• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.63-68
• /
• 2012

The aim of this study is to evaluate current policies and suggest the way of overcome financial impediments to the energy efficiency function of residential buildings. Based on this analysis the paper enumerates policy recommendations for enhancing how energy efficiency is addressed in building codes and other policies for residential buildings. For achieving this goal, this study conducts the cost-benefit analysis to measure total energy savings and associated total cost. The results of study shows that the cost is greater than the benefit from 1st to 4th year but the benefit will be greater than the cost for the rest of the year. In addition, this study designs a financial support method and an implementation mechanism. Investment from the capital market will take place with the government's interest subsidy. Home retrofit will be undertaken with low interest rate with 2.5% and the return will be paid by a monthly energy bill. The results of this study provides some useful insights for the policy design, including the importance of developing information tools for providing appropriate information to households.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신재생에너지학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.600-603
• /
• 2005

U.S. National Research Council proposed benefits framework for energy R&D project as economic benefits, environmental benefits, security benefits and knowledge benefits. Following this framework, U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory evaluated the projected benefits of Federal Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Programs in the indicators of energy-expenditure savings, energy system cost savings, $CO_2$ emissions reductions. oil savings, natural gas saving and avoided additions to central conventional power. As this result, geothermal energy have predominant position in the energy-expenditure savings, natural gas saving and avoided addi t ions to central conventional power to FY2050. The projected benefits, in monetary value, of the whole supply-potential of geothermal energy in Korea were evaluated as 480.2 billion Won, 43.1 billion Won and 135.8 billion Won for the private energy-cost savings, social environmental-cost savings, and import energy-cost saving, respectively.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2014

Since the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) would be started in 2012, the use of renewable energy should be 11% of total energy use including bio-fuel in 2030. The economic efficiency for renewable energy in B power plant was considered with the bio-diesel, wind power and solar power. The Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit/Cost Ratio(BC) were used for the economic efficiency with the cost and benefit analysis. In case of bio-diesel, the cost resulted from the fuel conversion and the benefit would be created with trade and environmental improvement. With regard to wind power and solar power, the construction cost would be required and benefit factors would be same as the bio-diesel. The wind power was the best of economic efficiency of renewable energy as the results of NPV and BC ratio. Whereas, the market of wind power was very popular and the techniques of wind power has been developing rapidly.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.39-45
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the energy saving and cost benefit analysis of the Low-income Energy Efficiency Treatment Program supported by KOREF(Korea Energy Foundation). This program was launched in 2007 and performs building energy retrofit for the low-income and energy poverty houses. Method: Energy simulation and cost benefit analysis were accomplished for the low-income detached houses. The structure of detached house was a lot og block structure, wood frame (single glass) and concrete roof. Baseline model of the low-income detached houses was proposed. Result: Annual heating energy consumptions were decreased by about 3.2% with the window system replacement(Case 1), 9.3% with reinforcement of insulation(Case2), and 12.5% with both(Case 3) compared to those of baseline model. The construction cost will be recouped within 5 years for the Case 1, 3 years for the Case 2, and 3 years for the Case 3. Case 3 was the most cost beneficient construction method in the analyzed cases in this study.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.40-60
• /
• 2020

단일 에너지 시스템으로부터 다양한 종류의 제품이 생산될 때, 공통비를 각 제품으로 배분하는 방법론은 생산자와 구매자의 손익과 직접적으로 관련되기 때문에 매우 중요하다. 열병합발전에서 전기와 열의 비용배분 방법론에는 Heat 방법, Work 방법, Benefit distribution 방법, Exergy 방법 등이 있다. 전 세계적으로 Benefit distribution 방법이 가장 많이 알려져 있고, Exergy 방법은 열공학자들 사이에서 크게 인정받고 있다. 검토 결과 Benefit distribution 방법은 일반 상식과 어긋나는 결과가 도출되어 합리성이 낮고, Exergy 방법은 일반 상식과 일치하는 결과가 도출되어 합리성이 높다고 판단된다. 회계학에서는 메리트 방법론으로 계산하여 그 결과를 생산자와 구매자 간의 협상에 활용하고 있으나, 열공학에서는 엑서지 방법론의 합리성을 논문으로만 서술하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 메리트 방법론과 엑서지 방법론의 합리성을 비교 검토하는 데 있으며, 생산자와 구매자가 각 방법론의 합리성을 이해할 수 있도록 세부적으로 서술하고자 한다.

