 경험적 사실들을 근거로 의미와 본질을 찾아 신변보호요원들의 윤리적 딜레마에 대한 과정과 경험을 연구하여 본질을 이해하고 예방과 대처를 할 수 있는 기초적자료를 위한 방안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 Colaizzi의 6단계 분석 절차를 사용하여 5년이상 근무를 한 7명의 윤리적 딜레마를 경험한 신변보호요원을 연구대상으로 선정하여, 2015년 10월 1일부터 2015년 11월 20일까지 면접 및 질문지를 통해 자료를 분석하고 연구의 타당성과 윤리적 고려사항을 통해 내용을 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 도출할 수 있었다. 연구 결과 신변보호요원의 윤리적 딜레마의 중심의미는 6개와 20개의 주제진술로 파악되었다. 첫째, 중심의미는 갈등요인으로 주제는 직전관행과의 충돌, 규정 절차 문제, 조직 직무소통, 서비스불일치이다. 둘째, 중심의미는 업무상 역할제한으로 주제는 제도적 관행, 의사결정, 우선순위이다. 셋째, 중심의미는 업무상 상황판단의 어려움으로 주제는 결정의 모호성, 지식 및 경험, 의견대립이다. 넷째, 중심의미는 합리적 자기 방어로 주제는 책임감결여, 합리화, 의도적 외면, 자괴감이다. 다섯째, 중심의미는 대인관계 어려움으로 주제는 상 하관계, 중간 관리자 역할, 비협조적 업무, 불쾌한 언행이다. 여섯째, 중심의미는 비밀유지로 주제는 묻혀진 행태, 불법관행이다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.382-390
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 호텔종사원을 대상으로 하여 윤리적 리더십, 스포츠맨십, 이타심, 통제위치와의 관계를 연구하였다. 윤리적 리더십이란 개인의 행위에 대한 결과와 상호관계를 통하여 규범적으로 적절한 행동을 보이는 것이며, 추종자들에게 쌍방향 커뮤니케이션, 강화, 그리고 의사결정과정을 통하여 그러한 행동을 하도록 촉진하는 것이다. 이러한 윤리적 리더십은 종사원의 태도와 윤리적 행위에 긍정적 영향을 미치며, 궁극적으로 사업부서나 조직성과에도 긍정적 영향을 미칠 것으로 기대한다. 이에 본 연구는 윤리적 리더십이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향관계를 실증적으로 규명하고자 문헌연구와 더불어 호텔기업의 종업원들을 대상으로 241부의 설문지를 최종분석에 사용하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 윤리적 리더십에 대한 지각은 스포츠맨십에 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 윤리적 리더십은 이타심과의 관계에서도 유의성이 검증되었다. 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 인력관리의 경제적 효용성을 위한 시사점과 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.327-339
• /
• 2015

Purpose: This study was done to identify the experiences of ethical issues and needs for ethics education in clinical nurses. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used and data were collected in 2013. Participants were 428 clinical nurses working in the general units of seven medical hospitals. The Ethical Issues in Clinical Practice Tool was used. Data analysis was performed using SPSS/WIN 19.0. Results: 'Providing care with a possible risk to your health' was the most frequent and disturbing ethical problems for nurses. The highest helpful ethical topic was 'the patients' right, autonomy and informed consent'. The ethical issue experience was significantly different according to education level, work units, and type of employment. The necessity of ethics education was statistically different according to age, religion, level of education, duration of working as RN, position, shift type, and continuing education about nursing ethics. Conclusion: The results of this study show that nursing educators need to provide practical ethics education based on frequent ethical issues and helpful education topics. These findings can be used in developing effective education strategies for clinical nurses and nursing organizations to improve nurses' ethical decision-making abilities.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.496-509
• /
• 1995

This study was conducted to identify the attitude of ethical dilemmas in hospital nurses. Ethical dilemmas were categorized into four areas : human life area, clients area, nursing practice area, and nurses-co-worker area. 354 nurses working in clinical settings were selected in Seoul and Kangwon area. Data were gathered from 26, June to 10, July, 1994 by structured guestionnaires. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data. The results obtained from data were as follows : 1) In human life area mean score was 3.03. This area showed remarkabale individual differences between utilitarian and deontological position. 2) In clients area mean score was 3.94. It means that nurses tend to take a deontological position. 3) In nursing practice area mean score was 3.41. It means that nurses tend to take a slightly deontological position. 4) In nurses-co-worker area mean score was 3.88. It means that nurses tend to take a deontological position. To conclude, clinents area, nursing practice area, and nurses-co-worker area taken deontological position. Most nurse's primary concern was the 'welfare of the patients' which is to fundamental ethical professional practice. But nurses experienced more ethical dilemmas in human life area than others. Therefore, nurses should be prepared to make in-dependent decision that based on bio-ethics and professional ethics.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.275-288
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 간호사를 대상으로 임상적 의사결정능력에 미치는 영향을 파악하고자 시도되었다. G도 병원에 근무하는 156명을 자료수집 하였다. IBM SPSS WIN/25.0을 이용하여 t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, Multiple regression을 사용하였다. 대상자의 임상적 의사결정능력에 가장 영향을 미치는 요인은 간호연구 '매우관심', 비판적 사고성향, '석/박사', 총 임상경력 '20년1개월 이상', 도덕적 행동, 간호연구 '중요하다', '미혼', 총 임상경력 '5년1개월-10년', 부서근무경력 '3년1개월-5년' 순이었다. 설명력은 51.4%이었다. 간호연구에 관심과 중요성, 도덕적 행동과 학력, 경력이 임상적 의사결정능력에 영향을 미치는 변수임을 확인하였다는 점에서 의의가 있었다. 본 연구결과는 프로그램 개발 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다. 또한, 윤리적 딜레마 상황에서 임상적 의사결정능력을 높일 수 있는 교육 프로그램을 개발하여 적용하고 그 효과를 검증할 것을 제언한다.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제29권
• /
• pp.218-240
• /
• 1996

