• Title/Summary/Keyword: Electronic Funds Transfer

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Study on Problems and Implication of Obligations and Responsibilities in Electronic Funds Transfer -Focused on the UCC and the UNCITRAL Model Law- (전자자금이체상의 당사자의 권리와 의무상의 문제점 및 시사점 -UCC와 UNCITRAL Model Law 중심으로-)

  • Kim, Jong-Chill;Lee, Byeong-Ryul
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.6 no.2
    • /
    • pp.339-358
    • /
    • 2004
  • This article discusses the critical issues on obligations and responsibilities in electronic funds transfer(EFT) between Article 4A of the UCC and the Model Law on International Credit Transfers of UNCITRAL. The electronic fund transfers begin with the issue of the payment order by the originator to the receiving bank for the beneficiary. All obligations and responsibilities of parties concerned occur when the receiving bank accept the originator's payment order to executes. So far, some the most compelling studies have focused on the legal obligations and responsibilities of electronic fund transfer in Korea. Therefore, In this paper, we would like to examine some problems of obligations and responsibilities in electronic fund transfer from Article 4A of UCC and the Model Law on International Credit Transfers of UNCITRAL. And also we present some Implications to reform EFT Law for the efficient application.

  • PDF

A Study on Acceptance of Payment Order and UCC 4A in the United States (전자자금이체에서의 지급지시의 승낙에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Byeong-Ryul
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.123-140
    • /
    • 2007
  • This paper wants to suggest some issues on the acceptance of payment order in Electronic Funds Transfer of USA. The result can be summarized as fellows; First, originator's bank accepts a payment order when it executes the order. Secondly, beneficiary's bank accepts a payment order at the earliest of the following times: (1) when the bank pays the beneficiary as stated in Section 4A-405(a) or 4A-405(b), (2) when the bank notifies the beneficiary of receipt of the order or that the account of the beneficiary has been credited with respect to the order unless the notice indicates that the bank is rejecting the order or that funds with respect to the order may not be withdrawn or used until receipt of payment from of the order. (3) when the bank receives payment of the entire amount of the sender's order pursuant to Section 4A-403(a)(1) or 4A-403(a)(2). Lastly, the acceptance of a payment order cannot occur before the order is received by the receiving bank.

  • PDF

Electronic Fund Transfer Systems in United States (미국(美國)의 전자자금이체(電子資金移替)시스템에 관한 고찰(考察))

  • Kang, Won-Jin
    • THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
    • /
    • v.15
    • /
    • pp.59-87
    • /
    • 2001
  • In recent years electronic fund transfers covered by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act 1978 for consumer protection and the Article 4A of Uniform Commercial Code(U.C.C.) 1989 for wholesale electronic payments in United States. Electronic fund transfers carried out by use of a wire transfer network, automated clearing house, or other communication system of a clearing house or other association of banks such as direct deposit, Fedwire, automated teller machine, point-of-sale, and credit card transactions have been increasingly common in consumer transactions and wholesale transactions. Especially, the Article 4A of U.C.C. governs the rights and obligations associated with transactions such as an issue and acceptance of payment order, execution of sender's payment order by receiving bank, and payment. These legal frameworks in connection with electronic fund transfers in United States can play a leading role in establishing model not only within the United States, but also as a basis for developments of electronic commerce law in Korea including other countries.