• 대한건축학회논문집:구조계
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.147-157
• /
• 2020

With the increasing obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the building sector, the government has been gradually expanding its obligation to zero-energy buildings since 2020. Since the ZEB certification took effect in 2017, 48 preliminary and main certifications have been completed as of March 2019, and most of them are public buildings or even certified, but have earned Grade 5 of ZEB. This means that compared with the number of annual building permits registered in Korea, the figure is insignificant, and that it receives little if not mandatory. Therefore, this study investigated empirical cases of ZEB additional construction cost and conducted cost benefit analysis according to changes in ZEB additional construction cost based on a preliminary feasibility analysis project recently conducted by the KDI. In addition, considering the public buildings, the social costs were considered, and the cost-benefit analysis method was the same as the KDI's preliminary feasibility analysis method. The analysis shows that if the ratio of ZEB additional construction cost is more than 5 percent, it is analyzed that there is no economic feasibility, and considering that the ratio of additional construction cost in the cases of ZEB in Korea is 17 percent to 38 percent, it will not be easy to obtain ZEB certification in terms of cost. Finally, to narrow these differences in cost and economic aspects, the overseas low energy and ZEB incentive examples proposed measures such as the concept of subsidy payment in Illinois and the compensation of social costs to private ZEB.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신재생에너지학회 2009년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.196-199
• /
• 2009

Korean government decided to give a subsidy for renewable energy system of green home. This policy will make an appeal to consumers. But For success of this policy, Economic benefit of consumer is essential. In this study, benefit and cost is seperated to consumer part and government part, respectively. consumer's benefit is energy saving and asset value increment. Consumer's cost is real input money except government's subsidy. Government's benefit is consist of energy import reduction, carbon discharge reduction and new production increment, As a result, the government subsidy will not so enough to activate the green home. PV system for the korean general apartment has the payback period of 19 years. So, For the dissemination of renewable energy of green home, more strong subsidy policy and more economic technoloy development is requested.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.179-186
• /
• 2012

온실가스의 증가로 인한 기후변화가 큰 이슈로 대두되고 있는 시점에서 순산소발전 실증사업은 화석에너지를 이용한 발전 부문의 이산화탄소 저감을 위한 한 가지 방안으로 주목을 받고 있다. 순산소발전 실증사업으로 인해 발생하는 전력공급 편익, 온실가스 저감 편익, 환경오염 물질 배출저감 편익, 국내외 시장 진출로 인한 부가가치 창출편익을 추정한다. 이러한 배경 하에서 내부수익률, 편익/비용 비율, 순현재가치의 기준을 이용하여 순산소발전 실증사업의 경제적 타당성을 분석하고자 한다. 순산소발전 실증사업의 경제적 타당성을 분석한 결과, 순산소발전 실증사업의 순현재가치, 편익/비용 비율, 내부수익률은 각각 681,620백만원, 1.69, 21.4%로 분석되었다. 이 분석결과들은 각각 0, 1.0, 5.5%를 초과하므로, 3가지 경제성 판단 지표 모두 본 사업이 경제적 타당성을 확보함을 의미한다. 이러한 분석 결과는 화력발전부문의 온실가스 저감을 위한 정책결정에 있어서 유용하게 활용될 수 있다.

• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제54권8호
• /
• pp.396-400
• /
• 2005

This paper proposes the cost analysis on the energy efficient equipment when this equipment is participated in the demand-side bidding. Conventional demand-side bidding is exercised through load re-distribution. However if this load reduction is exercised by the use of high efficient equipment, its effect will be assumed to be more economical. This paper analyses this cost-benefit effect of high efficient equipment in the demand-side bidding.

• 지역연구
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.49-59
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 경부고속도로 일부구간(신갈JC~수원신갈IC)에 압전에너지 하베스터를 설치한 후 수확된 전력으로 주거지의 가로등 전력을 대체하는 정책에 대한 비용편익분석을 실시하였다. 이때 비시장재효과인 하베스터 설치에 따른 주민의 사회적 편익은 구체적으로 지역 주민의 삶의 질 향상 효과, Blackout 대비효과 등을 포함하며 조건부가치측정법을 사용하여 추정하였다. 분석 결과 압전 에너지하베스팅 기술의 고속도로 적용은 사회적 편익효과를 고려하였을 때 경제성이 있는 것으로 나타났다.