• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.339-358
• /
• 2004

This article discusses the critical issues on obligations and responsibilities in electronic funds transfer(EFT) between Article 4A of the UCC and the Model Law on International Credit Transfers of UNCITRAL. The electronic fund transfers begin with the issue of the payment order by the originator to the receiving bank for the beneficiary. All obligations and responsibilities of parties concerned occur when the receiving bank accept the originator's payment order to executes. So far, some the most compelling studies have focused on the legal obligations and responsibilities of electronic fund transfer in Korea. Therefore, In this paper, we would like to examine some problems of obligations and responsibilities in electronic fund transfer from Article 4A of UCC and the Model Law on International Credit Transfers of UNCITRAL. And also we present some Implications to reform EFT Law for the efficient application.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.123-140
• /
• 2007

This paper wants to suggest some issues on the acceptance of payment order in Electronic Funds Transfer of USA. The result can be summarized as fellows; First, originator's bank accepts a payment order when it executes the order. Secondly, beneficiary's bank accepts a payment order at the earliest of the following times: (1) when the bank pays the beneficiary as stated in Section 4A-405(a) or 4A-405(b), (2) when the bank notifies the beneficiary of receipt of the order or that the account of the beneficiary has been credited with respect to the order unless the notice indicates that the bank is rejecting the order or that funds with respect to the order may not be withdrawn or used until receipt of payment from of the order. (3) when the bank receives payment of the entire amount of the sender's order pursuant to Section 4A-403(a)(1) or 4A-403(a)(2). Lastly, the acceptance of a payment order cannot occur before the order is received by the receiving bank.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제15권
• /
• pp.59-87
• /
• 2001

In recent years electronic fund transfers covered by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act 1978 for consumer protection and the Article 4A of Uniform Commercial Code(U.C.C.) 1989 for wholesale electronic payments in United States. Electronic fund transfers carried out by use of a wire transfer network, automated clearing house, or other communication system of a clearing house or other association of banks such as direct deposit, Fedwire, automated teller machine, point-of-sale, and credit card transactions have been increasingly common in consumer transactions and wholesale transactions. Especially, the Article 4A of U.C.C. governs the rights and obligations associated with transactions such as an issue and acceptance of payment order, execution of sender's payment order by receiving bank, and payment. These legal frameworks in connection with electronic fund transfers in United States can play a leading role in establishing model not only within the United States, but also as a basis for developments of electronic commerce law in Korea including other countries.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.43-63
• /
• 2017

본 논문은 거액지급결제시스템인 캐나다의 LVTS와 미국의 Fedwire를 비교하여 연구하였다. 왜냐하면 양국은 국제결제은행(BIS) 지급결제제도위원회(CPSS)에 참가하고 있는 주요 14개국 중 동일한 북미경제권이며, LVTS와 Fedwire는 양국을 대표하는 거액지급결제시스템이기 때문이다. 연구의 결과, 양국의 시스템은 지급시스템의 제도적 기반과 지배구조, 참가방법, 지급지시의 착오, 위험관리정책 및 지급의 최종성과 효과가 다르다는 결론에 도달하였다. 또한 양 지급시스템의 연구를 통하여 한국의 지급결제시스템이 참여자들에게 인정받으면서 더욱 보편적인 시스템으로 발전하기 위한 정책적 시사점으로 다음과 같은 점을 제시하였다. 첫째, 소액과 거액이체시스템을 분리운영하고 있는 미국 및 캐나다와 다르게 한국은 통합시스템을 운영해왔다. 비록 연계결제망의 구축으로 10억원이상의 거액자금도 1회이체가 가능하게 되었으나 이를 통제할 수 있는 제도적 장치, 즉, 자금이체 주체별 및 금액별로 분리하여 참가자를 규율하는 것이 바람직하다. 둘째, 미국이나 캐나다에서 규정하고 있는 착오에 관한 명확한 정의 및 유형에 관하 규정이 한국의 제도에서는 명확한 명시가 없다. 참가자를 안정적으로 규율하기 위해서는 이를 별도로 규정할 필요가 있다. 마지막으로 이체규모에 제한이 사라진 만큼 참가기관에게 지급시스템 운영 기술력 확보, 적절한 비상시에 대비 백업자원 및 엄격한 보안 및 기술 요구조건 등을 추가하여 참가요건을 더욱 엄격히 요구할 필요가 있다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.139-154
• /
• 2008

This research want to discuss some issues about payment system of America. This research focuses on comparing ACH with Fedwire. Firstly Fedwire is the payment system for only large-dollar transfer(Large-Value Transfer System; LVTS), while ACH(Automated Clearing House)payment mainly applies a consumer account. Secondly ACH transaction is either credit or debit transfer, while Fedwire is only credit transfer. Thirdly the communication system of Fedwire has twoway method, telephonelike communication network, but ACH is oneway store and forward electronic mail. At present LVTS divides into RTGS(Real-Time Gross Settlement) and DNS(Deferred Net Settlement). However Fedwire uses either RTGS(instantaneous for every transaction) or DNS(net net transaction) but ACH uses only DNS(net net transaction). Fourthly ACH is substantially cheaper than the Fedwire payment. lastly security is important in both Fedwire and ACH, it is even more crucial in Fedwire In addition, for each transaction, Fedwire may entail individual instantaneous confirmation to the originator and notification to the receiver, whereas ACH do not.