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2017

자율주행차량은 다양한 사회 문제를 해결하기 위한 대안으로 각광받고 있다. 자율주행차량의 도입 및 관련 기술 개발 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있으나 자율주행차량에 탑재된 운행 알고리즘에 따른 실제 운행의 영향력에 대한 연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 한정된 물리적 환경에서 공리주의와 사회적 합의를 고려하여 차량 운행 중 발생 가능한 상황인 중앙선 침범 상황에 대한 시나리오를 설정하고 시뮬레이션을 통해 윤리적 판단이 필요한 상황에서의 자율주행차량의 운행에 따른 영향을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 자율주행차량이 안전도를 판단하여 옆 차선으로 차선을 변경한 시나리오에서 사고에 따른 영향이 더 큰 것으로 나타났다. 또한 자율주행차량의 판단에 따라 전방 충돌한 경우, 자율주행차량의 기능에 의해 교통류 개선 효과가 있음을 확인하였다.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제11권10호
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 2020

Purpose: It suggests that making a policy and strategies in a way of AI and its impact of commercialization on economic efficiency, social custom ethics. Research design, data, and methodology: The paper has analyzed the data based on the proposed model when derived as AI vs. FI job, etc. It is very different for each professional evaluation, which is artificial intelligence or robot job. One concept case was selected as a substitute job, with a relatively low level of occupation ability, such as direct labors, easily replaced. By the induction data has resulted in modeling. Results: The paper suggests that AI at high level become something how to make real decisions on ethical value modeling. Through physical simulation with the deduction data, it can be tuned to design and control what has not been solved, from human senses to climate. Conclusion: For the exploiting of new AI decision-making jobs in markets, the deduction data is possible to prove to AI's Decision-making that the percentage who can easily have different leadership as is different for each person. what is generated by some information silos may be applied to occupation societies. The empirical results indicate the deduction data that if AI determines ethical decisions (VC) for that modifications, it may replace future jobs.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.49-52
• /
• 2017

Purpose - To improve and strengthen existing publication and research ethics, KODISA has identified and presented various cases which have violated publication and research ethics and principles in recent years. The editorial office of KODISA has been providing and continues to provide advice and feedback on publication ethics to researchers during peer review and editorial decision making process. Providing advice and feedback on publication ethics will ensure researchers to have an opportunity to correct their mistakes or make appropriate decisions and avoid any violations in research ethics. The purpose of this paper is to identify different cases of ethical violation in research and inform and educate researchers to avoid any violations in publication and research ethics. Furthermore, this article will demonstrate how KODISA journals identify and penalize ethical violations and strengthens its publication ethics and practices. Research design, data and methodology - This paper examines different types of ethical violation in publication and research ethics. The paper identifies and analyzes all ethical violations in research and combines them into five general categories. Those five general types of ethical violations are thoroughly examined and discussed. Results - Ethical violations of research occur in various forms at regular intervals; in other words, unethical researchers tend to commit different types of ethical violations repeatedly at same time. The five categories of ethical violation in research are as follows: (1) Arbitrary changes or additions in author(s) happen frequently in thesis/dissertation related publications. (2) Self plagiarism, submitting same work or mixture of previous works with or without using proper citations, also occurs frequently, but the most common type of plagiarism is changing the statistical results and using them to present as the results of the empirical analysis; (3) Translation plagiarism, another ethical violation in publication, is difficult to detect but occurs frequently; (4) Fabrication of data or statistical analysis also occurs frequently. KODISA requires authors to submit the results of the empirical analysis of the paper (the output of the statistical program) to prevent this type of ethical violation; (5) Mashup or aggregator plagiarism, submitting a mix of several different works with or without proper citations without alterations, is very difficult to detect, and KODISA journals consider this type of plagiarism as the worst ethical violation. Conclusions - There are some individual cases of ethical violation in research and publication that could not be included in the five categories presented throughout the paper. KODISA and its editorial office should continue to develop, revise, and strengthen their publication ethics, to learn and share different ways to detect any ethical violations in research and publication, to train and educate its editorial members and researchers, and to analyze and share different cases of ethical violations with the scholarly community.