• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.21-51
• /
• 2024

Since the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009, the importance of nonbank financial institutions in macroprudential management has increased significantly. Consequently, major countries and international financial institutions have been actively discussing and implementing macroprudential supervision and regulation for non-bank financial institutions (NBFI). In this context, this paper analyzes the systemic risk of both banks and non-bank sectors (securities firms and insurance companies) in South Korea over different time periods. Using the widely recognized ΔCoVaR methodology for measuring systemic risk, the analysis reveals that systemic risk increased substantially across all three sectors (banks, securities firms, and insurance companies) during the Global Financial Crisis, the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the banking sector exhibited relatively high systemic risk compared to the securities and insurance sectors, the relative differences in systemic risk varied across the different crisis periods. Notably, during the margin call crisis in March of 2020, the gap in systemic risk between the banking and securities sectors decreased significantly compared to that during both the Global Financial Crisis and the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, indicating that securities firms had a more substantial impact on risk in the overall financial system during this period. Furthermore, I analyze the impact of the issuance of equity-linked securities (ELS) by financial institutions on systemic risk, as measured by ΔCoVaR, finding that an increase in the outstanding balance of ELS issuance by financial institutions had an impact on increasing ΔCoVaR during the three crisis periods. These findings underscore the growing importance of non-bank financial institutions in relation to South Korea's macroprudential management and supervision. To address this evolving landscape, enhanced monitoring and regulatory measures focusing on non-bank systemic risk are essential components of maintaining financial stability in the country.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.93-100
• /
• 2009

In this paper, we review widely used methods to extract local volatility surfaces (LVSs) from implied volatility surfaces (IVSs) and suggest a model averaging method for constructing implied and local volatility surfaces weighted by trading volumes. It makes use of model averaging method by means of bandwidth priors, and then produces a robust LVS estimation. The method is shown to provide the information about the confidence interval of estimators as well as a rather less variable weighted mean value for the IVS and LVS. To show the merits of our proposed method, we conduct simulations on equity-linked warrants (ELWs) with reasonable and acceptable results.

• 서비스연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.103-122
• /
• 2018

본 연구의 목적은 금융마케팅 서비스에서 투자자들이 미흡하게 느끼는 ELS 상품이 실제로 획득할 수 있는 수익률이 얼마나 되는지를 분석하여 ELS에 대한 투자효과를 규명함으로써 ELS 투자방향을 제시하는데 있다. 연구방법은 스텝다운형 ELS를 대상으로 2001년 1월부터 2017년 8월까지 200개월 동안 만기 3년의 조기상환조건 달성확률, 만기상환조건 달성확률, 조기상환추정수익률, 만기상환추정수익률을 산출하였다. 분석결과는 조기상환조건 100% 달성확률은 74.5%이었으며, 조기상환조건 95%는 달성확률이 83.0%, 90%는 89.5%, 85%는 92.5%, 80%는 96.5%, 75%는 97.5% 이었다. 가장 낮은 75% 경우에 만기까지 보유할 확률은 2.5%인 것으로 분석되어 조기상환조건이 달성될 확률이 높았다. 만기도래했을 때 주가상승률이 만기상환조건 65% 이내에 있을 확률은 98.5%이었으며, 만기상환조건 60%, 58%, 57%, 55%, 50%, 45%는 달성확률이 100% 이었다. 만기상환조건 65%는 원금손실 리스크가 1.5%정도 있는 것으로 분석되어서 만기에 약정된 수익률을 달성할 확률이 높았다. ELS 투자의 유의방안으로는 만기상환조건의 비율이 낮은 상품을 선택하고, 조기상환조건 비율이 높은 상품을 선택해야 하며, 주가지수가 박스권 형성이 예상 될 때 투자하는 것이 유리하다.