• 정보화사회
• /
• 통권113호
• /
• pp.10-15
• /
• 1997

전자상거래란 '기업과 기업간 거래관계의 모든 측면에서 걸쳐 전자적으로 비지니스를 행하는 것'이라고 정의할 수 있으며, 이는 정형화된 전자문서를 주고 받는 전자문서(EDI), 전자우편(E-Mail), Fax, Bar-Code, 전자자금이체(EFT:Electronic Funds Transfer), 화일전송, 전자정보서비스(디렉토리, 카탈로그, 시장통계, 기술적인 문서 등 데이터베이스 서비스), 음성사서함, 이미지 시스템, 비디오 메세징 등 그 종류와 형태가 다양하다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.35-53
• /
• 2010

In connection with a non-cash payment through the banking system, "finality of payment" has acquired diverse meanings. In according to Section 4A-209(2), the acceptance by the beneficiary's bank by means of receiving payment "pursuant to section 4A-403(a)(1) or 4A-403(a)(2)," constitutes final settlement through a Federal Reserve Bank or through a funds-transfer system" or credit to the account of the beneficiary's bank. Above of all, Acceptance by beneficiary's bank is the most important. According to 4A-209(b), the beneficiary's bank can accept a payment order in one of four ways : First, by paying the beneficiary; obligating itself to pay the beneficiary or, Second, by notifying the beneficiary of receipt of the order or notifying the beneficiary that its account was credited or, Thirdly, by receiving full payment from the sender's order or Lastly, by passage of time, i.e., the opening of the next funds transfer business day of the bank following the payment date of the order. A beneficiary's bank is considered to have accepted a payment order when the earliest of the four means of acceptance occurs.

• 정보학연구
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.197-214
• /
• 2002

전자상거래의 도입으로 인하여 전신송금환(T/T)${\cdot}$우편송금환(M/T)${\cdot}$송금수표(D/D)와 같은 단순송금방식(Remittance), 현금결제방식(COD)과 서류결제방식(CAD), 지급인도조건(D/P)${\cdot}$인수인도조건(D/A)과 같은 추심 결제방식, 신용장(Letter of Credit)방식 등 기존의 무역결제수단이 신용카드(Credit Card), 전자화폐(Electronic Cash), 전자자금이체(EFT; Electronic Fund Transfer), 무역카드(TradeCard), SWIFT의 전자신용장(Electronic L/C), 볼레로 시스템 등의 전자결제시스템으로 전환되었다. 이에 본고는 대표적 전자무역결제시스템인 볼레로와 무역카드를 비교${\cdot}$분석함으로써 이들 시스템의 활용가능성을 모색하고자 하는 것이다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.27-43
• /
• 2009

This article explored the customers protection regulations in electronic payment system by Article 4A of the UCC and EFTA of 1978 and by Electronic Financial Transaction Act of Korea. Both Korea and America have various regulations to protect concerned parties(customers). For examples, the errors of payment order, money-back guarantee, and unauthorized payment order etc. First, this Article focuses on the allocation of risk of loss caused by ambiguous term in payment orders that do not express the subjective intention of the senders. Second, most rights and obligations created by Article 4A of America can be varied with the agreement of affected parties. But there are some exceptions. The exceptions include the money-back guarantee. So Receiving bank have to pay to originator the ordered money included interest. However, Korea also has money-back guarantee but bank do not pay interest to sender. Lastly, Electronic Funds Transfer Act of 1978 and Regulation E has US$ 50 regulation in order to protect customers on the unauthorized payment order. Article 4A imposes duty to detect unauthorized payment orders to originator in relation to the establishment of commercially reasonable security procedure, while Korean law imposes the duty to notify the bank in order to decrease the loss resulted from unauthorized payment order.

• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2015

Online or e-banking has been adopted as key banking innovation in Uganda adopted by all financial institutions in the country. This research explored the state of e-banking and its efficacy in Uganda banking industry. A correlation analysis approach was adopted for this research. In Uganda, the banking sector has been liberalized with telecommunications allowed to effect e-banking and ecommerce transactions. The study concentrated on the periods of years 2011/2012 and 2012/2013. Findings from this research revealed that BOU uses UNISS for real time gross settlement (RTGS). Since its adoption a +1 coefficient correlation was realized. With the use of mobile money, also a +1 coefficient correlation was achieved for the period under consideration. As regards the use of e-cheques, there was a drop reflected by -2.8 percent which could have been attributed to perception of the users, though there was a +1 coefficient correlation when considering e-cheque transactions and the monetary value. The use of EFT in Uganda generated a +1 coefficient correction considering the number of users and the monetary value involved. Bank of Uganda should work hard and make or go live with electronic banking supervision software which would aid them with their supervisory roles.