• 대한원격탐사학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.433-446
• /
• 2019

환경적 가치를 보존하고 개발로 인한 부정적 영향을 최소화하기 위하여 환경영향평가 제도가 수행되고 있다. 현재의 환경영향평가의 객관성 강화하기 위해 데이터 기반으로 전환이 필요한 시점이다. 또한 국가 차원의 다양한 공간정보 제공 및 환경영향평가에 공간정보 연계 가능성을 통해 환경영향평가제도의 공간정보 활용 확대가 요구되고 있다. 그러나 현재 환경영향평가에서 공간정보가 체계적으로 활용되고 있지 않는다. 또한 환경영향평가 업무 종사자(담당 공무원, 환경영향평가서 대행기관, 검토기관 등)들은 공간정보 개념에 대한 이해도가 부족하여 효율적으로 활용하는데 한계가 있다. 이러한 공간정보 활용의 한계점을 개선하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 공간정보 표준화(좌표, 속성 테이블) 방안을 제안하였다. 이를 위해, 국가 공인의 좌표계 및 표준을 기반으로 표준 좌표계를 제안하였으며, 환경매체별 조사 항목의 데이터 테이블의 기본항목을 9개로 설정하였다. 마지막으로, 전술된 표준화를 실제 환경영향평가 사업에 대하여 시범 적용하였다. 본 연구에서 제안한 표준화 방안은 환경영향평가에서의 공간정보 활용 활성화 및 평가 분야의 범위 확장에 기여할 것으로 사료된다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2014

This study, focusing on the area expansion of limestone mines, identifies the problems of Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) and what impact the current problems exert on another mines developing process. The legal relations analysis reveals that the Management of Mountainous Districts Act and other related laws effect on EIA process, especially the case of area expansion of limestone mines excluded from EIA. However, these problems can create mismatch with the policy goal of EIA system and have a negative impact on the environment in the future. A series of indepth interviews with managers in related agencies found that those agencies have been unaware of the seriousness of the problem. Without any strategy, negative result made by development activities would get more serious and sustainable development may not be possible at all. In order to solve these problems, government should modify the current interdependent legal provision and create the incentive structure to participate actively related agency in the EIA system.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 1993

We live in an age of information and an era of rising environmental awareness. As a result, efficient and judicious use of environmental information has become a prerequisite to planning and management of environmental affairs in contemporary societies. So, we have embarked on a study of Environmental Information System(EIS). In the first article, we discussed the status analysis of EIS in Korea, USA, and Japan. This study as the second project has three major components. First, it classifies items and sources of 22 EIA factors. Second, it explains building of environmental information comprising geographic and attribute data of 17 factors. Finally, the study presents applications of EIS as an alternative assessment of suitability analysis. Based on these analysis, the study makes some recommendations and conclusions.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.195-202
• /
• 2005

The health risks from the magnetic fields exposure have been brought out difficulties in the construction of transformer substation. According to several epidemiologic studies and the relevant international organizations, magnetic fields should not exceed the exposure limits of 3mG for the people living near electric power lines. The rigid regulation of the exposure levels for the elementary school and residental areas has been established already in Switzerland and Italy. Since 1998, the environmental impact assessment system in Korea has been reviewed for power-frequency magnetic field by precautionary policies. In this study, the possible application of Prior Environmental Performance Review System for the transformer substation was reviewed from the points of the properties of the powerfrequency magnetic fields. The ranges and survey methods of the assessment for the transformer substation were proposed. The ranges of magnetic fields was between 300m to 500m for the 345kV transformer substation. It is necessary to develop further specific assessment methods for various high-voltage transformer substations.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.81-95
• /
• 2008