  • PDF

A Comparative Assessment Between LVTS of Canada and Fedwire of America as a Wholesale Electronic Payment System (미국과 캐나다의 거액전자지급결제제도 비교연구 - 미국의 Fedwire와 캐나다의 LVTS를 중심으로 -)

  • Lee, Byeong-Ryul
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.43-63
    • /
    • 2017
  • I focused on LVTS compare with Fedwire to advance a research effects in this paper. The Fedwire Funds Service is generally used to make large-value, time-critical payments. The Federal Reserve Banks provide the Fedwire Funds Service, a real-time gross settlement system that enables participants to initiate funds transfer that are immediate, final, and irrevocable once processed. The Fedwire Funds Service is a credit transfer service. While, The LVTS(Large Value Transfer System) is the high value electronic wire system that facilitates the transfer of irrevocable payments in canadian dollars across the country. Through LVTS, funds can be transferred between participating financial institutions virtually instantaneously in a fully collateralized environment. Thus in this article, first of all, I considered features of payment system between LVTS and Fedwire. Second, I analyzed the governing structure and legal background. Third, I focused on the operational policy and risk aversion policy. Lastly, I suggested that the payment and banking system have to assume, with good reason, more efficiently accurately and securely operation together with conclusion.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study on ACH and Fedwire as a Cross-Border Payment System (국제전자결제시스템으로서 ACH와 Fedwire의 비교연구)

  • Lee, Byeong-Ryul
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.139-154
    • /
    • 2008
  • This research want to discuss some issues about payment system of America. This research focuses on comparing ACH with Fedwire. Firstly Fedwire is the payment system for only large-dollar transfer(Large-Value Transfer System; LVTS), while ACH(Automated Clearing House)payment mainly applies a consumer account. Secondly ACH transaction is either credit or debit transfer, while Fedwire is only credit transfer. Thirdly the communication system of Fedwire has twoway method, telephonelike communication network, but ACH is oneway store and forward electronic mail. At present LVTS divides into RTGS(Real-Time Gross Settlement) and DNS(Deferred Net Settlement). However Fedwire uses either RTGS(instantaneous for every transaction) or DNS(net net transaction) but ACH uses only DNS(net net transaction). Fourthly ACH is substantially cheaper than the Fedwire payment. lastly security is important in both Fedwire and ACH, it is even more crucial in Fedwire In addition, for each transaction, Fedwire may entail individual instantaneous confirmation to the originator and notification to the receiver, whereas ACH do not.

  • PDF

전자상거래의 동향과 전망

  • Im, Chun-Seong
    • 정보화사회
    • /
    • s.113
    • /
    • pp.10-15
    • /
    • 1997
  • 전자상거래란 '기업과 기업간 거래관계의 모든 측면에서 걸쳐 전자적으로 비지니스를 행하는 것'이라고 정의할 수 있으며, 이는 정형화된 전자문서를 주고 받는 전자문서(EDI), 전자우편(E-Mail), Fax, Bar-Code, 전자자금이체(EFT:Electronic Funds Transfer), 화일전송, 전자정보서비스(디렉토리, 카탈로그, 시장통계, 기술적인 문서 등 데이터베이스 서비스), 음성사서함, 이미지 시스템, 비디오 메세징 등 그 종류와 형태가 다양하다.

  • PDF

A Study on Payment Finality and Usefulness in the Electronic Payment System -Based on U.C.C. 4A- (국제전자자금이체시스템에서 지급의 최종성과 유용성에 관한 고찰(미국의 전자금융제도를 중심으로))

  • Lee, Byeong-Ryul
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.35-53
    • /
    • 2010
  • In connection with a non-cash payment through the banking system, "finality of payment" has acquired diverse meanings. In according to Section 4A-209(2), the acceptance by the beneficiary's bank by means of receiving payment "pursuant to section 4A-403(a)(1) or 4A-403(a)(2)," constitutes final settlement through a Federal Reserve Bank or through a funds-transfer system" or credit to the account of the beneficiary's bank. Above of all, Acceptance by beneficiary's bank is the most important. According to 4A-209(b), the beneficiary's bank can accept a payment order in one of four ways : First, by paying the beneficiary; obligating itself to pay the beneficiary or, Second, by notifying the beneficiary of receipt of the order or notifying the beneficiary that its account was credited or, Thirdly, by receiving full payment from the sender's order or Lastly, by passage of time, i.e., the opening of the next funds transfer business day of the bank following the payment date of the order. A beneficiary's bank is considered to have accepted a payment order when the earliest of the four means of acceptance occurs.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study on the Settlement System of Electronic Trade (전자무역결제시스템에 관한 연구 -Bolero System과 TradeCard를 중심으로-)