The study is intended to develop the measures to introduce the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) project manager (Environmental Assessor), who will be responsible for leading the EIA task. This role requires a quality standard of expertise in the area of natural science, social science, knowledge and technology on environment design mechanism, and the integrated approaches that combine the relevant policies and systems. To facilitate the system, the certificate will be given to the person who is well acquainted with the knowledge on EIA with relevant experiences, thereby authorizing them to coordinate the assessment task for reliable outcome. Hence, the need for introducing the system is very crucial. The EIA project manager, as a guide for an EIA project team, shall be the person who has a comprehensive understanding of the project, the knowledge about the principal for implementation of EIA and the expertise in structuring the management system, with a skill to maintain the good relationship with the people engaged in the project. To that end, it is highly recommended to set up such a certificate system to be incorporated in the college curriculum.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.107-120
• /
• 2007

The introduction of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has strengthened and extended the value of environmental impact assessment (EIA) as a foundational tool for sustainable development. In particular, SEA helps to overcome the limitation of project EIA as a 'stand alone' approach, applied relatively late in the decision making cycle. SEA is applied to policy, plan and programme (3P) proposals, when major alternatives are open and systematic consideration can be given to their environmental effects. This process also corresponds to options appraisal of development proposal to find the best practical outcome having regard to all potential impacts. There are imperatives for sustainable development (SD) that are shaping future directions for EIA and SEA internationally, regionally and locally. There is a shift toward more integrative approaches of using EIA and SEA as sustainability tools in cooperated environmental management system (EMS). Korea has established and applied EIA for over twenty years for various projects. Given its coverage, the current EIA system is SEA exclusive. The Prior Environmental Review System (PERS), which is a SEA-type of system, was applied in the late 1990s, mainly for various developing planning programs. The current PERS has been modified as a SEA type system, but in general, policy is not going to be covered.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.345-352
• /
• 2018

기후변화 적응 주류화를 위하여 세 가지 기후변화영향평가 시행 방안을 검토하였다. 첫째, 신법 마련 및 개별 시행, 둘째, 신법 마련 및 환경영향평가 틀 내 제도 시행, 셋째, 기존 환경영향평가 틀 내 시행하는 것이다. 이 논문에서는 세 가지 방안의 내용, 장 단점을 분석하였다. 그리고 신법 하에서 제도를 개별 시행할 경우의 개략적인 평가 내용과 환경영향평가 틀 내에서 시행하고자 할 경우 관련 법률, 규정개정(안)을 제안하였다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 1997

Vegetation Index(VI) derived from remote sensing data is used to assess ecosystem factor in Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) process. Ecosystem factor has been prepared by Degree of Green Naturality(DGN) mainly in Environmental Impact Statements. But DGN has room for improvement of assessing actual ecosystem situation. The objectives of this study are to define the relationship between field measure DGN and VI, and to develop methodologies to use VI for assessing the status and conditions of natural ecosystem. For verification of DGN and VI, 35 sites using global positioning system are selected and reviewed. Correlation coefficients of DGN and VI shows highly as 0.69. Also VI in EIA found it can be applied to assess ecosystem. It concluded that VI as well as DGN can be applied to assess ecosystem newly and largescale.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.69-76
• /
• 1994

GIS 기법을 이용한 환경영향평가 방법론을 설명한다. 도시(Kirovsk, Apaity, Murmank, 북극지역)에서의 생태적 갈등영역의 탐지에 대한 작가의 경험 뿐 아니라 모스크바 지역에서의 금속성 비료이용의 결과평가의 경험에 대한 특성을 단수하게 설명한다.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제16권7호
• /
• pp.847-853
• /
• 2007

In Korean coastal areas, land reclamations are main development projects that should be based on environmental impact assessment(EIA), because those human interventions can change coastlines, damage tidal flats, and pollute adjacent areas to threat seafood safety and devaluate overall ecosystem service value. Existing procedures of the EIA for land reclamation projects were diagnosed and evaluated to enhance them. Problems were identified in the designation of survey areas, the consistency in survey sites and periods, the standardization of survey methods and reports, the confidence of survey results and the verification of predictions. Lack of integration was noticeable and could be improved by synthesizing different assessments from topography geography, marine physics, marine chemistry and marine biology. We suggest that successful precautionary marine environment management requires readjusting the cost of EIA, recruiting experts in marine environment, constructing database and establishing specialized assessment system.