  • Jeon, Soon-Hwan
    • The Journal of Information Technology
    • /
    • v.5 no.3
    • /
    • pp.197-214
    • /
    • 2002
  • Electronic Commerce has already existed for over 20 years. The Bolero project initially had the support of TEDIS, and now is jointly financed by SWIFT(Society for World International Financial Telecommunications) which handles most of the electronic funds transfer for banks, and the Through Transport Mutual Assurance Association(the TT Club), a mutual insurance association most of whose members are drawn from the Multimodal transport industry or transport intermediaries. Bolero's mission is to provide guaranteed and secure delivery, in electronic form, of trade documentation, globally, based on a binding legal environment and common procedures, Bolero will also provide a platform for provision of neutral cross-industry services. TradeCard is a payment and settlement system that is an alternative to letters of credit. That is, TradeCard is a business-to-business e-commerce infrastructure that enables buyers and sellers to conduct and settle international trade transactions securely over the Internet. Paperless, payment-guaranteed international trade transactions - which eliminate the traditional letters of credit with electronic certifications - are widely considered the most difficult B2B transactions to conduct.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study on the Electronic Payment System between United States and Korea (한국과 미국의 전자결제제도 비교연구 -고객보호관련 주요쟁점을 중심으로-)

  • Lee, Byeong-Ryul
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.27-43
    • /
    • 2009
  • This article explored the customers protection regulations in electronic payment system by Article 4A of the UCC and EFTA of 1978 and by Electronic Financial Transaction Act of Korea. Both Korea and America have various regulations to protect concerned parties(customers). For examples, the errors of payment order, money-back guarantee, and unauthorized payment order etc. First, this Article focuses on the allocation of risk of loss caused by ambiguous term in payment orders that do not express the subjective intention of the senders. Second, most rights and obligations created by Article 4A of America can be varied with the agreement of affected parties. But there are some exceptions. The exceptions include the money-back guarantee. So Receiving bank have to pay to originator the ordered money included interest. However, Korea also has money-back guarantee but bank do not pay interest to sender. Lastly, Electronic Funds Transfer Act of 1978 and Regulation E has US$ 50 regulation in order to protect customers on the unauthorized payment order. Article 4A imposes duty to detect unauthorized payment orders to originator in relation to the establishment of commercially reasonable security procedure, while Korean law imposes the duty to notify the bank in order to decrease the loss resulted from unauthorized payment order.

  • PDF

E-Banking Performance in Uganda: A Case Study of Bank of Uganda

  • Nuwagaba, Alfred
    • East Asian Journal of Business Economics (EAJBE)
    • /
    • v.3 no.2
    • /
    • pp.13-20
    • /
    • 2015
  • Online or e-banking has been adopted as key banking innovation in Uganda adopted by all financial institutions in the country. This research explored the state of e-banking and its efficacy in Uganda banking industry. A correlation analysis approach was adopted for this research. In Uganda, the banking sector has been liberalized with telecommunications allowed to effect e-banking and ecommerce transactions. The study concentrated on the periods of years 2011/2012 and 2012/2013. Findings from this research revealed that BOU uses UNISS for real time gross settlement (RTGS). Since its adoption a +1 coefficient correlation was realized. With the use of mobile money, also a +1 coefficient correlation was achieved for the period under consideration. As regards the use of e-cheques, there was a drop reflected by -2.8 percent which could have been attributed to perception of the users, though there was a +1 coefficient correlation when considering e-cheque transactions and the monetary value. The use of EFT in Uganda generated a +1 coefficient correction considering the number of users and the monetary value involved. Bank of Uganda should work hard and make or go live with electronic banking supervision software which would aid them with their supervisory roles.